Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T09:17:28.469Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New Frontiers in Language and Technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2023

Christopher Joseph Jenks
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands

Summary

The Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) describes the technological transformations that are incrementally, but radically, changing everyday life practices. Like previous industrial revolutions, technological advancements are so pervasive and impactful that everything from an individual's sense of identity and understanding of the world to the economic success of an entire industry are profoundly altered by 4IR innovation. Despite the significance of 4IR transformations, little applied linguistic research has examined how these emergent technologies collectively transform human behavior and communication. To this end, this Element identifies key 4IR issues and outlines how they relate to applied linguistic research. The Element argues that applied linguists are in an excellent position to contribute to such research, as expertise in language and communication is critical to understanding 4IR issues. However, to make interdisciplinary and wider societal contributions, applied linguists must rethink how 4IR technologies can be harnessed to more efficiently publish and disseminate timely research.
Get access
Type
Element
Information
Online ISBN: 9781009184403
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 13 July 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2021). Poverty and Access to Internet, by County: Social Determinants of Health. Social Determinants of Health Database. https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/references/examples/report-government-agency-references.Google Scholar
Alao, O. D., Joshua, J. V., & Akinsola, J. E. T. (2019). Human computer interaction (HCI) and smart home applications. IUP Journal of Information Technology, 15(3), 721.Google Scholar
Andersson, M. (2021). The climate of climate change: Impoliteness as a hallmark of homophily in YouTube comment threads on Greta Thunberg’s environmental activism. Journal of Pragmatics, 178, 93107.Google Scholar
Andrée, B. P. J., Chamorro, A., Spencer, P., Koomen, E., & Dogo, H. (2019). Revisiting the relation between economic growth and the environment; a global assessment of deforestation, pollution and carbon emission. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 114, 109221. www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032119304216.Google Scholar
Andujar, A., & Buchner, J. (2019). The potential of 3D virtual reality (VR) for language learning: An overview. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference Mobile Learning (pp. 153156). Utrecht.Google Scholar
Araujo, T., Helberger, N., Kruikemeier, S., & De Vreese, C. H. (2020). In AI we trust? Perceptions about automated decision-making by artificial intelligence. AI & SOCIETY, 35(3), 611623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, K. C., Chauncey, K., & Gajos, K. Z. (2020). Predictive text encourages predictable writing. March. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (pp. 128138). New York, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atala, A., & Yoo, J. J. (2015). Essentials of 3D Biofabrication and Translation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. (2018). In digital we trust: Bitcoin discourse, digital currencies, and decentralized network fetishism. Palgrave Communications, 4(1), 110.Google Scholar
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Barnard-Wills, D. (2012). Surveillance and Identity: Discourse, Subjectivity and the State. Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Barracuda. (2021). Bot Attacks: Top Threats and Trends. Volume 1. September. www.barracuda.com/bot-threat-report.Google Scholar
Bhatia, A., & Jenks, C. J. (2018). Fabricating the American dream in US media portrays of Syrian refugees: A discourse analytical study. Discourser & Communication, 12(3), 221239.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V. K., Candlin, C. N., & Engberg, J. (2008). Legal Discourse across Cultures and Systems. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Block, D. (2013). Social Class in Applied Linguistics. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, D., Gray, J., & Holborow, M. (2012). Neoliberalism and Applied Linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Boerman, S. C., Kruikemeier, S., & Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. J. (2021). Exploring motivations for online privacy protection behavior: Insights from panel data. Communication Research, 48(7), 953977.Google Scholar
Bonarini, A. (2020). Communication in human-robot interaction. Current Robotics Reports, 1, 279285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brock, A. (2018). Critical technocultural discourse analysis. New Media & Society, 20(3), 10121030.Google Scholar
Brumfit, C. J. (1995). Teacher professionalism and research. In Cook, G. & Seidlhofer, B. (Eds.), Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics (pp. 2741). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cap, P. (2017). The Language of Fear: Communicating Threat in Public Discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Chohan, U. W. (2021). Counter-Hegemonic Finance: The Gamestop Short Squeeze. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3775127.Google Scholar
Cronin, M. (1998). The cracked looking glass of servants: Translation and minority languages in a global age. The Translator, 4(2), 145162.Google Scholar
Crabtree, A. (2003). Taking technomethodology seriously: Hybrid change in the ethnomethodology–design relationship. European Journal of Information Systems, 13(3), 195209.Google Scholar
Conklin, K., Pellicer-Sánchez, A., & Carrol, G. (2018). Eye-Tracking: A Guide for Applied Linguistics Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Curran, N. M. (2020). Intersectional English(es) and the gig economy: Teaching English online. International Journal of Communication, 14, 26672686.Google Scholar
Curran, N. M. (2021). Discrimination in the gig economy: The experiences of Black online English teachers. Language and Education, 37(3), 115.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. (1993). Elite Discourse and Racism. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Dodigovic, M. (2005). Artificial Intelligence in Second Language Learning: Raising Error Awareness. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Due, B. L, & Toft, T. (2021). Phygital highlighting: Achieving joint visual attention when physically co-editing a digital text. Journal of Pragmatics, 177, 117.Google Scholar
Eggers, D. (2014). The Circle. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2022). Towards a Green, Digital and Resilient Economy: Our European Growth Model. Brussels: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.Google Scholar
Federal Bureau of Investigation (2020). Internet Crime Report 2020.Google Scholar
Feng, W., & Ren, W. (2020). Impoliteness in negative online consumer reviews: A cross- language and cross-sector comparison. Intercultural Pragmatics, 17(1), 125.Google Scholar
Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 298320.Google Scholar
Gamble, C. N., Hanan, J. S., & Nail, T. (2019). What is new materialism? Angelaki, 24(6), 111134.Google Scholar
Georgalou, M. (2016). “I make the rules on my Wall”: Privacy and identity management practices on Facebook. Discourse & Communication, 10(1), 4064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gourlay, L. (2020). Posthumanism and the Digital University: Texts, Bodies and Materialities. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Graham, M. (2019). Digital Economies at Global Margins. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grudin, J., & Jacques, R. (2019). Chatbots, humbots, and the quest for artificial general intelligence. May. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 111). Glasgow.Google Scholar
Guinchard, A. (2021). Our digital footprint under Covid-19: Should we fear the UK digital contact tracing app? International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 35(1), 8497.Google Scholar
Haff, P. (2014). Humans and technology in the Anthropocene: Six rules. The Anthropocene Review, 1(2), 126136.Google Scholar
Hagendorff, T. (2020). The ethics of AI ethics: An evaluation of guidelines. Minds and Machines, 30(1), 99120.Google Scholar
Hancock, J. T., Naaman, M., & Levy, K. (2020). AI-mediated communication: Definition, research agenda, and ethical considerations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 89100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemphill, T. A. (2002). Electronic commerce and consumer privacy: Establishing online trust in the US digital economy. Business and Society Review, 107(2), 221239.Google Scholar
Iivari, N., Kinnula, M., Molin-Juustila, T., & Kuure, L. (2016). Exclusions in social inclusion projects: Struggles in involving children in digital technology development. Info Systems, 28, 10201048.Google Scholar
Jenks, C. J. (2020). Applying critical discourse analysis to classrooms. Classroom Discourse, 11(2), 99106.Google Scholar
Jordan, M. I., & Mitchell, T. M. (2015). Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science, 349(6245), 255260.Google Scholar
Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366410.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lock, S. (2021). “Not great news”: US boss fires 900 employees on a Zoom call. The Guardian. December 7. www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/dec/07/not-great-news-us-boss-fires-900-employees-on-a-zoom-call.Google Scholar
Master, F. (2021). Meet Grace, the healthcare robot COVID-19 created. Reuters. June 9. www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/meet-grace-healthcare-robot-covid-19-created-2021–06–09/.Google Scholar
McIlvenny, P. (2019). “It’s going to be very slippery”: Snow, space and mobility while learning cross-country skiing. In Jensen, O. B., Lassen, C. & Lange, I. S. G. (Eds.), Material Mobilities (pp. 77100). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Merlino, S., & Mondada, L. (2019). Crossing the street: How pedestrians interact with cars. Language & Communication, 65, 131147.Google Scholar
Mulligan, C. (2018). Blockchain and sustainable growth. United Nations: UN Chronicle, LV(3&4). December. www.un.org/en/un-chronicle/blockchain-and-sustainable-growth.Google Scholar
Narayanan, A., Bonneau, J., Felten, E., Miller, A., & Goldfeder, S. (2016). Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Technologies: A Comprehensive Introduction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
O’Halloran, K. (2022). Posthumanism and corpus linguistics. In O’Keeffe, A. & McCarthy, M.J. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics (pp. 675692). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2017). Posthumanist Applied Linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2018a). Applied linguistics as epistemic assemblage. AILA Review, 31, 113134.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2018b). Posthumanist applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 39(4), 445461.Google Scholar
Pilkington, M. (2016). Blockchain technology: Principles and applications. In Xavier Olleros, F. & Zhegu, M. (Eds.), Research Handbook on Digital Transformations (pp. 225253). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399441.Google Scholar
Rambe, P. (2012). Critical discourse analysis of collaborative engagement in Facebook postings. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.875.Google Scholar
Ricento, T. (Ed.). (2015). Language Policy and Political Economy: English in a Global Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Risse, M. (2018). Human rights and artificial intelligence: An urgently needed agenda. Human Rights Quarterly, 41, 117.Google Scholar
Rosentiel, T. (2012). State of the news media 2012. Pew Research Center. www.pewresearch.org/2012/03/19/state-of-the-news-media–2012/.Google Scholar
Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. London: Portfolio Penguin.Google Scholar
Schwab, K. (2018). Shaping the Future of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. New York: Currency.Google Scholar
Shilton, K., & Greene, D. (2019). Linking platforms, practices, and developer ethics: Levers for privacy discourse in mobile application development. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(1), 131146.Google Scholar
Silverman, C., Timberg, C., Kao, J., & Merrill, J. B. (2022). Facebook hosted surge of misinformation and insurrection threats in months leading up to Jan. 6 attack, records show. Propublica. www.propublica.org/article/facebook-hosted-surge-of-misinformation-and-insurrection-threats-in-months-leading-up-to-jan-6-attack-records-show.Google Scholar
Sismondo, S. (2009). An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ten Have, P. (2005). The notion of member is the heart of the matter: On the role of membership knowledge in ethnomethodological inquiry. Historical Social Research, 30(1), 2853.Google Scholar
Thomas, D. (2020). Cybercrime Losses: An eExamination of U.S. Manufacturing and the Totaleconomy. Advanced Manufacturing Series (NIST AMS), National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AMS.100-32.Google Scholar
Varis, P. (2019). Conspiracy theorising online: Memes as a conspiracy theory genre. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies No. 238. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.tilburguniversity.edu/sites/default/files/download/TPCS_238-Varis.pdf.Google Scholar
Verduyn, P., Ybarra, O., Résibois, M., Jonides, J., & Kross, E. (2017). Do social network sites enhance or undermine subjective well‐being? A critical review. Social Issues and Policy Review, 11(1), 274302.Google Scholar
Vincent, J. (2022). Meta announces plans to build an AI-powered “universal speech translator.” The Verge. February 23. www.theverge.com/2022/2/23/22947368/meta-facebook-ai-universal-speech-translation-project.Google Scholar
Wang, S. (2021). Consumers beware: How are your favorite “free” investment apps regulated? Duke Law & Technology Review, 19, 4358.Google Scholar
Weizenbaum, J. (1966). ELIZA—A computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Computational Linguistics, 9(1), 3645.Google Scholar
West, D. W. (2015). Digital Divide: Improving Internet Access in the Developing World through Affordable Services and Diverse Content. The Brookings Institute. www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/West_Internet-Access.pdf.Google Scholar
Williams, H. T., McMurray, J. R., Kurz, T., & Lambert, F. H. (2015). Network analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social media discussions of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 32, 126138.Google Scholar
Wolfe, C. (2010). What is Posthumanism? Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Yin, R., Wang, D., Zhao, S., Lou, Z., & Shen, G. (2021). Wearable sensors‐enabled human–machine interaction systems: From design to application. Advanced Functional Materials, 31(11), 2008936. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adfm.202008936.Google Scholar
Young, H. (2015). The digital language divide. Guardian. http://labs.theguardian.com/digital-language-divide/.Google Scholar
Zúñiga, H., Copeland, L., & Bimber, B. (2013). Political consumerism: Civic engagement and the social media connection. New Media & Society, 16(3), 488506.Google Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

New Frontiers in Language and Technology
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

New Frontiers in Language and Technology
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

New Frontiers in Language and Technology
Available formats
×