Element contents
Im Yunjidang
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 July 2022
Summary
This Element aims to critically examine the philosophical thought of Im Yunjidang 任允摯堂 (1721–93), a female Korean Neo-Confucian philosopher from the Chosŏn 朝鮮 dynasty (1392–1910), and to present her as a feminist thinker. Unlike most Korean women of her time, Yunjidang had the exceptional opportunity to be introduced to a major philosophical debate among Korean Neo-Confucians, which was focused on two core questions-whether sages and commoners share the same heart-mind, and whether the natures of human beings and animals are identical. In the course of engaging in this debate, she was able to reformulate Neo-Confucian metaphysics and ethics of moral self-cultivation, culminating in her bold ideas of the moral equality between men and women and the possibility of female sagehood. By proposing a 'stage-approach' to feminism that is also sensitive to the cultural context, this Element shows that Yunjidang's philosophical thought could be best captured in terms of Confucian feminism.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009024068Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 11 August 2022
References
Ackerly, B. A. “Is Liberalism the Only Way toward Democracy? Confucianism and Democracy,” Political Theory, 33(2005), 547–576.Google Scholar
Adler, J. A. Reconstructing the Confucian Dao: Zhu Xi’s Appropriation of Zhou Dunyi (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Angle, S. C. Sagehood: The Contemporary Significance of Neo-Confucian Philosophy (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Angle, S. C. and Tiwald, J. Neo-Confucianism: A Philosophical Introduction (Cambridge: Polity, 2017).Google Scholar
Bloom, I. “Mencian Confucianism and Human Rights” in de Bary, W. T. and Tu, W. (eds.), Confucianism and Human Rights (New York: Columbia University Press, 1998), pp. 94–116.Google Scholar
Brooks, E. B. and Brooks, A. T. The Original Analects: Sayings of Confucius and His Successors (New York: Columbia University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Chan, W.-T. “The Evolution of the Confucian Concept of Jen,” Philosophy East and West, 4(1955), 295–319.Google Scholar
Chi, T.-H. (지두환) “Ch’ŏng’ŭm kim sanghŏnŭi saeng’ewa sasang: Ch’unch’u taeŭironŭl chumsimŭro (청음 김상헌의 생애와 사상: 춘추대의론을 중심으로) [The Life and Thought of Ch’ŏng’ŭm Kim Sang-hŏn: Focusing on His Account of the Great Righteousness of the Spring and Autumn],” Han’gukhak nonchong, 24(2001), 65–94.Google Scholar
Cho, H. “The Historical Origin of Civil Society in Korea,” Korea Journal, 37(1997), 24–41.Google Scholar
Cho, S.-S. (조성산) “18segi horak nonjaenggwa noron sasanggyeŭi punhwa 18 (세기 호락논쟁과 노론 사상계의 분화) [The Horak Debate during the Eighteenth Century and the Differentiation within the Dominant Faction of the Yulgok School],” Han’guk sasangsa hak, 8 (1997), 75–111.Google Scholar
Chŏng, S.-W. (정순우) Sŏdangŭi sahoesa (서당의 사회사) [The Sociology of the Local Private Village School] (Seoul: T’aehaksa, 2012).Google Scholar
Chow, K.-W. The Rise of Confucian Ritualism in Late Imperial China (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Chu, H. Learning to Be a Sage, trans. D. K. Gardner (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Chung, E. Y. J. The Korean Neo-Confucianism of Yi T’oegye and Yi Yulgok: A Reappraisal of the “Four-Seven Thesis” and Its Practical Implications for Self-Cultivation (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995).Google Scholar
De Bary, W. T. The Liberal Tradition in China (New York: Columbia University Press, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deuchler, M. The Confucian Transformation of Korea: A Study of State and Ideology (Cambridge, MA: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University, 1992).Google Scholar
Deuchler, M. “Despoilers of the Way – Insulters of the Sages: Controversies over the Classics in Seventeenth-Century Korea” in Haboush, J. K. and Deuchler, M. (eds.), Culture and the State in Late Chosŏn Korea (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 1999), pp. 91–133.Google Scholar
Deuchler, M. “Propagating Female Virtues in Chosŏn Korea” in Ko, D., Haboush, J. K., and Piggott, J. R. (eds.), Women and Confucian Cultures in Premondern China, Korea, and Japan (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003), pp. 142–169.Google Scholar
Ebrey, P. B. The Inner Quarters: Marriage and the Lives of Chinese Women in the Sung Period (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Elman, B. A. Civil Examinations and Meritocracy in Late Imperial China (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Eno, R. The Confucian Creation of Heaven: Philosophy and the Defense of Ritual Mastery (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Fetzer, J. and Soper, J. C. Confucianism, Democratization, and Human Rights in Taiwan (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2013).Google Scholar
Gardner, D. K. Chu Hsi: Learning to Be a Sage (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Goldin, P. R. “The View of Women in Early Confucianism” in Li, C. (ed.), The Sage and the Second Sex (Chicago, IL: Open Court, 2000), pp. 139–143.Google Scholar
Haboush, J. K. “Constructing the Center: The Ritual Controversy and the Search for a New Identity in Seventeenth-Century Korea” in Haboush, J. K. and Deuchler, M. (eds.), Culture and the State in Late Chosŏn Korea (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 1999), pp. 46–90.Google Scholar
Hahm, C. “Ritual and Constitutionalism: Disputing the Ruler’s Legitimacy in a Confucian Polity,” American Journal of Comparative Law, 57(2009), 135–204.Google Scholar
Helgesen, G. Democracy and Authority in Korea: The Cultural Dimension in Korean Politics (Richmond, UK: Curzon, 1998).Google Scholar
Hong, J.-G. (홍정근) “Is the Morality of Human Beings Superior to the Morality of Non-Human Beings? Debate over Human versus Animal Nature in the Joseon Period,” Korea Journal, 51(2011), 72–96.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. P. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Im, S. (임성주) Nongmunjip (鹿門集) [The Collected Writings of Im Sŏngju]. https://db.itkc.or.kr/dir/item?itemId=MO#dir/node?grpId=&itemId=MO&gubun=book&depth=2&cate1=Z&cate2=&dataGubun=%EC%84%9C%EC%A7%80&dataId=ITKC_MO_0532A.Google Scholar
Im, Y. (임윤지당) Yunjidang yugo (允摯堂遺稿) [The Bequeathed Writings of Im Yunjidang]. https://db.itkc.or.kr/dir/item?itemId=MO#/dir/node?dataId=ITKC_MO_1072A.Google Scholar
Ivanhoe, P. J. “Metaphysics, Epistemology, and Ethics” in Ivanhoe, P. J. (ed.), Zhu Xi: Selected Writings (New York: Oxford University Press, 2019), pp. 14–34.Google Scholar
Ivanhoe, P. J. and Wang, H. Y. “Two Korean Women Confucian Philosophers: Im Yunjidang and Gang Jeongildang,” Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture, 36(2021), 29–53.Google Scholar
Kang, C. (강정일당) Chŏngildang yugo (靜一堂遺稿) [The Bequeathed Writings of Kang Chŏngildang]. https://db.itkc.or.kr/dir/item?itemId=MO#dir/node?grpId=&itemId=MO&gubun=book&depth=2&cate1=Z&cate2=&dataGubun=%EC%84%9C%EC%A7%80&dataId=ITKC_MO_1163A.Google Scholar
Kang, N.-S. (강남순) “Yugyowa p’eminisŭm: Kŭ pulganŭnghan manname taehayŏ (유교와 페미니즘: 그 불가능한 만남에 대하여) [Confucianism and Feminism: On Their Impossible Rendezvous]” in Han’guk yugyo hakhoe (한국유교학회) (ed.), Yugyuwa p’eminisŭm (유교와 페미니즘) [Confucianism and Feminism] (Seoul: Ch’ŏrakkwa hyŏnsilsa, 2001), pp. 271–282.Google Scholar
Kim, C.-I. (김재임) “Yunjidang yugoe nat’anan yŏsŏng ŭisik koch’al (윤지당유고에 나타난 여성의식 고찰) [An Examination on the Feminist Consciousness in the Bequeathed Writings of Im Yunjidang],” Hanmun kojŏn yŏn’gu, 10(2005), 215–256.Google Scholar
Kim, C.-I. “Im yunjidangŭi songnironŭl t’onghae pon in’ganhak kujo (임윤지당의 성리론을 통해 본 인간학 구조) [Im Yunjidang’s Neo-Confucian Philosophy of Human Nature and the Structure of Her Philosophical Understanding of Human Being],” Kangwŏn munhwa yŏn’gu 26(2007), 173–188.Google Scholar
Kim, H. (김현) “Sŏngnihakchŏk kach’igwanŭi hwaksan’gwa yŏsŏng (성리학적 가치관의 확산과 여성) [The Spread of Neo-Confucian Values and Women],” Minjok munhwa yŏn’gu, 41(2004), 455–488.Google Scholar
Kim, H.-C. (김형찬) Korean Confucianism: The Philosophy and Politics of T’oegye and Yulgok (London: Rowman & Littlefield International, 2018).Google Scholar
Kim, H.-K. “Yunjidang’s Feminism and Gender Equality,” Asian Philosophy, 31(2021), 143–159.Google Scholar
Kim, H.-S. (김혜숙) “Toward Critical Confucianism: Woman as a Method,” Han’guk yŏsŏng ch’ŏrak, 26(2016), 131–152.Google Scholar
Kim, K.-M. (김경미) “Chosŏn hugi namsŏng chisiginŭi yŏsŏng chisigine taehan p’yŏngkka (조선 후기 남성 지식인의 여성 지식인에 대한 평가) [The Evaluations of Female Intellectuals by Male Intellectuals in the Late Chosŏn Period],” Yŏsŏng munhak yŏn’gu, 42(2017), 35–63.Google Scholar
Kim, K.-M. Im yunjidang p’yŏngjŏn (임윤지당 평전) [A Critical Biography of Im Yunjidang] (Seoul: Han’gyŏrye ch’ulp’an, 2019).Google Scholar
Kim, M.-Y. (김미영) “Sŏngnihak’esŏ taedudoen kongchŏk yŏngyŏge taehan yŏsŏngjuŭijŏk chŏpkkŭn 성리학에서 대두된 ‘공적영역’에 대한 여성주의적 접근[A Feminist Approach to the Question of ‘Public Sphere’ in the Cheng-Zhu Neo-Confucian Context],” Ch’ŏrak yŏn’gu, 29(2005), 389–416.Google Scholar
Kim, R. “Human Nature and Animal Nature: The Horak Debate and Its Philosophical Significance” in Back, Y. and Ivanhoe, P. J. (eds.), Traditional Korean Philosophy: Problems and Debates (London: Rowman & Littlefield International, 2017), pp. 85–109.Google Scholar
Kim, S. Confucian Democracy in East Asia: Theory and Practice (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Kim, S. “The Way to Become a Female Sage: Im Yunjidang’s Confucian Feminism,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 75(2014), 395–416.Google Scholar
Kim, S. “From Wife to Moral Teacher: Kang Chŏngildang on Neo-Confucian Self-Cultivation,” Asian Philosophy, 24(2014), 28–47.Google Scholar
Kim, S. “Making Peace with the Barbarians: Neo-Confucianism and the Pro-Peace Argument in 17th-Century Korea,” European Journal of Political Theory (November 2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885120963966Google Scholar
Kim, S. “Between Coherence and Principle: Li 理 and the Politics of Neo-Confucianism in Late Koryŏ Korea,” Philosophy East and West, 71(2021), 369–392.Google Scholar
Kim, S. (김세서리아) “Chosŏn sŏngnihagŭi t’aegŭk ŭmyangnonŭl t’onghae pon han’gukchŏk yŏsŏng chuch’e hyŏngsŏng iron mosaek (조선 성리학의 태극음양론을 통해 본 한국적 여성주체형성 이론 모색) [A Search for the Theory of Korean Female Subjectivity Formation through the Discourses of the Great Ultimate and Yin-Yang],” Yuhak yŏn’gu, 36(2016), 295–315.Google Scholar
Kim, S. (김세서리아) “Im yunjidangŭi nonŏ ihae’e taehan yŏsŏng ch’ŏrakchŏk sŏngch’al (임윤지당의 논어 이해에 대한 여성철학적 성찰) [A Feminist Reflection on Im Yunjidang’s Interpretation of the Analects],” Han’guk yŏsŏng ch’ŏrak, 28(2017), 27–53.Google Scholar
Kim, Y. “Neo-Confucianism as Free-Floating Resource: Im Yunjidang and Kang Chŏngildang as Two Female Neo-Confucian Philosophers in Late Chosŏn’ in Kim, Y. and Pettid, M. J. (eds.), Women and Confucianism in Chosŏn Korea: New Perspectives (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2011), pp. 71–88.Google Scholar
Kim, Y-.S. (김영수) Kŏn’gugŭi chŏngch’i: Yŏmal sŏnch’o, hyŏngmyŏnggwa munmyŏng chŏnhwan (건국의 정치: 여말선초, 혁명과 문명전환) [The Politics of Founding: Revolution and the Transition of Civilization during the Late Koryŏ and Early Chosŏn Periods] (Seoul: Ihaksa, 2006).Google Scholar
Ko, D. Teachers of the Inner Chambers: Women and Culture in Seventeenth Century China (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Ku, M.-C. (구민정) “Im yunjidangŭi chagi chŏngch’esŏngŭi kusŏnge taehayŏ (임윤지당의 자기 정체성의 구성에 대하여) [On the Construction of Im Yunjidang’s Self-Identity],” Inmunhak yŏn’gu, 29(2019), 27–49.Google Scholar
Lee, C.-S. (이천승) “Philosophical Implications of the Discussion of Mibal in the Horak Debate of the Late Joseon Period,” Korea Journal, 51(2011), 97–117.Google Scholar
Lee, H.-I. (이해임) “Im Yunjidang’s View of Material Composition,” Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture, 34(2020), 105–128.Google Scholar
Lee, K.-K. (이경구) “The Horak Debate from the Reign of King Sukjong to King Sunjo,” Korea Journal, 51(2011), 15–41.Google Scholar
Lee, S.-H. “The Concept of Gong in Traditional Korea and Its Modern Transformations,” Korea Journal, 43(2003), 137–163.Google Scholar
Lee, J. “Zhu Xi’s Metaphysical Theory of Human Nature” in Ng, K. C. and Huang, Y. (eds.), Dao Companion to Zhu Xi’s Philosophy (Dordrecht: Springer, 2020), pp. 265–287.Google Scholar
Lee, P. C. “Li Zhi and John Stuart Mill: A Confucian Feminist Critique of Liberal Feminism’ in Li, C. (ed.), The Sage and the Second Sex (Chicago, IL: Open Court, 2000), pp. 113–132.Google Scholar
Lee, S.-G. (이순구) “Chosŏnsidae kajok chedoŭi pyŏnhwawa yŏsŏng (조선시대 가족제도의 변화와 여성) [The Change of the Family Structure and Women during the Chosŏn Period],” Yŏsŏng kojŏn munhak yŏn’gu, 10(2005), 119–142.Google Scholar
Lee, S.-G. “The Exemplar Wife: The Life of Lady Chang of Andong in Historical Context” in Kim, Y. and Pettid, M. J. (eds.), Women and Confucianism in Chosŏn Korea: New Perspectives (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2011), pp. 29–48.Google Scholar
Leung, Y.-H. “Zhu Xi and the Debate between Virtue Ethicists and Situationists: Virtue Cultivation as a Possible, Practical, and Necessary Enterprise” in Ng, K.-C. and Huang, Y. (eds.), Dao Companion to Zhu Xi’s Philosophy (Dordrecht: Springer, 2020), pp. 895–927.Google Scholar
Liu, Q. “Filiality versus Sociality and Individuality: On Confucianism as ‘Consanguinitism’,” Philosophy East and West, 53(2003), 234–250.Google Scholar
Mun, C.-Y. (문지영) “Yŏsŏng ch’abyŏre taehan tong sŏyangŭi insikkwa tojŏn: Im yunjidanggwa ulstonkraeptŭrŭl chungsimŭro (‘여성차별’에 대한 동서양의 인식과 도전: 임윤지당과 울스터크래프트를 중심으로) [The Understanding of and Challenge to ‘Discrimination against Women’ in East and West: Focusing on Im Yunjidang and Wollstonecraft],” Han’guk chŏngch’ihak hoebo, 50(2016), 23–49.Google Scholar
Mun, S.-Y. (문석윤) Horak nonjaeng hyŏngsŏnggwa chŏn’gae (호락논쟁 형성과 전개) [The Origin and Unfolding of the Horak Debate] (Seoul: Tonggwa sŏ, 2006).Google Scholar
Ni, P. “Seek and You Will Find It; Let Go and You Will Lose It: Exploring a Confucian Approach to Human Dignity,” Dao, 13(2014), 174–198.Google Scholar
Pae, W.-S. (배우성) Chosŏn’gwa chunghwa (조선과 중화) [Chosŏn and the Sincocentric Civilization] (Seoul: Tolbegae, 2014).Google Scholar
Pak, H.-S. (박현숙) “Im yunjidangnon (임윤지당론) [A Study on Im Yunjidang],” Yŏsŏng munhak yŏn’gu, 9(2003), 131–156.Google Scholar
Pak, H.-S. “Kang chŏngildang: Sŏngnihakchŏk namnyŏ p’yŏngdŭngjuŭija (강정일당: 성리학적 남녀평등주의자) [Kang Chŏngildang: A Neo-Confucian feminist],” Yŏsŏngmunhak yŏn’gu, 11(2004), 57–79.Google Scholar
Peterson, M. A. Korean Adoption and Inheritance: Case Studies in the Creation of Classic Confucian Society (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Raphals, L. A. “Gendered Virtue Reconsidered: Notes from the Warring States and Han” in Li, C. (ed.), The Sage and the Second Sex (Chicago, IL: Open Court, 2000), pp. 225–226.Google Scholar
Raphals, L. A. “A Woman Who Understood Rites” in Van Norden, B. W. (ed.), Confucius and the Analects (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 275–302.Google Scholar
Son, H.-C. (손흥철) Nongmun im sŏngjuŭi sam’gwa ch’ŏrak (녹문 임성주의 삶과 철학) [The Life and Philosophy of Im Sŏngju] (Seoul: Chisik sanŏpsa, 2004).Google Scholar
Tan, S.-H. Confucian Democracy: A Deweyan Reconstruction (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Tillman, H. C. Utilitarian Confucianism: Ch’en Liang’s Challenge to Chu Hsi (Cambridge, MA: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University, 1982).Google Scholar
Tillman, H. C. Confucian Discourse and Chu Hsi’s Ascendancy (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Virág, C. “Moral Psychology and Cultivating the Self” in Ivanhoe, P. J. (ed.), Zhu Xi: Selected Writings (New York: Oxford University Press, 2019), pp. 35–55.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. “When Justice Replaces Affection: The Need for Rights,” Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 11(1988), 625–647.Google Scholar
Wang, R. R. “Dong Zhongshu’s Transformation of ‘Yin-Yang’ Theory and Contesting of Gender Identity,” Philosophy East and West, 55(2005), 209–231.Google Scholar
Wu, K.-S. (우경섭) Chosŏnjunghwajuŭiŭi sŏnginpgwa tongasia (조선중화주의의 성립과 동아시아) [The Formation of Chosŏn Cultural-Centrism and East Asia] (Seoul: Unistori, 2013).Google Scholar
Yi, H.-C. (이해진) “Yŏsŏng’esŏ ‘in’ganŭro, chuch’erŭl hyanghan yŏlmang: Im yunjidang’gwa ulstonkraeptŭ pigyo yŏn’gu (‘여성’에서 ‘인간’으로, 주체를 향한 열망: 임윤지당과 울스턴크래프트 비교 연구) [From Woman to Human, the Passion toward a Moral Subject: A Comparative Study on Im Yunjidang and Wollstonecraft],” Han’guk yŏsŏnghak, 30(2014), 89–125.Google Scholar
Yi, H.-S. (이혜순) “Kang chŏnildangŭi ye tamnon (강정일당의 예 담론) [Kang Chŏngidang’s Discourse of Rituals],” Ŏmun yŏn’gu, 33(2005), 135–159.Google Scholar
Yi, H.-S. (이혜순) Chosŏncho hugi yŏsŏng chisŏngsa (조선조 후기 여성 지성사) [The History of Women Intellectuals in Late Chosŏn] (Seoul: Ihwa yŏja taehakkyo ch’ulp’anbu, 2007).Google Scholar
Yi, S.-I. “Chosŏnsidae yŏsŏng chisigŭi sŏngkkyŏkkwa kŭ kusŏng wŏlli (조선시대 여성 지식의 성격과 그 구성원리) [The Nature of Women’s Knowledge and Its Constitutive Principle during the Chosŏn Period],” Tongyang ch’ŏrak, 33(2005), 77–104.Google Scholar
Yi, Ŭ.-S. (이은선) Irŏbŏrin ch’owŏrŭl ch’ajasŏ: Han’guk yugyoŭi chonggyojŏk sŏngch’algwa yŏsŏngjuŭi (잃어버린 초월을 찾아서: 한국 유교의 종교적 성찰과 여성주의) [In Search of Lost Transcendence: Religious Reflexivity and Feminism in Korean Confucianism] (Seoul: Monsinŭn saramdŭl, 2009).Google Scholar
Yi, W.-C. (이완재) “Songnihagŭi maengnak’esŏ pon ch’ogi kaehw asasang (성리학의 맥락에서 본 초기개화사상) [Early Enlightenment Thought from the Standpoint of Cheng-Zhu Neo-Confucian Philosophy],” Tongasia muhwa yŏn’gu, 29(1996), 127–157.Google Scholar
Yi, Y.-C. (이영춘) Im Yunjidang: Kugyŏk yunjidangyugo (임윤지당: 국역 윤지당유교) [Im Yunjidang: A Korean Translation of the Bequeathed Writings of Yunjidang] (Seoul: Hyean, 1998).Google Scholar
Yu, Y.-H. (유영희) “Im yunjidangŭi sŏngni ch’ŏrakkwa suhaengnon (임윤지당의 성리 철학과 수행론) [Im Yunjidang’s Neo-Confucian Philosophy and Her Account of Moral Self-Cultivation],” Han’guk sasanggwa munhwa, 29(2005), 231–261.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this element is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 14
- Cited by