Element contents
Wittgenstein on Criteria and Practices
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 December 2022
Summary
In the interpretive literature from the 1950's through the 1970's the term 'criterion' was thought to be a central key to the understanding of Wittgenstein's later philosophy. Later on, it was relegated from this place of honour to being one of a variety of expressions used by Wittgenstein in dealing with philosophical questions. This Element tries to account for the shifting fate of this concept. It discusses the various occurrences of the word “criteria” in the Philosophical Investigations, argues that the post-Wittgensteinian debate about criteria was put on the wrong track by a problematic passage in Wittgenstein's early Blue Book, and finally gives an overview of the main contributions to this debate, trying to achieve a reconciliation between the rival conceptions.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781108946537Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 05 January 2023
Bibliography
Albritton, Rogers (1968). ‘On Wittgenstein’s Use of the Term “Criterion”’. In George Pitcher (ed.), Wittgenstein: The Philosophical Investigations. London: University of Notre Dame Press, 231–50.Google Scholar
Ambrose, Alice, ed. (1979). Wittgenstein’s Lectures, Cambridge 1932–1935: From the notes of Alice Ambrose and Margaret MacDonald. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baker, G. P. (1974). ‘Criteria: A New Foundation for Semantics’. Ratio 16 (1974), 156–89. Reprinted in Canfield 1986.Google Scholar
Baker, G. P. (2004). Wittgenstein’s Method: Neglected Aspects. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, G. P. & Hacker, P. M. S. (1985). Wittgenstein: Rules, Grammar and Necessity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Baker, G. P. & Hacker, P. M. S. (1980). Wittgenstein: Understanding and Meaning. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bennett, Philip W. (1978). ‘Wittgenstein and Defining Criteria’. Philosophical Investigations 1, 9–63. Reprinted in Canfield 1986.Google Scholar
Canfield, John V., ed. (1986). The Philosophy of Wittgenstein. Vol. 7: Criteria. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Canfield, John V. (1981). Wittgenstein: Language and World. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley (1979). The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, and Tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chihara, Charles S. & Fodor, Jerry A. (1965). ‘Operationalism and Ordinary Language: A Critique of Wittgenstein’. American Philosophical Quarterly 2, 281–95. Reprinted in Canfield 1986.Google Scholar
Cockburn, David (2021). ‘“Only of a Living Human Being”’. In Wittgenstein, Human Beings and Conversation. London: Anthem Press, 57–69.Google Scholar
Cook, John (1969). ‘Human Beings’. In Winch, Peter (ed.), Studies in the Philosophy of Wittgenstein. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 117–51.Google Scholar
Hacker, P. M. S. (1997). Insight and Illusion: Themes in the Philosophy of Wittgenstein. Revised ed. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Hanfling, Oswald (2002). ‘Criteria, Conventions and the Problem of Other Minds’. In Wittgenstein and the Human Form of Life. London: Routledge, 38–50.Google Scholar
Hertzberg, Lars (2022). ‘The Need for a Listener and Community Standards’. In Wittgenstein and the Life We Live with Language. London: Anthem Press, 73–86.Google Scholar
Hunter, John F. M. (1974). ‘Critical Notice of P. M. S. Hacker’s Insight and Illusion’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4, 201–11. Reprinted in Canfield 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, John F. M. (1977). ‘Wittgenstein on Inner Processes and Outward Criteria’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7, 805–17. Reprinted in Canfield 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, Anthony (1967). ‘Criterion’. In Edwards, Paul (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 2. New York: Macmillan, 258–61.Google Scholar
Kwon, Diana (2022). ‘The Battle over Pain in the Brain’. www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-battle-over-pain-in-the-brain/. Accessed 28 January 2022.Google Scholar
Loomis, Eric (2010). ‘Criteria’. In Jolly, Kelly Dean (ed.), Wittgenstein: Key Concepts. Durham: Acumen, 160–8.Google Scholar
Lycan, W. Gregory (1971). ‘Non-inductive Evidence: Recent Work on Wittgenstein’s “Criteria”’. American Philosophical Quarterly 8, 109–51. Reprinted in Canfield 1986.Google Scholar
Malcolm, Norman (1986). Nothing Is Hidden: Wittgenstein’s Criticism of His Early Thought. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Malcolm, Norman (1977). ‘Wittgenstein on the Nature of Mind.’ In Malcolm, Thought and Knowledge. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 133–58.Google Scholar
Malcolm, Norman. (1968). ‘Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations’. In Pitcher, George (ed.), Wittgenstein: The Philosophical Investigations. London: University of Notre Dame Press, 65–103.Google Scholar
McDowell, John (1998). ‘Criteria, Defeasibility and Knowledge’. In Meaning, Knowledge and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 369–94.Google Scholar
Rhees, Rush (1998). ‘Wittgenstein’s Builders.’ In Phillips, D. Z. (ed.), Wittgenstein and the Possibility of Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 178–97.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, Sydney (1963). Self-Knowledge and Self-Identity. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1968). Philosophical Investigations. 3rd ed., translated by Anscombe, G. E. M.. Oxford: Basil Blackwell [1953].Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (2009a). Philosophical Investigations. 4th ed., translated by Anscombe, G. E. M., Hacker, P. M. S., and Schulte, Joachim. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell [1953].Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (2009b). Philosophy of Psychology: A Fragment (previously known as “Part II”.) In Wittgenstein (2009a.)Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1980). Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology, vol. 1. Oxford: Basil Backwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1961). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, translated by Pears, D. F. & McGuinness, B. F.. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul [1921].Google Scholar
- 7
- Cited by