Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684bc48f8b-cvrnb Total loading time: 0.4 Render date: 2021-04-14T00:30:49.205Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

How to Use Replication Assignments for Teaching Integrity in Empirical Archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2019

Ben Marwick
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Denny Hall, Spokane Ln, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, Seattle, WA98195-3100
Li-Ying Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Denny Hall, Spokane Ln, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, Seattle, WA98195-3100
Ryan Robinson
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Denny Hall, Spokane Ln, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, Seattle, WA98195-3100
Hope Loiselle
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Denny Hall, Spokane Ln, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, Seattle, WA98195-3100
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

The value of new archaeological knowledge is strongly determined by how credible it is, and a key measure of scientific credibility is how replicable new results are. However, few archaeologists learn the skills necessary to conduct replication as part of their training. This means there is a gap between the ideals of archaeological science and the skills we teach future researchers. Here we argue for replications as a core type of class assignment in archaeology courses to close this gap and establish a culture of replication and reproducibility. We review replication assignments in other fields and describe how to implement a replication assignment suitable for many types of archaeology programs. We describe our experience with replication in an upper-level undergraduate class on stone artifact analysis. Replication assignments can help archaeology programs give students the skills that enable transparent and reproducible research.

El valor de los nuevos conocimientos arqueológicos está fuertemente determinado por su credibilidad, y una medida clave de la credibilidad científica es cuán replicables son los nuevos resultados. Sin embargo, pocos arqueólogos aprenden las habilidades necesarias para llevar a cabo la replicación como parte de su entrenamiento. Esto significa que existe una brecha entre los ideales de la ciencia arqueológica y las habilidades que enseñamos a los futuros investigadores. Aquí defendemos las repeticiones como un tipo central de asignación de clase en los cursos de arqueología para cerrar esta brecha y establecer una cultura de replicación y reproducibilidad. Revisamos las asignaciones de replicación en otros campos y describimos cómo implementar una asignación de replicación adecuada para muchos tipos de programas de arqueología. Describimos nuestra experiencia con la replicación en una clase de pregrado de nivel superior en análisis de artefactos de piedra. Las asignaciones de replicación pueden ayudar a los programas de arqueología a proporcionar a los estudiantes habilidades que permiten una investigación transparente y reproducible.

Type
How to Series
Copyright
Copyright 2019 © Society for American Archaeology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Ball, Richard, and Medeiros, Norm 2012 Teaching Integrity in Empirical Research: A Protocol for Documenting Data Management and Analysis. Journal of Economic Education 43: 182–89. DOI:10.1080/00220485.2012.659647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barba, Lorena A. 2018 Terminologies for Reproducible Research. arXiv Preprint. arXiv:1802.03311. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.03311, accessed September 25, 2019.Google Scholar
Baumer, Ben, Cetinkaya-Rundel, Mine, Bray, Andrew, Loi, Linda, and Horton, Nicholas J. 2014 R Markdown: Integrating a Reproducible Analysis Tool into Introductory Statistics. Technology Innovations in Statistics Education 8(1). http://escholarship.org/uc/item/90b2f5xh, accessed October 16, 2019.Google Scholar
Bicho, Nuno, and Cascalheira, João 2020 The Use of Lithic Assemblages for the Definition of Short-Term Occupations in Hunter-Gatherer Prehistory. In Short-Term Occupations in Paleolithic Archaeology: Definition and Interpretation, edited by Picin, Andrea and Cascalheira, João, in press. Springer, Basel, Switzerland. DOI:10.31235/osf.io/3wgsa.Google Scholar
Breslawski, Ryan P., Etter, Bonnie L., Jorgeson, Ian, and Boulanger, Matthew T. 2018 The Atlatl to Bow Transition: What Can We Learn from Modern Recreational Competitions? Lithic Technology 43:2637. DOI:10.1080/01977261.2017.1416918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çetinkaya-Rundel, Mine, and Rundel, Colin 2018 Infrastructure and Tools for Teaching Computing Throughout the Statistical Curriculum. American Statistician 72:5865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Harry 1992 Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Dvorak, Tomas, Halliday, Simon D., O'Hara, Michael, and Swoboda, Aaron 2019 Efficient Empiricism: Streamlining Teaching, Research, and Learning in Empirical Courses. Journal of Economic Education 50:242257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Michael C., and Saxe, Rebecca 2012 Teaching Replication. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7:600604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawkins, Robert X. D., Smith, Eric N., Au, Carolyn, Arias, Juan Miguel, Catapano, Rhia, Hermann, Eric, Keil, Martin, Lampinen, Andrew, Raposo, Sarah, Reynolds, Jesse, Salehi, Shima, Salloum, Justin, Tan, Jed, and Frank, Michael C. 2018 Improving the Replicability of Psychological Science through Pedagogy. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 1:718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höffler, Jan H. 2013 Teaching Replication in Quantitative Empirical Economics. Paper presented at The Economics Curriculum: Towards a Radical Reformation, a conference from the World Economics Association, May 3–June 14.Google Scholar
Höffler, Jan H. 2017 ReplicationWiki: Improving Transparency in Social Sciences Research. D-Lib Magazine 23(3/4). DOI:10.1045/march2017-hoeffler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janz, Nicole 2016 Bringing the Gold Standard into the Classroom: Replication in University Teaching. International Studies Perspectives 17:392407.Google Scholar
Jern, Alan 2018 A Preliminary Study of the Educational Benefits of Conducting Replications in the Classroom. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology 4(1):6468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marwick, Ben 2013 Multiple Optima in Hoabinhian Flaked Stone Artefact Palaeoeconomics and Palaeoecology at Two Archaeological Sites in Northwest Thailand. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 32:553564. DOI:10.1016/j.jaa.2013.08.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marwick, Ben 2017 Computational Reproducibility in Archaeological Research: Basic Principles and a Case Study of Their Implementation. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 24:424450. DOI:10.1007/s10816-015-9272-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marwick, Ben, Boettiger, Carl, and Mullen, Lincoln 2018 Packaging Data Analytical Work Reproducibly Using R (and Friends). American Statistician 72:8088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marwick, Ben, Clarkson, Chris, O'Connor, Sue, and Collins, Sophie 2016 Early Modern Human Lithic Technology from Jerimalai, East Timor. Journal of Human Evolution 101:4564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marwick, Ben, d'Alpoim Guedes, Jade, Michael Barton, C., Bates, Lynsey A, Baxter, Michael, Bevan, Andrew, Bollwerk, Elizabeth A, Bocinsky, Kyle, Brughams, Tom, Carter, Alison, Conrad, Cyler, Contreras, Daniel, Costa, Stephan, Crema, Enrico, Daggett, Andrea, Davies, Ben, Drake, Lee, Dye, Thomas, France, Phoebe, Fullager, Richard, Giusti, Domenico, Graham, Shaun, Harris, Matt, Hawks, John, Heath, Sebastian, Huffer, Damien, Kansa, Eric, Kansa, Sarah, Madsen, Mark, Melcher, Jennifer, Negre, Joan, Neiman, Fraser, Opitz, Rachel, Orton, David, Przystupa, Paulina, Raviele, Maria, Riel-Salvatore, Julien, Riris, Phil, Romanowska, Iza, Smith, Joelene, Strupler, Néhémie, Ullah, Isaac, Vlack, Hannah, VanValkenberg, Parker, Watrall, Ethan, Webster, Chris, Wells, Joshua, Winters, Judith, and Wren, Colin 2017 Open Science in Archaeology. SAA Archaeological Record 17(4):814.Google Scholar
Millman, K. Jarrod, Brett, Matthew, Barnowski, Ross, and Poline, Jean-Baptiste 2018 Teaching Computational Reproducibility for Neuroimaging. Frontiers in Neuroscience 12. DOI:10.3389/fnins.2018.00727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2019 Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. National Academies Press, Washington, DC. DOI:10.17226/25303.Google Scholar
Nosek, Brian A., Alter, George, Banks, George C., Borsboom, Denny, Bowman, Sara D., Breckler, Steven J., Buck, Stuart et al. 2015 Promoting an Open Research Culture. Science 348(6242):14221425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perkel, Jeffrey M. 2017 How Scientists Use Slack. Nature News 541(7635):123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team 2019 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/, accessed October 16, 2019.Google Scholar
Roettger, Timo B., and Baer-Henney, Dinah 2018 Towards a Replication Culture in Phonetic Research: Speech Production Research in the Classroom. PsyArXiv Preprint. DOI:10.31234/osf.io/q9t7c.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Sophie C., and Marwick, Ben 2019 Tool-Driven Revolutions in Archaeological Science. SocArXiv Preprint. DOI:10.31235/osf.io/4nkxv.Google Scholar
Spearman, Charles 1904 The Proof and Measurement of Association between Two Things. American Journal of Psychology 15:72101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Standing, Lionel G., Grenier, Manuel, Lane, Erica A., Roberts, Meigan S., and Sykes, Sarah J. 2014 Using Replication Projects in Teaching Research Methods. Psychology Teaching Review 20(1):96104.Google Scholar
Toelch, Ulf, and Ostwald, Dirk 2018 Digital Open Science—Teaching Digital Tools for Reproducible and Transparent Research. PLoS Biology 16(7):e2006022. DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.2006022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wessa, Patrick 2009 How Reproducible Research Leads to Non-Rote Learning within Socially Constructivist Statistics Education. Electronic Journal of e-Learning 7:173182.Google Scholar
Xie, Yihui, Allaire, Joseph J., and Grolemund, Garrett 2018 R Markdown: The Definitive Guide. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, Lisa, and McKeown, Nick 2017 Learning Networking by Reproducing Research Results. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 47(2):1926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 44
Total number of PDF views: 227 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 22nd October 2019 - 14th April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

How to Use Replication Assignments for Teaching Integrity in Empirical Archaeology
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

How to Use Replication Assignments for Teaching Integrity in Empirical Archaeology
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

How to Use Replication Assignments for Teaching Integrity in Empirical Archaeology
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *