Element contents
Parties and New Technologies in Latin America
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 November 2024
Summary
This Element analyzes the incorporation of new information and communication technologies (ICTs) by different parties in Latin America to organize volunteers and mobilize supporters during elections. It assesses ICT-related changes in how parties recruit prospective candidates, collect information about citizens' preferences, and mobilize for elections and how these changes have reduced the power of the rank and file within party organizations. Party leaders have an incentive to incorporate new ICTs to increase electoral efficacy and reduce the role of rank-and-file members in performing essential party functions. However, the result of the incorporation of technology depends on leaders' capacity to control the process within the party. Based on case studies of ICT incorporation by various Latin American parties and electoral campaigns, the authors posit that the incorporation of technology will consolidate a power dynamic that predates the adoption of ICTs to fulfill organizational functions.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009623018Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 09 January 2025
References
Aldrich, John. 1995. Why Parties?: The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John, Gibson, Rachel, Cantijoch, Marta, and Konitzer, Tobias. 2016. “Getting Out the Vote in the Social Media Era: Are Digital Tools Changing the Extent, Nature and Impact of Party Contacting in Elections?” Party Politics 22 (2): 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anria, Santiago, Pérez Bentancur, Verónica, Piñeiro Rodríguez, Rafael, and Rosenblatt, Fernando. 2022. “Agents of Representation: The Organic Connection between Society and Leftist Parties in Bolivia and Uruguay.” Politics & Society 50 (3): 384–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin-Philippi, Jessica. 2015. Using Technology, Building Democracy: Digital Campaigning and the Construction of Citizenship. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barberà, Oscar, Sandri, Giulia, Correa, Patricia, and Rodríguez-Teruel, Juan. 2021. “Political Parties Transition into the Digital Era.” In Digital Parties: The Challenges of Online Organisation and Participation, edited by Barberà, Oscar, Sandri, Giulia, Correa, Patricia, and Rodríguez-Teruel, Juan, 1–22. Cham: Springer International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
dos Santos, Bastos, Guilherme, João, Freitas, Miguel, Aldé, Alessandra, Santos, Karina, and Cristine Cardozo Cunha, Vanessa. 2019. “WhatsApp, política mobile e desinformação: a hidra nas eleições presidenciais de 2018.” Comunicação & Sociedade 41 (2): 307–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bene, Marton. 2017. “Go Viral on the Facebook! Interactions between Candidates and Followers on Facebook during the Hungarian General Election Campaign of 2014.” Information, Communication & Society 20 (4): 513–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benkler, Yochai, Faris, Robert, and Roberts, Hal. 2018. Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance, and Segerberg, Alexandra. 2013. The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance, and Livingston, Steven. 2020. The Disinformation Age: Politics, Technology, and Disruptive Communication in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biancalana, Cecilia, and Vittori, Davide. 2021. “Cyber-Parties’ Membership between Empowerment and Pseudo-participation: The Cases of Podemos and the Five Star Movement.” In Digital Parties: The Challenges of Online Organisation and Participation, edited by Barberà, Oscar, Sandri, Giulia, Correa, Patricia, and Rodríguez-Teruel, Juan, 109–126. Cham: Springer International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biancalana, Cecilia, and Vittori, Davide 2023. “Business as Usual? How Gamification Transforms Internal Party Democracy.” The Information Society 39 (5): 282–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2023.2241470. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2023.2241470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bimber, Bruce. 2003. Information and American Democracy: Technology in the Evolution of Political Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bimber, Bruce, Flanagin, Andrew, and Stohl, Cynthia. 2012. Collective Action in Organizations. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogliaccini, Ariel, Juan, Borba, Ignacio, Giambruno, Cecilia, Opertti, Martín, and Piñeiro Rodríguez, Rafael. 2019. Twittarquía: La Política de las Redes en Uruguay. Montevideo: Túnel – Universidad Católica del Uruguay.Google Scholar
Bond, Becky, and Exley, Zack. 2016. Rules for Revolutionaries: How Big Organizing Can Change Everything. White River Junction: Chelsea Green.Google Scholar
Brinks, Daniel M., Levitsky, Steven, and Victoria Murillo, Maria. 2020. Understanding Institutional Weakness: Power and Design in Latin American Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buquet, Daniel, Chasquetti, Daniel, and Andrés Moraes, Juan. 1998. Fragmentación Política y Gobierno en Uruguay: ¿Un Enfermo Imaginario? Montevideo: Facultad de Ciencias Sociales.Google Scholar
Buquet, Daniel, and Andrés Moraes, Juan. 2018. “Construyendo un Equilibrio Democrático: La Reforma Constitucional de Uruguay en 1917.” Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política 27 (1): 19–39.Google Scholar
Carrillo, Arturo J., and Jackson, Matías. 2022. “Follow the Leader? A Comparative Law Study of the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation’s Impact in Latin America.” Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law 16 (2): 177–262.Google Scholar
Chadwick, Andrew. 2017. The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corredor, Paola. 2022. “El Éxito y el Fracaso de la Campaña Presidencial de Rodolfo Hernández.” Licenciatura en Ciencia Política, Departamento de Ciencia Política, Universidad de los Andes.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems: Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell, McAllister, Ian, and Wattenberg, Martin. 2000. “The Consequences of Partisan Dealignment.” In Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, edited by Dalton, Russell and Wattenberg, Martin, 37–63. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell, and Wattenberg, Martin, eds. 2000. Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: University Press Oxford.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell, and Weldon, Steven. 2007. “Partisanship and Party System Institutionalization.” Party Politics 13 (2): 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Stuart, and Straubhaar, Joe. 2020. “Producing Antipetismo: Media Activism and the Rise of the Radical, Nationalist Right in Contemporary Brazil.” International Communication Gazette 82 (1): 82–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Blasio, Emiliana, and Viviani, Lorenzo. 2020. “Platform Party between Digital Activism and Hyper-Leadership: The Reshaping of the Public Sphere.” 8 (4): 16–17. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i4.3230. www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3230.Google Scholar
Dommett, Katharine. 2020. “Roadblocks to Interactive Digital Adoption? Elite Perspectives of Party Practices in the United Kingdom.” Party Politics 26 (2): 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068818761196. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1354068818761196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enli, Gunn Sara, and Skogerbø, Eli. 2013. “Personalized Campaigns in Party-Centred Politics: Twitter and Facebook as Arenas for Political Communication.” Information, Communication & Society 16 (5): 757–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Ben. 2018. The Only Constant Is Change: Technology, Political Communication, and Innovation over Time. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evangelista, Rafael, and Bruno, Fernanda. 2019. “WhatsApp and Political Instability in Brazil: Targeted Messages and Political Radicalisation.” Internet Policy Review 8 (4): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gainous, Jason, and Wagner, Kevin M.. 2014. Tweeting to Power: The Social Media Revolution in American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ganz, Marshall. 2009. Why David Sometimes Wins: Leadership, Organization, and Strategy in the California Farm Worker Movement. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Alexander L., and Bennett, Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gerbaudo, Paolo. 2021. “Are Digital Parties More Democratic than Traditional Parties? Evaluating Podemos and Movimento 5 Stelle’s Online Decision-Making Platforms.” Party Politics 27 (4): 730–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Rachel. 2015. “Party Change, Social Media and the Rise of ‘Citizen-Initiated’ Campaigning.” Party politics 21 (2): 183–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Rachel 2020. When the Nerds Go Marching in: How Digital Technology Moved from the Margins to the Mainstream of Political Campaigns. New york: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Rachel, Greffet, Fabienne, and Cantijoch, Marta. 2017. “Friend or Foe? Digital Technologies and the Changing Nature of Party Membership.” Political Communication 34 (1): 89–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1221011. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1221011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, Raul, and Ramiro, Luis. 2019. “The Limits of Organizational Innovation and Multi-Speed Membership: Podemos and Its New Forms of Party Membership.” Party Politics 25 (4): 534–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817742844. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1354068817742844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Cacheda, Bruno, and Cancela Outeda, Celso. 2024. “Digitalisation and Political Parties in Europe.” Party Politics 0 (0): 13540688231225639. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688231225639. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/13540688231225639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandinetti, Juan. 2015. “‘Mirar para Adelante’: Tres Dimensiones de la Juventud en la Militancia de Jóvenes PRO.” In Hagamos Equipo: PRO y la Construcción de la Nueva Derecha en Argentina, edited by Vommaro, Gabiel and Morresi, Sergio, 231–263. Los Polvorines: Ediciones UNGS.Google Scholar
Guess, Andrew M., and Lyons, Benjamin A.. 2020. “Misinformation, Disinformation, and Online Propaganda.” In Social Media and Democracy: The State of the Field, Prospects for Reform, edited by Persily, Nathaniel and Tucker, Joshua, 10–33. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Hahrie. 2014. How Organizations Develop Activists: Civic Associations and Leadership in the 21st Century. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazan, Reuven, and Rahat, Gideon. 2010. Democracy within Parties: Candidate Selection Methods and Their Political Consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hersh, Eitan D. 2015. Hacking the Electorate: How Campaigns Perceive Voters. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Invernizzi-Accetti, Carlo, and Wolkenstein, Fabio. 2017. “The Crisis of Party Democracy, Cognitive Mobilization, and the Case for Making Parties More Deliberative.” American Political Science Review 111 (1): 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Issenberg, Sasha. 2012. The Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Kristof, and Spierings, Niels. 2019. “A Populist Paradise? Examining Populists’ Twitter Adoption and Use.” Information, Communication & Society 22 (12): 1681–1696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jäger, Kai. 2017. “The Potential of Online Sampling for Studying Political Activists Around the World and across Time.” Political Analysis 25 (3): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpf, David. 2012. The MoveOn Effect: The Unexpected Transformation of American Political Advocacy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpf, David 2016. Analytic Activism: Digital Listening and the New Political Strategy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Richard, and Mair, Peter, eds. 1994. How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, Hawkins, Kirk, Pablo Luna, Juan, Rosas, Guillermo, and Zechmeister, Elizabeth. 2010. Latin American Party Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreiss, Daniel. 2012. Taking Our Country Back: The Crafting of Networked Politics from Howard Dean to Barack Obama. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreiss, Daniel 2016. Prototype Politics: Technology-Intensive Campaigning and the Data of Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniel, Kreiss, and Saffer, Adam J.. 2017. “Networks and Innovation in the Production of Communication: Explaining Innovations in U.S. Electoral Campaigning from 2004 to 2012.” Journal of Communication 67 (4): 521–544.Google Scholar
Larrain, Guillermo, Negretto, Gabriel, and Voigt, Stefan. 2023. “How Not to Write a Constitution: Lessons from Chile.” Public Choice 194 (3–4): 233–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levitsky, Steven, Loxton, James, and Van Dyck, Brandon. 2016. “Introduction.” In Challenges of Party-Building in Latin America, edited by Levitsky, Steven, Loxton, James, Dyck, Brandon Van, and Domínguez, Jorge, 1–48. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo. 2014. Segmented Representation: Political Party Strategies in Unequal Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo, Pérez, Cristian, Toro, Sergio, et al. 2022. “Much Ado about Facebook? Evidence from 80 Congressional Campaigns in Chile.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 19 (2): 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2021.1936334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo , Piñeiro Rodríguez, Rafael, Rosenblatt, Fernando, and Vommaro, Gabriel. 2021. Diminished Parties: Democratic Representation in Contemporary Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machado, Caio, Kira, Beatriz, Narayanan, Vidya, Kollanyi, Bence, and Howard, Philip. 2019. “A Study of Misinformation in WhatsApp Groups with a Focus on the Brazilian Presidential Elections.” Companion Proceedings of the 2019 World Wide Web Conference, San Francisco, USA.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, ed. 2018. Party Systems in Latin America: Institutionalization, Decay, and Collapse. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Zoco, Edurne. 2007. “Political Sequences and the Stabilization of Interparty Competition.” Party Politics 13 (2): 155–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAlevey, Jane. 2016. No Shortcuts: Organizing for Power in the New Gilded Age. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenna, Elizabeth, and Han, Hahrie. 2014. Groundbreakers: How Obama’s 2.2 Million Volunteers Transformed Campaigning in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morresi, Sergio, and Vommaro, Gabriel. 2014. “Argentina: The Difficulties of the Partisan Right and the Case of Propuesta Republicana.” In The Resilience of the Latin American Right, edited by Luna, Juan Pablo and Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira, 319–342. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis. 2011. “Mundane Internet Tools, Mobilizing Practices, and the Coproduction of Citizenship in Political Campaigns.” New Media & Society 13 (5): 755–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis 2012. Ground Wars: Personalized Communication in Political Campaigns. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nocetto, Lihuen, Pérez Bentancur, Verónica, Piñeiro Rodríguez, Rafael, and Rosenblatt, Fernando. 2021. “Unorganized Politics. The Political Aftermath of the Social Unrest in Chile.” America Political Science Association, Seattle, Washington, September 30–October 3.Google Scholar
Panebianco, Angelo. 1988. Political Parties: Organization and Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parasuraman, A. 2000. “Technology Readiness Index (Tri): A Multiple-Item Scale to Measure Readiness to Embrace New Technologies.” Journal of Service Research 2 (4): 307–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez Antón, Romeo. 1988. “Cuatro Antagonismos Sucesivos: La Concreta Instauración de la Democracia Uruguaya.” Revista de Ciencia Política (2), 41–59.Google Scholar
Bentancur, Pérez, Verónica, Rafael Piñeiro Rodríguez, and Rosenblatt, Fernando. 2020. How Party Activism Survives: Uruguay´s Frente Amplio. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Piaia, Victor, and Alves, Marcelo. 2020. “Abrindo a caixa preta: análise exploratória da rede bolsonarista no WhatsApp.” Intercom: Revista Brasileira de Ciências da Comunicação 43: 135–154.Google Scholar
Raniolo, Francesco, Tarditi, Valeria, and Vittori, Davide. 2021. “Political Parties and New ICTs: Between Tradition and Innovation.” In Digital Parties: The Challenges of Online Organisation and Participation, edited by Barberà, Oscar, Sandri, Giulia, Correa, Patricia, and Rodríguez-Teruel, Juan, 181–204. Cham: Springer International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resende, Gustavo, Melo, Philipe, Sousa, Hugo, et al. 2019. “(Mis) Information Dissemination in WhatsApp: Gathering, Analyzing and Countermeasures.” The World Wide Web Conference, San Francisco, May 13–17.Google Scholar
Rights, Office of the High Commissioner for Human. 2021. The Right to Privacy in the Digital Age: Report (2021). United Nations. www.ohchr.org/en/calls-for-input/2021/right-privacy-digital-age-report-2021.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth . 2014. Changing Course in Latin America: Party Systems in the Neoliberal Era. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, Laura, Schulz, Jeremy, Dodel, Matías, et al. 2020. “Digital Inclusion across the Americas and Caribbean.” Social Inclusion 8 (2): 244–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Römmele, Andrea . 2003. “Political Parties, Party Communication and New Information and Communication Technologies.” Party Politics 9 (1): 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scarrow, Susan. 2015. Beyond Party Members: Changing Approaches to Partisan Mobilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scarrow, Susan, Webb, Paul, and Poguntke, Thomas. 2017. Organizing Political Parties: Representation, Participation, and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmuck, Desirée, and Hameleers, Michael. 2020. “Closer to the People: A Comparative Content Analysis of Populist Communication on Social Networking Sites in pre-and post-Election Periods.” Information, Communication & Society 23 (10): 1531–1548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siavelis, Peter M., and Morgenstern, Scott, eds. 2008. Pathways to Power: Political Recruitment and Candidate Selection in Latin America. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, Arthur. 1968. Constructing Social Theories. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Stromer-Galley, Jennifer. 2019. Presidential Campaigning in the Internet Age. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treré, Emiliano. 2020. “The Banality of WhatsApp: On the Everyday Politics of Backstage Activism in Mexico and Spain.” First Monday 25 (12).Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 1995. “Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism.” British Journal of Political Science 25 (3): 289–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufekci, Zeynep. 2017. Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Vaccari, Cristian, and Valeriani, Augusto. 2016. “Party Campaigners or Citizen Campaigners? How Social Media Deepen and Broaden Party-Related Engagement.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 21 (3): 294–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dyck, Brandon. 2017. “The Paradox of Adversity: The Contrasting Fates of Latin America’s New Left Parties.” Comparative Politics 49 (2): 169–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dyck, Brandon 2021. Democracy against Parties: The Divergent Fates of Latin America’s New Left Contenders. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vommaro, Gabriel. 2017. La Larga Marcha de Cambiemos. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores.Google Scholar
Vommaro, Gabriel 2023. Conservatives against the Tide: The Rise of the Argentine PRO in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this element is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.