Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-z2ts4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-11T10:18:20.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Efficient Dynamic Mesh Generation Method for Complex Multi-Block Structured Grid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2015

Li Ding ,
Zhiliang Lu  and
Tongqing Guo
Li Ding
Affiliation:
Department of Aerodynamics, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 29 Yudao Street, Nanjing 210016, Jiangsu, China
Zhiliang Lu*
Affiliation:
Department of Aerodynamics, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 29 Yudao Street, Nanjing 210016, Jiangsu, China
Tongqing Guo
Affiliation:
Department of Aerodynamics, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 29 Yudao Street, Nanjing 210016, Jiangsu, China
*
* Corresponding author. Email: luzl@nuaa.edu.cn
Get access

Abstract

Aiming at a complex multi-block structured grid, an efficient dynamic mesh generation method is presented in this paper, which is based on radial basis functions (RBFs) and transfinite interpolation (TFI). When the object is moving, the multi-block structured grid would be changed. The fast mesh deformation is critical for numerical simulation. In this work, the dynamic mesh deformation is completed in two steps. At first, we select all block vertexes with known deformation as center points, and apply RBFs interpolation to get the grid deformation on block edges. Then, an arc-length-based TFI is employed to efficiently calculate the grid deformation on block faces and inside each block. The present approach can be well applied to both two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) problems. Numerical results show that the dynamic meshes for all test cases can be generated in an accurate and efficient manner.

Keywords

65Z05Multi-block structured gridmesh deformationradial basis functionstransfinite interpolation

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , February 2014 , pp. 120 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © Global-Science Press 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

[1]Reuther, J., Jameson, A., Farmer, J., Martinelli, L. and Saunders, D., Aerodynamics shape optimization of complex aircraft configurations via an adjoint formulation, AIAA, 96–0094.Google Scholar
[2]Byun, C. and Guruswamy, G. P., A parallel multi-block moving grid method for aeroelastic applications on full aircraft, AIAA, 98–4782.Google Scholar
[3]Tsai, H. M., A. Wong, S. F., Cai, J., Zhu, Y. and Liu, F., Unsteady flow calculations with a parallel multiblock moving mesh algorithm, AIAA J., 39 (2001), pp. 1021–1029.Google Scholar
[4]Gaitonde, A. L., Jones, D. P. and Fiddes, S. P., A 2D Navier-Stokes method for unsteady compressible flow calculations on moving meshes, Aeronautical J., 102 (1998), pp. 89–97.Google Scholar
[5]Dubuc, L., Gantariti, F., Woodgate, m., Gribben, B., Badcock, K. J. and Richards, B. E., A grid deformation technique for unsteady flow conputations, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 32 (2000), pp. 285–311.Google Scholar
[6]Morton, S. A., Melville, R. B. and Visbal, M. R., Accuracy and coupling issues of aeroelastic Navier-Stokes solutions on deforming meshes, J. Aircraft, 35 (1998), pp. 798–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Frank, R., Scattered data interpolation: Tests of some methods, Math. Comput., 38 (1982), pp. 181–200.Google Scholar
[8]Wu, Z. M., Multivariate compactly supported positive definite radial functions, Adv. Comput. Math., 4 (1995), pp. 283–292.Google Scholar
[9]Bernal, F. and Gutierrez, G., Solving delay differential equations through BRF collocation, Adv. Appl. Math. Mech., 1 (2009), pp. 257–272.Google Scholar
[10]Beckert, A. and Wenland, H., Multivariate interpolation for fluid-structure-interaction problems using radial basis functions, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 5 (2001), pp. 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Bos, F. M., Numerical Simulation of Flapping Foil and Wind Aerodynamics: Mesh Deformation using Radial Basis Functions, PH. D. Thesis, Dutch: Technical University Delft, 2009.Google Scholar
[12]Jakobsson, S. and Amoignon, O., Mesh deformation using radial basis junctions for gradient- based aerodynamic shape optimization, Comput. Fluids, 36 (2007), pp. 1119–1136.Google Scholar
[13]Morris, A. M., Allen, C. B. and T. Rendall, C. S., CFD-based optimization of aerofoils using radial basis functions for domain element parameterization and mesh deformation, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 58 (2008), pp. 827–860.Google Scholar
[14] T. Rendall, C. S. and Allen, C. B., Unifiedfluid-structure interpolation and mesh motion using radial basis functions, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 74 (2008), pp. 1519–1559.Google Scholar
[15]Rendall, T. C. S and Allen, C. B., Efficient mesh motion using radial basis functions with data reduction algorithms, J. Comput. Phys., 228 (2009), pp. 6231–6249.Google Scholar
[16]Van Zuijlen, A. H., Boer, A. de and Bijl, H., Higher-order time integration through smooth mesh deformation for 3D fluid-structure interaction simulations, J. Comput. Phys., 224 (2007), pp. 414–430.Google Scholar
[17]Buhmann, M. D., Radial basis functions, Acta Numer., 9 (2000), pp. 1–38.Google Scholar
[18]Faul, A. C. and Powell, M. J. D, Proof of convergence of an interative technique for thin plate spline interpolation in two dimensions, Adv. Comput. Math., 11 (1999), pp. 183–192.Google Scholar
[19]Wendland, H., Fast evalution of radial basis functions: methods based on partition of unity, Approximation Theory X: Wavelets, Splines, and Applications, Vand erbilt University Press, 2002, pp. 473–483.Google Scholar
[20]Wendland, H., On the smoothness of positive definite and radial functions, Comput. Appl. Math., 101 (1999), pp. 177–188.Google Scholar
[21]Boer A, A. DE, Van Der Schoot, M. S. and Bijl, H., Mesh deformation based on radial basis function interpolation, Comput. Struct., 85 (2007), pp. 784–795.Google Scholar
[22]Carr, J. C., Beatson, R. K., Mccallum, B. C., Fright, W. R., Mclennan, T. J. and Mitchell, T. J., Smooth surface reconstruction from noisy range data, First International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interaction Techniques, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Smith, M. J., Cesnik, C. E. S and Hodges, D. H., Evaluation of some data transfer algorithms for noncontiguous meshes, J. Aerosp. Eng., 13 (2000), pp. 52–58.Google Scholar
[24]William, Gordon, Linda, Thiel, Transfinite mapping and their application to grid generation, In Thomson, Joe, Numerical Grid Generation, pp. 117–134.Google Scholar
[25]Jones, W. T. AND Samareh, J., A grid generation system for multi-disciplinary design optimization, AIAA, 95–1689.Google Scholar
[26]ANASYS Software Corporation, ANASYS ICEM CFD 14.0 User Manual, Printer in U.S.A, 2011.Google Scholar
[27]Bathe, K. J., Finite Element Procedures, Prentice Hall, 1996.Google Scholar
[28]Gu, Ning, Lu, Zhiliang and Guo, Tongqing, Simulation of viscous flows around a moving airfoil by field velocity method with viscous flux correction, Adv. Appl. Math. Mech., 4 (2012), pp. 294–310.Google Scholar
[29]Deng, F., Wu, Y. Z. AND Liu, X. Q., Numerical simulation of two-dimensional unsteady viscous flow based on hybrid dynamic grids, Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 39 (2009), pp. 444–448.Google Scholar
[30]Lambourne, N. C., Landon, R. H. AND Zwaan, R. J., Compendium of unsteady aerodynamic measurements, AGARD R-702,1982.Google Scholar