Element contents
Mary Shepherd
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 September 2022
Summary
There has recently been a resurgence of interest in the early nineteenth century Scottish philosopher Mary Shepherd. This Element is intended to provide an overview of Shepherd's system, including her views on the following wide range of topics: causation, induction, knowledge of the external world, matter, life, animal cognition, the relationship between mind and body, the immortality of the soul, the existence of God, miracles, and the nature of divine creation. The author also provides an overview of relevant secondary literature and argues for their own interpretation of Shepherd's metaphysics.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009023740Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 08 September 2022
References
Abernethy, J. (1814). An Enquiry into the Probability and Rationality of Mr. Hunter’s Theory of Life. Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown.Google Scholar
Atherton, M. (1996). Lady Mary Shepherd’s Case against George Berkeley. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 4(2), 347–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atherton, M. (2005). Reading Lady Mary Shepherd. The Harvard Review of Philosophy, 13(2), 73–85.Google Scholar
Babbage, C. (1989). The Ninth Bridgewater Treatise: A Fragment (2nd ed.). New York University Press.Google Scholar
Bitzer, L. F. (1998). The “Indian Prince” in Miracle Arguments of Hume and His Predecessors and Early Critics. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 31(3), 175–230.Google Scholar
Blakey, R. (1850). History of the Philosophy of Mind. Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans.Google Scholar
Blakey, R. (1879). Memoirs of Dr. Robert Blakey: Professor of Logic and Metaphysics, Queens’s College, Belfast. Trübner.Google Scholar
Bliss, R., & Trogdon, K. (2021). Metaphysical Grounding. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter ed. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/grounding/Google Scholar
Bolton, M. (2011). Causality and Causal Induction: The Necessitarian Theory of Lady Mary Shepherd. In Allen, K. & Stoneham, T. (Eds.), Causation and Modern Philosophy (pp. 242–261). Routledge.Google Scholar
Bolton, M. (2017). Mary Shepherd. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter ed. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/mary-shepherd/Google Scholar
Bolton, M. (2019). Lady Mary Shepherd and David Hume on Cause and Effect. In O’Neill, E. & Lascano, M. P. (Eds.), Feminist History of Philosophy: The Recovery and Evaluation of Women’s Philosophical Thought (129–152). Springer.Google Scholar
Bow, C. (2013). In Defence of the Scottish Enlightenment: Dugald Stewart’s Role in the 1805 John Leslie Affair. Scottish Historical Review, 92, 123–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, D. (2017). Expanding the Canon of Scottish Philosophy: The Case for Adding Lady Mary Shepherd. Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 15(3), 275–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, D. (2020a). Mary Shepherd on Mind, Soul, or Self. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 58(1), 93–112.Google Scholar
Boyle, D. (2020b). A Mistaken Attribution to Lady Mary Shepherd. Journal of Modern Philosophy, 2(1), 5.Google Scholar
Boyle, D. (2021). Mary Shepherd and the Meaning of “Life.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 29(2), 208–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandreth, M. E. S. (1886). Some Family and Friendly Recollections of 70 Years. C. Hooker.Google Scholar
Brown, T. (1806). Observations on the Nature and Tendency of the Doctrine of Mr. Hume, Concerning the Relation of Cause and Effect. Mundell.Google Scholar
Brown, T. (1835). Inquiry into the Relation of Cause and Effect. Scholars’ Facsimiles & Reprints.Google Scholar
Campbell, G. (1766). A Dissertation on Miracles: Containing an Examination of the Principles Advanced by David Hume, Esq.; in an Essay on Miracles. By George Campbell, D. D. Principal of the Marischal College, and One of the Ministers, of Aberdeen (2nd ed., with additions and corrections). Printed for A. Kincaid & J. Bell, sold by R. Baldwin, W. Johnston, & J. Caddel, at Buchanan’s Head, in the Strand, London.Google Scholar
Clarke, S. (1998). A Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God and Other Writings (Vailati, E., Ed.). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Condillac, E. B. de. (1947). Oeuvres Philosophiques; Texte établi et Présenté Par Georges le Roy (Le Roy, G., Ed.). Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Fasko, M. (2021). Mary Shepherd’s Threefold “Variety of Intellect” and its Role in Improving Education. The Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 19(3), 185–201.Google Scholar
Fasko, M. (forthcoming). “The Animal Power to Feel” – Mary Shepherd’s Understanding of Non-Human Animal Cognition. In Fields, K. (Ed.), Essays on Mary Shepherd: Causation, Mind, and Knowledge. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fearn, J. (1820). First Lines of the Human Mind. Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown.Google Scholar
Fields, K. (forthcoming). Does Shepherd Have a Bundle Theory of the Self? In Fields, K. (Ed.), Essays on Mary Shepherd: Causation, Mind, and Knowledge. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Folescu, M. (2021). Mary Shepherd on the Role of Proofs in Our Knowledge of First Principles. Noûs, 2021, 1–21.Google Scholar
Garrett, D. (forthcoming a). External Existence and the Rejection of Idealism in Hume and Shepherd. In Fields, K. (Ed.), Essays on Mary Shepherd: Causation, Mind, and Knowledge. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, D. (Ed.). (forthcoming b). Mary Shepherd’s Essay Upon the Relation of Cause and Effect. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon‐Roth, J., & Kendrick, N. (2019). Recovering Early Modern Women Writers: Some Tensions. Metaphilosophy, 50, 268–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, G. (2017). Identifying Scottish Philosophers: A Brief Response to Deborah Boyle. Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 15(3), 295–297.Google Scholar
Grandi, G. B. (2011). The Extension of Color Sensations: Reid, Stewart, and Fearn. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 41(S1), 50–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandi, G. B. (2015). Providential Naturalism and Miracles: John Fearn’s Critique of Scottish Philosophy. Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 13(1), 75–94.Google Scholar
Grandi, G. B. (2018). On the Ancestry of Reid’s Inquiry: Stewart, Fearn, and Reid’s Early Manuscripts. In Bow, C. B. (Ed.), Common Sense in the Scottish Enlightenment (pp. 77–106). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1975. Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals. In Selby-Bigge, L. A. (Ed.), 3rd Ed., Revised, P. H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (2001). A Treatise of Human Nature (Norton, D. F. & Norton, M. J., Eds.). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Landy, D. (2020a). A Defence of Shepherd’s Account of Cause and Effect as Synchronous. Journal of Modern Philosophy, 2(2), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landy, D. (2020b). Shepherd on Hume’s Argument for the Possibility of Uncaused Existence. Journal of Modern Philosophy, 2(1), 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lascano, M. P. (2019). Early Modern Women on the Cosmological Argument: A Case Study in Feminist History of Philosophy. In O’Neill, E. & Lascano, M. P. (Eds.), Feminist History of Philosophy: The Recovery and Evaluation of Women’s Philosophical Thought (pp. 23–47). Springer Nature.Google Scholar
Lawrence, W. (1822). Lectures on Physiology, Zoology, and the Natural History of Man. Benbow.Google Scholar
Leslie, J. S. (1804). An Experimental Inquiry into the Nature and Propagation of Heat (special collections stacks). Printed for Mawman, J., sold also by Bell and Bradfute, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1823). The Works of John Locke (new ed., corrected). Printed for Tegg, T.. Locke, J. (1979). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
LoLordo, A. (2019). Mary Shepherd on Causation, Induction, and Natural Kinds. Philosophers’ Imprint, 19(52), 1–14.Google Scholar
LoLordo, A. (2020). Mary Shepherd’s Essays on the Perception of an External Universe. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
LoLordo, A. (forthcoming). Mary Shepherd’s Account of the Mind: Its Opponents and Implications. In Fields, K. (Ed.), Essays on Mary Shepherd: Causation, Mind, and Knowledge. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martineau, H. (1877). Harriet Martineau’s Autobiography, Cambridge Library Collection: British and Irish History, 19th Century. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McRobert, J. (2000a). Introduction. In McRobert, J. (Ed.), Philosophical Works of Lady Mary Shepherd (p. 21). Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
McRobert, J. (2002). Mary Shepherd and the University (2002). https://philpapers.org/rec/MCRMSA-2Google Scholar
McRobert, J. (1999). Mary Shepherd’s Refutation of Idealism (1999). https://philpapers.org/rec/MCRMSR-2Google Scholar
Melamedoff, A. (n.d.). Mary Shepherd’s Metaphysics of Emergence. https://philpapers.org/rec/MELMSMGoogle Scholar
Newton, I. (1979). Opticks: Or, a Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections & Colours of Light; Based on the 4th Ed., London, 1730. Dover.Google Scholar
Ott, W. (2011). Review of Keith Allen and Tom Stoneham (eds.), Causation and Modern Philosophy. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/causation-and-modern-philosophy/Google Scholar
Paoletti, C. (2011a). Causes as Proximate Events: Thomas Brown and the Positivist Interpretation of Hume on Causality. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 42(1), 37–44.Google Scholar
Paoletti, C. (2011b). Restoring Necessary Connections: Lady Mary Shepherd on Hume and the Early Nineteenth-Century Debate on Causality. I Castelli di Yale 11: 47–59.Google Scholar
Reid, T. (1764). An Inquiry into the Human Mind: On the Principles of Common Sense. By Thomas Reid, D. D. Professor of Philosophy in King’s College, Aberdeen. Printed for A. Millar, London, and A. Kincaid & J. Bell, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Rickless, S. (2018). Is Shepherd’s Pen Mightier Than Berkeley’s Word? British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 26(2), 317–330.Google Scholar
Shepherd, M. (1827). Essays on the Perception of an External Universe. J. Botson and Palmer.Google Scholar
Shepherd, M. (1828a). Observations by Lady Mary Shepherd on the “First Lines of the Human Mind.” Parriana: Or Notices of the Rev. Samuel Parr, LL.D. Collected from Various Sources, Etc, 1, 624–627.Google Scholar
Shepherd, M. (1828b). On the Causes of Single and Erect Vision. The Kaleidoscope; or, Literary and Scientific Mirror, 9 (July 15, 3 and July 22, 22–23)Google Scholar
Shepherd, M. (1828c). On the Causes of Single and Erect Vision. The Philosophical Magazine, 405–416.Google Scholar
Shepherd, M. (1832). Lady Mary Shepherd’s Metaphysics. Fraser’s Magazine for Town and Country, 5(30), 697–708.Google Scholar
Stewart, D. (1877). The Collected Works of Dugald Stewart (Hamilton, S. W., Ed., 2nd ed. improved, Vols. 1–7). T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Tanner, T. (2022). How Good was Shepherd’s Response to Hume’s Epistemological Challenge? British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 30(1), 71–89.Google Scholar
West, P. (forthcoming). Shepherd’s Modified Berkeleian Theory. In Fields, K. (Ed.), Essays on Mary Shepherd: Causation, Mind, and Knowledge. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whately, E. J. (1868). Life and Correspondence of Richard Whately, D.D.: Late Archbishop of Dublin (new ed). Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. (forthcoming). On Mary Shepherd’s Essay Upon the Relation of Cause and Effect. In Schliesser, E. (Ed.), Neglected Classics of Philosophy, II. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this element is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 20
- Cited by