Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T06:56:14.683Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measuring and Interpreting Subjective Wellbeing in Different Cultural Contexts

A Review and Way Forward

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2018

Robert A. Cummins
Affiliation:
Deakin University, Victoria

Summary

The scientific study of 'wellbeing' involves both objective and subjective variables. While objective wellbeing can be simply measured as tangible aspects of the living environment, measuring subjective wellbeing involves quantifying self-reported feelings. Although reliable and valid measures can be achieved, in a cross-cultural context differences in language and culture present formidable challenges to measurement comparability. This Element begins by describing the behaviour of subjective wellbeing in single cultures, using the theory of homeostasis. Robert A. Cummins then discusses cross-cultural differences in subjective wellbeing, with a focus on measurement invariance as a means of ensuring the validity of comparative results. Cummins proposes that the major barrier to creating such comparability of measurement is a pervasive response bias that differs between cultures. He concludes that current instruments are inadequate to provide valid cross-cultural measures of subjective wellbeing, and that suitable measures may be created as short forms of current scales.
Get access
Type
Element
Information
Online ISBN: 9781108685580
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 17 May 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ager, A. (2002). ‘Quality of life’ assessment in critical context. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 15, 369376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, I., Bados, A., & Pero, M. (2010). Factorial structure and validity of the multicultural Quality of Life Index. Quality of Life Research, 19, 225229.Google Scholar
Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: Americans’ perceptions of life quality, New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Anglim, J., Weinberg, M. K., & Cummins, R. A. (2015). Bayesian hierarchical modeling of the temporal dynamics of subjective well-being: A 10 year longitudinal analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 59, 114.Google Scholar
Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health: How people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Antonovsky, A. (1993). The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Social Science & Medicine, 36, 725733.Google Scholar
Aranda, M., & Knight, B. (1997). The influence of ethnicity on the caregiver stress and coping process: A sociocultural review and analysis. The Gerontologist, 37, 342354.Google Scholar
Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Multiple-group factor analysis alignment. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21, 495508.Google Scholar
Australian Centre on Quality of Life (ACQOL). (2017). Australian Centre on Quality of Life – Directory of Instruments. Available at:http://www.acqol.com.au/instruments#measuresGoogle Scholar
Bachman, J. G., & O’Malley, P. M. (1984). Yea-saying, nay-saying, and going to extremes: Black-white differences in response styles. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48, 491509.Google Scholar
Barendse, M. T., Albers, C., Oort, F., et al. (2014). Measurement bias detection through Bayesian factor analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1087.Google Scholar
Batinic, B., Selenko, E., Stiglbauer, B., et al. (2010). Are workers in highstatus jobs healthier than others? Assessing Jahoda’s latent benefits of employment in two working populations. Work & Stress, 24, 7387.Google Scholar
Bauer, R. A. (1966) Social indicators. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bedin, L. M., & Sarriera, J. C. (2015). A comparative study of the subjective well-being of parents and adolescents considering gender, age and social class. Social Indicators Research, 120, 7995.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (1780). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. London: T. Payne.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (1789). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, S. L., Kouzarides, T., Shiekhattar, R., et al. (2009). An operational definition of epigenetics. Genes & Development, 23, 781783.Google Scholar
Bieda, A., Hirschfeld, G., Schönfeld, P., et al. (2017). Universal happiness? Cross-cultural measurement invariance of scales assessing positive mental health. Psychological Assessment, 29, 408421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloom, A. (1981). The linguistic shaping of thought, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Blore, J. D., Stokes, M. A., Mellor, D., et al. (2011). Comparing multiple discrepancies theory to affective models of subjective wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 100, 116.Google Scholar
Braungart, J. M., Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., et al. (1992). Genetic influence on tester-rated infant temperament as assessed by Bayley’s infant behavior record: Nonadoptive and adoptive siblings and twins. Developmental Psychology, 28, 4047.Google Scholar
Brickman, P., Coates, D., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (1978). Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 917927.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, T. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Bunnin, N., & Yu, J. (2008). The Blackwell dictionary of Western philosophy. Malden, MA: Wiley.Google Scholar
Burns, J. H. (2005). Happiness and utility: Jeremy Bentham’s equation. Utilitas, 17, 4661.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Greiling, H. (1999). Adaptive individual differences. Journal of Personality, 67, 209243.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M. (1994). Testing for the factorial validity, replication, and invariance of a measuring instrument: A paradigmatic application based on the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 289311.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modelling in AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Cannon, W. B. (1932). The wisdom of the body. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Capic, T., Li, N., & Cummins, R. A. (2018). Confirmation of subjective wellbeing set-points: Foundational for subjective social indicators. Social Indicators Research. 137 (1), 128. doi:10.1007/s11205-017–1585-5.Google Scholar
Casas, F. (2016). Children, adolescents and quality of life: The social sciences perspective over two decades. In Maggino, F. (Ed.), A life devoted to quality of life – Festschrift in honor of Alex C. Michalos (pp. 321). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Casas, F., González, M., Figuer, C., et al. (2009). Satisfaction with spirituality, satisfaction with religion and personal well-being among Spanish adolescents and young university students. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 4, 2345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cella, D. F., Tulsky, D. S., Gray, G., et al. (1993). The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measure. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 11, 570579.Google Scholar
Chang, H. H., & Nayga, R. M. (2010). Childhood obesity and unhappiness: The influence of soft drinks and fast food consumption. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 261276.Google Scholar
Chen, C., Lee, S.-Y., & Stevenson, H. W. (1995). Response style and cross-cultural comparisons of rating scales among East Asian and North American students. Psychological Science, 6, 170175.Google Scholar
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, F. F., Sousa, K. H., & West, S. G. (2005). Teacher’s corner: Testing measurement invariance of second-order factor models. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 471492.Google Scholar
Chen, Z., & Davey, G. (2008). Normative life satisfaction in Chinese societies. Social Indicators Research, 89, 557564.Google Scholar
Clark, A. E, Diener, E., Georgellis, Y., et al. (2008). Lags and leads in life satisfaction: A test of the baseline hypothesis. Economic Journal, 118, F222F243.Google Scholar
Clarke, P. J., Marshall, V. W., Ryff, C. D., et al. (2001). Measuring psychological well-being in the Canadian Study of Health and Aging. International Psychogeriatrics, 33, 7990.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. (1941). An experimental comparison of the multiple true-false and multiple multiple-choice tests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 32, 533543.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. (1942). Studies of acquiescence as a factor in the true-false test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 33, 401415.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. (1946). Response sets and test validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 6, 475494.Google Scholar
Cummins, R. A. (1997). Self-rated quality of life scales for people with an intellectual disability: A review. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disability, 10, 199216.Google Scholar
Cummins, R. A. (1998). The second approximation to an international standard of life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 43, 307334.Google Scholar
Cummins, R. A. (2000). Personal income and subjective well-being: A review. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 133158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, R. A. and Nistico, H. (2002). “Maintaining life satisfaction: The role of positive cognitive bias.” Journal of Happiness Studies 3(1): 37-69.Google Scholar
Cummins, R. A., Walter, J., & Woerner, J. (2007). Australian Unity Wellbeing Index: Report 16.1 - “The Wellbeing of Australians - Groups with the highest and lowest wellbeing in Australia”, Australian Centre on Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne. http://www.acqol.com.au/projects#reportsGoogle Scholar
Cummins, R. A. (2010). Fluency disorders and life quality: Subjective wellbeing vs. health related quality of life. Invited paper. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 35, 161172.Google Scholar
Cummins, R. A, Woerner, J., Weinberg, M, et al. (2013c). Australian Unity Wellbeing Index: -Report 30.0 - The Wellbeing of Australians: Social media, personal achievement, and work. Melbourne, Australian Centre on Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Deakin University. http://www.acqol.com.au/projects#reports.Google Scholar
Cummins, R. A., et al. (2014a). “A demonstration of set-points for subjective wellbeing.” Journal of Happiness Studies 15: 183-206.Google Scholar
Cummins, R. A. (2014). Subjective indicators of wellbeing. In Michalos, A. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 64296431). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, R. A. (2016). The theory of subjective wellbeing homeostasis: A contribution to understanding life quality. In Maggino, F. (Ed.), A life devoted to quality of life – Festschrift in honor of Alex C. Michalos (pp. 6179). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Cummins, R. A., Eckersley, R., Pallant, J., et al. (2003). Developing a national index of subjective wellbeing: The Australian Unity Wellbeing Index. Social Indicators Research, 64, 159190.Google Scholar
Cummins, R. A., & Gullone, E. (2000). Why we should not use 5-point Likert scales: The case for subjective quality of life measurement. Second International Conference on Quality of Life in Cities, Singapore: National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
Cummins, R. A., Woerner, J., Weinberg, M., et al. (2012). Australian Unity Wellbeing Index: – Report 28.0 – The Wellbeing of Australians – The impact of marriage. Available at: http://www.acqol.com.au/projects#reportsGoogle Scholar
Davern, M., Cummins, R. A., & Stokes, M. (2007). Subjective wellbeing as an affective/cognitive construct. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8, 429449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidov, E., Meuleman, B., Cieciuch, J., et al. (2014). Measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Annual review of sociology, 40, 5575.Google Scholar
Deaton, A. (2008). Income, health, and well-being around the world: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22, 5372.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008b). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal or Happiness Studies, 9, 111.Google Scholar
DeNavas-Walt, C., Proctor, B. D., & Smith, J. C. (2012). U.S. Census Bureau, current population reports, P60-243, income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2011. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
DeRoover, K., Timmerman, M. E., De Leersnyder, J., et al. (2014). What’s hampering measurement invariance: Detecting non-invariant items using clusterwise simultaneous component analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 604. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00604Google Scholar
deSilva, M. J., Huttly, S. R., Harpham, T., et al. (2007). Social capital and mental health: A comparative analysis of four low income countries. Social Science & Medicine, 64, 520.Google Scholar
deSilva, M. J., McKenzie, K., Huttly, S. R., et al. (2005). Social capital and mental illness: A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, 619627.Google Scholar
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542575.Google Scholar
Diener, E. (2006). Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 397404.Google Scholar
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., et al. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 7175.Google Scholar
Diener, E., Scollon, C. N., & Lucas, R. E. (2004). The evolving concept of subjective well-being. The multifaceted nature of happiness. In Costa, P. T. & Siegler, I. C. (Eds.), Recent advances in psychology and aging (pp. 188219). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science BV.Google Scholar
Dixon, P. N., Bobo, M., & Stevick, R. A. (1984). Response differences and preferences for all-category-defined and end-defined Likert formats. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44, 6166.Google Scholar
Drasgow, F. (1987). Study of the measurement bias of two standardized psychological tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 1929.Google Scholar
Drasgow, F., & Kanfer, R. (1985). Equivalence of psychological measurement in heterogeneous populations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 662680.Google Scholar
Ensel, W. M., Lin, N. (1991). The life stress paradigm and psychological distress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 32, 321341.Google Scholar
Forjaz, M. J., Ayala, A., Rodriguez-Blazquez, C., et al. (2012) Rasch analysis of the international wellbeing index in older adults. International Psychogeriatrics, 24, 324332.Google Scholar
Freyd, M. (1923). The graphic rating scale. Journal of Educational Psychology, 14, 83102.Google Scholar
Fromm, E. (1947). Man for himself: An inquiry into the psychology of ethics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. P., & Williams, P. A. (1988). User’s guide to the general health questionnaire. Windsor, UK: NFER/Nelson.Google Scholar
Gregorich, S. E. (2006). Do self-report instruments allow meaningful comparisons across diverse population groups? Testing measurement invariance using the confirmatory factor analysis framework. Medical Care, 44, S78S94.Google Scholar
Gross, B. M. (1966b). The state of the nation: Social systems accounting. In Bauer, R. A. (Ed.), Social Indicators (pp. 154271). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gurin, G., Veroff, J., & Feld, S. (1960). Americans view their mental health: A nationwide interview survey. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hammond, T., Weinberg, M. K., & Cummins, R. A. (2014). The dyadic interaction of relationships and disability type on informal carer subjective well-being. Quality of Life Research, 23, 15351542.Google Scholar
Hartmann, G. W. (1934) Personality traits associated with variations in happiness. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 29, 202212.Google Scholar
Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (2017). World happiness report 2017. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.Google Scholar
Henderson, S. (1977). The social network, support and neurosis. The function of attachment in adult life. British Journal of Psychiatry, 131, 185191.Google Scholar
Hildingh, C., & Baigi, A. (2010). The association among hypertension and reduced psychological well-being, anxiety and sleep disturbances: A population study. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 24, 366371.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Holton, S., Fisher, J., & Rowe, H. (2010). Motherhood: Is it good for women’s mental health? Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 28, 223239.Google Scholar
Horn, J. L., McArdle, J. J., & Mason, R. (1983). When is invariance not invarient: A practical scientist’s look at the ethereal concept of factor invariance. Southern Psychologist, 1, 179188.Google Scholar
Human Development Index. (2007/2008). Fighting climate change: Human solidarity in a divided world. New York: United Nations Development Program & Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Human Development Index. (2017). Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Development Program, http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. (1996). The clash of civilizations and remaking of world order. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. (1997). World values surveys; GNP/capita purchasing power estimates from World Bank, World Development Report 1977. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available at: http://margaux.grandvinum.se/SebTest/wvs/articles/folder published/articlebase56.Google Scholar
International Wellbeing Group. (2013). Personal wellbeing index manual (5th ed.). Available at: http://www.acqol.com.au/instruments#measuresGoogle Scholar
Iwata, N., Roberts, C. R., & Kawakami, N. (1995). Japan-US comparison of responses to depression scale items among adult workers. Psychiatry Research, 58, 237245.Google Scholar
Iwata, N., Saito, K., & Roberts, R. E. (1994). Responses to a self-administered depression scale among younger adolescents in Japan. Psychiatry Research, 53, 275287.Google Scholar
Jang, S., Kim, E. S., Cao, C., et al. (2017). Measurement invariance of the Satisfaction With Life Scale across 26 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48, 560576.Google Scholar
Jones, L. V., & Thurstone, L. L. (1955). The psychophysics of semantics: An experimental investigation. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 39, 3136.Google Scholar
Joshanloo, M. (2013). A comparison of Western and Islamic conceptions of happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 18571874.Google Scholar
Kafka, G. J., & Kozma, A. (2002). The construct validity of Ryff’s Scales of Psychological Well-Being (SPWB) and their relationship to measures of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 57, 171190.Google Scholar
Kanai, R., & Rees, G. (2011). The structural basis of inter-individual differences in human behaviour and cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12, 231242.Google Scholar
Kay, P., & Kempton, W. (1984). What is the Sapir‐Whorf hypothesis? American Anthropologist, 86, 6579.Google Scholar
Kim, Y. H., Peng, S. Q., & Chiu, C. Y. (2008). Explaining self-esteem differences between Chinese and North Americans: Dialectical self (vs. self-consistency) or lack of positive self-regard. Self and Identity, 7, 113128.Google Scholar
Kirmayer, L. J. (1989). Cultural variations in the response to psychiatric disorders and emotional distress. Social Science & Medicine, 29, 327339.Google Scholar
Land, K. C., & Michalos, A. C. (2018). Fifty years after the social indicators movement: Has the promise been fulfilled? An Assessment and an Agenda for the Future. Social Indicators Research 135(3), 835868.Google Scholar
Lau, A. L. D., Cummins, R. A., & McPherson, W. (2005). An investigation into the cross-cultural equivalence of the Personal Wellbeing Index. Social Indicators Research, 72, 403430.Google Scholar
Lavric, M., & Flere, S. (2008). The role of culture in the relationship between religiosity and psychological well-being. Journal of Religion & Health, 47, 164175.Google Scholar
Lee, J. W., Jones, P. S., Mineyama, Y., et al. (2002). Cultural differences in responses to a Likert scale. Research in Nursing and Health, 25, 295306.Google Scholar
Leung, S. O. (2011). A comparison of psychometric properties and normality in 4–5-6 and 11 point Likert scales. Journal of Social Service Research, 37, 412421.Google Scholar
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives in Psychology, 140, 155.Google Scholar
Lommen, M. J. J., Van De Schoot, R., & Engelhard, I. M. (2014). The experience of traumatic events disrupts the measurement invariance of a posttraumatic stress scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 13041313.Google Scholar
Longo, Y. (2015). The simple structure of positive affect. Social Indicators Research, 124, 183198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowenthal, M. F., & Haven, C. (1968). Interaction and adaptation: Intimacy as a critical variable. American Sociological Review, 33, 2030.Google Scholar
Lykken, D. T., & Tellegen, A. (1996). Happiness is a stochastic phenomenon. Psychological Science, 7, 186189.Google Scholar
Magana, S., & Smith, M. J. (2006). Psychological distress and well-being of Latina and non-Latina White mothers of youth and adults with an autism spectrum disorder: Cultural attitudes towards coresidence status. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 76, 346357.Google Scholar
Magilvy, J., Congdon, J., Martinez, R., et al. (2000). Caring for our own: Health care experiences of rural Hispanic elders. Journal of Aging Studies, 14, 171191.Google Scholar
Marin, G., & Marin, B. (1991). Research with Hispanic populations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Matell, M. S., & Jacoby, J. (1972). Is there an optimal number of alternatives for Likert-scale items? Effects of testing time and scale properties. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 506517.Google Scholar
McEwen, B. S., & Wingfield, J. C. (2003). The concept of allostasis in biology and biomedicine. Hormones and Behavior, 43, 215.Google Scholar
McGill, V. J. (1968). The idea of happiness. New York: Frederick A. Praeger.Google Scholar
McGue, M., Bacon, S., & Lykken, D. T. (1993). Personality stability and change in early adulthood: A behavioral genetic analysis. Developmental Psychology, 29, 96109.Google Scholar
McHorney, C. A., Ware, J. E., & Raczek, A. E. (1993). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Medical Care, 31, 247263.Google Scholar
Mellenbergh, G. J. (1989). Item bias and item response theory. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 127143.Google Scholar
Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525543.Google Scholar
Merriam-Webster. (2018). Online dictionary. Available at: http://www.merriam-webster.com.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 8197.Google Scholar
Millsap, R. E. (2012). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Misajon, R., Pallant, J., & Bliuc, A-M. (2016). Rasch analysis of the Personal Wellbeing Index. Quality of Life Research, 25, 25652569.Google Scholar
Moksnes, U. K., Løhre, A., Byrne, D. G., et al. (2014). Satisfaction with life scale in adolescents: Evaluation of factor structure and gender invariance in a Norwegian sample. Social Indicators Research, 118, 657671.Google Scholar
Møller, V., Roberts, B., & Zani, D. (2015). The Personal Wellbeing Index in the South African IsiXhosa Translation: A qualitative focus group study. Social Indicators Research, 124, 835862.Google Scholar
National Institutes of Health. (2017) Roadmap Epigenomics Project. Washington, DC: NIH. Available at: http://www.roadmapepigenomics.org/overview.Google Scholar
Nyamathi, A. M. (1993). Sense of coherence in minority women at risk for HIV infection. Public Health Nursing, 10, 151158.Google Scholar
Oatley, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1987). Towards a cognitive theory of emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 1, 2950.Google Scholar
OECD. (2017a). PISA 2015 Results (Volume III): Students’ Well-Being, PISA, Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD. (2017b). Better Life Index (life satisfaction), Paris: OECD. Available at: http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/topics/life-satisfaction/.Google Scholar
Oishi, S. (2006). The concept of life satisfaction across cultures: An IRT analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 411423.Google Scholar
Oishi, S. (2007). The application of structural equation modeling and item response theory to cross-cultural positive psychology research. In Ong, A. D. & Van Dulmen, M. H. M. (Eds.), Handbook of methods in positive psychology (pp. 126138). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oishi, S. (2010). Culture and well-being: Conceptual and methodological issues. In Diener, E., Helliwell, J. F., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.), International differences in well-being (pp. 3469). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Olsson, C. A., McGee, R., Nada-Raja, S., et al. (2013). A 32-year longitudinal study of child and adolescent pathways to well-being in adulthood. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 10691083.Google Scholar
Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164172.Google Scholar
Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385401.Google Scholar
Reise, S. P., Widaman, K. F., & Pugh, R. H. (1993). Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 552566.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renn, D., Pfaffenberger, N., Platter, M., et al. (2009). International Well-Being Index: The Austrian version. Social Indicators Research, 90, 243256.Google Scholar
Richardson, B., Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M. D., Tomyn, A. J., et al. (2016). The psychometric equivalence of the Personal Wellbeing Index for normally functioning and homeostatically defeated Australian adults. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 627641.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J. R., & Snyder, S. S. (1982). Changing the world and changing the self: A two-process model of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 537.Google Scholar
Røysamb, E., Nes, R. B., & Vittersø, J. (2014). Well-being: Heritable and changeable. In Sheldon, K. M. & Lucas, R. E. (Eds.), Stability of happiness: Theories and evidence on whether happiness can change (pp. 936). Philadelphia: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 11611178.Google Scholar
Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110, 145172.Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141166.Google Scholar
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 10691081.Google Scholar
Ryland, E., & Greenfield, S. (1991). Work stress and well being: An investigation of Antonovsky’s sense of coherence model. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 3954.Google Scholar
Sabogal, F., Marin, G., Otero-Sabogal, R., et al. (1987). Hispanic familism and acculturation: What changes and what doesn’t. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Science, 9, 397412.Google Scholar
Sarason, B. R., Sarason, I. G., & Pierce, G. R. (1990b). Social support: An interactional view, New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Sarason, S. B. (1977). The psychological sense of community: Prospects for a community psychology. London: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Schulz, R., & Heckhausen, J. (1996) A life span model of successful aging. American Psychologist, 51, 702714.Google Scholar
Seidlitz, L., & Diener, E. (1993). Memory for positive versus negative life events: Theories for the differences between happy and unhappy persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 654664.Google Scholar
Shurgot, G., & Knight, B. (2004) Preliminary study investigating acculturation, cultural values, and psychological distress in Latino caregivers of dementia patients. Journal of Mental Health and Aging, 10, 183194.Google Scholar
Sigelman, C. K., Budd, E. C., Spanhel, C. L., et al. (1981). When in doubt, say yes: Acquiescence in interviews with mentally retarded persons. Mental Retardation, 19, 5358.Google Scholar
Silva, A. D., do Céu Taveira, M., Marques, C., et al. (2015). Satisfaction with Life Scale among adolescents and young adults in Portugal: Extending evidence of construct validity. Social Indicators Research, 120, 309318.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and caufes of the wealth of nations, London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell. Available at: http://books.google.bg/books?id=C5dNAAAAcAAJ&pg=PP7#v=onepage&q&f=true (accessed January 13, 2018).Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1869). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Available at: https://books.googleusercontent.com/books/content?Google Scholar
Steel, P., Taras, V., Uggerslev, K., et al. (2017). The happy culture: A theoretical, meta-analytic, and empirical review of the relationship between culture and wealth and subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Review, before print, 142. doi:10.1177/1088868317721372Google Scholar
Stening, B. W., & Everett, J. E. (1984). Response styles in a cross-cultural managerial study. Journal of Social Psychology, 122, 151156.Google Scholar
Stevelink, S. A. M., & van Brakel, W. H. (2013). The cross-cultural equivalence of participation instruments: A systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 35, 12561268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tavor, I., Jones, O. P., Mars, R., et al. (2016). Task-free MRI predicts individual differences in brain activity during task performance. Science, 352, 216220.Google Scholar
Tellegen, A., Lykken, D. T., Bouchard, T. J. J., et al. (1988). Personality similarity in twins reared apart and together. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 10311039.Google Scholar
Thompson., R. F. (2009). Habituation: A history. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 92, 127134.Google Scholar
Tiliouine, H., Cummins, R. A., & Davern, M. (2006). Measuring wellbeing in developing countries: The case of Algeria. Social Indicators Research, 75, 130.Google Scholar
Tomyn, A. J., & Cummins, R, A. (2011). Subjective wellbeing and homeostatically protected mood: Theory validation with adolescents. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 897914.Google Scholar
Trewin, D. (2001). Frameworks for Australian social statistics. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics. Available at: http://www.ausstats.abs.gov.au/ausstats/free.nsf/0/D609B8E54F0EDCA8CA256AE30004282D/$File/41600_2001.pdf.Google Scholar
van Beuningen, J. (2012). The satisfaction with life scale examining construct validity. Discussion paper (2012209). The Hague: Statistics Netherlands.Google Scholar
van Beuningen, J., & de Jonge, T. (2011). The PWI Index – Construct validity for the Netherlands. Discussion paper (201124). The Hague: Statistics Netherlands.Google Scholar
Van De Schoot, R., Schmidt, P., De Beuckelaer, A., et al. (2015). Editorial: Measurement invariance. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 14.Google Scholar
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 470.Google Scholar
Veenhoven, R. (1996). Developments in satisfaction-research. Social Indicators Research, 37, 146.Google Scholar
Veenhoven, R. (2010). Greater happiness for a greater number: Is that possible and desirable? Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 605629.Google Scholar
Veenhoven, R. (2017). World database of happiness. (accessed November 4, 2017).Google Scholar
Watson, G. B. (1930). Happiness among adult students of education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 21, 79109.Google Scholar
Weinberg, M. K., Webb, D. A., Gwozdz, W., et al. (under review) Subjective wellbeing and recruitment from incentivised online panels: Caveat emptor. Journal of Wellbeing Assessment.Google Scholar
Wessman, A. E., & Ricks, D. F. (1966). Mood and personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
WHOQOL Group. (1994). Development of the WHOQOL: Rationale and current status. International Journal of Mental Health, 23, 2456.Google Scholar
Widaman, K. F., & Reise, S. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In Bryant, K. J., Windle, M., & West, S. G. (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281324). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
World Bank (1997). “World Values Surveys; GNP/Capita purchasing Power Estimates from World Bank, World Development Report 1977, Inglehart, R.” Collection of Graphs Presenting WVS Data.Google Scholar
Wu, C. H., Chen, L. H., & Tsai, Y.-M. (2009). Longitudinal invariance analysis of the satisfaction with life scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 396401.Google Scholar
Wyatt, R. C., & Meyers, L. S. (1987). Psychometric properties of four 5-point Likert type response scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 2735.Google Scholar
Ying, Y.-W. (1989). Nonresponse on the center for epidemiological studies-depression scale in Chinese Americans. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 35, 156163.Google Scholar
Ying, Y. -W. (1988). Depressive symptomatology among Chinese‐Americans as measured by the CES‐D. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 739746.Google Scholar
Zanon, C., Bardagi, M. P., Layous, K., et al. (2014). Validation of the satisfaction with life scale to Brazilians: Evidences of measurement noninvariance across Brazil and US. Social Indicators Research, 119, 443453.Google Scholar
Żemojtel-Piotrowska, M., Piotrowski, J. P., Cieciuch, J., et al. (2017). Measurement invariance of Personal Well-Being Index (PWI-8) across 26 countries. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18, 16971711.Google Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Measuring and Interpreting Subjective Wellbeing in Different Cultural Contexts
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Measuring and Interpreting Subjective Wellbeing in Different Cultural Contexts
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Measuring and Interpreting Subjective Wellbeing in Different Cultural Contexts
Available formats
×