Element contents
The Politics of Transitional Justice in Latin America
Power, Norms, and Capacity Building
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 January 2020
Summary
How has Latin America pioneered the field of transitional justice (TJ)? Do approaches vary across the region? This Element describes Latin American innovations in trials and truth commissions, and evaluates two influential models that explain variation in TJ outcomes: the Huntingtonian and Justice Cascade approaches. It argues that scholars should complement these approaches with one that recognizes the importance of state capacity building and institutional change. To translate domestic/international political pressure and human rights norms into outcomes, states must develop 'TJ capabilities'. Not only should states be willing to pursue these highly complex policies, they must also develop competent bureaucracies.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781108869973Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 06 February 2020
References
Abrão, P. and Torelly, M. 2012. ‘Resistance to Change: Brazil’s Persistent Amnesty and its Alternatives for Truth and Justice’. In Lessa, F and Payne, L, eds, Amnesty in the Age of Human Rights Accountability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 152–181Google Scholar
Acuña, C. and Smulovitz, C. 1995. ‘Militares en la transición argentina: del gobierno a la subordinación constitucional’. In C. Acuña et al. Juicio, castigo y memoria: derechos humanos y justicia en la política argentina. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión, pp. 19–99Google Scholar
Acuña, C. and Smulovitz, C 1997. ‘Guarding the Guardians in Argentina: Some Lessons about the Risks and Benefits of Empowering the Courts’. In McAdams, J, ed., Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 93–111Google Scholar
Albarracín, J. and Gamboa, L. 2017. ‘Public Opinion and Support for Transitional Justice in Colombia’. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, New Orleans, 26 December.Google Scholar
Ambos, K. 2011. ‘The Fujimori Judgment: A President’s Responsibility for Crimes Against Humanity as Indirect Perpetrator by Virtue of an Organized Power Apparatus’. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 9:137–158.Google Scholar
Anton, S. 2018. The ICC’s Inconsistent Approach to Complementary in Preliminary Examinations. MPhil Thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Arthur, P. 2009. ‘How Transitions Reshaped Human Rights: A Conceptual History of Transitional Justice’. Human Rights Quarterly, 31(2):321–367.Google Scholar
Arzobispado de Santiago. 1996. Situación de los derechos humanos durante el primer semestre de 1996. Available at: www.derechos.org/nizkor/chile/vicaria/informe1.htmlGoogle Scholar
Baird, E. and Roht-Arriaza, N. 2012. ‘De Facto and De Jure Amnesty Laws: The Central American Case’. In Lessa, F and Payne, L, eds, Amnesty in the Age of Human Rights Accountability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 182–209Google Scholar
Balardini, L., Oberlin, A, and Sobredo, L. 2011. ‘Violencia de género y abusos sexuales en los centros clandestinos de detención’. In Hacer justicia: Nuevos debates sobre el juzgamiento de crímenes de lesa humanidad en Argentina. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI, pp. 167–225Google Scholar
Barnett, M. and Finnemore, M. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Berlin, M. 2015. The Criminalization of Atrocities in Domestic Legal Systems Since World War II. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
Betancour, B., Figuereido, R, and Buergenthal, T. 1993. From Madness to Hope: The 12-year War in El Salvador. Washington: USIP.Google Scholar
Brett, R. 2016. ‘Peace Without Reconciliation? Understanding the Trial against Generals Ríos-Montt and Rodríguez-Salazar in the Wake of Guatemala’s Genocide’. Journal of Genocide Research, 18(2):285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botero, S. 2017. ‘Colombia’s Special Criminal Tribunal: Justicia Especial para la Paz’. International Journal of Constitutional Law Blog, 15 October.Google Scholar
Burt, J. M. 2009. ‘Guilty as Charged: The Trial of Former Peruvian President Alberto Fujimori for Human Rights Violations’. The International Journal of Transitional Justice, 3(3):384–405.Google Scholar
Burt, J. M. 2016. ‘From Heaven to Hell in Ten Days: The Genocide Trial in Guatemala’. Journal of Genocide Research, 18(2):143–169.Google Scholar
Burt, J. M., Fried, G, and Lessa, F. 2013. ‘Civil Society and the Resurgent Struggle against Impunity in Uruguay (1986–2012)’. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 7(2):306–327.Google Scholar
Carozza, P. (2003) ‘From Conquest to Constitutions: Retrieving a Latin American Tradition of the Idea of Human Rights’. Human Rights Quarterly, 25(2):281–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassel, D. 1996. ‘Lessons from the Americas: Guidelines for International Response to Amnesties for Atrocities’. Law and Contemporary Problems, 59(4):197–224.Google Scholar
CIDE. 2018. Estudio para elaborar una propusta de política pública en materia de Justicia Transicional en México. Mexico City: CIDE.Google Scholar
Collins, C. 2011. Post-Transitional Justice: Human Rights Trials in Chile and El Salvador. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, C.2018. ‘Verdad, justicia y memoria en Chile a dos décadas del Caso Pinochet’. In Informe anual sobre derechos humanos en Chile 2018. Santiago: Universidad Diego Portales, pp. 17–105Google Scholar
Collins, C. and Hau, B. 2016. ‘Chile: Incremental Truth, Late Justice’. In Skaar, E, García-Godos, J, and Collins, C, eds., Transitional Justice in Latin America. London: Routledge, pp. 126–150Google Scholar
Crenzel, E. ‘Argentina’s National Commission on the Disappearance of Persons: Contributions to Transitional Justice’. The International Journal of Transitional Justice, 2:173–191.Google Scholar
de Grieff, P., ed. 2008. The Handbook of Reparations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Engstrom, P., ed. 2019. The Inter-American Human Rights System: Impact Beyond Compliance. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Ensalaco, M. 1994. ‘Truth Commissions for Chile and El Salvador’. Human Rights Quarterly, 16(4):656–675.Google Scholar
Evans, R. 2007. ‘Treating Poorly Healed Wounds: Partisan Choices and Human Rights Policies in Latin America’. Human Rights Review, 8(3):249–276.Google Scholar
Glendon, M. 2008. ‘The Forgotten Crucible: The Latin American Influence on the Universal Human Rights Idea’. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 16:27–39.Google Scholar
Goldman, R. 2009. ‘History and Action: The Inter-American Human Rights System and the Role of the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights’. Human Rights Quarterly, 31(4):856–887.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Cueva, E. 2004. ‘The Contributions of the Peruvian Truth and Reconciliation Commission to Prosecutions’. Criminal Law Forum, 15(1–2):55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez-Ocantos, E. 2014. ‘Persuade Them or Oust Them: Crafting Judicial Change and Transitional Justice in Argentina’. Comparative Politics, 46(4):479–498.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Ocantos, E.2016a. Shifting Legal Visions: Judicial Change and Human Rights Trials in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Ocantos, E.2016b. ‘Evaluations of Human Rights Trials and Trust in Judicial Institutions: Evidence from Fujimori’s Trial in Peru’. The International Journal of Human Rights, 20(4):445–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez-Ocantos, E.2018. ‘Communicative Entrepreneurs: The Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ Dialogue with National Judges’. International Studies Quarterly, 62(4):737–750.Google Scholar
Hayner, P. 2010. Unspeakable Truths: Transitional Justice and the Challenge of Truth Commissions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hilbink, L. 2007. Judges Beyond Politics in Democracy and Dictatorship: Lessons from Chile. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hillebrecht, C., Huneeus, A and Borda, S. 2018. ‘The Judicialization of Peace’. Harvard International Law Journal, 59(2):279–330.Google Scholar
Huneeus, A. 2010. ‘Judging from a Guilty Conscience: The Chilean Judiciary’s Human Rights Turn’. Law & Social Inquiry, 35(1):99–135.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. London: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
International Crisis Group. 2011. Learning to Walk Without a Crutch: An Assessment of the International Commission Against Impunity in Guatemala. ICG Latin America Report N. 36.Google Scholar
Karl, T. 2007. ‘The Justice Cascade in Latin America’. Santa Clara Journal of International Law, 5(2):345–362.Google Scholar
Keck, M. and Sikkink, K. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kemp, S. 2014. ‘Guatemala Prosecutes Former President Ríos-Montt’. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 12(1):133–156.Google Scholar
Krook, M. L. 2009. Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kovras, I. 2017. Grassroots Activism and the Evolution of Transitional Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
LaPlante, L. and Theidon, K. 2006. ‘Transitional Justice in Times of Conflict: Colombia’s Ley de Justicia y Paz’. Michigan Journal of International Law, 49(1):49–106.Google Scholar
Lessa, F. 2012. ‘Barriers to Justice: The Ley de Caducidad and Impunity in Uruguay’. In Lessa, F and Payne, L, eds, Amnesty in the Age of Human Rights Accountability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 123–151Google Scholar
Lessa, F.2015. ‘Justice Beyond Borders: The Operation Condor Trial and Accountability for Transnational Crimes in South America’. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 9(3):494–506.Google Scholar
Lessa, F.2019. Investigating Crimes Against Humanity in South America. Policy Brief, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Lessa, F. and Payne, L, eds. 2012. Amnesty in the Age of Human Rights Accountability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lessa, F., Olsen, T, Payne, L, Pereira, G, and Reiter, A. 2014. ‘Overcoming Impunity: Pathways to Accountability in Latin America’. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 8(1):75–98Google Scholar
Lutz, E. and Sikkink, K. 2000. ‘International Human Rights Law and Practice in Latin America’. International Organization, 54(3):633–659.Google Scholar
Lutz, E. and Sikkink, K 2001. ‘The Justice Cascade: Evolution and Impact of Foreign Human Rights Trials in Latin America’. Chicago Journal of International Law, 2(1):1–33.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, S. and Pérez-Liñán, A. 2013. Democracies and Dictatorships in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mallinder, L. 2008. ‘Exploring the Practice of States in Introducing Amnesties’. In Ambos, K, Large, J, and Wierda, M, eds, Building a Future on Peace and Justice. Berlin: Springer, pp. 127–171Google Scholar
Martínez-Barahona, E. and Gutiérrez-Salazar, M. 2016. ‘El Salvador: The Difficult Fight Against Impunity’. In Skaar, E, García-Godos, J, and Collins, C, eds, Transitional Justice in Latin America. London: Routledge, pp. 178–202Google Scholar
Mayer-Rieckh, A. and de Grieff, P. 2008. Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies. New York: Social Science Research Council.Google Scholar
Méndez, J. 1997. ‘In Defence of Transitional Justice’. In McAdams, J, ed., Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 1–26Google Scholar
Méndez, J.2010. ‘Significance of the Fujimori Trial’. American University International Law Review, 25(4):649–656.Google Scholar
Michel, V. 2018. Prosecutorial Accountability and Victims’ Rights in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Michel, V. and Sikkink, K. 2013. ‘Human Rights Prosecutions and the Participation Rights of Victims in Latin America’. Law & Society Review, 47(4):873–907.Google Scholar
Nino, C. 1991. ‘The Duty to Punish Past Abuses of Human Rights Put into Context: The Case of Argentina’. Yale Law Journal, 100(8):2619–2640.Google Scholar
Norden., D. 1996. Military Rebellion in Argentina. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, G. and Schmitter, P. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Olsen, T., Payne, L, and Reiter, A. 2010. Transitional Justice in Balance. Washington: USIP.Google Scholar
Open Society. 2015. Unfinished Business: Guatemala’s International Commission Against Impunity (CICIG). March Briefing, OSJI.Google Scholar
Orentlicher, D. 1991. ‘Settling Accounts: The Duty to Prosecute Human Rights Violations of a Prior Regime’. Yale Law Journal, 100(8):2537–2615.Google Scholar
Osiel, M. 1986. ‘The Making of Human Rights Policy in Argentina: The Impact of Ideas and Interests on Legal Conflict’. Yale Law Journal, 100:2537–2618.Google Scholar
Payne, L. 2008. Unsettling Accounts: Neither Truth nor Reconciliation in Confessions of State Violence. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Pion-Berlin, D. 1994. ‘To Prosecute or to Pardon? Human Rights Decisions in the Latin American Southern Cone’. Human Rights Quarterly, 16(1):105–130.Google Scholar
Procuraduría de Crímenes Contra la Humanidad. 2018. Informe estadístico sobre el estado de las causas por delitos de lesa humanidad en Argentina. Buenos Aires: MPF.Google Scholar
Prusak, C. 2010. ‘The Trial of Alberto Fujimori: Navigating the Show Trial Dilemma in Pursuit of Transitional Justice’. NYU Law Review, 85(3):867–904.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, C. 2013. Individual Rights and the Making of the International System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Risse-Kappen, T. and Sikkink, K. 1999. ‘The Socialization of International Human Rights Norms into Domestic Practices: Introduction’. In Risse-Kappen, T, Ropp, S, and Sikkink, K, eds, The Power of Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–38Google Scholar
Robben, A. 2005. Political Violence and Trauma in Argentina. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Roehrig, T. 2009. ‘Executive Leadership and the Continuing Quest for Justice in Argentina’. Human Rights Quarterly, 31(3):721–747.Google Scholar
Roht-Arriaza, N. 1995. ‘Conclusion’. In Roth-Arriaza, N, ed., Impunity and Human Rights in International Law and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 181–304Google Scholar
Roht-Arriaza, N.2006. The Pinochet Effect. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Roht-Arriaza, N.2015. ‘After Amnesties are Gone: Latin American National Courts and the New Contours of the Fight Against Impunity’. Human Rights Quarterly 37(2):341–382.Google Scholar
Roht-Arriaza, N. and Gibson, L. 1998. ‘The Developing Jurisprudence on Amnesty’. Human Rights Quarterly, 20:843–885.Google Scholar
Rowen, J. 2018. Searching for Truth in the Transitional Justice Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scarfi, J. P. 2017. The Hidden History of International Law in the Americas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Seils, P. 2004. ‘Promised Unfulfilled? The Special Prosecutor’s Office in Mexico’. Occasional Paper Series, ICTJ.Google Scholar
Sharp, D. 2012. ‘Addressing Economic Violence in Times of Transition: Towards Positive-Pace Paradigm for Transitional Justice’. Fordham International Law Journal, 35(3):780–813.Google Scholar
Sikkink, K. 1993. ‘Human Rights, Principled-Issue Networks, and Sovereignty in Latin America’. International Organization, 47(3):411–441.Google Scholar
Sikkink, K.2005. ‘The Transnational Dimension of the Judicialization of Politics in Latin America’. In Sieder, R, Schjolden, L and Angell, A, eds, The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America. London: Palgrave, pp. 263–292Google Scholar
Sikkink, K.2008. ‘From Pariah State to Global Protagonist: Argentina and the Struggle for International Human Rights’. Latin American Politics and Society, 50(1):1–29.Google Scholar
Skaar, E. 2011. Judicial Independence and Human Rights in Latin America. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Speck, P. 1987. ‘The Trial of the Argentine Junta: Responsibilities and Realities’. University of Miami Inter-American Law Review, 18(3):491–531.Google Scholar
Supreme Court of Justice of Peru. 2010. ‘The Judgement against Fujimori for Human Rights Violations [Aimee Sullivan, trans.]’. American University International Law Review, 25:657–838.Google Scholar
Teitel, R.2003. ‘Transitional Justice Genealogy’. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 16:69–94.Google Scholar
United Nations. 2004. ‘Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies’. UN-Doc S/2004/616.Google Scholar
United Nations 2010. ‘United Nations Approach to Transitional Justice’. Guidance Notes of the Secretary-General.Google Scholar
United Nations 2015. ‘Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence’. UN-Doc A/HRC/30/42.Google Scholar
United Nations 2017. ‘Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion of Truth, Justice, Reparation, and Guarantees of Non-recurrence’. UN-Doc A/HRC/36/50.Google Scholar
Vecchioli, V. 2010. ‘Derechos humanos y compromiso militante’. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Weyland, K. 2006. Bounded Rationality and Policy Diffusion: Social Sector Reform in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Yankelevich, J. 2018. El canto del cisne de la FEMOSPP: la única condena a un perpetrador de la guerra sucia en Mexico. Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
Yashar, D. 2018. Homicidal Ecologies: Illicit Economies and Complicit States in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zalaquett, J. 1990. ‘Confronting Human Rights Violations Perpetrated by Former Governments: Applicable Principles and Political Constraints’. Hamline Law Review, 13:623–660.Google Scholar
Zalaquett, J.1995. ‘Confronting Human Rights Violations Committed by Former Governments: Principles Applicable and Political Constraints’. In Kirtz, N, ed., Transitional Justice. Washington: USIP, pp. 3–31Google Scholar
Zunino, M. 2019. Justice Framed: A Genealogy of Transitional Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- 12
- Cited by