Hostname: page-component-5d84bcc8dc-v8zcx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-09-10T19:58:14.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Long-Term Legacies and Their Challenges in the Age of Modern Curation at the University of Georgia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2019

Amanda D. Roberts Thompson Open the ORCID record for Amanda D. Roberts Thompson [Opens in a new window] ,
Victor D. Thompson ,
Michiel Kappers ,
Kristine Schenk  and
Mark Williams
Amanda D. Roberts Thompson*
Affiliation:
University of Georgia, Laboratory of Archaeology/Georgia Archaeological Site File, 1125 E. Whitehall Rd., Athens, Georgia 30602, USA
Victor D. Thompson
Affiliation:
University of Georgia, Laboratory of Archaeology/Georgia Archaeological Site File, 1125 E. Whitehall Rd., Athens, Georgia 30602, USA
Michiel Kappers
Affiliation:
QLC Inc. InTerris Registries, 228 East 45th Street, 9E New York, NY 10017, USA
Kristine Schenk
Affiliation:
University of Georgia, Laboratory of Archaeology/Georgia Archaeological Site File, 1125 E. Whitehall Rd., Athens, Georgia 30602, USA
Mark Williams
Affiliation:
University of Georgia, Laboratory of Archaeology/Georgia Archaeological Site File, 1125 E. Whitehall Rd., Athens, Georgia 30602, USA
*
(arobthom@uga.edu, corresponding author)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Formally established in the fall of 1947, the Laboratory of Archaeology at the University of Georgia is an archaeological research and collection repository. It is considered one of the premier institutions for curation of archaeological collections from the American Southeast. For over 70 years, the Laboratory has served as a repository for objects and associated records generated from archaeological projects and research undertaken by faculty, students, CRM professionals, and state and federal agencies. The Laboratory curates over 20,000 cubic feet of artifacts as well as paper and digital archives. In addition, the Laboratory houses the Georgia Archaeological Site File and manages data from more than 59,000 archaeological sites, including over 11,500 archaeological reports. In this paper, we explore implementation procedures for bringing legacy collections up to modern curation standards. We also outline how we migrate the data on paper records into the digital realm, articulating them within a comprehensive framework.

Establecido formalmente en el otoño de 1947, el Laboratorio de Arqueología de la Universidad de Georgia es una instalación de depósito de investigación y recolección arqueológica en Georgia y está considerado como una de las principales instituciones para la arqueología del sudeste estadounidense. El Laboratorio sirve como depósito de colecciones arqueológicas y registros asociados producidos a través de proyectos arqueológicos e investigaciones realizadas por profesores, estudiantes, profesionales de CRM y agencias estatales y federales durante los últimos 70 años. El laboratorio cura más de 20,000 pies cúbicos de artefactos, papel y archivos digitales. Además, el Laboratorio alberga el Archivo de sitios arqueológicos de Georgia e información sobre más de 59,000 sitios arqueológicos, incluidos más de 11,500 informes arqueológicos. En el presente trabajo, exploramos algunas de las direcciones que implementamos para comenzar la incorporación de colecciones heredadas a los estándares de curación moderna, así como el translado o movimiento de los archivos de información asociados al ámbito digital donde cada dato se articula dentro de un marco integral.

Keywords

Curationcollections managementrehabilitationcollection repositorylegacy collectionarchaeological managementartifact caredatabase managementcuracióngestión de coleccionesrehabilitaciónrepositorio de coleccionescolección legadamanejo arqueológicocuidado de artefactosgestión de base de datos

Information

Type
How to Series
Information
Advances in Archaeological Practice , Volume 7 , Special Issue 3: Archaeological Collections Care: Current Topics and Innovative Trends in the Repository , August 2019 , pp. 274 - 283
Copyright
Copyright 2019 © Society for American Archaeology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Bawaya, Michael 2007 Curation in Crisis. Science 317:1025–1026.10.1126/science.317.5841.1025Google Scholar
Childs, S. Terry (editor) 2004 Our Collective Responsibility: The Ethics and Practice of Archaeological Collections Stewardship. Society for American Archaeology, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Childs, S. Terry, and Benden, Danielle M. 2017 A Checklist for Sustainable Management of Archaeological Collections. Advances in Archaeological Practice 5(1):12–25.Google Scholar
Childs, Terry S., and Warner, Mark (editors) 2019 Curating and Using Archaeological Collections. SAA Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Fagan, Brian 1995 Archaeology's Dirty Secret. Archaeology 48(4):14–17.Google Scholar
Ford, Richard I. 1977 Regional Repositories: A View from the Smithsonian. In Regional Centers in Archaeology: Prospects and Problems, edited by Marquardt, William H., pp. 13–15. Missouri Archaeological Society, Research Series 14, Columbia.Google Scholar
Frieman, Catherine J., and Janz, Lisa 2018 A Very Remote Storage Box Indeed: The Importance of Doing Archaeology with Old Museum Collections. Journal of Field Archaeology 43:257–268.10.1080/00934690.2018.1458527Google Scholar
Lindsay, Alexander J. Jr., and Williams-Dean, Glenna 1980 Artifacts, Documents, and Data: A New Frontier for American Archaeology. Curator 23(1):19–29.10.1111/j.2151-6952.1980.tb01268.xGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, Alexander J. Jr., Williams-Dean, Glenna, and Haas, Jonathan 1980 The Curation and Management of Archeological Collections: A Pilot Study. Cultural Resource Management Series. U.S. Department of the Interior, Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
MacFarland, Kathryn, and Vokes, Arthur W. 2016 Dusting Off the Data: Curating and Rehabilitating Archaeological Legacy and Orphaned Collections. Advances in Archaeological Practice 4(2):161–175.10.7183/2326-3768.4.2.161Google Scholar
Majewski, Teresita 2010 Not Just the End Game Anymore. Heritage Management 3(2):167–188.Google Scholar
Marquardt, William H. (editor) 1977 Regional Centers in Archaeology: Prospects and Problems. Missouri Archaeological Society, Research Series 14, Columbia.Google Scholar
Marquardt, William H., Montet-White, Anta, and Scholtz, Sandra C. 1982 Resolving the Crisis in Archaeological Collections Curation. American Antiquity 47:409–418.10.1017/S0002731600061308Google Scholar
Nielsen-Grimm, Glenna, and Haynie, Robyn 2019 Care of Archaeological Materials Begins in the Field. Advances in Archaeological Practice 7(3). doi:10.1017/aap.2019.18Google Scholar
Sullivan, Lynne P., and Terry Childs, S. 2003 Curating Archaeological Collections: From the Field to the Repository. Vol. 6. AltaMira Press, Lanham, Maryland.Google Scholar
Voss, Barbara 2012 Curation as Research: A Case Study in Orphaned and Underreported Archaeological Collections. Archaeological Dialogues 19:145–169.10.1017/S1380203812000219Google Scholar