Element contents
Monotheism and Divine Aggression
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 December 2023
Summary
The aggression of the biblical God is notorious. The phrase 'Old Testament God' conjures up images of jealousy and wrath, smiting and judging. But is it only an accident that this god became capital-G God, the unique creator and sustainer of three world religions? Or is there a more substantive connection between monotheism and divine aggression? This Element proposes exactly this causal connection. In three case studies, it showcases ways that literarily treating one god alone as god amplifies divine destructiveness. This happens according to two dynamics: God absorbs the destructive power of other divine beings-and God monopolizes divinity such that other beings, even special ones like God's beloved king or the people of God, are rendered vulnerable to divine aggression. The Element also attends to the literary contexts and counterbalances within which the Hebrew Bible imagines divine aggression.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009067171Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 01 February 2024
Bibliography
Aaron, David H. Etched in Stone: The Emergence of the Decalogue. London: T&T Clark, 2006.Google Scholar
Aberbach, Moshe and Smolar, Levi. “Aaron, Jereboam, and the Golden Calves.” JBL 86 (1967): 129–140.Google Scholar
Angel, Hayyim. “The Eternal Davidic Covenant in II Samuel Chapter 7 and Its Later Manifestation in the Bible.” JBQ 44 (2016): 83–90.Google Scholar
Berges, Ulrich. “Der Zorn Gottes in der Prophetie und Poesie Israels auf dem Hintergrund altorientalischer Vorstellungen.” Bib 85 (2004): 305–340.Google Scholar
Brock, Sebastian, ed. Isaac of Nineveh (Isaac the Syrian), The Second Part; Chapters IV–XLI. Corpus scriptorum christianorum orientalium 554–555/Scriptores Syri 224–225. Leuven: Peeters, 1995.Google Scholar
Carr, David M. The Formation of Genesis 1–11: Biblical and Other Precursors. New York: Oxford University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, Stephen B. The Law and the Prophets: A Study in Old Testament Canon Formation. FAT 27. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000.Google Scholar
Chapman, Stephen B. “Miqreh and YHWH: Fate, Chance, Simultaneity, and Providence.” In Divine Doppelgängers: YHWH’s Ancient Look-Alikes, edited by Cornell, Collin, 181–200. University Park, PA: Eisenbrauns/Penn State University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Childs, Brevard S. The Book of Exodus: A Critical, Theological Commentary. OTL. Philadelphia, PA: Westminster Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Clifford, Richard J. “Psalm 89: A Lament over the Davidic Ruler’s Continued Failure.” HTR 73 (1980): 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clines, David. “Noah’s Flood I: The Theology of the Flood Narrative.” Faith and Thought 100 (1972–3): 128–142.Google Scholar
Considine, Patrick. “The Theme of Divine Wrath in Ancient East Mediterranean Literature.” SMEA 8 (1969): 85–109.Google Scholar
Cornell, Collin. Divine Aggression in Psalms and Inscriptions: Vengeful Gods and Loyal Kings. SOTS. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Cornell, Collin. “The Royal Psalms, or: The King in the Psalms.” In Cambridge Companion to the Psalms, edited by Brent A. Strawn, and LeMon, Joel M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Cornell, Collin. “The Value of Egyptian Aramaic for Biblical Studies.” Journal of Biblical and Theological Studies 7 (2022): 3–19.Google Scholar
Davies, Philip R. “And Enoch Was Not, for Genesis Took Him.” In Biblical Traditions in Transmission: Essays in Honour of Michael A. Knibb, edited by Charlotte Hempel, , 97–107. JSJSup 111. Leiden: Brill, 2006.Google Scholar
Day, John. “Comparative Ancient Near Eastern Study: The Genesis Flood Narrative in Relation to Ancient Near Eastern Flood Accounts.” In Biblical Interpretation and Method: Essays in Honour of John Barton, edited by Dell, Katharine J. and Joyce, Paul M., 74–88. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
deClaissé-Walford, Nancy, ed. The Shape and Shaping of the Book of Psalms: The Current State of Scholarship. AIL 20. Atlanta, GA: SBL Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Draffkorn Kilmer, Anne. “The Mesopotamian Concept of Overpopulation and Its Solution As Reflected in the Mythology.” Or 41 (1972): 160–177.Google Scholar
Fox, Everett. The Five Books of Moses: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy: A New Translation with Introductions, Commentary, and Notes. Schocken Bible 1. New York: Schocken, 1995.Google Scholar
Frankena, Rintje. “The Vassal-Treaties of Esarhaddon and the Dating of Deuteronomy.” In Kaf-Hē: 1940–1965 Jubilee Volume, Published on the Occasion of the 25th Anniversary of the Dutch O. T. Society, edited by de Boer, Pieter Arie Hendrik, 122–154. OtSt 14. Leiden: Brill, 1965.Google Scholar
Fredriksen, Paula. “Mandatory Retirement: Ideas in the Study of Christian Origins Whose Time Has Come to Go.” SR 35 (2006): 231–246.Google Scholar
Goldenberg, Robert. “Why Should the Look-Alikes Be a Problem?” In Divine Doppelgängers: YHWH’s Ancient Look-Alikes, edited by Collin Cornell, , 88–96. University Park, PA: Eisenbrauns/Penn State University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Grant, Deena A. Divine Anger in the Hebrew Bible. CBQMS 52. Washington, DC: Catholic Biblical Association of America, 2014.Google Scholar
Green, Douglas J. “I Undertook Great Works”: The Ideology of Domestic Achievements in West Semitic Royal Inscriptions. FAT 2.41. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2010.Google Scholar
Hay, David M. Glory at the Right Hand: Psalm 110 in Early Christianity. SBLMS 18. Nashville, TN: Abingdon, 1973.Google Scholar
Hayes, Christine E. “Golden Calf Stories: The Relationship of Exodus 32 and Deuteronomy 9–10.” In The Idea of Biblical Interpretation: Essays in Honor of James L. Kugel, edited by Najman, Hindy and Newman, Judith, 45–93. JSJSup 83. Leiden: Brill, 2004.Google Scholar
Henze, Matthias. Mind the Gap: How the Jewish Writings between the Old and New Testament Help Us Understand Jesus. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Hryrniewicz, Wacław. “Universalism of Salvation: St, Isaac The Syrian.” In Die Wurzel aller Theologie: Sentire Cum Ecclesia, Festschrift zum 60 Geburstag von Urs Von Arx, edited by Gerny, Hans, Rein, Harald, and Weyermann, Maja, 139–150. Bern: Stämpfli, 2003.Google Scholar
Humphreys, W. Lee. The Character of God in the Book of Genesis. Louisville, KT: Westminster John Knox, 2001.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, Thorkild. “The Eridu Genesis.” In I Studied Inscriptions from Before the Flood: Ancient Near Eastern, Literary, and Linguistic Approaches to Genesis 1–11, edited by Hess, Richard S. and Tsumura, David Toshio, 129–142. SBTSOTS 4. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 1994.Google Scholar
Käsemann, Ernst. “The Theological Problem Presented by the Motif of the Body of Christ.” In Perspectives on Paul, 102–121. Translated by Kohl, Margaret. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress, 1971.Google Scholar
Kratz, Reinhard G. and Spieckermann, Hermann, eds. Divine Wrath and Divine Mercy in the World of Antiquity. FAT 33. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008.Google Scholar
Kugler, Gili. “Metaphysical Hatred and Sacred Genocide: The Questionable Role of Amalek in Biblical Literature.” Journal of Genocide Research 23 (2021): 1–16.Google Scholar
Kugler, Gili. When God Wanted to Destroy the Chosen People: Biblical Traditions and Theology on the Move. BZAW 515. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2019.Google Scholar
Lam, Joseph. “Psalm 2 and the Disinheritance of Earthly Rulers: New Light from the Ugaritic Legal Text RS 94.2168.” VT 64 (2014): 34–46.Google Scholar
Lambert, Wilfred G. Babylonian Creation Myths. Mesopotamian Civilizations 16. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2013.Google Scholar
Lambert, Wilfred G. and Millard, Alan R., Atra-Hasis: the Babylonian Story of the Flood. Oxford: Clarendon, 1970.Google Scholar
Lang, Martin. “Floating from Babylon to Rome: Ancient Near Eastern Flood Stories in the Mediterranean World.” Kaskal 5 (2008): 211–231.Google Scholar
Lawson, Jack N. The Concept of Fate in Ancient Mesopotamia of the First Millennium: Toward an Understanding of Šīmtu. Orientalia Biblica et Christiana 7. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1994.Google Scholar
Milik, J. T. The Books of Enoch: Aramaic Fragments of Qumrân Cave 4. Oxford: Clarendon, 1976.Google Scholar
Moberly, R. W. L. “How Appropriate Is ‘Monotheism’ as a Category for Biblical Interpretation?” In Early Jewish and Christian Monotheism, edited by Stuckenbruck, Loren T. and Wendy, E. S. North, 216–234. JSNTSup 263. London: T&T Clark, 2004.Google Scholar
Moberly, R. W. L. The God of the Old Testament: Encountering the Divine in Christian Scripture. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2020.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Ernest W. God and His People: Covenant and Theology in the Old Testament. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Nickelsburg, George W. E. and VanderKam, James C.. 1 Enoch: The Hermeneia Translation. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 2012.Google Scholar
Novenson, Matthew V. The Grammar of Messianism: An Ancient Jewish Political Idiom and Its Users. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Otto, Eckart. Das Deuteronomium: Politische Theologie und Rechtsreform in Juda und Assyrien. BZAW 284. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1999.Google Scholar
Parpola, Simo and Watanabe, Kazuko. Neo-Assyrian Treaties and Loyalty Oaths. SAA 2. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Payne, Annick. Iron Age Hieroglyphic Luwian Inscriptions. WAW 29. Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature, 2012.Google Scholar
Pettinato, G. “Die Bestrafung des Menschengeschlechts durch die Sintflut: Die erste Tafel des Atramḫasīs-Epos eröffnet eine neue Einsicht in die Motivation dieser Strafe.” Or 37 (1968): 165–200.Google Scholar
Prinsloo, Gert T. M. “Reading the Masoretic Psalter as a Book: Editorial Trends and Redactional Trajectories.” CurBR 19 (2021): 145–177.Google Scholar
Römer, Thomas C. “Yhwh, the Goddess, and Evil: Is ‘Monotheism’ an Adequate Concept to Describe the Hebrew Bible’s Discourses about the God of Israel?” Verbum et Ecclesia 34 (2013): 1–5.Google Scholar
Sanders, James A. The Monotheizing Process: Its Origins and Development. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2014.Google Scholar
Schlimm, Matthew R. From Fratricide to Forgiveness: The Language and Ethics of Anger in Genesis. Siphrut 7. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2011.Google Scholar
Schlimm, Matthew R. Review of Deena Grant, Divine Anger in the Hebrew Bible. JHS 15 (2015). https://doi.org/10.5508/jhs.2015.v15.r8Google Scholar
Sommer, Benjamin D. “Yehezkel Kaufmann and Recent Scholarship: Toward a Richer Discourse of Monotheism.” In Yehezkel Kaufmann and the Reinvention of Jewish Biblical Scholarship, ed. Jindo, Job Y., Sommer, Benjamin D., and Staubli, Thomas, 204–239. OBO 283. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2017.Google Scholar
Sonnet, Jean-Pierre. “God’s Repentance and ‘False Starts’ In Biblical History (Genesis 6–9; Exodus 32–34; 1 Samuel 15 And 2 Samuel 7).” In Congress Volume Ljubljana 2007, ed. Lemaire, André, 469–494. VTSup 133. Leiden: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar
Starbuck, Scott R. A. “Theological Anthropology at a Fulcrum: Isaiah 55:1–5, Psalm 89, and Second Stage Traditio in the Royal Psalms.” In David and Zion: Biblical Studies in Honor of J. Roberts, J. M., ed. Bernard F. Batto, and Roberts, Kathryn L., 247–265. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2004.Google Scholar
Strawn, Brent A. “Yhwh’s Poesie: The Gnadenformel, the Book of Exodus, and Beyond.” In The Incomparable God: Readings in Biblical Theology, ed. Collin Cornell, and Walker, M. Justin, 26–44. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2023.Google Scholar
Suriano, Matthew J. “The Apology of Hazael: A Literary and Historical Analysis of the Tel Dan Inscription.” JNES 66 (2007): 163–176.Google Scholar
Thompson, John Arthur. The Ancient Near Eastern Treaties and the Old Testament. London: Tyndale, 1964.Google Scholar
Thompson, Thomas L. “A Testimony of the Good King: Reading the Mesha Stele.” In Ahab Agonistes: The Rise and Fall of the Omri Dynasty, ed. Grabbe, Lester L., 236–292. LHBOTS 421/ESHM 6. London: T&T Clark, 2007.Google Scholar
Tolan, Patrick H. “Understanding Violence.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Violent Behavior and Aggression, ed. Flannery, Daniel J., Vazsonyi, Alexander T., and Waldman, Irwin D., 5–18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Tropper, Josef. Die Inschriften von Zincirli: Neue Edition und vergleichende Grammatik des phönizischen, sam’alischen und aramäischen Textkorpus. Abhandlungen zur Literatur Alt-Syrien-Palästinas 6. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag, 1993.Google Scholar
Von Soden, Wolfram. “Der Mensch bescheidet sich nicht Überlegungen zu Schöpfungserzählungen in Babylonien und Israel.” In Bibel und Alter Orient: Altorientalische Beiträge zum Alten Testament, edited by Müller, Hans-Peter. BZAW 162. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1995.Google Scholar
Wälchli, Stefan H. Gottes Zorn in den Psalmen: eine Studie zur Rede vom Zorn Gottes in den Psalmen im Kontext des Alten Testaments. OBO 244. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht; Academic Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Walker, Justin. The Power of Images: The Poetics of Violence in Lamentations 2 and Ancient Near Eastern Art. OBO 297. Leuven: Peeters, 2022.Google Scholar
Wasserman, Nathan. The Flood: The Akkadian Sources – A New Edition, Commentary, and a Literary Discussion. OBO 290. Leuven: Peeters, 2020.Google Scholar
Weinfeld, Moshe. “Traces of Assyrian Treaty Formulae in Deuteronomy.” Bib 46 (1965): 417–427.Google Scholar
Wilson, Gerald H. The Editing of the Hebrew Psalter. SBLDS 76. Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Wilson, Gerald H. “King, Messiah, and the Reign of God: Revisiting the Royal Psalms and the Shape of the Psalter.” In The Book of Psalms: Composition and Reception, edited by Flint, Peter W. and Miller, Patrick D. Jr. 391–406. VTSup 99. Leiden: Brill, 2005.Google Scholar
Wyatt, Nicolas. “The Evidence of the Colophons in the Assessment of Ilimilku’s Scribal and Authorial Role.” UF 46 (2015): 399–446.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this element is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 19
- Cited by