Element contents
Series: Elements in Phonetics
The Phonetics of Tarifit
Variation and Change in a Moroccan Amazigh Language
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 February 2026
Summary
Tarifit is an Amazigh language spoken in northern Morocco. This Element provides an overview of some aspects of the phonetics of this under-studied language, focusing on patterns of variation and ongoing sound changes. An acoustic analysis of productions by native speakers is provided, comparing clear and fast speaking styles, focusing on the phonetic realization of vowels in Tarifit: three full vowels /a, i, and u/, and variation in the realization of schwa. The analysis reveals phonetically vowelless words in Tarifit: vowelless productions are a rare, but are allowable variants of some words (especially those containing multiple voiceless obstruents). Another ongoing sound change is explored: post-vocalic /r/ deletion. We find higher rates of r-dropping by female speakers. A perception study investigating native speakers' discrimination of words is presented. This Element discusses what the findings have for models of phonetic variation, individual differences in language production, and sound change theory.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in PhoneticsOnline ISBN: 9781009661218Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 05 March 2026
References
Adda-Decker, M., de Mareüil, P. B., Adda, G., & Lamel, L. (2005). Investigating syllabic structures and their variation in spontaneous French. Speech Communication, 46(2), 119–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Turki, B., & Bouhfad, T. (2023). Teaching the Amazigh language in Morocco: The ambition of generalization, the constraints of implementation, and the question of development. Tidghin, 11, 93–106.Google Scholar
[(التركي، إ. & بوحفاض، ت. (2023)، تدريس اللغة الأمازيغية بالمغرب: بني طموح التعميم وإكراهات التنزيل وسؤال التنمية. تيدغين، العدد11.)]Google Scholar
Amrous, N., & Bensoukas, K. (2004). Tarifiyt long vowels and diphthongs: Independent phonemes or simple phonetic variants of the basic Amazigh vowels? In Boumal, A. & Ameur, M. (Eds.), Standardisation de l’amazighe (pp. 117–139). IRCAM.Google Scholar
Amrous, N., & Bensoukas, K. (2006). Coerced vowel weight in Tarifiyt Berber: A comparison of three dialects. Languages and Linguistics, 18(19), 1–30.Google Scholar
Aoki, N. B., & Zellou, G. (2024). Being clear about clear speech: Intelligibility of hard-of-hearing-directed, non-native-directed, and casual speech for L1-and L2-English listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 104, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2024.101328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baese-Berk, M., & Goldrick, M. (2009). Mechanisms of interaction in speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(4), 527–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802299378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banhakeia, H., & Farhad, H. (2011). Problèmes et règles d’insertion du schwa en tarifit: Analyse de cas et propositions. Tawiza, 69, 3–4.Google Scholar
Barreda, S. (2020). Vowel normalization as perceptual constancy. Language, 96(2), 224–254. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lan.2020.0018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beddor, P. S. (2009). A coarticulatory path to sound change. Language, 85(4), 785–821. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belhiah, H., Majdoubi, M., & Safwate, M. (2020). Language revitalization through the media: A case study of Amazigh in Morocco. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2020(266), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2020-2114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berent, I., Lennertz, T., Jun, J., Moreno, M. A., & Smolensky, P. (2009). Language universals in human brains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(18), 6829–6834. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0801469105[1].Google Scholar
Berrebi, S., Bat-El, O., & Meltzer-Asscher, A. (2023). The roots of consonant bias in semitic languages: A critical review of psycholinguistic studies of languages with non-concatenative morphology. Morphology, 33(3), 225–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-023-09409-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, J. (2004). Evolutionary phonology: The emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouarourou, F. (2014). La gémination en tarifit: considérations phonologiques, étude acoustique et articulatoire. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Strasbourg].Google Scholar
Bouarourou, F., Vaxelaire, B., Laprie, Y., Ridouane, R., & Sock, R. (2018). The timing of geminate consonants in Tarifit Berber. Procedia Computer Science, 128, 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.03.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouarourou, F., Bouzidi, S., Vaxelaire, B., & Sock, R. (2020). Geminate consonants in Tarifit: phonetic correlates and perceptual cues. In Adak, M. El (Ed.), Les études linguistiques et littéraires amazighes: Quelles tendances au cours des deux dernières décennies?: Mélanges en hommage à Cadi Kaddour (pp. 66–82). Faculté des Lettres et des Sciences Humaines, Oujda.Google Scholar
Bouferroum, O., & Boudraa, M. (2015). CV coarticulation, locus and locus equation perspective on the invariance issue involving Algerian Arabic consonants. Journal of Phonetics, 50, 120–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2015.03.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boukous, A. (2014). The planning of standardizing Amazigh language; The Moroccan experience. Iles d Imesli, 6, 7–23.Google Scholar
Bradlow, A. R. (2002). Confluent talker-and listener-oriented forces in clear speech production. In Gussenhoven, C. & Warner, N. (Eds.), Laboratory Phonology 7 (pp. 241–273). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradlow, A. R., Torretta, G. M., & Pisoni, D. B. (1996). Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics. Speech Communication, 20(3–4), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(96)00063-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1992). Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica, 49(3–4), 155–180. https://doi.org/10.1159/000261913.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buz, E., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). Dynamically adapted context-specific hyper-articulation: Feedback from interlocutors affects speakers’ subsequent pronunciations. Journal of Memory and Language, 89, 68–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.12.009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camps, G. (1995). Société, langues et cultures au Maroc. Publications de la Faculté des Lettres et des Sciences Humaines.Google Scholar
Census, Morocco. (2024). Population légale du Royaume du Maroc répartie par régions, provinces et préfectures et communes selon les résultats du Recensement général de la population et de l’habitat 2024. Haut-Commisariat Au Plan.Google Scholar
Chasaide, A. N. (1985). Preaspiration in phonological stop contrasts: An instrumental phonetic study. [Doctoral dissertation, University College of North Wales].Google Scholar
Chen, F. R. (1980). Acoustic characteristics and intelligibility of clear and conversational speech at the segmental level. [Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology].Google Scholar
Chtatou, M. (1997). The influence of the Berber language on Moroccan Arabic. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 1997(123), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1997.123.101.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. (1990). The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In Kingston, J. & Beckman, M. E. (Eds.) Papers in laboratory phonology (pp. 283–333). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crouch, C., Katsika, A., & Chitoran, I. (2023). Sonority sequencing and its relationship to articulatory timing in Georgian. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 53(3), 1049–1072. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100323000026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, L., & Stone, M. (2003). Epenthesis versus gestural mistiming in consonant cluster production: An ultrasound study. In Garding, G. & Tsujimura, M. (Eds.), Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (Vol. 22, pp. 165–178). Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
de Jong, N. H., Pacilly, J., & Heeren, W. (2021). PRAAT scripts to measure speed fluency and breakdown fluency in speech automatically. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 28(4), 456–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2021.1951162.Google Scholar
Dell, F., & Elmedlaoui, M. (2012). Syllables in Tashlhiyt Berber and in Moroccan Arabic. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Dell, F., & Tangi, O. (1992). Syllabification and empty nuclei in Ath-Sidhar Rifian Berber. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics, 13, 125–162. https://doi.org/10.1515/jall.1992.13.2.125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberhard, D. M., Simons, G. F., & Fennig, C. D. (Eds.). 2025. Ethnologue: Languages of the world. Twenty-eighth edition. SIL International. Online version: http://www.ethnologue.com.Google Scholar
El Guabli, B. (2025). Amazigh Indigenous post-coloniality and Maghreb/North African studies. The Journal of North African Studies, 30(2),163–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629387.2024.2436701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Guabli, B., & Boum, A. (2022). The Amazigh republic of letters: A review and close readings. Review of Middle East Studies, 56(2), 162–170. https://doi.org/10.1017/rms.2023.25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elouatiq, A., Kidd, E., & Rowland, C. F. (2024). The acquisition sketch approach to child language documentation: The phonology of Tashlhiyt’s infant-directed speech. In the 53rd Colloquium on African Languages and Linguistics. August 26–28, 2024.Google Scholar
Embarki, M., Guilleminot, C., Yeou, M., & Al Maqtari, S. (2007). Résistance coarticulatoire dans les séquences VCV en contexte pharyngalisé vs non pharyngalisé en arabe moderne et dialectal. In Dodane, C. & Embarki, M. (Eds.), Workshop international: La coarticulation: indices, direction et représentation (pp. 39–42). Montpellier, France.Google Scholar
Farhad, E. H. (2017). Regard critique sur l’alphabet adopté pour enseigner l’amazighe au Maroc. Timsal N Tamazight, 8, 19–35.Google Scholar
Ferguson, S. H., & Kewley-Port, D. (2002). Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112(1), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1482078.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleischhacker, H. (2001). Cluster-dependent epenthesis asymmetries. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics, 7, 71–116.Google Scholar
Flemming, E. (2009). The phonetics of schwa vowels. Phonological Weakness in English, 493, 78–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, C. A. (1984). Segmentation of coarticulated speech in perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 36(4), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gagne, J. P., Querengesser, C., Folkeard, P., Munhall, K. G., & Mastern, V. M. (1995). Auditory, visual, and audiovisual speech intelligibility for sentence-length stimuli: An investigation of conversational and clear speech. The Volta Review, 97, 33–51.Google Scholar
Hall, N. (2006). Cross-linguistic patterns of vowel intrusion. Phonology, 23(3), 387–429. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675706000996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, N. (2024). Intrusive and epenthetic vowels revisited. In Kim, J. Y., Miatto, V., Petrović, A., & Repetti, L. (Eds.), Epenthesis and beyond: Recent approaches to insertion in phonology and its interfaces (pp. 167–197). Language Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Harrington, J., Kleber, F., Reubold, U., Schiel, F., & Stevens, M. (2019). The phonetic basis of the origin and spread of sound change. In Katz, W. & Assmann, P. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of phonetics (pp. 401–426). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfer, K. S. (1997). Auditory and auditory-visual perception of clear and conversational speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40(2), 432–443. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4002.432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hermes, A., Mücke, D., & Auris, B. (2017). The variability of syllable patterns in Tashlhiyt Berber and Polish. Journal of Phonetics, 64, 127–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, J. B. (1978). Constraints on schwa-deletion in American English. Recent Developments in Historical Phonology, 4, 131–208.Google Scholar
Ishihara, T. (2016). Endangered languages: Restoration of the Berber languages and the Tifinagh scripts. Collected Papers of the Humanities, 9, 1–17.Google Scholar
Jung, Y. J., & Dmitrieva, O. (2023). Acoustic properties of non-native clear speech: Korean speakers of English. Speech Communication, 154, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2023.102982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, D., & Clayards, M. (2019). Individual differences in the link between perception and production and the mechanisms of phonetic imitation. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(6), 769–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdom of Morocco. (2011). Constitution of the Kingdom of Morocco. [English translation]. Retrieved from https://constitutionnet.org/sites/default/files/the_2011_moroccan_constitution_english.pdf.Google Scholar
Cohn, A. C. (1989). Stress in Indonesian and bracketing paradoxes. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 7(2), 167–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kossmann, M. (1995). Schwa en berbère. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics, 16(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1515/jall.1995.16.1.71.Google Scholar
Kossmann, M. (2009). Loanwords in Tarifiyt, a Berber language of Morocco. In Haspelmath, M. & Tadmor, U. (Eds.), Loanwords in the world’s languages. A comparative handbook (pp. 191–214). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110218442.191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kossmann, M. (2012). Berber. In Frajzyngier, Z., & Shay, E. (Eds.), The Afroasiatic Languages (pp. 18–101). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krause, J. C., & Braida, L. D. (2002). Investigating alternative forms of clear speech: The effects of speaking rate and speaking mode on intelligibility. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112(5), 2165–2172. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1509432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1986). The social origins of sound change. In Allen, H. & Linn, M. (Eds.), Dialect and language variation (pp. 524–541). Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafkioui, M. B. (2007). Atlas linguistique des variétés berbères du Rif. Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar
Lafkioui, M. B. (2011). How system-internal linguistic factors indicate language change and diffusion. A geolinguistic analysis of Berber data. Dialectologia et geolinguistica, 19(1), 62–80. https://doi.org/10.1515/dig.2011.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafkioui, M. B. (2017). Rif: la langue (rifain/tarifit). Encyclopédie Berbère, 41, 6916–6956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafkioui, M. B. (2018). Berber languages and linguistics. Oxford Bibliographies Online. 1–18. DOI: 10.1093/OBO/9780199772810-0219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafkioui, M. B. (2024). Tamazight. A multi-millennial journey of a language family and its cultural practices. Las Lenguas y las Literaturas de África del Norte, 1–10.Google Scholar
Lahrouchi, M. (2010). On the internal structure of Tashlhiyt Berber triconsonantal roots. Linguistic Inquiry, 41(2), 255–285. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2010.41.2.255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, E., Scobbie, J. M., & Stuart‐Smith, J. (2011). The social stratification of tongue shape for postvocalic/r/in Scottish English1. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 15(2), 256–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00464.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, B. (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In Hardcastle, W. J. & Marchal, A. (Eds.), Speech production and speech modelling (pp. 403–439).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2037-8_16[1] (https://sci-hub.se/10.1007/978-94-009-2037-8_16).Google Scholar
Maddieson, I. (2013). Consonant-vowel ratio. The world atlas of language structures online. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at http://wals.Info.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. J. (1981). A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry, 12(3), 373-418.Google Scholar
McClelland, C. W. (1996). Interrelations of prosody, clause structure and discourse pragmatics in Tarifit Berber. The University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
McClelland, C. W. (2004). A Tarifit Berber-English dictionary: Documenting an endangered language. Lincom.Google Scholar
Moon, S. J., & Lindblom, B. (1994). Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96(1), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.410492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mourigh, K., & Kossmann, M. (2019). An introduction to Tarifiyt Berber (Nador, Morocco). Ugarit-Verlag.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. J. (1993). Sound change as nature’s speech perception experiment. Speech Communication, 13(1–2), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6393(93)90067-U[1].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, M. (1999). The seeds of sound change: Data from connected speech. In Bak, S. Y. & Ahn, H. D. (Eds.), Linguistics in the morning calm, iv: Selected papers from SICOL 97 (pp. 263–74). Hanshin Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Parker, S. G. (2002). Quantifying the sonority hierarchy. [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst].Google Scholar
Payton, K. L., Uchanski, R. M., & Braida, L. D. (1994). Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95(3), 1581–1592. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.408545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penchoen, T. G. (1973). Tamazight of the Ayt Ndhir. African Studies Center, University of California.Google Scholar
Peperkamp, S., & Dupoux, E. (2007). Learning the mapping from surface to underlying representations in an artificial language. Laboratory Phonology, 9, 315–338.Google Scholar
Phatak, S. A., & Allen, J. B. (2007). Consonant and vowel confusions in speech-weighted noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(4), 2312–2326. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2642397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Picheny, M. A., Durlach, N. I., & Braida, L. D. (1985). Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing: I. Intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28(1), 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2801.96[1](https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1985-20581-001).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Picheny, M. A., Durlach, N. I., & Braida, L. D. (1986). Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 29(4), 434–446. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2904.434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2016). Phonological representation: Beyond abstract versus episodic. Annual Review of Linguistics, 2(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030514-125050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouplier, M., & Beňuš, Š. (2011). On the phonetic status of syllabic consonants: Evidence from Slovak. Laboratory Phonology, 2(2), 243–273. https://doi.org/10.1515/labphon.2011.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recasens, D. (2023). Diachronic aspects of stressed schwa. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 35(1), 175–214. DOI: 10.26346/1120-2726-215.Google Scholar
Reino, T. (2007). Language Attitudes: Amazigh in Morocco. [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst].Google Scholar
Ridouane, R. (2008). Syllables without vowels: Phonetic and phonological evidence from Tashlhiyt Berber. Phonology, 25(2), 321–359. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675708001498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridouane, R., & Cooper-Leavitt, J. (2019). A story of two schwas: A production study from Tashlhiyt. Phonology, 36(3), 433–456. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675719000216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridouane, R., & Fougeron, C. (2011). Schwa elements in Tashlhiyt word-initial clusters. Laboratory Phonology, 2(2), 275–300. https://doi.org/10.1515/labphon.2011.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarborough, R., & Zellou, G. (2013). Clarity in communication: “Clear” speech authenticity and lexical neighborhood density effects in speech production and perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(5), 3793–3807. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4824120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schum, D. J. (1996). Intelligibility of clear and conversational speech of young and elderly talkers. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 7(3), 212–218.Google Scholar
Shaw, J. A., Gafos, A. I., Hoole, P., & Zeroual, C. (2011). Dynamic invariance in the phonetic expression of syllable structure: A case study of Moroccan Arabic consonant clusters. Phonology, 28(3), 455–490. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675711000224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, D. (2011). Schwa. In van Oostendorp, M. (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to phonology (pp. 628–642). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smiljanić, R & Bradlow, A. R., (2005). Production and perception of clear speech in Croatian and English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118(3), 1677–1688. http://doi.org/10.1121/1.2000788.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smiljanić, R., & Bradlow, A. R. (2007). Clear speech intelligibility: Listener and talker effects. In Proceedings of the XVI international congress of phonetic sciences (pp. 4). Saarbrücken, Germany.Google Scholar
Soulaimani, D. (2023). Arabic or Latin: Language contact and script practices. University of Marburg.Google Scholar
Tamminga, M. (2019). Interspeaker covariation in Philadelphia vowel changes. Language Variation and Change, 31(2), 119–133. doi:10.1017/S0954394519000139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tangi, O., (1991). Aspects de la phonologie d’un parler berbère du Maroc: Ath-Sidhar (Rif). [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Paris VIII].Google Scholar
Tucker, B. V., & Wright, R. (2020). Introduction to the special issue on the phonetics of under-documented languages. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 147(4), 2741–2744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tupper, P., Leung, K. W., Wang, Y., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. A. (2021). The contrast between clear and plain speaking style for Mandarin tones. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 150(6), 4464–4473. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0009142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uchanski, R. M. (2005). Clear speech. In Pisoni, D. & Remez, R. (Eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 207–235). Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uchanski, R. M., Choi, S. S., Braida, L. D., Reed, C. M., & Durlach, N. I. (1996). Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing IV: Further studies of the role of speaking rate. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 39(3), 494–509. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3903.49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van der Lugt, A. H. (2001). The use of sequential probabilities in the segmentation of speech. Perception & Psychophysics, 63(5), 811–823. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wedel, A., Jackson, S., & Kaplan, T. (2018). Predictability shapes phonological patterns: Evidence from corpus and experimental data. Cognition, 176, 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.002.Google Scholar
Wright, R. (1997). Lexical competition and reduction in speech: A preliminary report. Research on Spoken Language Processing Progress Report, 2, 472–485.Google Scholar
Yu, A. C., & Zellou, G. (2019). Individual differences in language processing: Phonology. Annual Review of Linguistics, 5(1), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011516-033815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zakhir, M. (2023). The challenges of Amazigh in education in Morocco. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2023.2226638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zec, D. (1995). Sonority constraints on syllable structure. Phonology, 12(1), 85–129. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675700002396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zellou, G. (2017). Individual differences in the production of nasal coarticulation and perceptual compensation. Journal of Phonetics, 61, 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2016.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zellou, G., & Afkir, M. (2025). Social factors condition consonant separation in Moroccan Arabic word-initial clusters: Amazigh-Arabic bilingualism, region, and speaking style. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 157(2), 845–856. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0035641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zellou, G., & Brotherton, C. (2021). Phonetic imitation of multidimensional acoustic variation of the nasal split short-a system. Speech Communication, 135, 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2021.10.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zellou, G., Lahrouchi, M., & Bensoukas, K. (2022). Clear speech in Tashlhiyt Berber: The perception of typologically uncommon word-initial contrasts by native and naive listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 152(6), 3429–3443. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0016579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zellou, G., Lahrouchi, M., & Bensoukas, K. (2023). Clear speech and phonological typology: A case study of Tashlhiyt Berber. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 153(3_supplement), A167–A167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zellou, G., Lahrouchi, M., & Bensoukas, K. (2024). The perception of vowelless words in Tashlhiyt. Glossa, 9(1), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.10438.Google Scholar
Zouhir, A. (2013). Language situation and conflict in Morocco. In Orie, O. O. & Sanders, K. W. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 43rd annual conference on African linguistics (pp. 271–277). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Inaccessible, or known limited accessibility
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this element is known to have missing or limited accessibility features.
We may be reviewing its accessibility for future improvement, but final compliance is
not yet assured and may be subject to legal exceptions. If you have any questions,
please contact
accessibility@cambridge.org.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.