Element contents
Post-Humanistic Love
How Artificial Intelligence Is Reimagining the Construction of Human Intimacy and Emotions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 May 2026
Summary
The rapid integration of artificial intelligence into everyday life has extended beyond functional assistance into the intimate domains of emotion, companionship, and love. AI chatbots and virtual companions are increasingly engaged as emotional confidants, romantic partners, and sources of care, prompting a re-evaluation of how intimacy is constituted and experienced in a technologically mediated society. This Element examines the emergence of what is termed post-humanistic love, defined as a profound emotional and romantic attachment formed between humans and artificial agents. Drawing on sociological and philosophical theories of intimacy, love, and post-humanism, the Element explores how AI interfaces reconfigure classical conceptions of love, as well as contemporary understandings of emotional reflexivity, distant intimacy and emotional labour. Empirically, the study analyses first-person accounts describing romantic and emotionally significant relationships with AI companions. The findings highlight both the affective potency and the ethical fragility of AI-mediated intimacy in the post-human condition.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009880183Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 02 July 2026
Bibliography
Alvarado, R. C. (2026). Turing’s children: Large language models and imitative intelligence. Social Science Computer Review, 44(1), 92–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, W. (2024). Bourdieu on love: A latent capital, a primary field and a new research agenda. The Sociological Review, 73(3), 645–660.Google Scholar
Blumberg, K., & Strohminger, M. (2025). Imaginative hopes and other desires. Analysis, 85(1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braidotti, R. (2018). A theoretical framework for the critical posthumanities. Theory, Culture & Society, 36(6), 31–61.Google Scholar
Brandtzaeg, P. B., Skjuve, M., & Følstad, A. (2022). My AI friend: How users of a social chatbot understand their human–AI friendship. Human Communication Research, 48(3), 404–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, R. N. (2022). ‘If Alexa knew the state I was in, it would cry’: Older adults’ perspectives of voice assistants for health. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts. ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinkmann, S. (2025). Persons in a posthuman world. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 22(3), 596–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinkmann, S. (2017). Humanism after posthumanism: Or qualitative psychology after the ‘posts’. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 14(2), 109–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buolamwini, J. (2023). Unmasking AI: My Mission to Protect What Is Human in a World of Machines. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Chen, X., Kang, J., & Hu, C. (2024). Design of an artificial intelligence companion chatbot. Journal of New Media, 6(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, X., Zhang, X., Cohen, J., & Mou, J. (2022). Human vs. AI: Understanding the impact of anthropomorphism on consumer response to chatbots from the perspective of trust and relationship norms. Information Processing & Management, 59(3), 102940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chin, H., Song, H., Baek, G., Shin, M., Jung, C., Cha, M., Choi, J., & Cha, C. (2023). The potential of chatbots for emotional support and promoting mental well-being in different cultures: A mixed methods study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e51712.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cronin, A. M. (2015). Distant friends, mobility and sensed intimacy. Mobilities, 10(5), 667–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darcy, M. (2023). Psychological projection – Are you making everyone else responsible? Harley Therapy. www.harleytherapy.co.uk/counselling/psychological-projection-are-you-making-everyone-else-responsible.htmGoogle Scholar
De Freitas, J., Uğuralp, A. K., Uğuralp, Z., & Puntoni, S. (2024). AI Companions Reduce Loneliness (Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 24-078).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Sousa, R. (2015). Love: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dibble, J. L., Hartmann, T., & Rosaen, S. F. (2016). Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship: Conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures. Human Communication Research, 42(1), 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, M. (2022). The importance of being heard. The DMC Clinic. https://thedmcclinic.ie/blog-the-importance-of-being-heard/Google Scholar
Frost, D. M., & LeBlanc, A. J. (2021). The complicated connection between closeness and the quality of romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 39(5), 1237–1255.Google Scholar
Fussey, P., & Roth, S. (2020). Digitizing sociology: Continuity and change in the internet era. Sociology, 54(4), 659–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A. (1992). The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Gillath, O., Ai, T., Branicky, M. S., Keshmiri, S., Davison, R. B., & Spaulding, R. (2021). Attachment and trust in artificial intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior, 115(1), 106607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerreiro, J., & Loureiro, S. M. C. (2023). I am attracted to my cool smart assistant! Analyzing attachment-aversion in AI-human relationships. Journal of Business Research, 161, 113863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Y. (2021). Do we love for reasons? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 102(1), 107–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, Cyborgs, and Women the Reinvention of Nature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hayles, K. (1999). How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics (74th ed.). University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healthline. (n.d.). How to recognise and work through emotional dependency. www.healthline.com/health/emotional-dependencyGoogle Scholar
Herzberg, B. (2024). Defining emotional overdependency in unhealthy relationships. Psychology Today. www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/the-psychology-of-relationships-and-emotional-intelligence/202405/defining-emotionalGoogle Scholar
Hillman, J. G., Fowlie, D. I., & MacDonald, T. K. (2022). Social verification theory: A new way to conceptualize validation, dissonance, and belonging. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 27(3), 309–331.Google ScholarPubMed
Hillman, J. G., & Hauser, D. J. (2021). Master narratives, expectations of change, and their effect on temporal appraisals. Social Cognition, 39(6), 717–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochschild, A. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85(1), 551–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, M., Manning, N., & Wettergren, Å. (2020). Political economies of emotion. Emotions and Society, 2(1), 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, M. (2019). ‘Going against the grain’? Distance relationships, emotional reflexivity and gender. Emotion, Space and Society, 31(1), 56–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, M. (2010). The emotionalisation of reflexivity. Sociology, 44(1), 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, M., & Whyte, M. (2004). An equal distance? Individualisation, gender and intimacy in distance relationships. The Sociological Review, 52(2), 180–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Illouz, E. (2007). Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism. London: Polity.Google Scholar
Iorio, G. (2014). Sociology of Love: The Agapic Dimension of Societal Life. New York: Vernon Press.Google Scholar
Jamieson, L. (2011). Intimacy as a concept: Explaining social change in the context of globalisation or another form of ethnocentricism? Sociological Research Online, 16(4), 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamieson, L. (1999). Intimacy transformed? A critical look at the ‘pure relationship’. Sociology, 33(3), 477–494.Google Scholar
Joffe, A. D., Kangas, M., & Peters, L. (2025). An empirical examination of the relationship between emotion regulation and emotional labor. The Journal of Psychology, 159(3), 169–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, J., & Im, I. (2023). Anthropomorphic response: Understanding interactions between humans and artificial intelligence agents. Computers in Human Behavior, 139(1), 107512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koulouri, T., Macredie, R. D., & Olakitan, D. (2022). Chatbots to support young adults’ mental health: An exploratory study of acceptability. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 12(2), 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozinets, R. V. (2019). Netnography: The Essential Guide to Qualitative Social Media Research. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Laestadius, L., Bishop, A., Gonzalez, M., Illenčík, D., & Campos-Castillo, C. (2022). Too human and not human enough: A grounded theory analysis of mental health harms from emotional dependence on the social chatbot Replika. New Media & Society, 26(10), 5923–5941.Google Scholar
Lemay, E. P., & Wolf, N. R. (2016). Projection of romantic and sexual desire in opposite-sex friendships: How wishful thinking creates a self-fulfilling prophecy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(7), 864–878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ley, M, & Rambukkana, N. (2021). Touching at a distance: Digital intimacies, haptic platforms, and the ethics of consent. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27(5), 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayring, P. (2019). Qualitative content analysis: Demarcation, varieties, developments. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 20(3), 16–28.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1982). The Individual & The Social Self (pr Only): Unpublished Work of George Herbert Mead. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Montagna, N. (2023). For a new sociology of social love. The American Sociologist, 54(1), 338–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muldoon, J. (2026, 11 January). Lamar wants to have children with his girlfriend. The problem? She’s entirely AI. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/11/lamar-wants-to-have-children-with-his-girlfriend-the-problem-shes-entirely-aiGoogle Scholar
Nicmanis, M. (2024). Reflexive content analysis: An approach to qualitative data analysis, reduction, and description. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23(1), 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, T., & Rose, N. (2023). Against posthumanism: Notes towards an ethopolitics of personhood. Theory, Culture & Society, 41(1), 3–21.Google Scholar
Pal, D., Vanijja, V., Thapliyal, H., & Zhang, X. (2023). What affects the usage of artificial conversational agents? An agent personality and love theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 145(1), 107788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paoli, A. D., & D’Auria, V. (2021). Digital ethnography: A systematic literature review. Italian Sociological Review, 11(1), 243–267.Google Scholar
Pataranutaporn, P., Karny, S., Archiwaranguprok, C., Albrecht, C., Liu, A. R., & Maes, P. (2025). ‘My boyfriend is AI’: A computational analysis of human-AI companionship in reddit’s AI community. ArXiv, 2(1), 11–39. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.11391Google Scholar
Pentina, I., Hancock, T., & Xie, T. (2023). Exploring relationship development with social chatbots: A mixed-method study of Replika. Computers in Human Behavior, 140(1), 107600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rain, M., & Mar, R. A. (2021). Adult attachment and engagement with fictional characters. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(9), 2792–2813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ravi, N., & Patki, S. M. (2025). Parasocial relationships, social support and well-being: A mixed-methods study among Indian youth. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 30(1), 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinne, P., Lahnakoski, J. M., Saarimäki, H., Tavast, M., Sams, M., & Henriksson, L. (2024). Six types of loves differentially recruit reward and social cognition brain areas. Cerebral Cortex, 34(8), 98–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rusu, M. S. (2017). Theorising love in sociological thought: Classical contributions to a sociology of love. Journal of Classical Sociology, 18(1), 3–20.Google Scholar
Salah, M., Abdelfattah, F., & Al Halbusi, H. (2024). The good, the bad, and the GPT: Reviewing the impact of generative artificial intelligence on psychology. Current Opinion in Psychology, 59(1), 101872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sedgwick, E. K. (2003). Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Skjuve, M., Følstad, A., Fostervold, K. I., & Brandtzaeg, P. B. (2021). My chatbot companion: A study of human – chatbot relationships. International Journal of Human – Computer Studies, 149(1), 102601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, J.-P., Linda Breves, P., & Anders, N. (2024). Parasocial interactions with real and virtual influencers: The role of perceived similarity and human-likeness. New Media & Society, 26(6), 3433–3453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ta, V., Griffith, C., Boatfield, C., Wang, X., Civitello, M., Bader, H., DeCero, E., & Loggarakis, A. (2020). User experiences of social support from companion chatbots in everyday contexts: Thematic analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(3), e16235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vears, D. F., & Gillam, L. (2022). Inductive content analysis: A guide for beginning qualitative researchers. Focus on Health Professional Education: A Multi-Disciplinary Journal, 23(1), 111–127.Google Scholar
Vogler, G. (2021). Bridging the gap between affect and reason: On thinking-feeling in politics. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 22(3), 259–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voinea, C., Mann, S. P., Savulescu, J., & Earp, B. D. (2025). Digital doppelgängers, human relationships, and practical identity. Bioethics, 45(1), 76–91.Google Scholar
Wang, K., Pan, Z., & Lu, Y. (2025). From general AI to custom AI: the effects of generative conversational AI’s cognitive and emotional conversational skills on user’s guidance. Kybernetes, 54(14), 7511–7547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, N., Liu, Z., Yang, H., Ren, Z., & Xie, W. (2024). ‘Treat me as your friend, not a virtual being’: The impact of intelligent virtual agents’ self-disclosure of different emotions on children’s friendship. International Journal of Human – Computer Interaction, 76(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
Weinstock, L., Jeayes, A., Kurze, H., & Albuquerque, S. (2025). Worlds apart: Using technology to alleviate grief-related loneliness in young people. Mental Health and Digital Technologies, 87(1), 89–102.Google Scholar
Wilding, R. (2018). Families, Intimacy and Globalization: Floating Ties (Sociology for Globalizing Societies). London: Bloomsbury Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, T. J. V., Slater, H. E., & Tamayo Gomez, C. (2024). Unpacking the construction of online identities of hybristophilia communities on TikTok. Deviant Behavior, 46(2), 179–194.Google Scholar
Xia, H., Chen, J., Qiu, Y., Liu, P., & Liu, Z. (2024). The impact of human – chatbot interaction on human – human interaction: A substitution or complementary effect. International Journal of Human – Computer Interaction, 67(2), 1–13.Google Scholar
Zhong, W., & Luo, J. (2025). Befriend GenAI chatbots: Exploring the determinants of parasocial relationship in human – AI interaction through a hybrid PLS–ANN–NCA approach. International Journal of Human – Computer Interaction, 33(3), 1–22.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.0 A
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this element
conforms to version 2.0 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), ensuring core accessibility principles are addressed and meets the basic
(A)
level of WCAG compliance, addressing essential accessibility barriers.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.