Element contents
The Sublime
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 July 2018
Summary
This Element considers Kant's account of the sublime in the context of his predecessors both in the Anglophone and German rationalist traditions. Since Kant says with evident endorsement that 'we call sublime that which is absolutely great' (Critique of the Power of Judgment, 5:248) and nothing in nature can in fact be absolutely great (it can only figure as such, in certain presentations), Kant concludes that strictly speaking what is sublime can only be the human calling (Bestimmung) to perfect our rational capacity according to the standard of virtue that is thought through the moral law. The Element takes account of the difference between respect and admiration as the two main varieties of sublime feeling, and concludes by considering the role of Stoicism in Kant's account of the sublime, particularly through the channel of Seneca.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781108529709Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 05 July 2018
References
Primary Sources
Ashfield, A. & de Bolla, P., eds. (1996). The Sublime: A Reader in British Eighteenth-century Aesthetic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgarten, A. G. (2007 [1750]). Aesthetica/Ästhetik, Latin-German edition. Trans. Dagmar Mirbach. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Burke, E. (1990 [1757]). A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful. Ed. Phillips, Adam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, E. (1817). Letters from Mrs. Elizabeth Carter to Mrs. Montagu, Between the Years 1755 and 1800, Chiefly upon Literary and Moral Subjects. Ed. Rev. Pennington, Montagu. Volume 1. London: F. C. and J. Rivington.Google Scholar
Gerard, A. (1759). Essay on Taste: with Three Dissertations on the Same Subject by Mr. De Voltaire, Mr. D’Alembert, and Mr. De Montesquieu. London and Edinburgh: A. Millar, A. Kincaid, and J. Bell.Google Scholar
Herder, J. G. (1998). Werke. Volume 8, Schriften zu Literatur und Philosophie 1792–1800. Frankfurt: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag.Google Scholar
Kames, (Henry Home) (2005 [1785]). Elements of Criticism, sixth edition. Ed. Jones, Peter, 2 vols. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. & Sedley, D. N. (1987). The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 volumes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Longinus, (1995). On the Sublime [ΠΕΡΙ ΥΨΟΥΣ]. Trans. W. H. Fyfe, revised by Donald Russell. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Meier, G. F. (1757). Betrachtungen über den ersten Grundsatz aller schönen Künste und Wissenschaften. Halle: Carl Hermann Hemmerde.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, M. (1929–). Gesammelte Schriften: Jubiläumsausgabe. Stuttgart/Bad Cannstatt: Frommann/Holzboog.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, M. (1997 [1761]). Philosophical Writings. Trans. Daniel O. Dahlstrom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139164078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, A. (2016). An Essay on Man. Ed. Jones, Tom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Reid, T. (1969 [1785]). Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Seneca, L. A. (1917 and 1925). Epistles. 2 vols. Trans. Richard M. Gummere. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Seneca, L. A. (1928, 1932, and 1935). Moral Essays. 3 vols. Trans. John W. Basore. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Seneca, L. A. (2010). Anger, Mercy, Revenge. Trans. Robert A. Kaster and Martha C. Nussbaum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226748535.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seneca, L. A. (2014). Hardship and Happiness. Trans. Elaine Fantham, Harry M. Hine, James Ker, and Gareth D. Williams. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226108353.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seneca, L. A. (2015). Letters on Ethics to Lucilius. Trans. Margaret Graver and A. A. Long. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226265209.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Secondary Sources
Ashfield, A. & de Bolla, P., eds. (1996). The Sublime: A Reader in British Eighteenth-century Aesthetic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgarten, A. G. (2007 [1750]). Aesthetica/Ästhetik, Latin-German edition. Trans. Dagmar Mirbach. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Burke, E. (1990 [1757]). A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful. Ed. Phillips, Adam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, E. (1817). Letters from Mrs. Elizabeth Carter to Mrs. Montagu, Between the Years 1755 and 1800, Chiefly upon Literary and Moral Subjects. Ed. Rev. Pennington, Montagu. Volume 1. London: F. C. and J. Rivington.Google Scholar
Gerard, A. (1759). Essay on Taste: with Three Dissertations on the Same Subject by Mr. De Voltaire, Mr. D’Alembert, and Mr. De Montesquieu. London and Edinburgh: A. Millar, A. Kincaid, and J. Bell.Google Scholar
Herder, J. G. (1998). Werke. Volume 8, Schriften zu Literatur und Philosophie 1792–1800. Frankfurt: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag.Google Scholar
Kames, (Henry Home) (2005 [1785]). Elements of Criticism, sixth edition. Ed. Jones, Peter, 2 vols. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. & Sedley, D. N. (1987). The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 volumes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Longinus, (1995). On the Sublime [ΠΕΡΙ ΥΨΟΥΣ]. Trans. W. H. Fyfe, revised by Donald Russell. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Meier, G. F. (1757). Betrachtungen über den ersten Grundsatz aller schönen Künste und Wissenschaften. Halle: Carl Hermann Hemmerde.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, M. (1929–). Gesammelte Schriften: Jubiläumsausgabe. Stuttgart/Bad Cannstatt: Frommann/Holzboog.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, M. (1997 [1761]). Philosophical Writings. Trans. Daniel O. Dahlstrom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139164078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, A. (2016). An Essay on Man. Ed. Jones, Tom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Reid, T. (1969 [1785]). Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Seneca, L. A. (1917 and 1925). Epistles. 2 vols. Trans. Richard M. Gummere. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Seneca, L. A. (1928, 1932, and 1935). Moral Essays. 3 vols. Trans. John W. Basore. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Seneca, L. A. (2010). Anger, Mercy, Revenge. Trans. Robert A. Kaster and Martha C. Nussbaum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226748535.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seneca, L. A. (2014). Hardship and Happiness. Trans. Elaine Fantham, Harry M. Hine, James Ker, and Gareth D. Williams. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226108353.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seneca, L. A. (2015). Letters on Ethics to Lucilius. Trans. Margaret Graver and A. A. Long. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226265209.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, H. (2001). Kant’s Theory of Taste. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511612671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, F. C. (2009). Diotima’s Children: German Aesthetic Rationalism from Leibniz to Lessing. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573011.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, E. (2013). The Sublime in Modern Philosophy: Aesthetics, Ethics, and Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139018098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, R. (2003). The Vocation of the Human Being. In Jacobs, B. and Kain, P., eds., Essays on Kant’s Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 85–104.10.1017/CBO9780511498190.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, T. (2003). Stoic Moral Psychology. In Inwood, B., ed., Cambridge Companion to the Stoics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 257–94.Google Scholar
Budick, S. (2010). Kant and Milton. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctv1r4xd6kCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budd, M. (2008). Aesthetic Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199556175.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clewis, R. (2009). The Kantian Sublime and the Revelation of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511576492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochrane, T. (2012). The Emotional Experience of the Sublime. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 42 (2), 125–48.10.1353/cjp.2012.0003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, S. (2008). Kant on Respect, Dignity, and the Duty of Respect. In Betzler, M., ed., Kant’s Ethics of Virtue. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 175–200.10.1515/9783110209655.175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
di Giovanni, G. (2011). The Year 1786 and Die Bestimmung des Menschen. In Munk, R., ed., Moses Mendelssohn’s Metaphysics and Aesthetics. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 217–34.Google Scholar
Doran, R. (2015). The Theory of the Sublime from Longinus to Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316182017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsey, J. (2007). Is a Theory of the Sublime Possible? Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 85 (4), 381–9.Google Scholar
Graver, M. (2016). Anatomies of Joy: Seneca and the Gaudium Tradition. In Caston, R. R. and Kaster, R. A., eds., Hope, Joy, and Affection in the Classical World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 123–42.Google Scholar
Guyer, P. (1993). Kant and the Experience of Freedom: Essays on Aesthetics and Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139172516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, P. (2005). The Symbols of Freedom in Kant’s Aesthetics. In Values of Beauty: Historical Essays in Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 222–41.10.1017/CBO9780511840876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, P. (2014). A History of Modern Aesthetics. Volume 1: The Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kennett, J. (2015). What is Required for Motivation by Principle? In Björnsson, G., Strandberg, C., Olinder, R. F., Eriksson, J., Björklund, F. B., eds., Motivational Internalism. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 108–29.Google Scholar
Koller, A. (2011). Mendelssohn’s Response to Burke on the Sublime. In Munk, R., ed., Moses Mendelssohn’s Metaphysics and Aesthetics. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 329–50.Google Scholar
Kuehn, M. (2009). Reason as a Species Characteristic. In Rorty, A. and Schmidt, J., eds., Kant’s Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 68–93.10.1017/CBO9780511581434.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyotard, J.-F. (1994). Lessons on the Analytic of the Sublime. Trans. E. Rottenberg. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. (1979). Virtue and Reason. The Monist 62 (3), 331–50.10.5840/monist197962319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, M. (2011). Kant on Enlightened Moral Pedagogy. Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (3), 227–53.10.1111/j.2041-6962.2011.00072.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, M. (2012). The Moral Source of the Kantian Sublime. In Costelloe, T., ed., The Sublime: from Antiquity to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 37–49.10.1017/CBO9780511978920.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, M. (2017). Sublimity and Joy: Kant on the Aesthetic Constitution of Virtue. In Altman, M., ed., Palgrave Kant Handbook. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 447–67.Google Scholar
Merritt, M. (2018). Kant on Reflection and Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108344005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monk, S. H. (1960). The Sublime. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.12946777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdoch, I. (1999 [1959]). The Sublime and the Beautiful Revisited. In Conradi, P., ed., Existentialists and Mystics: Writings on Philosophy and Literature. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Rayman, J. (2012). Kant on Sublimity and Morality. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Reath, A. (1989). Kant’s Theory of Moral Sensibility. Kant Studien 80 (1–4), 284–302.10.1515/kant.1989.80.1-4.284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santozki, U. (2012). Die Bedeutung antiker Theorien für die Genese und Systematik von Kants Philosophie. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schaper, E. (1992). Taste, Sublimity, and Genius: The Aesthetics of Nature and Art. In Guyer, P., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 367–93.10.1017/CCOL0521365872.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, N. (1997). Making a Necessity of Virtue: Aristotle and Kant on Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511624865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogt, K. M. (2008). Law, Reason, and the Cosmic City: Political Philosophy in the Early Stoa. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320091.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckert, R. (2003). Awe or Envy: Herder contra Kant on the Sublime. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 61 (3), 217–32.10.1111/1540-6245.00108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this element is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 13
- Cited by