Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home
Student-Centered Teaching in Paleontology and Geoscience Classrooms
This Element is free online until 22nd February 2019
  • Access
Student-Centered Teaching in Paleontology and Geoscience Classrooms

Research on learning and cognition in geoscience education research and other discipline-based education communities suggests that effective instruction should include three key components: a) activation of students' prior knowledge on the subject, b) an active learning pedagogy that allows students to address any existing misconceptions and then build a new understanding of the concept, and c) metacognitive reflections that require students to evaluate their own learning processes during the lesson. This Element provides an overview of the research on student-centered pedagogy in introductory geoscience and paleontology courses and gives examples of these instructional approaches. Student-centered learning shifts the power and attention in a classroom from the instructor to the students. In a student-centered classroom, students are in control of their learning experience and the instructor functions primarily as a guide. Student-centered classrooms trade traditional lecture for conceptually-oriented tasks, collaborative learning activities, new technology, inquiry-based learning, and metacognitive reflection.

  • View HTML
    • Send element to Kindle

      To send this element to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Student-Centered Teaching in Paleontology and Geoscience Classrooms
      Available formats
      ×
      Send element to Dropbox

      To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Student-Centered Teaching in Paleontology and Geoscience Classrooms
      Available formats
      ×
      Send element to Google Drive

      To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Student-Centered Teaching in Paleontology and Geoscience Classrooms
      Available formats
      ×
  • Export citation
  • Buy the print element
  • Copyright
  • COPYRIGHT: © The Paleontological Society 2018
Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stephin, C., Sikes, J., and Snapp, M.. (1978). The Jigsaw Classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing Company.
Aronson, E., and Patnoe, S.. (2011). Cooperation in the Classroom: The Jigsaw Method, 3rd edn. London: Printer and Martin, Ltd.
Arthurs, L., and Templeton, A.. (2009). Coupled collaborative in-class activities and individual follow-up homework promote interactive engagement and improve student learning outcomes in a college-level environmental geology course. Journal of Geoscience Education, 57(5):356371.
Bruno, B. C., Engels, J., Ito, G., Gillis-Davis, J., Dulai, H., Carter, G., Fletcher, C., and Bottjer-Wilson, D.. (2017). Two-stage exams: A powerful tool for reducing the achievement gap in undergraduate oceanography and geology classes. Oceanography, 30(2):198208.
Bursztyn, N., Shelton, B., Walker, A., and Pederson, J.. (2017). Increasing undergraduate interest to learn geoscience with GPS-based augmented reality field trips on students’ own smartphones. GSA Today, 27(6):410.
Chadwick, P. (1978). Some aspects of the development of geological thinking. Journal of Geology Teaching, 3:142148.
Cortright, R. N., Collins, H. L., Rodenbaugh, D. W., and DiCarlo, S. E.. (2003). Student retention of course content is improved by collaborative-group testing. Advanced Physiological Education, 27(3):102108.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. The Psychologist, 34:906911.
Fosnot, C. T. (2005). Constructivism: Theory, Perspective and Practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., and Wenderoth, M. P.. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering and mathematics. PNAS, 111:84108415.
Frodeman, R. (2003). Geo-Logic: Breaking Ground between Philosophy and the Earth Sciences. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Glossary of Education Reform. (2014). Retrieved Dec. 3, 2017, http://edglossary.org/student-centered-learning/.
Gilley, B. H., and Clarkston, B.. (2014). Collaborative testing: Evidence of learning in a controlled in-class study of undergraduate students. Journal of College Science Teaching, 43(3):8391.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Marathe, S., and Liu, L.. (2007). Fish swim, rocks sit, and lungs breathe: Expert-novice understanding of complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(3):307331.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., and Nagarajan, A.. (2002). “It’s harder than we thought it would be”: A comparative case study of expert-novice experimentation strategies. Science Education, 86(2):219243.
Kastens, K., Manduca, C. A., Cervato, C., Frodeman, R., Goodwin, C., Liben, L. S., Mogk, D. W., Spranger, T. C., Stillings, N. A., and Titus, S.. (2009). How geoscientists think and learn. EOS Transactions, 90:265272.
Kyoungna, K., Sharma, P., Land, S. M., and Furlong, K. P.. (2012). Effects of active learning on enhancing student critical thinking in an undergraduate general science course. Innovative Higher Learning, 38(3):223235.
Lorenzo, M., Crouch, C. H., and Mazur, E.. (2005). Reducing the gender gap in the physics classroom. American Journal of Physics, 74:118122.
Lyle, K. S., and Robinson, W. R.. (2003). A statistical evaluation: Peer-led team learning in an organic chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(2):121124.
Lusk, M. and Conklin, L.. (2003). Collaborative testing to promote learning. Journal of Nursing Education, 42(3):121124.
McConnell, D. A., Steer, D. N., Owens, K. D., and Knight, C. C.. (2005). How students think: Implications for learning in introductory geoscience courses. Journal of Geoscience Education, 54(4):462470.
McGreen, N, and Sánchez, I. A.. (2005). Mapping challenge: A case study in the use of mobile phones in collaborative, contextual learning. In Isaías, P., Borg, C., Commers, P., and Bonanno, P., eds., Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference Mobile Learning. Qawra, Malta:IADIS pp. 213217.
Mogk, D. W., and Goodwin, C.. (2012). Learning in the field: Synthesis of research on thinking and learning in the geosciences. Geological Society of American Special Papers, 486:131163.
National Academies of Sciences. (1998). Activities for teaching about evolution and the nature of science. In Teaching about Evolution and the Nature of Science. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, pp. 6173.
National Research Council. (1996). From Analysis to Action: Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2000a). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, expanded edn. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2000b). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning. Washington, DC: National Academics Press.
Novack, J. D. (1991). Clarify with concept maps: A tool for students and teachers alike. The Science Teacher, 58:4549.
Park, C. (2003). Engaging students in the learning process: The learning journal. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 27(2):183199.
Piaget, J. (1964). Development and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28:213224.
Ramasundaram, V., Grunwald, S., Mangeot, A., Comerford, N. B., and Bliss, C. M.. (2005). Development of an environmental virtual field laboratory. Computers and Education, 45:2134.
Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). What is instructional-design theory and how it is changing? In Reigeluth, C. M., ed. Instructional-Design Theories and Models, Volume II. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 530.
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Briggs, D., Iverson, H., Talbot, R., and Shepard, L. A.. (2011). Impact of undergraduate science course innovations on learning. Science, 331(6022):12691270.
Schmitt, M. C., and Newby, T. J.. (1986). Metacognition: Relevance to instruction design. Journal of Instructional Design, 9(4):2933.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). What’s all the fuss about metacognition? In Schoenfeld, A. H., ed., Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 189215.
Science Education Resource Center. (2017). Retrieved Dec. 2, 2017, http://serc.carleton.edu.
Spencer, D. (2017). Enhancing Socially-Shared Metacognition in Introductory Geology. Unpublished PhD dissertation, North Carolina State University.
Tenney, A., and Houck, B.. (2003). Peer-led team learning in introductory biology and chemistry courses: A parallel approach. Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 6:1120.
Uhen, M. D., Lukes, L., George, C., and Lockwood, R.. (2016). Build creative thinking into the STEM undergraduate classroom experience using large databases: The Paleobiology Database example. Innovations in Teaching and Learning Conference Proceedings Vol. 8, http://dx.doi.org/10.13021/G84G7B.
van der Hoeven Kraft, K. J., Srogi, L., Husman, J., Semken, S., and Fuhrman, M.. (2011). Engaging students to learn through the affective domain: A new framework for teaching in the geosciences. Journal of Geoscience Education, 59:7184.
White, B., Fredericksen, J., and Collins, A.. (2009). The interplay of scientific inquiry and metacognition: More than a marriage of convenience. In Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., and Graesser, A. C., eds., Handbook of Metacognition in Education. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 176205.
Yacobucci, M. M. (2012). Using active learning strategies to promote deep learning in the undergraduate paleontology classroom. In Yacobucci, M. M. and Lockwood, R., eds., Teaching Paleontology in the 21st Century. Paleontological Society Special Publication Vol. 12, pp. 135153.
Yuretich, R. F., Kahn, S. A., Leckie, R. M., and Clement, J. J.. (2001). Active-learning methods to improve student performance and scientific interest in a large introductory oceanography course. Journal of Geoscience Education, 49(2):111119.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed