Element contents
More is Less
Why Parties May Deliberately Write Incomplete Contracts
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 April 2024
Summary
Why are contracts incomplete? Transaction costs and bounded rationality cannot be a total explanation since states of the world are often describable, foreseeable, and yet are not mentioned in a contract. Asymmetric information theories also have limitations. We offer an explanation based on 'contracts as reference points'. Including a contingency of the form, 'The buyer will require a good in event E', has a benefit and a cost. The benefit is that if E occurs there is less to argue about; the cost is that the additional reference point provided by the outcome in E can hinder (re)negotiation in states outside E. We show that if parties agree about a reasonable division of surplus, an incomplete contract is strictly superior to a contingent contract. If parties have different views about the division of surplus, an incomplete contract can be superior if including a contingency would lead to divergent reference points.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009396059Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 23 May 2024
References
Philippe, Aghion and Bolton, Patrick. 1987. “Contracts as a Barrier to Entry.” American Economic Review 77(3): 388–401.Google Scholar
Aghion, Philippe and Hermalin, Benjamin. 1990. “Legal Restrictions on Private Contracts Can Enhance Efficiency.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organizations 6(2): 381–409.Google Scholar
Al-Najjar, Nabil I., Anderlini, Luca and Felli, Leonardo. 2006. “Undescribable Events.” Review of Economic Studies 73(4): 849–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderlini, Luca and Leonardo, Felli. 1994. “Incomplete Written Contracts: Undescribable States of Nature.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 109(4): 1085–1124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, Ian and Gertner, Robert. 1989. “Filling Gaps in Incomplete Contracts: An Economic Theory of Default Rules.” Yale Law Journal 99(1): 87–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, Ian and Gertner, Robert. 1992. “Strategic Contractual Inefficiency and the Optimal Choice of Legal Rules.” Yale Law Journal 101(4): 729–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajari, Patrick and Tadelis, Steven. 2001. “Incentives versus Transaction Costs: A Theory of Procurement Contracts.” Rand Journal of Economics 32(3): 387–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Baker, Gibbons, Robert and Murphy, Kevin J.. 1994. “Subjective Performance Measures in Optimal Incentive Contracts.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 109(4): 1125–1156.Google Scholar
Benabou, Roland and Tirole, Jean. 2003. “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation.” Review of Economic Studies 70(3): 489–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benabou, Roland and Tirole, Jean. 2006. “Incentives and Prosocial Behavior.” American Economic Review 96(5): 1652–1678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernheim, B. Douglas and Michael, D. Whinston. 1998. “Incomplete Contracts and Strategic Ambiguity.” American Economic Review 88(4): 902–932.Google Scholar
Bolton, Patrick and Faure-Grimaud, Antoine. 2010. “Satisficing Contracts.” Review of Economic Studies 77(3): 937–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Card, David. 1986. “An Empirical Model of Wage Indexation Provisions in Union Contracts.” Journal of Political Economy 94(3): S144–S175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakravarty, Surajeet and Bentley MacLeod, W.. 2009. “Contracting in the Shadow of the Law.” Rand Journal of Economics 40(3): 533–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Che, Yeon-Koo and Hausch, Donald. 1999. “Cooperative Investments and the Value of Contracting.” American Economic Review 89(1): 125–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dye, Ronald. 1985. “Costly Contract Contingencies.” International Economic Review 26(1): 233–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, Ernst, Hart, Oliver and Zehnder, Christian. 2015. “How Do Informal Agreements and Renegotiation Shape Contractual Reference Points?” Journal of the European Economic Association 13(1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frydlinger, David, Hart, Oliver and Vitasek, Kate. 2019. “A New Approach to Contracts.” Harvard Business Review September–October.Google Scholar
Frydlinger, David and Hart, Oliver. 2024. “Overcoming Contractual Incompleteness: The Role of Guiding Principles.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halonen-Akatwijuka, Maija and Hart, Oliver. 2020. “Continuing Contracts.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 36(2): 284–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, Oliver and Moore, John. 1999. “Foundations of Incomplete Contracts.” Review of Economic Studies 66(1): 115–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, Oliver and Moore, John. 2008. “Contracts as Reference Points.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 123(1): 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman-Glaser, Barney and Hébert, Benjamin. 2020. “The Insurance Is the Lemon: Failing to Index Contracts.” Journal of Finance 75(1): 463–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heider, Fritz. 1958. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. Hillside (NJ): Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herold, Florian. 2010. “Contractual Incompleteness as a Signal of Trust.” Games and Economic Behavior 68: 180–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herweg, Fabian and Schmidt, Klaus M.. 2015. “Loss Aversion and Ex Post Inefficient Renegotiation.” Review of Economic Studies 82(1): 297–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelman, Herbert C. 1958. “Compliance, Identification, and Internalization: Three Processes of Attitude Change.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 2(1): 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kvaløy, Ola and Olsen, Trond E.. 2009. “Endogenous Verifiability and Relational Contracting.” American Economic Review 99: 2193–2208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malcomson, James. 2013. “Relational Incentive Contracts.” In The Handbook of Organizational Economics, edited by Gibbons, Robert and Roberts, John, 1014–1065. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Robert M. and Hunt, Shelby D.. 1994. “The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing.” Journal of Marketing 58(3): 20–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyer, Paul. 2004. “Why Do Firms Use Incentives that Have No Incentive Effects?” Journal of Finance 59(4): 1619–1649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, Michael and Stiglitz, Joseph. 1976. “Equilibrium in Competitive Insurance Markets: An Essay on the Economics of Imperfect Information.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 90(4): 629–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Klaus M. and Schnitzer, Monika. 1995. “The Interaction of Explicit and Implicit Contracts.” Economics Letters 48(2): 193–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Alan and Scott, Robert E.. 2010. “Contract Interpretation Redux.” Yale Law Journal 119: 926–964.Google Scholar
Segal, Ilya. 1999. “Complexity and Renegotiation: A Foundation for Incomplete Contracts.” Review of Economic Studies 66(1): 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shavell, Steven. 1980. “Damage Measures for Breach of Contract.” Bell Journal of Economics 11(2): 466–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spier, Kathryn. 1992. “Incomplete Contracts and Signalling.” RAND Journal of Economics 23(3): 432–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tirole, Jean. 2009. “Cognition and Incomplete Contracts.” American Economic Review 99(1):265–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzman, Martín L. 1984. The Share Economy: Conquering Stagflation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this element is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.