Element contents
The YouTube Apparatus
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 April 2024
Summary
The academic agenda for studying social media and politics has been somewhat haphazard. Thanks to rapid technological change, a cascade of policy-relevant crises, and sheer scale, we do not have a coherent framework for deciding what questions to ask. This Element articulates such a framework by taking existing literature from media economics and sociology and applying it reflexively, to both the academic agenda and to the specific case of politics on YouTube: the Supply and Demand Framework. The key mechanism, traced over the past century, is the technology of audience measurement. The YouTube audience comes pre-rationalized in the form of Likes, Views and Comments, and is thus unavoidable for all actors involved. The phenomenon of 'radicalization' is best understood as a consequence of accelerated feedback between audiences and creators, radicalizing each other. I use fifteen years of supply and demand data from YouTube to demonstrate how different types of producers respond more or less to this feedback, which in turn structures the ideological distribution of content consumed on the platform. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.
Keywords
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009359795Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 31 May 2024
References
Allen, Jennifer, Howland, Baird, Mobius, Markus, Rothschild, David, and Watts, Duncan J. 2020. “Evaluating the fake news problem at the scale of the information ecosystem.” Science Advances 6 (14): eaay3539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arceneaux, Kevin, Gravelle, Timothy B, Osmundsen, Mathias, et al. 2021. “Some people just want to watch the world burn: The prevalence, psychology and politics of the ‘Need for Chaos’.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 376 (1822): 20200147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Archer, Allison M, and Clinton, Joshua. 2018. “Changing owners, changing content: Does who owns the news matter for the news?” Political Communication 35 (3): 353–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barberá, Pablo, Casas, Andreu, Nagler, Jonathan, et al. 2019. “Who leads? Who follows? Measuring issue attention and agenda setting by legislators and the mass public using social media data.” American Political Science Review 113 (4): 883–901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beniger, James. 2009. The control revolution: Technological and economic origins of the information society. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, W Lance, and Iyengar, Shanto. 2008. “A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication.” Journal of Communication 58 (4): 707–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisbee, James, Larson, Jennifer, and Munger, Kevin. 2022. “# polisci Twitter: A descriptive analysis of how political scientists use Twitter in 2019.” Perspectives on Politics 20 (3): 879–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bode, Leticia, and Vraga, Emily K. 2015. “In related news, that was wrong: The correction of misinformation through related stories functionality in social media.” Journal of Communication 65 (4): 619–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boydstun, Amber E. 2013. Making the news: Politics, the media, and agenda setting. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boydstun, Amber E, Hardy, Anne, and Walgrave, Stefaan. 2014. “Two faces of media attention: Media storm versus non-storm coverage.” Political Communication 31 (4): 509–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridle, James. 2017. “Something is wrong on the internet.” Medium. https://medium.com/@jamesbridle/something-is-wrong-on-the-internet-c39c471271d2 [consultado 22/11/2017].Google Scholar
Brown, Megan A, Bisbee, James, Lai, Angela, et al. 2022. “Echo chambers, rabbit holes, and algorithmic bias: How YouTube recommends content to real users.” SSRN 4114905.Google Scholar
Bruns, Axel. 2019. “ It’s not the technology, stupid: How the ‘Echo Chamber’and ‘Filter Bubble’ metaphors have failed us.” International Association for Media and Communication Research.Google Scholar
Buntain, Cody, Bonneau, Richard, Nagler, Jonathan, and Tucker, Joshua A. 2021. “YouTube recommendations and effects on sharing across online social platforms.” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5 (CSCW1): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Matt. 2017. Journalistic authority: Legitimating news in the digital era. Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, Andrew. 2017. The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaffee, Steven H, and Metzger, Miriam J. 2001. “The end of mass communication?” Mass Communication & Society 4 (4): 365–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christin, Angèle. 2020. Metrics at work: Journalism and the contested meaning of algorithms. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Christin, Angèle, and Lewis, Rebecca. 2021. “The drama of metrics: Status, spectacle, and resistance among YouTube drama creators.” Social Media+ Society 7 (1): 2056305121999660.Google Scholar
Converse, Phillip. 1964. “The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Ideology and discontent, ed. David Apter, . Free Press, pp. 56–89.”Google Scholar
Cook, John, Ecker, Ullrich, and Lewandowsky, Stephan. 2015. “Misinformation and how to correct it.” Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: An Interdisciplinary, Searchable, and Linkable Resource pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Coppock, Alexander. 2021. “Persuasion in parallel.” Chicago Studies in American Politics.Google Scholar
Cowen, Tyler. 2018. “Eric Schmidt on the life-changing magic of systematizing, scaling, and saying ‘Thanks’.” Medium. https://medium.com/conversations-with-tyler/eric-schmidt-tyler-cowen-google-ec33aa3e6dae.Google Scholar
DellaPosta, Daniel. 2020. “Pluralistic collapse: The ‘oil spill’ model of mass opinion polarization.” American Sociological Review 85 (3): 507–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DellaPosta, Daniel, Shi, Yongren, and Macy, Michael. 2015. “Why do liberals drink lattes?” American Journal of Sociology 120 (5): 1473–1511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deutsch, Karl W. 1963. The nerves of government; models of political communication and control. Technical Report.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul K. 1975. “Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge.” Verso Books.Google Scholar
Flusser, Vilém. 2022. Communicology: Mutations in human relations? Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freelon, Deen, Pruden, Meredith L, and Malmer, Daniel. 2023. “# politicalcommunicationsowhite: Race and politics in nine communication journals, 1991–2021.” Political Communication 40 (4):1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, R Kelly, and Weeks, Brian E. 2013. “ The promise and peril of real-time corrections to political misperceptions”. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on computer supported cooperative work. ACM pp. 1047–1058.Google Scholar
Gentzkow, Matthew, and Shapiro, Jesse M. 2006. “Media bias and reputation.” Journal of political Economy 114 (2): 280–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentzkow, Matthew, and Shapiro, Jesse M. 2008. “Competition and truth in the market for news.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 22 (2): 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentzkow, Matthew, and Shapiro, Jesse M. 2010. “What drives media slant? Evidence from US daily newspapers.” Econometrica 78 (1): 35–71.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 2012. “Mere description.” British Journal of Political Science 42 (4): 721–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1986. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Vol. 349. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Guess, Andrew, and Coppock, Alexander. 2020. “Does counter-attitudinal information cause backlash? Results from three large survey experiments.” British Journal of Political Science 50 (4): 1497–1515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guess, Andrew M. 2021. “(Almost) Everything in moderation: New evidence on Americans’ online media diets.” American Journal of Political Science 65 (4): 1007–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurri, Martin. 2018. The revolt of the public and the crisis of authority in the new millennium. Stripe Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, James. 2004. All the news that’s fit to sell: How the market transforms information into news. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hersh, Eitan D. 2015. Hacking the electorate: How campaigns perceive voters. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hindman, Matthew. 2018. The internet trap: How the digital economy builds monopolies and undermines democracy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hosseinmardi, Homa, Ghasemian, Amir, Clauset, Aaron, et al. 2020. “Evaluating the scale, growth, and origins of right-wing echo chambers on YouTube.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.12843.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Henry, Ford, Sam, and Green, Joshua. 2013. “ Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture.” New York University Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Richard. 2009. “The origins of objectivity in American journalism.” In Allan, Stuart, ed., The Routledge companion to news and journalism. Routledge, pp. 69–81.Google Scholar
Karpf, David. 2019. “On digital disinformation and democratic myths.” Mediawell, Social Science Research Council 10.Google Scholar
Kata, Anna. 2010. “A postmodern Pandora’s box: Anti-vaccination misinformation on the Internet.” Vaccine 28 (7): 1709–1716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kata, Anna. 2012. “Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm–An overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement.” Vaccine 30 (25): 3778–3789.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katz, Elihu, and Felix Lazarsfeld, Paul. 1964. Personal influence, The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Transaction.Google Scholar
Key, Valdimer Orlando. 1966. The responsible electorate: Rationality in presidential voting 1936–1960. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klar, Samara, and Krupnikov, Yanna. 2016. Independent politics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, Jonathan M. 2011. Why Americans hate the media and how it matters. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, Angela, Brown, Megan A, Bisbee, James, et al. 2022. “Estimating the ideology of political YouTube videos.” SSRN.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno, and Woolgar, Steve. 2013. Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledwich, Mark, and Zaitsev, Anna. 2020. “Algorithmic extremism: Examining YouTube’s rabbit hole of radicalization.” First Monday 25 (3).Google Scholar
Ledwich, Mark, Zaitsev, Anna, and Laukemper, Anton. 2022. “Radical bubbles on YouTube? Revisiting algorithmic extremism with personalised recommendations.” First Monday 27 (12).Google Scholar
Lewis, Rebecca. 2018. “Alternative influence: Broadcasting the reactionary right on YouTube.” Data & Society.Google Scholar
Lewis, Rebecca. 2020. “‘This is what the news won’t show you’: YouTube Creators and the Reactionary Politics of Micro-celebrity.” Television & New Media 21 (2): 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Gregory J, and McCrain, Joshua. 2019. “Local news and national politics.” American Political Science Review 113 (2): 372–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merkley, Eric. 2020. “Anti-intellectualism, populism, and motivated resistance to expert consensus.” Public Opinion Quarterly 84 (1): 24–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mider, Zachary. 2016. “ What kind of man spends millions to elect Ted Cruz?” Bloomberg Politics.Google Scholar
Munger, Kevin. 2019. “The limited value of non-replicable field experiments in contexts with low temporal validity.” Social Media+ Society 5 (3): 2056305119859294.Google Scholar
Munger, Kevin. 2020. “All the news that’s fit to click: The economics of clickbait media.” Political Communication 37 (3): 376–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munger, Kevin, Guess, Andrew M, and Hargittai, Eszter. 2021. “Quantitative description of digital media: A modest proposal to disrupt academic publishing.” Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media 1, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
Munger, Kevin, and Phillips, Joseph. 2022. “Right-wing YouTube: A supply and demand perspective.” International Journal of Press/Politics 27 (1): 186–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutz, Diana C. 1998. Impersonal influence: How perceptions of mass collectives affect political attitudes. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Napoli, Philip M. 2011. Audience evolution: New technologies and the transformation of media audiences. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Napoli, Philip M. 2019. Social media and the public interest: Media regulation in the disinformation age. Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Jacob L, and Webster, James G. 2016. “Audience currencies in the age of big data.” International Journal on Media Management 18 (1): 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Callaghan, Derek, Greene, Derek, Conway, Maura, Carthy, Joe, and Cunningham, Pádraig. 2015. “Down the (white) rabbit hole: The extreme right and online recommender systems.” Social Science Computer Review 33 (4): 459–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearl, Judea. 1995. “Causal diagrams for empirical research.” Biometrika 82 (4): 669–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philips, Whitney, and Milner, Ryan. 2020. You are here: A field guide for navigating polluted information. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Postman, Neil. 2005. Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the age of show business. Penguin.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, Manoel H, Ottoni, Raphael, West, Robert, Almeida, Virgílio A. F., and Meira Jr., Wagner 2020. Auditing radicalization pathways on YouTube. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. pp. 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribeiro, Manoel Horta, Ottoni, Raphael, West, Robert, Almeida, Virgílio A. F., and Meira, Wagner. 2019. “Auditing radicalization pathways on YouTube.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.08313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roose, Kevin. 2019. “The making of a YouTube radical.” The New York Times. www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/06/08/technology/youtuberadical.html.Google Scholar
Simon, Felix M, and Camargo, Chico Q. 2023. “Autopsy of a metaphor: The origins, use and blind spots of the ‘infodemic’.” New Media & Society 25 (8): 2219–2240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soroka, Stuart N, and Wlezien, Christopher. 2010. Degrees of democracy: Politics, public opinion, and policy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Soroka, Stuart N, and Wlezien, Christopher. 2022. Information and democracy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starr, Paul. 2004. “ The creation of the media: Political origins of modern communications.” New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Stocking, Galen, Van Kessel, Patrick, Barthel, Michael, Eva Matsa, Katerina, and Khuzam, Maya. 2020. “Many Americans get news on YouTube, where news organizations and independent producers thrive side by side.” Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
Stroud, Natalie Jomini. 2017. “Selective exposure theories.” In Kenski, Kate, and Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, eds., The Oxford handbook of political communication, pp. 531–548.Google Scholar
Uscinski, Joseph E, Enders, Adam M, Seelig, Michelle I, et al. 2021. “American politics in two dimensions: partisan and ideological identities versus anti-establishment orientations.” American Journal of Political Science 65 (4): 877–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Mason, and Eva Matsa, Katerina. 2021. News consumption across social media in 2021. Pew.Google Scholar
Watts, Duncan J. 2017. “Should social science be more solution-oriented?” Nature Human Behaviour 1 (1): 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, James G. 2011. “The duality of media: A structurational theory of public attention.” Communication Theory 21 (1): 43–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, James G. 2014. The marketplace of attention: How audiences take shape in a digital age. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Bari. 2020. “Did I just get yanged?” The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/30/opinion/sunday/andrew-yang-2020.html.Google Scholar
Williams, Bruce A, and Delli Carpini, Michael X. 2011. After broadcast news: Media regimes, democracy, and the new information environment. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wlezien, Christopher. 1995. “The public as thermostat: Dynamics of preferences for spending.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (4): 981–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wlezien, Christopher. 2023. “News and public opinion: Which comes first?” Journal of Politics 86 (1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar