Element contents
Series: Elements in Pragmatics
Pragmatics, Utterance Meaning, and Representational Gesture
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 February 2024
Summary
Humans produce utterances intentionally. Visible bodily action, or gesture, has long been acknowledged as part of the broader activity of speaking, but it is only recently that the role of gesture during utterance production and comprehension has been the focus of investigation. If we are to understand the role of gesture in communication, we must answer the following questions: Do gestures communicate? Do people produce gestures with an intention to communicate? This Element argues that the answer to both these questions is yes. Gestures are (or can be) communicative in all the ways language is. This Element arrives at this conclusion on the basis that communication involves prediction. Communicators predict the behaviours of themselves and others, and such predictions guide the production and comprehension of utterance. This Element uses evidence from experimental and neuroscientific studies to argue that people produce gestures because doing so improves such predictions.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in PragmaticsOnline ISBN: 9781009031080Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 29 February 2024
References
Alibali, M. W., Evans, J. L., Hostetter, A. B., Ryan, K., & Mainela-Arnold, E. (2009). Gesture–speech integration in narrative: Are children less redundant than adults? Gesture, 9(3), 290–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alibali, M. W., Kita, S., & Young, A. J. (2000). Gesture and the process of speech production: We think, therefore we gesture. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(6), 593–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altmann, G. T., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73(3), 247–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Edited by James O. Urmson & Marina Sbisá.)Google Scholar
Bara, B. G. (2010). Cognitive pragmatics: The mental processes of communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bara, B. G. (2017). Cognitive pragmatics. In Huang, Y. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of pragmatics (pp. 279–99). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bara, B. G., Enrici, I., & Adenzato, M. (2016). At the core of pragmatics: The neural substrates of communicative intentions. In Hickok, G. & Small, S. L. (Eds.), Neurobiology of language (pp. 675–85). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory and Cognition, 11(3), 211–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bavelas, J., Gerwing, J., Sutton, C., & Prevost, D. (2008). Gesturing on the telephone: Independent effects of dialogue and visibility. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 495–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bavelas, J., & Healing, S. (2013). Reconciling the effects of mutual visibility on gesturing: A review. Gesture, 13(1), 63–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beattie, G., & Shovelton, H. (1999a). Do iconic hand gestures really contribute anything to the semantic information conveyed by speech? An experimental investigation. Semiotica, 123(1–2), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beattie, G., & Shovelton, H. (1999b). Mapping the range of information contained in the iconic hand gestures that accompany spontaneous speech. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18(4), 438–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beattie, G., & Shovelton, H. (2001). An experimental investigation of the role of different types of iconic gesture in communication: A semantic feature approach. Gesture, 1(2), 129–49.Google Scholar
Beattie, G., & Shovelton, H. (2002). An experimental investigation of some properties of individual iconic gestures that mediate their communicative power. British Journal of Psychology, 93(2), 179–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beattie, G., & Shovelton, H. (2006). When size really matters: How a single semantic feature is represented in the speech and gesture modalities. Gesture, 6(1), 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cafazzo, S., Natoli, E., & Valsecchi, P. (2012). Scent-marking behaviour in a pack of free-ranging domestic dogs. Ethology, 118(10), 955–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campisi, E., & Mazzone, M. (2016). Do people intend to gesture? A review of the role of intentionality in gesture production and comprehension. Reti Saperi Linguaggi–Italian Journal of Cognitive Science, 3(2), 285–300.Google Scholar
Campisi, E., & Özyürek, A. (2013). Iconicity as a communicative strategy: Recipient design in multimodal demonstrations for adults and children. Journal of Pragmatics, 47(1), 14–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carston, R. (2010). Xiii – Metaphor: Ad hoc concepts, literal meaning and mental images. In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Vol. 110, pp. 295–321). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carston, R. (2018). Figurative language, mental imagery, and pragmatics. Metaphor and Symbol, 33(3), 198–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, M., Meyer, A., Foulkes, L., & Kita, S. (2014). Individual differences in frequency and saliency of speech-accompanying gestures: The role of cognitive abilities and empathy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 694–709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, A. (2015). Surfing uncertainty: Prediction, action, and the embodied mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. (2016). Depicting as a method of communication. Psychological Review, 123(3), 324–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22(1), 1–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, D., Beattie, G., & Shovelton, H. (2011). Tracking the distribution of individual semantic features in gesture across spoken discourse: New perspectives in multi-modal interaction. Semiotica, 185(1–4), 147–88.Google Scholar
Cooperrider, K., Slotta, J., & Nunez, R. (2018). The preference for pointing with the hand is not universal. Cognitive Science, 42(4), 1375–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. (2001). Essays on actions and events: Philosophical essays (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, C., & Richardson, A. (2021). Semantic as well as referential relevance facilitates the processing of referring expressions. Journal of Pragmatics, 178(1), 258–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Degen, J., Hawkins, R. D., Graf, C., Kreiss, E., & Goodman, N. D. (2020). When redundancy is useful: A Bayesian approach to ‘overinformative’ referring expressions. Psychological Review, 127(4), 591–621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Ruiter, J. P. (2000). The production of gesture and speech. In McNeill, D. (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 284–311). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Ruiter, J. P. (2006). Can gesticulation help aphasic people speak, or rather, communicate? International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 8(2), 124–7.Google Scholar
de Ruiter, J. P. (2007). Postcards from the mind: The relationship between speech, imagistic gesture, and thought. Gesture, 7(1), 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Ruiter, J. P. (2017). The asymmetric redundancy of gesture and speech. In Church, R. B., Alibali, M. W. & Kelly, S. D. (Eds.), Why gesture? How the hands function in speaking, thinking and communicating (pp. 59–76). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Ruiter, J. P., Bangerter, A., & Dings, P. (2012). The interplay between gesture and speech in the production of referring expressions: Investigating the tradeoff hypothesis. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(2), 232–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91(1), 176–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekman, P. (1999). Emotional and conversational nonverbal signals. In Messing, L. S. & Campbell, R. (Eds.), Gesture, speech, and sign (pp. 45–55). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N. J. (2009). The anatomy of meaning: Speech, gesture, and composite utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N. J. (2013). A ‘composite utterances’ approach to meaning. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S., McNeill, D. & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 689–706). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J., & Sidnell, J. (2017). The concept of action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enrici, I., Adenzato, M., Cappa, S., Bara, B. G., & Tettamanti, M. (2011). Intention processing in communication: A common brain network for language and gestures. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(9), 2415–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enrici, I., Bara, B. G., & Adenzato, M. (2019). Theory of mind, pragmatics and the brain: Converging evidence for the role of intention processing as a core feature of human communication. Pragmatics & Cognition, 26(1), 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiengo, R. (2007). Asking questions: Using meaningful structures to imply ignorance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2020). Action and interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrod, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2004). Why is conversation so easy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(1), 8–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerwing, J., & Bavelas, J. (2004). Linguistic influences on gesture’s form. Gesture, 4(2), 157–95.Google Scholar
Geurts, B. (2019). What’s wrong with gricean pragmatics. In Exling 2019: Proceedings of the 10th international conference of experimental linguistics (pp. 1–9). Athens: ExLing Society.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S., Nusbaum, H., Kelly, S. D., & Wagner, S. (2001). Explaining math: Gesturing lightens the load. Psychological Science, 12(6), 516–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, N. D., & Frank, M. C. (2016). Pragmatic language interpretation as probabilistic inference. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(11), 818–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grice, H. P. (1968). Utterer’s meaning, sentence-meaning and word-meaning. Foundations of Language, 4, 1–18.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gsell, A., Innes, J., de Monchy, P., & Brunton, D. (2010). The success of using trained dogs to locate sparse rodents in pest-free sanctuaries. Wildlife Research, 37(1), 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, G. H. (1965). The inference to the best explanation. Philosophical Review, 74(1), 88–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, B. L. (1974). Environmental and hormonal influences on urine marking behavior in the adult male dog. Behavioral Biology, 11(2), 167–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heyes, C. M. (2018). Cognitive gadgets: The cultural evolution of thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Heyes, C. M., & Catmur, C. (2020). What happened to mirror neurons? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(1), 153–68.Google Scholar
Heyes, C. M., & Frith, C. D. (2014). The cultural evolution of mind reading. Science, 344(6190), 1243091.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holler, J., & Bavelas, J. (2017). Multi-modal communication of common ground: A review of social functions. In Kelly, S. D., Church, R. Breckinridge, & Alibali, M. W. (Eds.), Why gesture? How the hands function in speaking, thinking and communicating (pp. 213–240). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holler, J., & Beattie, G. (2002). A micro-analytic investigation of how iconic gestures and speech represent core semantic features in talk. Semiotica, 142(1/4), 31–70.Google Scholar
Holler, J., & Beattie, G. (2003). Pragmatic aspects of representational gestures: Do speakers use them to clarify verbal ambiguity for the listener? Gesture, 3(2), 127–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holler, J., Schubotz, L., Kelly, S. D., Hagoort, P., Schuetze, M., & Özyürek, A. (2014). Social eye gaze modulates processing of speech and co-speech gesture. Cognition, 133(3), 692–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horn, L. (2004). Implicature. In Horn, L. & Ward, G. (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 3–28). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Hostetter, A. B., & Alibali, M. W. (2007). Raise your hand if you’re spatial: Relations between verbal and spatial skills and gesture production. Gesture, 7(1), 73–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hostetter, A. B., Alibali, M. W., & Kita, S. (2007). I see it in my hands’ eye: Representational gestures reflect conceptual demands. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(3), 313–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iverson, J. M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2001). The resilience of gesture in talk: Gesture in blind speakers and listeners. Developmental Science, 4(4), 416–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iverson, J. M., Tencer, H. L., Lany, J., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2000). The relation between gesture and speech in congenitally blind and sighted language-learners. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 24(2), 105–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, S. D., Barr, D. J., Church, R. B., & Lynch, K. (1999). Offering a hand to pragmatic understanding: The role of speech and gesture in comprehension and memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(4), 577–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, S. D., Healey, M., Özyürek, A., & Holler, J. (2015). The processing of speech, gesture, and action during language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(2), 517–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, S. D., Kravitz, C., & Hopkins, M. (2004). Neural correlates of bimodal speech and gesture comprehension. Brain and Language, 89(1), 253–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, S. D., Özyürek, A., & Maris, E. (2010). Two sides of the same coin: Speech and gesture mutually interact to enhance comprehension. Psychological Science, 21(2), 260–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendon, A. (1980). Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. In Key, M. Ritchie (Ed.), The relationship of verbal and nonverbal communication (Vol. 25, pp. 207–27). The Hague: Mouton Publishers.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kepa, K., & Perry, J. (2020). Pragmatics. In Zalta, E. N. & Nodelman, U. (Eds.), The Standford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Kissine, M. (2013). From utterances to speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kita, S. (2009). Cross-cultural variation of speech-accompanying gesture: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(2), 145–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kita, S., & Davies, T. S. (2009). Competing conceptual representations trigger co-speech representational gestures. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(5), 761–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kita, S., & Özyürek, A. (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 16–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kita, S., Özyürek, A., Allen, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., & Ishizuka, T. (2007). Relations between syntactic encoding and co-speech gestures: Implications for a model of speech and gesture production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(8), 1212–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, H., & Kohshima, S. (2001). Unique morphology of the human eye and its adaptive meaning: Comparative studies on external morphology of the primate eye. Journal of Human Evolution, 40(5), 419–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kockelman, P. (2012). Meaning, motivation, and mind: Some conditions and consequences for the flexibility and intersubjectivity of cognitive processes. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(1), 65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kokocińska-Kusiak, A., Woszczyło, M., Zybala, M., Maciocha, J., Barłowska, K., & Dzięcioł, M. (2021). Canine olfaction: Physiology, behavior, and possibilities for practical applications. Animals, 11(8), 2463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krauss, R. M., Chen, Y., & Gottesmamn, R. F. (2000). Lexical gestures and lexical access: A process model. In McNeill, D. (Ed.), Language and gesture (Vol. 2, pp. 261–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krauss, R. M., Dushay, R. A., Chen, Y., & Rauscher, F. (1995). The communicative value of conversational hand gesture. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31(6), 533–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. J. (1993). Speaking: From intention to articulation (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (1979). Activity types and language. Linguistics, 17(5–6), 365–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (1995). Interactional biases in human thinking. In Goody, E. N. (Ed.), Social intelligence and interaction (pp. 221–60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (2012). Action formation and ascription. In Sidnell, J. & Stivers, T. (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 101–30). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1969). Convention: A philosophical study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Liszkowski, U., Brown, P., Callaghan, T., Takada, A., & de Vos, C. (2012). A prelinguistic gestural universal of human communication. Cognitive Science, 36(4), 698–713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, P. H., Domínguez, D., J. F., Winter, B., & Grignolio, A. (2015). Hidden in plain view: Degeneracy in complex systems. Biosystems, 128, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mazzone, M., & Campisi, E. (2013). Distributed intentionality: A model of intentional behavior in humans. Philosophical Psychology, 26(2), 267–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, B., & Bemis, K. E. (2017). Scent marking in shelter dogs: Effects of body size. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 186, 49–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, J. T., & Kable, J. W. (2012). Decision makers calibrate behavioral persistence on the basis of time-interval experience. Cognition, 124(2), 216–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (2000). Introduction. In McNeill, D. (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 1–12). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D. (2012). How language began: Gesture and speech in human evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D. (2015). Why we gesture: The surprising role of hand movements in communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melinger, A., & Levelt, W. J. (2004). Gesture and the communicative intention of the speaker. Gesture, 4(2), 119–41.Google Scholar
Millikan, R. G. (1984). Language, thought, and other biological categories: New foundations for realism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, R. (2017). Gricean communication and cognitive development. Philosophical Quarterly, 67(267), 303–26.Google Scholar
Morsella, E., & Krauss, R. M. (2004). The role of gestures in spatial working memory and speech. American Journal of Psychology, 117(3), 411–24.Google ScholarPubMed
Neale, S. (1992). Paul Grice and the philosophy of language. Linguistics and Philosophy, 15, 509–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noordzij, M., Newman-Norlund, S., De Ruiter, J. P., Hagoort, P., Levinson, S., & Toni, I. (2009). Brain mechanisms underlying human communication. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 3, 14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Novack, M. A., Wakefield, E. M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2016). What makes a movement a gesture? Cognition, 146, 339–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ozcaliskan, S., Lucero, C., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2016). Does language shape silent gesture? Cognition, 148, 10–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Özyürek, A. (2002). Do speakers design their cospeech gestures for their addressees? The effects of addressee location on representational gestures. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(4), 688–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özyürek, A. (2014). Hearing and seeing meaning in speech and gesture: Insights from brain and behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1651), 20130296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Allen, S., Furman, R., & Brown, A. (2005). How does linguistic framing of events influence co-speech gestures? Insights from crosslinguistic variations and similarities. Gesture, 5(1–2), 219–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özyürek, A., Willems, R. M., Kita, S., & Hagoort, P. (2007). On-line integration of semantic information from speech and gesture: Insights from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(4), 605–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parikh, P. (2019). Communication and content (Vol. Topics at the Grammar-Discourse Interface) (No. 4). Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Pearl, J., & Mackenzie, D. (2018). The book of why: The new science of cause and effect. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1998). The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, 1893–1913 (Vol. 1). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Gambi, C. (2018). Predicting while comprehending language: A theory and review. Psychological Bulletin, 144(10), 1002–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2007). Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(3), 105–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 329–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Proverbio, A. M., Gabaro, V., Orlandi, A., & Zani, A. (2015). Semantic brain areas are involved in gesture comprehension: An electrical neuroimaging study. Brain and Language, 147, 30–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rauscher, F. H., Krauss, R. M., & Chen, Y. S. (1996). Gesture, speech, and lexical access: The role of lexical movements in speech production. Psychological Science, 7(4), 226–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redcay, E., Velnoskey, K. R., & Rowe, M. L. (2016). Perceived communicative intent in gesture and language modulates the superior temporal sulcus. Human Brain Mapping, 37(10), 3444–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rizzolatti, G., & Arbib, M. A. (1998). Language within our grasp. Trends in Neurosciences, 21(5), 188–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubio-Fernández, P. (2016). How redundant are redundant color adjectives? An efficiency-based analysis of color overspecification. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubio-Fernández, P. (2019). Overinformative speakers are cooperative: Revisiting the Gricean maxim of quantity. Cognitive Science, 43(11), 12797.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1983). Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. (2010). Making the social world: The structure of human civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedivy, J., Tanenhaus, M., Chambers, C., & Carlson, G. (1999). Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation. Cognition, 71(2), 109–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1987). Thinking for speaking. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 13, 435–45.Google Scholar
So, W. C., Alvan, Y. F., Yap, D. F., Kheng, E., & Yap, J. M. (2013). Iconic gestures prime words: Comparison of priming effects when gestures are presented alone and when they are accompanying speech. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
So, W. C., Kita, S., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2009). Using the hands to identify who does what to whom: Gesture and speech go hand-in-hand. Cognitive Science, 33(1), 115–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. (1995). How do we communicate? In Brockman, J & Matson, K. (Eds.), How things are: A science toolkit for the mind (pp. 191–99). New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (2002). Pragmatics, modularity and mind-reading. Mind & Language, 17(1–2), 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spunt, R. P., Kemmerer, D., & Adolphs, R. (2016). The neural basis of conceptualizing the same action at different levels of abstraction. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(7), 1141–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spunt, R. P., Satpute, A. B., & Lieberman, M. D. (2011). Identifying the what, why, and how of an observed action: An fMRI study of mentalizing and mechanizing during action observation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(1), 63–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stalnaker, R. C. (2002). Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy, 25, 701–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenning, K., Lascarides, A., & Calder, J. (2006). Introduction to cognition and communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Straube, B., Green, A., Weis, S., & Kircher, T. (2012, 11). A supramodal neural network for speech and gesture semantics: An fMRI study. PLoS ONE, 7(11), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. Language Typology and Syntactic Description, 3(99), 36–149.Google Scholar
Thesen, A., Steen, J. B., & Doving, K. B. (1993). Behaviour of dogs during olfactory tracking. Journal of Experimental Biology, 180(1), 247–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M. (2006). Why don’t apes point? In Enfield, N. & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.), The roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 506–24). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Trujillo, J. P., Simanova, I., Bekkering, H., & Özyürek, A. (2018). Communicative intent modulates production and comprehension of actions and gestures: A kinect study. Cognition, 180, 38–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trujillo, J. P., Simanova, I., Özyürek, A., & Bekkering, H. (2019). Seeing the unexpected: How brains read communicative intent through kinematics. Cerebral Cortex, 30(3), 1056–67.Google Scholar
Van Overwalle, F., & Baetens, K. (2009). Understanding others’ actions and goals by mirror and mentalizing systems: A meta-analysis. NeuroImage, 48(3), 564–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagner, S. M., Nusbaum, H., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2004). Probing the mental representation of gesture: Is handwaving spatial? Journal of Memory and Language, 50(4), 395–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesp, R., Hesse, J., Keutmann, D., & Wheaton, K. (2001). Gestures maintain spatial imagery. American Journal of Psychology, 114(4), 591–600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wharton, T. (2009). Pragmatics and non-verbal communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willems, R. M., Öyürek, A., & Hagoort, P. (2007). When language meets action: The neural integration of gesture and speech. Cerebral Cortex, 17(10), 2322–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willems, R. M., Özyürek, A., & Hagoort, P. (2009). Differential roles for left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in multimodal integration of action and language. NeuroImage, 47(4), 1992–2004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willems, R. M., & Varley, R. (2010). Neural insights into the relation between language and communication. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, D., & Wharton, T. (2006). Relevance and prosody. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(10), 1559–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. (2016). What co-speech gestures do: Investigating the role of visual behaviour accompanying language use during reference in interaction (unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Leeds.Google Scholar
Wilson, J., & Argyriou, P. (2019, June). When do speakers share gesture perspective? Poster presented at Body up: Current trends and future directions in embodiment and social interaction.Google Scholar
Winter, B. (2014). Spoken language achieves robustness and evolvability by exploiting degeneracy and neutrality. BioEssays, 36(10), 960–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, Y. C., & Coulson, S. (2005). Meaningful gestures: Electrophysiological indices of iconic gesture comprehension. Psychophysiology, 42(6), 654–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, Y. C., & Coulson, S. (2007). Iconic gestures prime related concepts: An ERP study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(1), 57–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, J., Gannon, P. J., Emmorey, K., Smith, J. F., & Braun, A. R. (2009). Symbolic gestures and spoken language are processed by a common neural system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(49), 20664–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yorzinski, J. L., & Miller, J. (2020). Sclera color enhances gaze perception in humans. PLoS ONE, 15(2), e0228275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this element is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 14
- Cited by