Skip to main content

Numerical Optimization and Noise Analysis of High-Tip-Speed Wind Turbine

  • Long Wang (a1) (a2), Guoping Chen (a2), Tongguang Wang (a1) and Jiufa Cao (a3)

With lower turbulence and less rigorous restrictions on noise levels, offshore wind farms provide favourable conditions for the development of high-tip-speed wind turbines. In this study, the multi-objective optimization is presented for a 5MW wind turbine design and the effects of high tip speed on power output, cost and noise are analysed. In order to improve the convergence and efficiency of optimization, a novel type of gradient-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm is proposed based on uniform decomposition and differential evolution. Optimization examples of the wind turbines indicate that the new algorithm can obtain uniformly distributed optimal solutions and this algorithm outperforms the conventional evolutionary algorithms in convergence and optimization efficiency. For the 5MW wind turbines designed, increasing the tip speed can greatly reduce the cost of energy (COE). When the tip speed increases from 80m/s to 100m/s, under the same annual energy production, the COE decreases by 3.2% in a class I wind farm and by 5.1% in a class III one, respectively, while the sound pressure level increases by a maximum of 4.4dB with the class III wind farm case.

Corresponding author
*Corresponding author. Email: (T. G. Wang)
Hide All
[1] Guo, Y., Parsons, T., Dykes, K. and King, R. N., A systems engineering analysis of three- point and four- point wind turbine drivetrain configurations, Wind Energy, Published online in Wiley Online Library (, 2016.
[2] Resor, B. R., Maniaci, D. C., Berg, J. C. and Richards, P., Effects of increasing tip velocity on wind turbine rotor design, Sandia National Laboratories: SAND2014-3136 518390, 2013.
[3] Ganjefar, S., Ghassemi, A. A. and Ahmadi, M. M., Improving efficiency of two-type maximum power point tracking methods of tip-speed ratio and optimum torque in wind turbine system using a quantum neural network, Energy, 67 (2014), pp. 444453.
[4] Nejad, A. R., Guo, Y., Gao, Z. and Moan, T., Development of a 5MW reference gearbox for offshore wind turbines, Wind Energy, 19 (2015), pp. 10891106.
[5] Arany, L., Bhattacharya, S., MacDonald, J. and Hogan, S. J., Simplified critical mudline bending moment spectra of offshore wind turbine support structures, Wind Energy, 18 (2015), pp. 21712197.
[6] Wang, H., Barthelmie, R. J., Pryor, S. C. and Kim, H. G., A new turbulence model for offshore wind turbine standards, Wind Energy, 17 (2014), pp. 15871604.
[7] Türk, M. and Emeis, S., The dependence of offshore turbulence intensity on wind speed, J. Wind Eng. Indust. Aerodyn., 98 (2010), pp. 466471.
[8] Chehouri, A., Younes, R., Ilinca, A. and Perron, J., Review of performance optimization techniques applied to wind turbines, Appl. Energy, 142 (2015), pp. 361388.
[9] Gray, J. S., Hearn, T. A., Moore, K. T., Hwang, J. T., Martins, J. R. and Ning, A., Automatic evaluation of multidisciplinary derivatives using a graph-based problem formulation in Open MDAO, 15th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2014.
[10] Giguère, P. P., Selig, M. S. and Tangler, J. L., Blade design trade-offs using low-lift airfoils for stall-regulated HAWTs, J. Solar Energy Eng., 121 (1999), pp. 217223.
[11] Benini, E. and Toffolo, A., Optimal design of horizontal-axis wind turbines using blade-element theory and evolutionary computation, J. Solar Energy Eng., 124 (2002), pp. 357363.
[12] Kusiak, A., Zhang, Z. and Li, M., Optimization of wind turbine performance with data-driven models, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 1 (2010), pp. 6676.
[13] Dufo-Lopez, R., Multi-objective optimization minimizing cost and life cycle emissions of standalone PV-wind-diesel systems with batteries storage, Appl. Energy, 88 (2011), pp. 40334041.
[14] Ju, Y. P. and Zhang, C. H., Multi-point robust design optimization of wind turbine airfoil under geometric uncertainty, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part A Journal of Power & Energy, 226 (2012), pp. 245261.
[15] Wang, L., Wang, T. G. and Luo, Y., Improved non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA)-II in multi-objective optimization studies of wind turbine blades, Appl. Math. Mech., 32 (2011), pp. 739748.
[16] Sessarego, M., A hybrid multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for wind-turbine blade optimization, Eng. Opt., 47 (2015), pp. 10431062.
[17] Sorkhabi, S. Y. D., Romero, D. A., Yan, G. K., Gu, M. D., Moran, J., Morgenroth, M. and Amon, C. H., The impact of land use constraints in multi-objective energy-noise wind farm layout optimization, Renewable Energy, 85 (2016), pp. 359370.
[18] Wang, W., Caro, S., Bennis, F., Soto, R. and Crawford, B., Multi-objective robust optimization using a postoptimality sensitivity analysis technique: application to a wind turbine design, J. Mech. Design, 137 (2015), 011403-1-11.
[19] Liao, C. C., Zhao, X. L. and Xu, J. Z., Blade layers optimization of wind turbines using FAST and improved PSO algorithm, Renew Energy, 42 (2012), pp. 227233.
[20] Sharafi, M., Elmekkawy, T. Y. and Bibeau, E. L., Optimal design of hybrid renewable energy systems in buildings with low to high renewable energy ratio, Renewable Energy, 83 (2015), pp. 10261042.
[21] Ning, A. and Petch, D., Integrated design of downwind land-based wind turbines using analytic gradients, Wind Energy, Published online in Wiley Online Library (, 2016.
[22] Lucken, C., Baran, B. and Abrizuela, C., A survey on multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for many-objective problems, Comput. Opt. Appl., 58 (2014), pp. 707756.
[23] Bänos, R., Manzano-Agugliaro, F., Montoya, F. G., Gil, C., Alcayde, A. and Gómez, J., Optimization methods applied to renewable and sustainable energy: A review, Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15 (2011), pp. 17531766.
[24] Chang, B., Miller, A., Issa, R. and Chen, G., Review of computer-aided numerical simulation in wind energy, Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25 (2013), pp. 122134.
[25] Wang, X., Shen, W. Z., Zhu, W. J., Srensen, J. N. and Jin, C., Shape optimization of wind turbine blades, Wind Energy, 12 (2009), pp. 781-803.
[26] Wood, D. H., Dual purpose design of small wind turbine blades, Wind Eng., 28 (2004), pp. 511527.
[27] Abedi, S., A comprehensive method for optimal power management and design of hybrid RES-based autonomous energy systems, Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16 (2012), pp. 15771587.
[28] Wagner, T., Beume, N. and Naujoks, B., Pareto-, aggregation- and indicator-based methods in many-objective optimization, Int. Conference Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, 2007.
[29] Resor, B. R. and Brian, R., Definition of a 5MW/61.5m wind turbine blade reference model, SAND2013-2569 463454, 2013.
[30] Coulling, A. J., Goupee, A. J., Robertson, A. N., Jonkman, J. M. and Dagher, H. J., Validation of a FAST semi-submersible floating wind turbine numerical model with DeepCwind test data, J. Renewable Sustainable Energy, 5 (2013), 023116.
[31] Gasmi, A., Sprague, M. A., Jonkman, J. M. and Jones, W. B., Numerical stability and accuracy of temporally coupled multi-physics modules in wind turbine CAE tools, AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum & Aerospace Exposition, 2013.
[32] Ning, A., Damiani, R. and Moriarty, P., Objectives and constraints for wind turbine optimization, J. Solar Energy Eng., 136 (2013), pp. 303312.
[33] Resor, B. R. and Maniaci, D. C., Definition of the national rotor testbed: an aeroelastically relevant research-scale wind turbine rotor, AIAA SciTech: 32nd ASME Wind Energy Symposium. 2013.
[34] Benini, E. and Toffolo, A., Optimal design of horizontal-axis wind turbines using blade-element theory and evolutionary computation, J. Solar Energy Eng., 124 (2002), pp. 357363.
[35] Hand, M. M., Simms, D. A., Fingersh, L. J., Jager, D. W., Cotrell, J. R., Schreck, S. and Larwood, S. M., Unsteady aerodynamics experiment phase VI: wind tunnel test configurations and available data campaigns, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, Report No. NREL/TP-500-29955, 2001.
[36] Jonkman, J., Butterfield, S., Musial, W. and Scott, G., Definition of a 5MW reference wind turbine for offshore system development, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Tech Rep, NREL/TP-500-38060, 2009.
[37] Qiu, X., Xu, J. X., Tan, K. C. and Abbass, H. A., Adaptive cross-generation differential evolution operators for multiobjective optimization, IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Comput., 20 (2016), pp. 232244.
[38] Bader, J. and Zitzler, E., HypE: An algorithm for fast hypervolume-based many-objective optimization, Evolutionary Comput., 19 (2011), pp. 4576.
[39] Brooks, F. T., Pope, D. S. and Marcolini, M. A., Airfoil self-noise and prediction, NASA Reference Publication, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Office of Management, Scientific and Technical Information Division, NASA-RP-1218, 1989.
[40] Lowson, M. V., Assessment and prediction model for wind turbine noise: basic aerodynamic and acoustic models, Department of Trade and Industry, W/13/00284/REP, 1993.
[41] Moriarty, P. and Migliore, P., Semi-empirical aeroacoustic noise prediction code for wind turbines, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Tech Rep, NREL-TP-500-34478, 2003.
[42] Kim, H., Lee, S., Son, E., Lee, S. and Lee, S., Aerodynamic noise analysis of large horizontal axis wind turbines considering fluid-structure interaction, Renewable Energy, 42 (2012), pp. 4653.
[43] Anicic, O., Petković, D. and Cvetkovic, S., Evaluation of wind turbine noise by soft computing methodologies: A comparative study, Renewable Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56 (2016), pp. 11221128.
[44] Türk, M. and Emeis, S., The dependence of offshore turbulence intensity on wind speed, J. Wind Eng. Industrial Aerodyn., 98 (2010), pp. 466471.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Advances in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics
  • ISSN: 2070-0733
  • EISSN: 2075-1354
  • URL: /core/journals/advances-in-applied-mathematics-and-mechanics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 49 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 267 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 28th November 2017 - 25th May 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.