Element contents
The Statues of Constantinople
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 June 2021
Summary
This Element discusses the ancient statues once set up in Byzantine Constantinople, with a special focus on their popular reception. From its foundation by Constantine the Great in 324, Constantinople housed a great number of statues which stood in the city on streets and public places, or were kept in several collections and in the Hippodrome. Almost all of them, except a number of newly made statues of reigning emperors, were ancient objects which had been brought to the city from other places. Many of these statues were later identified with persons other than those they actually represented, or received an allegorical (sometimes even an apocalyptical) interpretation. When the Crusaders of the Fourth Crusade conquered the city in 1204, almost all of the statues of Constantinople were destroyed or looted.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781108956147Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 15 July 2021
Bibliography
Primary Sources
Secondary Sources
Anderson, B., ‘Classified knowledge: the epistemology of statuary in the Parastaseis Syntomoi Chronikai’, Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 35 (2011), 1–19Google Scholar
Anderson, B. ‘Leo III and the Anemodoulion’, Byzantinische Zeitschrift 104 (2011), 41–54Google Scholar
Andreae, B., and Conticello, B., ‘Skylla und Charybdis: Zur Skylla-Gruppe von Sperlonga’, Abhandlungen der Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaftlichen Klasse, no. 14 (1987)Google Scholar
Asutay-Effenberger, N., Die Landmauer von Konstantinopel – İstanbul, Millennium Studies 18 (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2007)Google Scholar
Bär, S., ‘Museum of words: Christodorus, the art of ekphrasis and the epyllic genre’ in Baumbach, M., Bär, S. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Greek and Latin Epyllion and its Reception (Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2012), 447–71Google Scholar
Bardill, J., Constantine, Divine Emperor of the Christian Golden Age (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Bardill, J. ‘The Palace of Lausus and nearby monuments in Constantinople: a topographical study’, American Journal of Archaeology 101 (1997), 67–95Google Scholar
Bassett, S., ‘ “Curious art”: myth, sculpture, and Christian response in the world of Late Antiquity’ in Leppin, H., Antike Mythologie in christlichen Kontexten der Spätantike, Millennium Studies 54 (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2015), 240–61Google Scholar
Bassett, S. ‘Excellent offerings: the Lausos Collection in Constantinople’, The Art Bulletin 82 (2000), 6–25Google Scholar
Bassett, S. The Urban Image of Late Antique Constantinople (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Belobrova, O. A., ‘Статуя византийского императора Юстиниана в древнерусских письменных источниках и иконографии’, Vizantiyskiy Vremmenik 17 (1960), 114–23Google Scholar
Berger, A., ‘Das apokalyptische Konstantinopel’ in Brandes and Schmieder, Endzeiten, 135–55Google Scholar
Berger, A. ‘Das Haus des Manns aus Amastris: Zu einem Gebäudekomplex im byzantinischen Konstantinopel’, Acta antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 51 (2011), 87–96Google Scholar
Berger, A. ‘Tauros e Sigma. Due piazze di Costantinopoli’ in Bisanzio e l’Occidente: Arte, archeologia, storia. Studi in onore di Fernanda de’ Maffei (Rome: Viella, 1996), 17–31Google Scholar
Berger, A. Untersuchungen zu den Patria Konstantinupoleos, Poikila Byzantina 8 (Bonn: Habelt, 1988)Google Scholar
Bianchetti, S., Falaride e Pseudofalaride: storia e leggenda (Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider, 1987)Google Scholar
Boeck, E. N., Imagining the Byzantine Past: The perception of History in the Illustrated Manuscripts of Skylitzes and Manasses (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeck, E. N. The Bronze Horseman of Justinian in Constantinople: The Cross-Cultural Biography of a Mediterranean Monument (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021)Google Scholar
Brandes, W. and Schmieder, F. (eds.), Endzeiten, Millennium-Studien 16 (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2008)Google Scholar
Brokkaar, W. G., The Oracles of the Most Wise Emperor Leo and the Tale of the True Emperor (Amstelodamensis Graecus VI E 8) (Amsterdam: Nieuwgriekse Taal- en Letterkunde en Byzantinologie, 2002)Google Scholar
Cameron, A., The Greek Anthology from Meleager to Planudes (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Cameron, A. and Herrin, J, Constantinople in the Early Eighth Century: The Parastaseis Syntomoi Chronikai (with translation), Columbia Studies in the Classical Tradition 10 (Leiden: Brill, 1984)Google Scholar
Casson, S., Talbot Rice, D., Hudson, G. F. and Jones, A. H. M., Preliminary Report upon the Excavations Carried out in the Hippodrome of Constantinople in 1927 on Behalf of the British Academy (London: Milford, 1928)Google Scholar
Chatterjee, P., ‘Viewing the unknown in eighth-century Constantinople’, Gesta 56 (2017), 137–49Google Scholar
Coates-Stephens, R., ‘The Byzantine sack of Rome’, Antiquité Tardive 25 (2017), 191–212Google Scholar
Croke, B., ‘Poetry and propaganda: Anastasius I as Pompey’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 48 (2008), 447–66Google Scholar
Dagron, G., Constantinople imaginaire. Études sur le reueil des Patria, Bibliothèque byzantine, Études 8 (Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1984)Google Scholar
Dagron, G. Naissance d’une capitale. Constantinople et ses institutions de 330 à 451, Bibliothèque byzantine 7 (Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1974)Google Scholar
Dagron, G. ‘L’organisation et le déroulement des courses d’après le Livre de cérémonies’, Travaux et mémoires 13 (2000), 3–200Google Scholar
Effenberger, A., ‘Überlegungen zur Aufstellung des Theodosius-Obelisken im Hippodrom von Konstantinopel’ in Brenk, B. (ed.), Innovation in der Spätantike (Wiesbaden: Reichert, 1996), 207–82Google Scholar
Effenberger, A. ‘Zu den beiden Reiterstandbildern auf dem Tauros von Konstantinopel’, Millennium 5 (2008), 261–97Google Scholar
Effenberger, A. ‘Zur Wiederverwendung der venezianischen Tetrarchengruppen in Konstantinopel’, Millennium 10 (2013), 215–74Google Scholar
Frickenhaus, A., ‘Der Eros von Myndos’, Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 30 (1915), 127–29Google Scholar
Gehn, U. and Ward-Perkins, B., ‘Constantinople’, in Smith, R. R. R. and Ward-Perkins, B. (eds.), The Last Statues of Antiquity (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016), 136–45Google Scholar
Griebeler, A., ‘The Serpent Column and the talismanic ecologies of Byzantine Constantinople’, Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 44 (2019), 86–105Google Scholar
Guberti Bassett, S., ‘Historiae custos: sculpture and tradition in the Baths of Zeuxippos’, American Journal of Archaeology 100 (1996), 491–506Google Scholar
James, L., ‘Pray not to fall into temptation and be your own guard: pagan statues in Christian Constantinople’, Gesta 35 (1996), 12–20Google Scholar
Jouette, J.-C., ‘Divination, magie et sorcellerie autour des statues antiques et des colonnes historiées de Constantinople (XIe–XIIe siècles)’ in Dasen, V. and Spieser, J.-M. (eds.), Les savoirs magiques et leur transmission de l’Antiquité à la Renaissance. Micrologus’ Library 60 (Florence: SISMEL, 2014), 461–75Google Scholar
Kaldellis, A., ‘Christodoros on the statues of the Zeuxippos baths: a new reading of the Ekphrasis’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 47 (2007), 361–83Google Scholar
Keesling, C. M., ‘Greek statue terms revisited: what does ἀνδριάς mean?’ Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 57 (2017), 836–61Google Scholar
Kiilerich, B., ‘The Barletta Colossus revisited’, Acta ad Archaeologiam et Artivm Historiam Pertinentia 28 (2015), 55–72Google Scholar
Konrad, C., ‘Beobachtungen zur Architektur und Stellung des Säulenmonuments in Istanbul-Cerrahpasa “Arkadiussäule”’, Istanbuler Mitteilungen 51 (2001), 319–401Google Scholar
Laubscher, H. P., ‘Beobachtungen zu tetrarchischen Kaiserbildnissen aus Porphyr’, Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 44 (1999), 207–52Google Scholar
Leeb, R., Konstantin und Christus, Arbeiten zur Kirchengeschichte 58 (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1992)Google Scholar
Lehmann, P. W., ‘Theodosius or Justinian? A Renaissance drawing of a Byzantine rider?’, Art Bulletin 41 (1959), 39–57Google Scholar
Loverance, R., ‘The bronze goose from the Hippodrome’ in Shilling and Stephenson, Fountains, 87–102Google Scholar
Magdalino, P., ‘The End of Time in Byzantium’ in Brandes and Schmieder, Endzeiten, 119–33Google Scholar
Majeska, G. P., Russian Travelers to Constantinople in the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Centuries, Dumbarton Oaks Studies 19 (Washington: Dumbarton Oaks, 1984)Google Scholar
Mango, C., ‘Antique statuary and the Byzantine beholder’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 17 (1963), 53–75Google Scholar
Mango, C. ‘The columns of Justinian and his successors’ in Studies on Constantinople (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1997), X 1–20Google Scholar
Mango, C. ‘Constantine’s porphyry column and the Chapel of St Constantine’, Deltion tes Christianikes Archaiologikes Hetaireias 4, 10 (1981), 103–10Google Scholar
Mango, C. ‘Epigrammes honorifiques, statues et portraits a Byzance’ in Studies on Constantinople (Aldershot: Ashgate 1997), IX 22–35Google Scholar
Mango, C. ‘Septime Severe et Byzance’, Comptes rendus des séances de l’Académie de Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres 147 (2003), 593–608Google Scholar
Mango, C., Vickers, M., and Francis, E. D., ‘The Palace of Lausus at Constantinople and its collection of ancient statues’, Journal of the History of Collections 4 (1992), 89–98Google Scholar
Martins de Jesus, C. A., ‘The nude Constantinople: masterpieces of Greek sculpture at Byzantium according to the Greek Anthology’ in Morais, R., Leão, D., Rodríguez Pérez, D. and Ferreira, D. (eds.), Greek Art in Motion: Studies in Honour of Sir John Boardman on the Occasion of His 90th Birthday (Oxford: Archaeopress Archaeology, 2019), 78–84Google Scholar
Martins de Jesus, C. A. ‘The statuary collection held at the baths of Zeuxippus (Ap 2) and the search for Constantine’s museological intentions’, Synthesis 21 (2014), www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.6391/pr.6391.pdfGoogle Scholar
Mathiopulu, E., ‘Klassisches und Klassizistisches im Statuenfragment von Niketas Choniates’, Byzantinische Zeitschrift 73 (1980), 25–40Google Scholar
Naumann, R., ‘Der antike Rundbau beim Myrelaion und der Palast Romanos I. Lekapenos’, Istanbuler Mitteilungen 16 (1966), 199–216Google Scholar
Naumann, R. ‘Neue Beobachtungen am Theodosiusbogen und Forum Tauri in Istanbul’, Istanbuler Mitteilungen 26 (1976), 117–41Google Scholar
Newskaja, W. P., Byzanz in der klassischen und hellenistischen Epoche (Leipzig: Koehler & Amelang, 1955)Google Scholar
Niewöhner, P. and Abura, J., ‘Der frühbyzantinische Rundbau beim Myrelaion in Konstantinopel. Kapitelle, Mosaiken und Ziegelstempel’, Istanbuler Mitteilungen 60 (2010), 411–59Google Scholar
Niewöhner, P. and Peschlow, U., ‘Neues zu den Tetrarchenfiguren in Venedig und zu ihrer Aufstellung in Konstantinopel’, Istanbuler Mitteilungen 62 (2012), 341–67Google Scholar
Odorico, P., ‘Du recueil à l’invention du texte: le cas des Parastaseis syntomoi chronikai’, Byzantinische Zeitschrift 107 (2014), 755–84Google Scholar
Papamastorakis, T., ‘Interpreting the de Signis of Nicetas Choniates’ in Simpson, A. and Efthymiadis, S. (eds.), Nicetas Choniates: A Historian and a Writer (Geneva: La pomme d’or, 2009), 209–22Google Scholar
Peschlow, U., ‘Eine wiedergewonnene byzantinische Ehrensäule in Istanbul’, in Feld, O. and Peschlow, U. (eds.), Studien zur spätantiken und byzantinischen Kunst. Festschrift für F. W. Deichmann, Monographien des Römisch-germanisches Zentralmuseum 10.1 (Bonn: Habelt, 1986), 23–33Google Scholar
Pingitzer, P., ‘Nilpferd attackiert Krokodil. Zur Darstellung einer Tierkampfszene auf einer Gemme aus Carnuntum’, Forum Archaeologiae 87/VI/2018, http://farch.netGoogle Scholar
Pont, A.-V., ‘Septime Sévère à Byzance: l’invention d’un fondateur’, Antiquité Tardive 18 (2010), 191–198Google Scholar
Poulsen, E., ‘A bronze portrait statuette of the Sovereign-Sun of about 500 AD (Theoderic?)’ in Arce, J. and Burkhalter, F. (eds.), Bronce y religion romana. Actas del XI Congreso internacional de bronces antiguos (Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 1993), 349–60Google Scholar
Puech, V., ‘Les statues des bains de Zeuxippe à Constantinople: collection et patrimoine dans l’Antiquité tardive’, Anabasis 24 (2016), 145–81Google Scholar
Saradi, H., ‘Christodorus of Koρtus, the statuary of the baths of Zeuxippus: Virgilian heroes in a Constantinopolitan context’ in Ch. Chotzakoglu (ed.): Ζείδωρος Ὑετός (Levkosia: Hetaireia Kypriakon Spoudon, 2019), II 703–18Google Scholar
Schreiner, P., ‘Untersuchungen zu den Niederlassungen westlicher Kaufleute im Byzantinischen Reich des 11. und 12. Jahrhunderts’, Byzantinische Forschungen 7 (1979), 175–91Google Scholar
Shilling, B. and Stephenson, P., Fountains and Water Culture in Byzantium (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016)Google Scholar
Speck, P., ‘War Bronze ein knappes Metall? Die Legende von dem Stier auf dem Bus in den ‘Parastaseis 42’’, Hellenika 39 (1988), 3–17Google Scholar
Stephenson, P., The Serpent Column: A Cultural Biography (New York: Oxford University Press, 2016)Google Scholar
Stephenson, P. ‘The Serpent Column fountain’ in Shilling and Stephenson, Fountains, 103–29Google Scholar
Stichel, R., ‘Die Schlangensäule im Hippodrom von Istanbul’, Istanbuler Mitteilungen 47 (1997), 315–48Google Scholar
Striker, C. L., The Myrelaion, Bodrum Camii, in Istanbul (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1981)Google Scholar
Stupperich, R., ‘Das Statuenprogramm in den Zeuxippos-Thermen. Überlegungen zur Beschreibung durch Christodoros von Koptos’, Istanbuler Mitteilungen 32 (1982), 210–35Google Scholar
Tissoni, F., Cristodoro. Un’introduzione e un commento (Alessandria: Edizioni Dell’Orso, 2000)Google Scholar
Van der Vin, J. P., Travellers to Greece and Constantinople: Ancient Monuments and Old Traditions in Medieval Travellers’ Tales, Uitgaven van het Nederlands Historisch-Archeologisch Instituut te Istanbul 49 (Istanbul: Nederlands Historisch-Archaeologisch Instituut te Istanbul, 1980)Google Scholar
Von Mosch, H.-C., ‘Hadrians ‟Sandalenlöser”. Der Hermes des Lysipp (?) auf den Münzen von Trapezous, Amastris und Markianopolis’, Jahrbuch für Numismatik und Geldgeschichte 63 (2013), 93–149Google Scholar
Von Mosch, H.-C. ‘Aphrodite Selene. Von der Aenadon genetrix zum problematischen Bios der Helena Augusta’, Jahrbuch für Numismatik und Geldgeschichte 67 (2017), 145–239Google Scholar
Von Schlosser, J., ‘Kleinasiatische und thrakische Münzbilder der Kaiserzeit’, Numismatische Zeitschrift 23 (1891), 1–28Google Scholar
Whitby, M., ‘Christodorus of Coptus on the statues in the Baths of Zeuxippus at Constantinople: text and context’ in Nonnus of Panopolis in Context II: Poetry, Religion, and Society, Mnemosyne, Supplement 408 (Leiden: Brill, 2017), 271–88Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this element is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 14
- Cited by