Element contents
Series: Elements in Public Policy
Zombie Ideas
Why Failed Policy Ideas Persist
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 November 2020
Summary
Ideas are important in shaping the policy choices of governments. But many ideas that have not been successful in the past continue to be used by policymakers, and some good ideas tend not to be adopted. This Element will focus on why governments make these poor policy choices. We will discuss a number of examples of 'zombie ideas' that refuse to die, and then discuss the factors that are associated with their survival. Those factors occur at the elite, the organizational and the societal level. We will also examine some 'ghost' ideas that may well be successful but have a difficult time being adopted, and the factors that are associated with the exclusion of these ideas from the policy process.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in Public PolicyOnline ISBN: 9781108921312Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 24 December 2020
References
Allison, G. T. and Zelikow, P. (1999) Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis (New York: Longman).Google Scholar
Altenburg, T. and Lütkenhorst, W. (2015) Industrial Policy in Developing Countries: Failing Markets, Weak States (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, D. M. and Rees, D. I. (2011) Medical Marijuana Laws, Alcohol Consumption and Traffic Fatalities (Bonn: IZA). IZA Discussion Paper 6112.Google Scholar
Arango, T. and Fuller, T. (2020) Why Liberal Californians Don’t Want to Go Back to Normal, New York Times, May 4.Google Scholar
Bach, T. and Wegrich, K. (2019). Blind Spots, Biased Attention, and the Politics of Non Coordination, in Bach, T. and Wegrich, K., eds., The Blind Spots of Public Bureaucracy and the Politics of Non-Coordination. (London: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
Baert, P. (1991) Unintended Consequences: Typology and Examples, International Sociology 6, 201–10.Google Scholar
Bardach, E. (1996) Turf Barriers in Inter-Agency Collaboration, in Kettl, D. F. and Milward, H. B., eds., The State of Public Management (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
Bardach, E. (1997) Getting Agencies to Work Together (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution).Google Scholar
Beh, H. G. and Diamond, M. (2006) The Failure of Abstinence-Only Education: Minors Have a Right to Honest Talk About Sex, Columbia Journal of Gender and Law 15, 12–49.Google Scholar
Behague, D., Tawiah, C., Rosato, M., Some, T. and Morrison, J. (2009) Evidence-based Policymaking: The Implications of Globally Applicable Research for Context-Specific Problem-Solving in Developing Countries, Social Science and Medicine 69, 1529–46.Google Scholar
Béland, D. (2019) How Ideas and Institutions Shape the Politics of Public Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Béland, D. and Cox, R. H. (2011) Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Béland, D. and Cox, R. H. (2013) Valence, Policy Ideas, and the Rise of Sustainability, Governance 26, 307–28.Google Scholar
Béland, D. and Cox, R. H. (2016) Ideas as Coalition Magnets: Coalition Building, Policy Entrepreneurship and Power Relations, European Journal of Public Policy 23, 428–45.Google Scholar
Béland, D. and Howlett, M. (2016) How Solutions Chase Problems: Instrument Constituencies in the Policy Process, Governance 25, 393–409.Google Scholar
Bellé, N., Cantarelli, P. and Belardinelli, P. (2018) Prospect Theory Goes Public: Experimental Evidence on Cognitive Biases in Public Policy and Management Decisions, Public Administration Review 78, 828–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, P. and Luckmann, T. (1966) The Social Construction of Reality (New York: Anchor Books).Google Scholar
Birkinshaw, P. (2006) Transparency as a Human Right, in Hood, C. and Heald, D., eds. Transparency: The Key to Better Government? (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Birkland, T. A. and Warnement, M. K. (2016) Refining the Idea of Focusing Events in the Multiple-Steams Framework, in Zohlnhöfer, R. and Rüb, F. W., eds. Decision-Making Under Ambiguity and Time Constraints (Colchester: ECPR Press).Google Scholar
Blyth, M. (2001) The Transformation of the Swedish Model: Economic Ideas. Distributional Conflict and Institutional Change, World Politics 54, 1–26.Google Scholar
Blyth, M. (2013) Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Bouckaert, G., Peters, B. G. and Verhoest, K. (2010) The Coordination of Public Sector Organizations: Shifting Patterns of Public Management (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
Bovens, M. A. P and ‘t Hart, P (1998) Understanding Policy Fiascoes (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction).Google Scholar
Bovens, M. A. P. And ‘t Hart, P (2016) Revisiting the Study of Policy Failure, Journal of European Public Policy 23, 653–66.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T and Stanley, J. C. (1963) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Design for Research (Chicago: Rand-McNally).Google Scholar
Campbell, J. R. (2002) Ideas, Polities and Public Policy, Annual Review of Sociology 28, 21–38.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. R. and Anderson, M. P. (2001) Identifying Shifts in Policy Regimes: Cluster and Interrupted Time-series Analyses of US Income Taxes, Social Science History 25, 37–65.Google Scholar
Carstensen, M. B. and Matthijs, M. (2018) Of Paradigms and Power: British Economic Policy Making Since Thatcher, Governance 31, 431–47.Google Scholar
Cashore, B. and Nathan, I. (2019) Good Governance Gone Bad: Assessing the Impact of Transnational Market-Driven Interventions Designed to Make “Weak States” Stronger (Unpublished Paper, Department of Political Science, Yale University).Google Scholar
Cobb, R. W. and Elder, C. D. (1971) The Politics of Agenda-Building: An Alternative Perspective for Modern Democratic Theory, Journal of Politics 33, 892–915.Google Scholar
Coy, P. (2018) Trump’s Tax Cuts Made a Difference in 2018, Just not the One Backers Were Hoping For, Bloomberg Businessweek, December 13 www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-12-13/trump-s-tax-cuts-had-an-impact-but-not-the-one-backers-hoped-forGoogle Scholar
Cyert, R. and March, J. G. (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).Google Scholar
Daigneault, P.-M. (2014) Reassessing the Concept of Policy Paradigm: Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Policy Studies, Journal of European Public Policy 21, 453–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, C, and Tabuchi, H. (2019) Automakers, Rejecting Trump Pollution Rule, Strike a Deal with California, New York Times, July 25.Google Scholar
Davis, K. and Schoen, C. (1978) Health and the War on Poverty: A Ten-Year Appraisal (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution).Google Scholar
Dimaggio, P. and Powell, W. (1991) The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields, American Sociological Review 48, 147–60.Google Scholar
Erkkilä, T. (2012) Government Transparency: Impacts and Unintended Consequences (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
Fung, A, Graham, M. and Weil, D. (2007) Full Disclosure: The Perils and Promise of Transparency (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Gentile, G. P. (2001) How Effective is Strategic Bombing?: Lessons Learned from World War II to Kosovo (New York: New York University Press).Google Scholar
Genieys, W. (2017) The New Custodians of the State: Programmatic Elites in French Society (London: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, A. (2014). Mexico, in Kopstein, J., Lichtbach, M., and Hanson, S., eds., Comparative Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Goodsell, C. T. (2011), Mission Mystique: Belief Systems in Public Agencies (Washington, DC: CQ Press).Google Scholar
Green, E. L and Goldstein, D. (2019) Reading Scores on National Exams Decline in Half the States, New York Times, October 30 (updated December 5).Google Scholar
Greenberg, D. and Cebulla, A. (2008) The Cost-Effectiveness of Welfare-to-Work Programs: A Meta-Analysis, Public Budgeting and Finance 28, 112–45.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. S. (2004) Privatizing Risk Without Privatizing the Welfare State: The Hidden Politics of Social Policy Retrenchment in the United States. American Political Science Review 98, 243–60.Google Scholar
Hale, W. G., Gelfond, H., Krupkin, A., Mazur, M. J. and Toder, E. (2018) Effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act: A Preliminary Analysis (Washington, DC: Tax Policy Center).Google Scholar
Hall, P. A. (1993) Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain, Comparative Politics 25, 275–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. A., and Soskice, D. W. (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Hay, C. (2011) Ideas and the Construction of Interests, in Béland, D. and Cox, R. H., eds., Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2004) Reclaiming Habit for Institutional Economics, Journal of Economic Psychology 25, 651–60.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J. and Minkov, M. (2010) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind: Intercultural Cooperation and its Importance for Survival. 3rd ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill).Google Scholar
Hogwood, B. W. and Peters, B. G. (1985) The Pathology of Public Policy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Homedes, N. and Ugalde, A. (2005) Why Neoliberal Health Reforms Have Failed in Latin America, Health Policy 71, 83–96.Google Scholar
Hood, C. (2011) The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy and Self-Preservation in Government (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Houghton, D. P. (1996) The Role of Analogical Reasoning in Novel Foreign Policy Situations, British Journal of Political Science 26, 523–52.Google Scholar
Hurley, A. F. (1975) Billy Mitchell: Crusader for Air Power (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
Innes, J. E. and Booher, D. E. (2018) Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy. 2nd ed. (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Irwin, N. (2020) America is addicted to Using the Tax Code to Fix its Problems, New York Times March 6.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A. N. (2011) Governing for the Long Term: Democracy and the Politics of Investment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janis, I. (1991) Groupthink, in Griffin, E., ed. A First Look at Communication Theory (New York: McGraw Hill).Google Scholar
Jann, W. (1983), Staatliche Programme und Verwaltungskultur. Bekämpfung des Drogenmissbrauchs und der Jugendarbeitslosigkeit in Schweden, Großbritannien und der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im Vergleich. (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag).Google Scholar
Jann, W., and Wewer, G., (1998): Helmut Kohl und der schlanke Staat. Eine verwaltungspolitische Bilanz, in Wewer, G., eds. Bilanz der Ära Kohl (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag).Google Scholar
Jones, B. D. (1999) Bounded Rationality, Annual Review of Political Science 2, 297–321.Google Scholar
Jones, B. D. and Williams, W. (2008) The Politics of Bad Ideas: The Great Tax Cut Delusion and the Decline of Good Government in America (New York: Longman).Google Scholar
Jordan, A. J. and Turnpenny, J. R. (2015) The Tools of Policy Formulation (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).Google Scholar
Kaiser Health Network (2019) KHN Morning Briefing: Medicaid Work Requirements, May 16.Google Scholar
Kingdon, J. W. (2003) Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policy, 2nd ed. (New York: Longman).Google Scholar
Kleck, G. (2012) Gun Control After Heller and McDonald: What Cannot Be Done and What Can be Done, Fordham Urban Law Journal 39, 1383–420.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. (2019) The Zombie Style in American Politics: Why Bad Ideas Just Won’t Stay Dead, The New York Times, April 29.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. (2020) Arguing with Zombies: Economics, Politics and the Fight for a Better Future (New York: W. W. Norton).Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Kurbjuweit, D. (2014) Alternativlos: Merkl, die Deutschen und das Ende der Politik (Munich: Carl Hanser Verlag).Google Scholar
Leeuw, F. L. (1991) Policy Theories, Knowledge Utilization, and Evaluation, Knowledge and Policy 4, 73–91.Google Scholar
Legro, J. W. (2000) The Transformation of Policy Ideas, American Journal of Political Science 44, 419–32.Google Scholar
Levin, K., Cashore, B, Bernstein, S. and Auld, G. (2012) Overcoming the Tragedy of Super Wicked Problems: Constraining our Future Selves to Ameliorate Global Climate Change. Policy Sciences 45, 2, 123–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, W. And Tao Yang, D. (2005) The Great Leap Forward: Anatomy of a Central Planning Disaster, Journal of Political Economy 113, 840–77.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (2012) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, 2nd. Ed. (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Linder, S. H. And Peters, B. G. (1989) Instruments of Government: Perceptions and Contexts, Journal of Public Policy 9, 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linder, S. H. and Peters, B. G. (1992) The Study of Policy Instruments, Policy Currents 2, 1–7.Google Scholar
Linderman, J. (2019) 688,000 will Lose Food Stamp Benefits Under Trump’s New Work Rule, Los Angeles Times, December 4.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J, and Thelen, K. (2010) Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency and Power (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Malesky, E., Schuler, P. and Tran, A (2012) The Adverse Effects of Sunshine: A Field Experiment on Transparency in an Authoritarian Legislature, American Political Science Review 106, 762–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G. (1996) Continuity and Change in Theories of Organizational Action, Administrative Science Quarterly 41, 278–87.Google Scholar
March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. (1989) Rediscovering Institutions (New York: Free Press).Google Scholar
March, J. G. And Olsen, J. P. (2011) The Logic of Appropriateness, in Goodin, R. E., ed., Oxford Handbook of Political Science (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
McConnell, A. (2010) Understanding Policy Success: Rethinking Public Policy (Basingstoke: Macmillan).Google Scholar
McConnell, A. (2015) What is Policy Failure? A Primer to Help Navigate the Maze, Public Policy and Administration 30, 221–42.Google Scholar
McConnell, A, (2019) The Use of Placebo Ideas to Escape Policy Traps, European Journal of Public Policy 27, 7, 957–76.Google Scholar
McIntyre, A. (1992) Utilitarianism and Cost-Benefit Analysis: An Essay on the Relevance of Moral Philosophy to Bureaucratic Theory, in Gilroy, J. M. and Wade, M., eds., The Moral Dimension of Public Policy Choice (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press).Google Scholar
Mehta, J. (2011) The Varied Role of Ideas in Politics: From “Whether” to “How,” in Béland, D. and Cox, R. H., eds., Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Moynihan, D. P., and Lavertu, S. (2012). Does Involvement in Performance Management Routines Encourage Performance Information Use? Evaluating GPRA and PART. Public Administration Review 72, 592–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintrom, M. And Luetjens, J. (2017) Policy Entrepreneurs and Problem Framing: The Case of Climate Change, Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 35, 1362–77.Google Scholar
Mintrom, M. and Norman, P. (2009) Policy Entrepreneurship and Policy Change, Policy Studies Journal 37, 649–67.Google Scholar
Nguyen, T. (2020) Coronavirus Gets a Promising Drug but MAGAworld Isn’t Buying It, Politico, May 2 www.politico.com/search?q=coronavirus+gets+a+promising+drugGoogle Scholar
Peacock, A. (1989) The Rise and Fall of the Laffer Curve, in Bös, D. and Felderer, B., eds., The Political Economy of Progressive Taxation (Heidelberg: Springer).Google Scholar
Peneder, M. (2017) Competitiveness and Industrial Policy: From the Rationalities of Failure towards the Ability to Evolve, Cambridge Journal of Economics 41, 829–58.Google Scholar
Peters, B. G. (2014) Information and Governing: Cybernetic Models of Governance, in Levi-Faur, D., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Peters, B. G. (2016) Advanced Introduction to Public Policy (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).Google Scholar
Peters, B. G. (2021) Can We Be So Casual about Being Causal? Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis [forthcoming].Google Scholar
Peters, B. G., Pierre, J. and King, D. S. (2005) The Politics of Path Dependency: Political Conflict in Historical Institutionalism, Journal of Politics 67, 1275–300.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J. (2005) Why Do Bad Management Theories Persist?: A Comment on Ghoshal, Academy of Management Learning & Education 4, 96–100.Google Scholar
Pierce, J. J., Siddiki, S., Jones, M. D., Schumacher, K., Pattison, A. and Peterson, H. (2004) Social Construction and Policy Design: A Review of Past Applications, Policy Studies Journal 42, 1–29.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (2000) Increasing Returns, Path Dependence and the Study of Politics, American Political Science Review 94, 251–67.Google Scholar
Quaid, M. (2002) Workfare: Why Good Social Policy Ideas Go Bad (Toronto: University of Toronto Press).Google Scholar
Quiggin, J. (2013) Zombie Economics: How Dead Ideas Still Walk Among Us (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Riddell, P. (2019) 15 Minutes of Power: The Uncertain Life of British Ministers (London: Profile Books).Google Scholar
Riley, C. L. (2019) For Labour the 2019 Election Echoes “the Longest Suicide Note in History,” Post Everything (The Washington Post), www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/12/14/labour-election-echoes-longest-suicide-note-history/Google Scholar
Röber, M. (2018) Outsourcing und Privatisierung. In Voigt, R, ed., Handbuch Staat (Wiesbaden: Springer VS). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20744-1_94Google Scholar
Roberts, A. (2006) Dashed Expectations: Government Adaptation to Transparency Rules, in Hood, C. and Heald, D., eds. Transparency: The Key to Better Government? (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Rocco, P. and Thurston, C. (2014) From Metaphor to Measures: Observable Indicators of Gradual Institutional Change, Journal of Public Policy 34, 35–62.Google Scholar
Rochefort, D. A. and Cobb, R. W. (1994) The Politics of Problem Definition: Shaping the Policy Agenda (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas).Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. (2014) When Ideas Trump Interests: Preferences, Worldviews and Policy Innovations, Journal of Economic Perspectives 28, 189–208.Google Scholar
Rosenbluth, F. And Shapiro, I (2018) Responsible Parties: Saving Democracy From Itself (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Rosenthal, M. R. (2009) What Works in Market-oriented Health Policy, New England Journal of Medicine 360, 2157–60.Google Scholar
Sabatier, P. A. and Weible, C. M. (2007) The Advocacy Coalition Framework, in Weible, C. M, ed., Theories of the Policy Process (Boulder, CO: Westview Pres).Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M. (1979) The Time Dimension in Policy Evaluation: The Case of New Deal Land Reform, Public Policy, 27, 2, 129–83.Google Scholar
Sarigil, Z. (2015) Showing the Path to Path Dependence: The Habitual Path, European Political Science Review 7, 221–42.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F. W. (1988) The Joint Decision Trap: Lessons from German Federalism and European Integration, Public Administration 66, 239–78.Google Scholar
Schmidt, V A. (2016) The Resilience of “Bad Ideas” in Eurozone Crisis Discourse, Even as Rival Ideas Inform Changing Practice. Paper presented at 23rd Conference of Europeanists.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P. C. (1974) Still the Century of Corporatism? Review of Politics 36, 85–131.Google Scholar
Schneider, S. K. (2011) Dealing with Disaster: Public Management in Crisis Situations, 2nd ed. (Armonk, NY: M. S. Sharpe).Google Scholar
Schön, D. A. (2010) Government as a Learning System, in Blackmore, C., ed., Social Learning Systems and Communities of Practice (London: Springer).Google Scholar
Schön, D. A. and Rein, M. (1994) Frame Reflection: Solving Intractable Policy Disputes (Cambridge: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Schrad, M. L. (2010) The Political Power of Bad Ideas: Networks, Institutions and the Global Prohibition Wave (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Schröder, M. (2014) Varianten des Kapitalismus – Die Unterschiede liberaler und koordinierter Marktwirtschaften (Wiesbaden: Springer VS).Google Scholar
Schumacher, G. and Van Kersbergen, K. (2016) Do Mainstream Parties Adapt to the Welfare Chauvinism of Populist Parties? Party Politics 22, 300–12.Google Scholar
Schut, F. T. And Van de Ven, W. P. M. M (2011) Effects of Purchaser Competition in the Dutch Health System: Is the Glass Half Full or Half Empty? Health Economics, Policy and Law 6, 109–23.Google Scholar
Scott, I. (2019) Governing by Silos, in Peters, B. G. and Thynne, I., eds., Oxford Research Encyclopedia in Public Administration (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Seibel, W. (1992) Funktionaler Dilettantismus: Erfolgreich scheiternde Organisationen im “Dritten Sektor” zwischen Markt und Staat, 2nd ed. (Baden-Baden: Nomos).Google Scholar
Séville, A. (2017) From “One Right Way” to “One Ruinous Way”: Discursive Shifts in “There is no Alternative,” European Political Science Review 9, 449–70.Google Scholar
Shapiro, I. (2017) Collusion in Restraint of Democracy: Against Political Deliberation, Daedalus 146, 3, 77–84.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W. (2003) Misleading Evidence and Evidence-Led Policy: Making the Social Sciences More Experimental, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 589, 6–19.Google Scholar
Soskice, D. W. (1999). Divergent Production Regimes: Coordinated and Uncoordinated Market Economies in the 1980s and 1990s. In Kitschelt, H., Lange, P., Marks, G., and Stephens, J., eds., Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139175050.006Google Scholar
Steinmo, S., Thelen, K. and Longstreth, F. (1992) Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Stubbs, R. (2009) Whatever Happened to the East Asian Developmental State?: The Unfolding Debate, The Pacific Review 22, 1–22.Google Scholar
Sydow, J., Schreyögg, G. and Koch, J. (2009) Organizational Path Dependence: Opening the Black Box, Academy of Management Review 34, 689–709.Google Scholar
‘t Hart, P. (1990) Groupthink in Government: A Study of Small Groups and Policy Failure (Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger).Google Scholar
Tamny, J. (2020) A Few Questions for the Many Critics of the Gold Standard, Real Clear Markets, February 25. www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2020/02/24/a_few_questions_for_the_many_critics_of_the_gold_standard_485148.htmlGoogle Scholar
Tang, W. (2016) Populist Authoritarianism: Chinese Political Culture and Regime Sustainability (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Thompson, V. A. (1977) Modern Organizations, 2nd ed. (Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press).Google Scholar
Vedung, E. (2013) Six Models of Evaluation, in Araral, E., Fritzen, S., Howlett, M., Ramesh, M. and Wu, X., eds., Routledge Handbook of Public Policy (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Walt, S. M. (2005) The Relationship Between Theory and Policy in International Relations, Annual Review of Political Science 8, 23–48.Google Scholar
Weaver, R. K. (1986) The Politics of Blame Avoidance, Journal of Public Policy 6, 371–98.Google Scholar
Weyland, K. (2008) Toward a new Theory of Institutional Change, World Politics 60, 281–304.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, A. (2018[1980]) Policy as its Own Cause, in Wildavsky, A., The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
Winters, J. A. and Page, B. I (2009) Oligarchy in the United States? Perspectives on Politics 7, 731–51.Google Scholar
Wollmann, H. (2002) Verwaltungspolitische Reformdiskurse und verläufe im internationalen Vergleich, in König, K, ed., Deutsche Verwaltung in der We nde zum 21. Jahrhundert (Baden-Baden: Nomos).Google Scholar
Zahariadis, N. (2019) The Multiple Streams Framework: Structure, Limitations, Prospects, in Weible, C. M. and Sabatier, P. A., eds., Theories of the Policy Process, 4th ed. (Boulder, CO: Westview Press).Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this element is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.