Element contents
Indigenous Rights to Land Versus Extractivism
The Promise and Limits of ILO Convention No. 169 in Mexico
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 November 2025
Summary
Indigenous and tribal communities often make claims to territory citing their longstanding ties to the land. Since 1989, they increasingly reference ILO Convention No. 169, the only legally binding international agreement on Indigenous and tribal peoples rights. This Element proposes a three-pronged analytical framework to assess the promise and limits of indigenous rights to land as influenced by international law. The framework calls for the place-specific investigation of the interrelations between: (1) indigenous identity politics, (2) citizenship regimes, and (3) land tenure regimes. Drawing on the case of Mexico, it argues that the ILO Convention has generally been a weak tool for securing rights to ancestral land and for effectively challenging the expansion of extractivism. Still, it has had numerous other significant socio-political implications, such as shaping discourses of resistance and incentivizing the use of prior consultation mechanisms in the context of territorial disputes.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009590532Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 04 December 2025
References
Anaya, James. 1996. Indigenous Peoples in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195086201.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anaya, James. 2004. “International Human Rights and Indigenous Peoples: The Move toward the Multicultural State.” Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 21(1): 13–61.Google Scholar
Assies, Willem. 2008. “Land Tenure and Tenure Regimes in Mexico: An Overview.” Journal of Agrarian Change 8(1): 33–63.10.1111/j.1471-0366.2007.00162.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bebbington, Anthony and Bury, Jeffrey (eds.). 2013. Subterranean Struggles: New Dynamics of Mining, Oil, and Gas in Latin America. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Borras, Jun, Franco, Jennifer, Kay, Cristobal and Spoor, Max 2011. “Land Grabbing in Latin America and the Caribbean Viewed from Broader International Perspectives.” Chile: FAO.Google Scholar
Borras, Jun, Franco, Jennifer, Gómez, Sergio, Kay, Cristobal and Spoor, Max . “Land Grabbing in Latin America and the Caribbean.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 39: 845–72.10.1080/03066150.2012.679931Google Scholar
Bowen, John R. 2000. “Should We Have a Universal Concept of ‘Indigenous Peoples’ Rights?: Ethnicity and Essentialism in the Twenty-First Century.” Anthropology Today 16(4): 12–16.10.1111/1467-8322.00037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridge, Gavin. 2004. “Mapping the Bonanza: Geographies of Mining Investment in an Era of Neoliberal Reform.” Professional Geographer 56(3): 406–21.10.1111/j.0033-0124.2004.05603009.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burchardt, Hans-Jürgen and Dietz, Kristina. 2014. “(Neo-)Extractivism – a New Challenge for Development Theory from Latin America.” Third World Quarterly 35(3): 468–86.10.1080/01436597.2014.893488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castellanos, Laura. 2018. “Estos 108 mexicanos fueron asesinados por defender nuestros bosques y ríos.” Remamx.org. December 5.Google Scholar
Castree, Noel. 2004. “Differential Geographies: Place, Indigenous Rights and ‘local’ Resources.” Political Geography 23(2): 133–67.10.1016/j.polgeo.2003.09.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CEACR Direct Requests. 1993, 1998, 2001, 2011, 2019. Geneva: International Labor Organization.Google Scholar
CEACR Observations. 1998, 2005, 2007, 2008, 2019. Geneva: International Labor Organization.Google Scholar
Champagne, Duane. 2013. “UNDRIP (United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples): Human, Civil and Indigenous Rights.” Wicazo Sa Review 28(1): 9–22.10.5749/wicazosareview.28.1.0009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, Veronika M. 2019. “The Changing Face of Environmental Governance in the Brazilian Amazon: Indigenous and Traditional Peoples Promoting Norm Diffusion.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 62(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201900208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CIDH. 2016. “Resolución 51/2016. Medida cautelar no. 60-14. Ampliación de beneficiarios a favor de integrantes de la Comunidad Indígena de Choréachi respecto de México.” OAS. October 26, 2016.Google Scholar
Dunlap, Alexander. 2018. “‘A Bureaucratic Trap:’ Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) and Wind Energy Development in Juchitán, Mexico.” Capitalism Nature Socialism 29(4): 88–108.10.1080/10455752.2017.1334219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, Nancy. 2018. “La minería causa más de 15.000 conflictos sociales en México.” RT. February 27.Google Scholar
Fontana, Lorenza and Grugel, Jean. 2016. “The Politics of Indigenous Participation Through ‘Free Prior Informed Consent’: Reflections from the Bolivian Case.” World Development 77: 249–61.10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.08.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galinier, Jacques and Molinié, Antoinette. 2013. The Neo-Indians: A Religion for the Third Millenium. Denver: University Press of Colorado.10.5876/9781607322740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Global Witness. 2022. “Decade of Defiance: Ten Years of Reporting Land and Environmental Activism Worldwide.” London.Google Scholar
Gómez Rivera, Magdalena. 2013. “Los Pueblos Indígenas y La Razón de Estado En México: Elementos Para Un Balance.” Nueva Antropología 26(78): 43–62.Google Scholar
González Oropeza, Manuel. 2005. “Aplicación Del Convenio 169 de La OIT En México.” In Salgado, David Cienfuegos, López Olvera, Miguel Alejandro, eds., Estudios En Homenaje a Don Jorge Fernández Ruiz: Derecho Constitucional y Política, Mexico City: UNAM, 255–67.Google Scholar
Gudynas, Eduardo. 2015. Extractivismos: Ecología, economía y política de un modo de entender el desarrollo y la naturaleza. Cochabamba: CEDIB.Google Scholar
Gudynas, Eduardo. 2016. “Teología de Los Extractivismos.” Tabula Rasa 24: 11–23.10.25058/20112742.55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Charles. 2002. “Does Multiculturalism Menace? Governance, Cultural Rights and the Politics of Identity in Guatemala.” Journal of Latin American Studies 34(3): 485–524.10.1017/S0022216X02006521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haley, Brian. 2024. “In Cahoots with Neo-Indigenism.” Genealogy 8(99): 1–14.10.3390/genealogy8030099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haley, Brian and Wilcoxon, Larry. 2005. “How Spaniards Became Chumash and other Tales of Ethnogenesis.” American Anthropologist 107(3): 432–45.10.1525/aa.2005.107.3.432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, David. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199283262.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays, Jennifer and Kronik, Jakob. 2020. “The ILO PRO169 Programme: Learning from Technical Cooperation in Latin America and South Africa.” International Journal of Human Rights 24(2–3): 191–213.10.1080/13642987.2019.1690469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, Dorothy. 2002. “Introduction: Comparative Perspectives on the Indigenous Rights Movement in Africa and the Americas.” American Anthropologist 104(4), 1037-1049.10.1525/aa.2002.104.4.1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ILO. 1989. Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention No. 169. Geneva: International Labor Organization.Google Scholar
ILO. 2009. Indigenous and Tribal Peoples’ Rights in Practice: A Guide to ILO Convention No. 169. Geneva: International Labor Organization.Google Scholar
ILO. 2013. Understanding the Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989 (No. 169). Geneva: International Labor Organization.Google Scholar
ILO. 2019. Implementing the ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention No. 169: Towards an inclusive, sustainable and just future. Geneva: International Labor Organization.Google Scholar
Klare, Michael. 2012. The Race for What’s Left: The Global Scramble for the World’s Last Resources. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
Larsen, Peter. 2020. “Contextualising Ratification and Implementation: A Critical Appraisal of ILO Convention 169 from a Social Justice Perspective.” International Journal of Human Rights 24(2–3): 94–111.10.1080/13642987.2019.1677613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, Peter Bille and Gilbert, Jérémie. 2020. “Indigenous Rights and ILO Convention 169: Learning from the Past and Challenging the Future.” International Journal of Human Rights 24(2–3): 83–93.10.1080/13642987.2019.1677615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, Peter and Nolle, Louise. 2020. “Enabling Human Rights-Based Development for Indigenous and Tribal Peoples? Summarising the 25th Anniversary Global Policy Debate on ILO Convention 169.” International Journal of Human Rights 24(2–3): 279–92.10.1080/13642987.2019.1677614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leal, Pablo. 2007. “Participation: The Ascendancy of a Buzzword in the Neo-Liberal Era.” Development in Practice 17(4–5): 539–48.Google Scholar
Lemus, Jesús. 2018. México a cielo abierto: De cómo el boom minero resquebrajó al país. Mexico City: Grijalbo.Google Scholar
Leroux, Darryl. 2019. Distorted Descent: White Claims to Indigenous Identity. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.10.1515/9780887555961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leroux, Darryl. 2024. “Proximity, Family Lore, and False Claims to an Algonquin Identity.” Genealogy 8(125): 1–23.10.3390/genealogy8040125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Hidrocarburos, Ley. 2014. “Decreto por el que se expide la Ley de Hidrocarburos y se reforman diversas disposiciones de la Ley de Inversión Extranjera; Ley Minera, y Ley de Asociaciones Público Privadas.” Diario Oficial de la Federación. August 11.Google Scholar
Ley, Sandra, Mattiace, Shannan and Trejo, Guillermo . 2019. “Indigenous Resistance to Criminal Governance: Why Regional Ethnic Autonomy Institutions Protect Communities from Narco Rule in Mexico.” Latin American Research Review 54(1): 181–200.10.25222/larr.377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tania, Li. 2010. “Indigeneity, Capitalism and the Management of Dispossession.” Current Anthropology 51(3): 385–414.Google Scholar
López Portillo, José. 1977. “Iniciativa de Reformas a los artículos 7º y 10 de la Ley Reglamentaria del Artículo 27 Constitucional en el Ramo del Petróleo, enviada por el Ejecutivo de la Unión.” Mexico City.Google Scholar
Loveman, Mara. 2014. National Colors: Racial Classification and the State in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199337354.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Thomas Humphrey and Bottomore, Tom. 1987. Citizenship and Social Class. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Navarro-López, América. 2024. “Fifty Years of Forced Displacement in Chiapas, Mexico: From Political Conflicts to Cartel Conflicts.” Journal of Latin American Geography 23(2): 91–131.10.1353/lag.2024.a939020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peet, Richard and Watts, Michael. 2004. Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development and Social Movements. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203235096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perreault, Tom. 2015. “Performing Participation: Mining, Power, and the Limits of Public Consultation in Bolivia.” Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology 20(3): 433–51.Google Scholar
Pimentel, Spensky. 2021. “The Right to Say No: Extractivism and Territorial Struggles.” Revista Ambiente e Sociedade 24. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422asoc20210159vu2021L5NR.Google Scholar
Pirsoul, Nicolas. 2019. “The Deliberative Deficit of Prior Consultation Mechanisms.” Australian Journal of Political Science 54(2): 255–71.10.1080/10361146.2019.1601681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riofrancos, Thea. 2020. Resource Radicals: From Petro-Nationalism to Post-Extractivism in Ecuador. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Robles Berlanga, Héctor, 2000. “Propiedad de la tierra y población indígena.” Estudios Agrarios 14: 123–47.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Piñero, Luis. 2005. Indigenous Peoples, Postcolonialism and International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199284641.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santaolalla, Ximena. 2023. “State Crime, Extraction and Cartels: The Meaning of Mining in Guerrero, Mexico.” ReVista: Harvard Review of Latin America.Google Scholar
Sassen, Saskia. 2006. Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages. New York: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sassen, Saskia. 2013. “Land Grabs Today: Feeding the Disassembling of National Territory.” Globalizations 10(1): 25–46.10.1080/14747731.2013.760927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sener, . 2018. “Consultas Previas, Libres e Informadas a Comunidades y Pueblos Indígenas en el Sector Energético.” June 1. Mexico City: Secretaría de Energía.Google Scholar
Shah, Alpa. 2007. “The Dark Side of Indigeneity?: Indigenous People, Rights and Development in India.” History Compass 5(6): 1806–32.10.1111/j.1478-0542.2007.00471.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speed, Shannon and Sierra, Maria Teresa. 2005. “Critical Perspectives on Human Rights and Multiculturalism in Neoliberal Latin America.” PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 28(1): 1–9.10.1525/pol.2005.28.1.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stamatopoulous, Elsa. 1994. “Indigenous Peoples and the United Nations: Human Rights as a Developing Dynamic.” Human Rights Quarterly 16(1): 58–81.10.2307/762411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Steve and Straus, Scott (eds.). 2014. The Human Rights Paradox: Universality and Its Discontents. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Svampa, Maristella. 2015. “Commodities Consensus: Neoextractivism and Enclosure of the Commons in Latin America.” South Atlantic Quarterly 114(1): 65–82.10.1215/00382876-2831290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swepston, Lee. 2020. “Progress through Supervision of Convention No. 169.” International Journal of Human Rights 24(2–3): 112–26.10.1080/13642987.2019.1702529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temper, Leah, del Bene, Daniela, and Martinez-Alier, Joan. 2015. “Mapping the Frontiers and Front Lines of Global Environmental Justice: The EJAtlas.” Journal of Political Ecology 22: 254–78.10.2458/v22i1.21108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veltmeyer, Henry and Petras, James (eds.). 2014. New Extractivism: A Post-Neoliberal Development Model or Imperialism of the Twenty-First Century? New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Yashar, Deborah. 1999. “Democracy, Indigenous Movements, and the Postliberal Challenge in Latin America.” World Politics 52(1): 76–104.10.1017/S0043887100020037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yashar, Deborah. 2005. Citizenship in Latin America: The Rise of Indigenous Movements and the Postliberal Challenge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511790966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yashar, Deborah J. 2007. “Resistance and Identity Politics in an Age of Globalization.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 610(1): 160–81.Google Scholar
Zoomers, Annelies. 2010. “Globalisation and the Foreignisation of Space: Seven Processes Driving the Current Global Land Grab.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 37(2): 429–47.10.1080/03066151003595325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: Inaccessible, or known limited accessibility
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The PDF of this Element is known to have missing or limited accessibility features.
We may be reviewing its accessibility for future improvement, but final compliance is
not yet assured and may be subject to legal exceptions. If you have any questions,
please contact
accessibility@cambridge.org.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.