Skip to main content Accessibility help
Religious Disagreement

Religious Disagreement

This Element examines what we can learn from religious disagreement, focusing on disagreement with possible selves and former selves, the epistemic significance of religious agreement, the problem of disagreements between religious experts, and the significance of philosophy of religion. Helen De Cruz shows how religious beliefs of others constitute significant higher-order evidence. At the same time, she advises that we should not necessarily become agnostic about all religious matters, because our cognitive background colors the way we evaluate evidence. This allows us to maintain religious beliefs in many cases, while nevertheless taking the religious beliefs of others seriously.

  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Buy the Element
  • Copyright

  • COPYRIGHT: © Helen De Cruz 2019


Hide all
Bourget, D. , & Chalmers, D. J. (2014). What do philosophers believe? Philosophical Studies, 170 , 465–500. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Augustine . (5th century [1953]). The usefulness of belief (De utilitate credendi). In J. H. S. Burleigh (Ed.), Augustine: Earlier writings (pp. 284–323). Philadelphia: Westminster Press. Google Scholar
Frank, R. M. (1994). Al-Ghazālī and the Ash‘arite school. Durham and London: Duke University Press. Google Scholar
Bogardus, T. (2013). The problem of contingency for religious belief. Faith and Philosophy, 30 , 371–392. CrossRef | Google Scholar
De Cruz, H. (2018). Religious belief and philosophical views: A qualitative study. Res Philosophica, 95 (3), 477–504. Google Scholar
Draper, P. , & Nichols, R. (2013). Diagnosing cognitive biases in philosophy of religion. The Monist, 96 , 420–444. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Feldman, R. (2007). Reasonable religious disagreements. In L. Anthony (Ed.), Philosophers without gods (pp. 194–214). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Gellman, J. (1997). Experience of God and the rationality of theistic belief. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar
Fricker, L. (2014). Epistemic trust in oneself and others – An argument from analogy? In L. Callahan & T. O’Connor (Eds.), Religious faith and intellectual virtue (pp. 174–203). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Hills, A. (2009). Moral testimony and moral epistemology. Ethics, 120 , 94–127. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Janzen, J. (1978). The quest for therapy in Lower Zaire. Berkeley: University of California Press. Google Scholar
King, N. L. (2012). Disagreement: What’s the problem? Or a good peer is hard to find. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 85 , 249–272. CrossRef | Google Scholar
King, P. , & Ballantyne, N. (2009). Augustine on testimony. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 39 (2), 195–214. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Gross, N. , & Simmons, S. (2009). The religiosity of American college and university professors. Sociology of Religion, 70 , 101–129. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Calvin, J. (1559 [1960]). Institutes of the Christian religion (F. L. Battles, Trans.). Philadelphia: Westminster Press. Google Scholar
Augustine . (5th century CE [1961]). Confessions (R. S. Pine-Coffin, Trans.). London: Penguin. Google Scholar
Easwaran, K. , Fenton-Glynn, L. , Hitchcock, C. , & Velasco, J. D. (2016). Updating on the credences of others: Disagreement, agreement, and synergy. Philosophers’ Imprint, 16 (11), 1–39. Google Scholar
James, W. (1902). The varieties of religious experience. A study in human nature. New York: Longmans, Green, and Co. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Kelly, T. (2011). Consensus gentium: Reflections on the ‘common consent’ argument for the existence of God. In K. J. Clark & R. J. VanArragon (Eds.), Evidence and religious belief (pp. 135–156). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Ballantyne, N. , & Coffman, E. (2012). Conciliationism and uniqueness. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 90 , 657–670. CrossRef | Google Scholar
62 Christensen, D. (2007). Epistemology of disagreement: The good news. Philosophical Review, 116 (2), 187–217. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Douven, I. (2010). Simulating peer disagreements. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science A, 41 , 148–157. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (2001). Nonoverlapping magisteria. In R. Pennock (Ed.), Intelligent design creationism and its critics. Philosophical, theological, and scientific perspectives (pp. 737–749). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Gutting, G . (2009). What philosophers know: Case studies in recent analytic philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Harris, P. L. , & Corriveau, K. H. (2011). Young children’s selective trust in informants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 366 , 1179–1187. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Christensen, D. (2011). Disagreement, question-begging, and epistemic self-criticism. Philosopher’s Imprint, 11 (6), 1–22. Google Scholar
    Dixon, R. D. , Lowery, R. C. , & Jones, L. P. (1992). The fact and form of born-again religious conversions and sociopolitical conservatism. Review of Religious Research, 34 , 117–131. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Gutting, G . (1982). Religious belief and religious skepticism. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. Google Scholar
    64 Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108 , 814–834. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Kelemen, D. (2004). Are children “intuitive theists”? Reasoning about purpose and design in nature. Psychological Science, 15 , 295–301. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Barnett, Z. (in press). Belief dependence: How do the numbers count? Philosophical Studies, 1–23. Google Scholar
    Christensen, D. (2010). Higher-order evidence. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 81 (1), 185–215. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Dellsén, F. (2018). When expert disagreement supports the consensus. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 96 , 142–156. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Al-Ghazālī, A. H. M. (ca. 1100 [1952]). Deliverance from error . In W. M. Watt (Trans.), The practice and faith of al-Ghazālī (pp. 1–359). London: Allen & Unwin. Google Scholar
    Alston, W. P. (1991). Perceiving God. The epistemology of religious experience. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar
    Berger, M . (1998). Rabbinic authority. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    Kelley, J. , & De Graaf, N. D. (1997). National context, parental socialization, and religious belief: Results from 15 nations. American Sociological Review, 62 , 639–659. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Benton, M. A. (2016). Expert opinion and second-hand knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 92 , 492–508. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Clark, K. J. , & Barrett, J. L. (2010). Reformed epistemology and the cognitive science of religion. Faith and Philosophy, 27 , 174–189. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Griffel, F. (2017). Al-Ghazālī’s Incoherence of the philosophers. In K. El-Rouayheb & S. Schmidtke (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Islamic philosophy (pp. 191–200). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    Guthrie, S. E. (1993). Faces in the clouds. A new theory of religion. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    Hick, J. (1988). God and the universe of faiths. Essays in the philosophy of religion. London: Macmillan. Google Scholar
    Al-Ghazālī, A. H. M. (11th century [1963]). The incoherence of the philosophers (S. A. Kamali, Trans.). Lahore: Pakistan Philosophical Congress. Google Scholar
    Asiedu, F. B. A. (2001). The limits of Augustine’s Personal Authority: The Hermeneutics of Trust in De utilitate credendi. In K. Paffenroth & K. L. Hughes (Eds.), Augustine and liberal education (pp. 124–145). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar
    Collins, H. , & Evans, R. (2008). Rethinking expertise. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
    De Cruz, H. (2017). Religious disagreement: An empirical study among academic philosophers. Episteme, 14 , 71–87. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Gauchat, G. (2012). Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review, 77 , 167–187. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Barrett, J. L. , Richert, R. A. , & Driesenga, A. (2001). God’s beliefs versus mother’s: The development of nonhuman agent concepts. Child Development, 72 , 50–65. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • De Cruz, H. , & De Smedt, J. (2015). A natural history of natural theology. The cognitive science of theology and philosophy of religion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
    De Cruz, H. , & De Smedt, J. (2013). Reformed and evolutionary epistemology and the noetic effects of sin. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 74 (1), 49–66. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Griffel, F. (2005). Taqlīd of the philosophers: al-Ghazālī’s initial accusation in his tahāfut . In S. Günther (Ed.), Ideas, images, and methods of portrayal: Insights into classical Arabic literature and Islam. Leiden and Boston: Brill. Google Scholar
    63 Edwards, J. (1821). A treatise concerning religious affections, in three parts. Philadelphia: James Crissy. Google Scholar
    Goldman, A. I. (2001). Experts: Which ones should you trust? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 63 , 85–110. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Hume, D. (1757). The natural history of religion. In Four dissertations (pp. 1–117). London: A. Millar. Google Scholar
    Cummins, R. (1998). Reflections on reflective equilibrium. In W. Ramsey & M. DePaul (Eds.), The role of intuition in philosophy (pp. 113–127). New York: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar
    Barrett, J. L. (2004). Why would anyone believe in God? Lanham, MD: AltaMita Press. Google Scholar
    Gellman, J. (1992). A new look at the problem of evil. Faith and Philosophy, 9 (2), 210–216. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Heiphetz, L. , Spelke, E. S. , Harris, P. L. , & Banaji, M. R. (2013). The development of reasoning about beliefs: Fact, preference, and ideology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49 , 559–565. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Carel, H. , Kidd, I. J. , & Pettigrew, R. (2016). Illness as transformative experience. The Lancet, 388 (10050), 1152–1153. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Cohen, G. A. (2000). If you’re an egalitarian, how come you’re so rich? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
    Goldman, A. I. (2018). Expertise. Topoi, 37 , 3–10. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Ecklund, E. H. , & Scheitle, C. P. (2007). Religion among academic scientists: Distinctions, disciplines, and demographics. Social Problems, 54 (2), 289–307. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Elga, A. (2007). Reflection and disagreement. Noûs, 41 , 478–502. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Fridland, E. (in press). Do as I say and as I do: Imitation, pedagogy and cumulative culture. Mind and Language. Google Scholar
    Legare, C. H. (2017). Cumulative cultural learning: Development and diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114 (30), 7877–7883. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Kitcher, P. (1990). The division of cognitive labor. Journal of Philosophy, 87 , 5–22. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Littlejohn, C. (2013). Disagreement and defeat. In D. E. Machuca (Ed.), Disagreement and skepticism (pp. 169–192). London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
    Matheson, J. (2009). Conciliatory views of disagreement and higher-order evidence. Episteme, 6 (3), 269–279. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Rollins, J. (2015). Beliefs and testimony as social evidence: Epistemic egoism, epistemic universalism, and common consent arguments. Philosophy Compass, 10 , 78–90. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Levinstein, B. A. (2015). With all due respect: The macro-epistemology of disagreement. Philosopher’s Imprint, 15 (13), 1–20. Google Scholar
    Maimonides, M. (12th century [1963b]). The guide of the perplexed (Vol. 2; S. Pines, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
    Potter, K. (2013). Religious disagreement: Internal and external. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 74 , 21–31. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Rowe, W. L. (1979). The problem of evil and some varieties of atheism. American Philosophical Quarterly, 16 , 335–341. Google Scholar
    Van Leeuwen, N. (2014). Religious credence is not factual belief. Cognition, 133 , 698–715. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Vavova, K. (2018). Irrelevant influences. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 96 (1), 134–152. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Lofland, J. , & Stark, R. (1965). Becoming a world-saver: A theory of conversion to a deviant perspective. American Sociological Review, 30 , 862–875. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Luhrmann, T. M. (2012a). A hyperreal God and modern belief. Current Anthropology, 53 , 371–395. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Peels, R. (2015). Believing at will is possible. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 93 , 524–541. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Roberts, R. C. , & Wood, W. J. (2007). Intellectual virtues: An essay in regulative epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Swinburne, R. (2004). The existence of God (6th ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Nagel, J. (2012). Intuitions and experiments: A defense of the case method in epistemology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 85 , 495–527. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Shea, N. (2009). Imitation as an inheritance system. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 364 , 2429–2443. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Shtulman, A. (2013). Epistemic similarities between students’ scientific and supernatural beliefs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105 , 199–212. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Langermann, Y. T. (2000). Maimonides’ repudiation of astrology. In R. S. Cohen & H. Levine (Eds.), A Maimonides reader (pp. 131–157). Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar
    Pasnau, R. (2015). Disagreement and the value of self-trust. Philosophical Studies, 172 (9), 2315–2339. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    66 Luskin, R. C. , O’Flynn, I. , Fishkin, J. S. , & Russell, D. (2014). Deliberating across deep divides. Political Studies, 62 (1), 116–135. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Maimonides, M. (12th century [1963a]). The guide of the perplexed (Vol. 1; S. Pines, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
    Maimonides, M . (12th century [1972]). Letter on astrology. In I. Twersky (Ed.), A Maimonides reader (pp. 463–473). Springfield, NJ: Behrman House. Google Scholar
    Paul, L. A. (2014). Transformative experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Teresa of Ávila . (1577 [1921]). The interior castle or the mansions. Google Scholar
    Lane, J. D. , Wellman, H. M. , & Gelman, S. A. (2013). Informants’ traits weigh heavily in young children’s trust in testimony and in their epistemic inferences. Child Development, 84 , 1253–1268. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Nielsen, M. , Mushin, I. , Tomaselli, K. , & Whiten, A. (2014). Where culture takes hold: “Overimitation” and its flexible deployment in Western, Aboriginal, and Bushmen children. Child Development, 85 , 2169–2184. Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Pollock, J. L. (1987). Defeasible reasoning. Cognitive Science, 11 , 481–518. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Schoenfield, M. (2014). Permission to believe: Why permissivism is true and what it tells us about irrelevant influences on belief. Noûs, 48 , 193–218. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Van Inwagen, P. (1996). It is wrong, everywhere, always, for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence. In J. Jordan & D. Howard-Snyder (Eds.), Faith, freedom and rationality (pp. 137–154). Savage, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. Google Scholar
    Kox, W. , Meeus, W. , & Hart, H. (1991). Religious conversion of adolescents: Testing the Lofland and Stark model of religious conversion. Sociological Analysis, 52 (3), 227–240. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    65 Lackey, J. (2018). Experts and peer disagreement. In M. Benton , J. Hawthorne , & D. Rabinowitz (Eds.), Knowledge, belief, and God: New insights in religious epistemology (pp. 228–245). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    Lakhdar, M. , Vinsonneau, G. , Apter, M. J. , & Mullet, E. (2007). Conversion to Islam among French adolescents and adults: A systematic inventory of motives. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17 (1), 1–15. Google Scholar
    Luhrmann, T. M. (2006). The art of hearing God: Absorption, dissociation, and contemporary American spirituality. Spiritus: A Journal of Christian Spirituality, 5 , 133–157. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Norenzayan, A. , Gervais, W. M. , & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2012). Mentalizing deficits constrain belief in a personal god. PLoS ONE, 7 , e36880. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Paloutzian, R. F. , Richardson, J. T. , & Rambo, L. R. (1999). Religious conversion and personality change. Journal of Personality, 67(6), 1047–1079. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Sperber, D. , Clément, F. , Heintz, C. , Mascaro, O. , Mercier, H. , Origgi, G. , & Wilson, D. (2010). Epistemic vigilance. Mind and Language, 25 , 359–393. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Plantinga, A. (2000). Warranted Christian belief. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    68 Taves, A. (2016). Revelatory events. Three case studies of the emergence of new spiritual paths. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
    Van Leeuwen, N. & van Elk, M. (in press). Seeking the supernatural: The interactive religious experience model. Religion, Brain and Behavior. Google Scholar
    Levy, N. (in press). Due deference to denialism: Explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings. Synthese, 1–15. Google Scholar
    Longino, H. E. (1991). Multiplying subjects and the diffusion of power. Journal of Philosophy, 88 , 666–674. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Reid, J. (2015). The common consent argument from Herbert to Hume. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 53 , 401–433. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Levy, N. (2017). Religious beliefs are factual beliefs: Content does not correlate with context sensitivity. Cognition, 161 , 109–116. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Mill, J. S. (1874). Three essays on religion. London: Henry Holt and Co. Google Scholar
    Lindeman, M. , Svedholm-Häkkinen, A. M. , & Lipsanen, J. (2015). Ontological confusions but not mentalizing abilities predict religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in supernatural purpose. Cognition, 134 , 63–76. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Mill, J. S. (1859). On liberty. London: John W. Parker and Son. Google Scholar
    Luhrmann, T. M. (2012b). When God talks back. Understanding the American Evangelical relationship with God. New York: Vintage. Google Scholar
    Pettigrew, R. (2016). Jamesian epistemology formalised: An explication of “the will to believe.” Episteme, 13 , 253–268. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Pritchard, D. (2008). Knowing the answer, understanding, and epistemic value. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 77 (1), 325–339. Google Scholar
    67 Ranney, M. A. , & Clark, D. (2016). Climate change conceptual change: Scientific information can transform attitudes. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8 (1), 49–75. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Schwitzgebel, E. , & Cushman, F. (2015). Philosophers’ biased judgments persist despite training, expertise and reflection. Cognition, 141 , 127–137. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Pronin, E. , Lin, D. Y. , & Ross, L. (2002). The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28 (3), 369–381. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Stanford, K. (2006). Exceeding our grasp: Science, history, and the problem of unconceived alternatives. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Stroud, S. (2006). Epistemic partiality in friendship. Ethics, 116 , 498–524. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Lackey, J. (2010). What should we do when we disagree? In T. Gendler & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), Oxford studies in epistemology (Vol. 3 , pp. 274–293). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    Lackey, J. (2011). Assertion and isolated second-hand knowledge. In J. Brown & H. Cappelen (Eds.), Assertion: New philosophical essays (pp. 251–275). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Mercier, H. , & Sperber, D. (2017). The enigma of reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Seeskin, K. (2017). Maimonides. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, retrieved September 21, 2017, from Google Scholar
    Rini, R. (2017). Fake news and partisan epistemology. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 27 (2), E43–E64. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Schwitzgebel, E. (2014). The moral behavior of ethicists and the role of the philosopher. In C. Luetge , H. Rusch , & M. Uhl (Eds.), Experimental ethics: Toward an empirical moral philosophy (pp. 59–64). Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar
    Simpson, R. M. (2017). Permissivism and the arbitrariness objection. Episteme, 14(4)519–538. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Smith, J. (1902). History of the Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter-Day Saints. Period I: History of Joseph Smith, the prophet, by himself (Vol. 1). Salt Lake City: Deseret News. Google Scholar
    Whiten, A. , Allan, G. , Devlin, S. , Kseib, N. , Raw, N. , & McGuigan, N. (2016). Social learning in the real-world: ‘Over-imitation’ occurs in both children and adults unaware of participation in an experiment and independently of social interaction. PloS One, 11 (7), e0159920. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Zuckerman, P. (2007). Atheism. Contemporary numbers and patterns. In M. Martin (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to atheism (pp. 47–65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
    White, R. (2014). Evidence cannot be permissive. In M. Steup , J. Turri , & E. Sosa (Eds.), Contemporary debates in epistemology (pp. 312–323). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    The Design Argument Elliott Sober Google Scholar
    The Divine Attributes T. J. Mawson Google Scholar
    Cosmological Arguments Michael Almeida CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Wolterstorff, N. (1996). John Locke and the ethics of belief. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Miracles David Basinger Google Scholar
    The Atonement William Lane Craig CrossRef | Google Scholar
    God and Time Natalja Deng Google Scholar
    Wedgwood, R. (2007). The nature of normativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Zagzebski, L. (2011). Epistemic self-trust and the Consensus Gentium argument. In K. J. Clark & R. J. VanArragon (Eds.), Evidence and religious belief (pp. 22–36). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Zagzebski, L. (2012). Epistemic authority: A theory of trust, authority, and autonomy in belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Wettstein, H. (2012). The significance of religious experience. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Atheism and Agnosticism Graham Oppy CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Worrall, J. (2004). Science discredits religion. In M. L. Peterson & R. J. VanArragon (Eds.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of religion (pp. 59–72). Malden, MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar


    Altmetric attention score

    Full text views

    Total number of HTML views: 0
    Total number of PDF views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    Abstract views

    Total abstract views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    * Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

    Usage data cannot currently be displayed.