Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T14:01:38.763Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Moving Mesh Method for Kinetic/Hydrodynamic Coupling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2015

Zhicheng Hu  and
Heyu Wang
Zhicheng Hu*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, Zhejiang, China
Heyu Wang*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, Zhejiang, China
*
URL: http://mypage.zju.edu.cn/wangheyu, Email: huzhicheng@zju.edu.cn
Corresponding author. Email: wangheyu@zju.edu.cn
Get access

Abstract

This paper deals with the application of a moving mesh method for kinetic/hydrodynamic coupling model in two dimensions. With some criteria, the domain is dynamically decomposed into three parts: kinetic regions where fluids are far from equilibrium, hydrodynamic regions where fluids are near thermody-namical equilibrium and buffer regions which are used as a smooth transition. The Boltzmann-BGK equation is solved in kinetic regions, while Euler equations in hydrodynamic regions and both equations in buffer regions. By a well defined monitor function, our moving mesh method smoothly concentrate the mesh grids to the regions containing rapid variation of the solutions. In each moving mesh step, the solutions are conservatively updated to the new mesh and the cut-off function is rebuilt first to consist with the region decomposition after the mesh motion. In such a framework, the evolution of the hybrid model and the moving mesh procedure can be implemented independently, therefore keep the advantages of both approaches. Numerical examples are presented to demonstrate the efficiency of the method.

Keywords

65M5076P05Moving mesh methodkinetic/hydrodynamic couplingthe Boltzmann-BGK equation
Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics , Volume 4 , Issue 6 , December 2012 , pp. 685 - 702
Copyright
Copyright © Global-Science Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Degond, P., Jin, S. and Mieussens, L., A smooth transition model between kinetic and hydrodynamic equations, J. Comput. Phys., 209(2) (2005), pp. 665–694.Google Scholar
[2]Degond, P., Dimarco, G. and Mieussens, L., A moving interface method for dynamic kinetic-fluid coupling, J. Comput. Phys., 227(2) (2007), pp. 1176–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Cai, Z. and Li, R., An h-adaptive mesh method for Boltzmann-BGK/hydrodynamics coupling, J. Comput. Phys., 229(5) (2010), pp. 1661–1680.Google Scholar
[4]Cai, Z., Li, R. and Wang, Y., Numerical regularized moment method for high Mach number flow, Commun. Comput. Phys., 11 (2012), pp. 1415–1438.Google Scholar
[5]Passalacqua, A., Galvin, J. E., Vedula, P., Hrenya, C. M. and Fox, R. O., A quadrature-based kinetic model for dilute non-isothermal granular flows, Commun. Comput. Phys., 10 (2011), pp. 216–252.Google Scholar
[6]Forest, M. Gregory, Liao, Q. and Wang, Q., A 2-D kinetic theory forflows of monodomain polymer-rod nanocomposites, Commun. Comput. Phys., 7 (2010), pp. 250–282.Google Scholar
[7]Baines, M. J., Hubbard, M. E. and Jimacki, P. K., Velocity-based moving mesh methods for nonlinear partial differential equations, Commun. Comput. Phys., 10 (2011), pp. 509–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Jin, C.-Q., Xu, K. and Chen, S., A three dimensional gas-kinetic scheme with moving mesh for low-speed viscous flow computations, Adv. Appl. Math. Mech., 2 (2010), pp. 746–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Xu, K., Luo, J. and Chen, S.A well-balanced kinetic scheme for gas dynamic equations under gravitational field, Adv. Appl. Math. Mech., 2 (2010), pp. 200–210.Google Scholar
[10]Zhang, Y.-B., Wang, H.-Y. and Tang, T., Simulating two-phase viscoelastic flows using moving finite element methods, Commun. Comput. Phys., 7 (2010), pp. 333–349.Google Scholar
[11]Zhang, Y.-B. and Tang, T., Simulating three-dimensional free surface viscoelastic flows using moving finite difference schemes, Numer. Math. Theor. Meth. Appl., 4 (2011), pp. 92–112.Google Scholar
[12]Tang, T. and Xu, J., Adaptive Computations: Theory and Algorithms, Science Press, 2007.Google Scholar
[13]Huang, W. Z. and Russell, R. D., Adaptive Moving Mesh Methods, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Li, R., Tang, T. and Zhang, P., Moving mesh methods in multiple dimensions based on harmonic maps, J. Comput. Phys., 170(2) (2001), pp. 562–588.Google Scholar
[15]Wang, H., Li, R. and Tang, T., Efficient computation of dendritic growth with r-adaptive finite element methods, J. Comput. Phys., 227(12) (2008), pp. 5984–6000.Google Scholar
[16]Qiao, Z. H., Numerical investigations of the dynamical behaviors and instabilities for the Gierer-Meinhardt system, Commun. Comput. Phys., 3 (2008), pp. 406–426.Google Scholar
[17]Di, Y., Li, R., Tang, T. and Zhang, P., Moving mesh finite element methods for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 26(3) (2005), pp. 1036–1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Di, Y., Li, R. and Tang, T., A general moving mesh framework in 3D and its application for simulating the mixture of multi-phase flows, Commun. Comput. Phys., 3(3) (2008), pp. 582–602.Google Scholar
[19]Li, R. and Tang, T., Moving mesh discontinuous Galerkin method for hyperbolic conservation laws, J. Sci. Comput., 27(1) (2006), pp. 347–363.Google Scholar
[20]Li, B. and Shopple, J., An interface-fitted finite element level set method with application to solidification and solvation, Commun. Comput. Phys., 10 (2011), pp. 32–56.Google Scholar
[21]Wang, D., Li, R. and Yan, N.-N., An edge-based anisotropic mesh refinement algorithm and its application to interface problems, Commun. Comput. Phys., 8 (2010), pp. 511–540Google Scholar
[22]Yang, J. Y. and Huang, J. C., Rarefied flow computations using nonlinear model Boltzmann equations, J. Comput. Phys., 120(2) (1995), pp. 323–339.Google Scholar
[23]Huang, J. C., Xu, K. and Yu, P.-B., A unified gas-kinetic scheme for continuum and rarefied flows II: multi-dimensional cases, Commun. Comput. Phys., 12 (2012), pp. 662–690.Google Scholar
[24]Mieussens, L., Discrete velocity model and implicit scheme for the BGK equation of rarefied gas dynamics, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 10(8) (2000), pp. 1121–1149.Google Scholar
[25]Cercignani, C., Illner, R. and Pulvirenti, M., The Mathematical Theory of Dilute Gases, Volume 106, Springer, 1994.Google Scholar
[26]Perthame, B., Boltzmann type schemes for gas dynamics and the entropy property, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 27(6) (1990), pp. 1405–1421.Google Scholar
[27]Wang, W. L. and Boyd, I. D., Predicting continuum breakdown in hypersonic viscous flows, Phys. Fluids, 15(1) (2003), pp. 91–100.Google Scholar
[28]Li, R., Tang, T. and Zhang, P., A moving mesh finite element algorithm for singular problems in two and three space dimensions, J. Comput. Phys., 177(2) (2002), pp. 365–393.Google Scholar
[29]Cao, W., Huang, W. and Russell, R. D., A study of monitor functions for two-dimensional adaptive mesh generation, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 20(6) (1999), pp. 1978–1994.Google Scholar
[30]Van Dam, A. and Zegeling, P. A., Balanced monitoring of flow phenomena in moving mesh methods, Commun. Comput. Phys., 7 (2010), pp. 138–170.Google Scholar
[31]Zegeling, P. A., Lagzi, I. and Izsk, F., Transition of Liesegang precipitation systems: simulations with an adaptive grid PDE method, Commun. Comput. Phys., 10 (2011), pp. 867–881.Google Scholar
[32]Winslow, A. M., Numerical solution of the quasilinear Poisson equation in a nonuniform triangle mesh, J. Comput. Phys., 1 (1967), pp. 149–172.Google Scholar
[33]Li, R., Moving Mesh Method and its Application. PhD Thesis, Peking University, 2001. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
[34]Li, R. and Liu, W. B., .Google Scholar
[35]Niceno, B., .Google Scholar
[36]Woodward, P. and Colella, P., The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks, J. Comput. Phys., 54(1) (1984), pp. 115–173.Google Scholar
[37]Deiterding, Ralf, .Google Scholar