Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-7zcd7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T09:57:18.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Digital Dilemma

Preservation and the Digital Archaeological Record

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2017

Mary Clarke
Mary Clarke*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, Boston University, 675 Commonwealth Ave., MA 02215 (meclarke@bu.edu)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

The long-term care of collected and created data is an ethical obligation in the fields of archaeology and cultural heritage management. With the growing application of digital methodologies in these fields and the complexity of the resulting data, this task has become complicated. Digital data preservation firms have emerged since this methodological shift, but their policies—championing the democratization of academic data—may conflict with the legal obligations dictated by the countries where data originate. Scholars thus face an inevitable choice between two obligations, one ethical and one legal. While the amount of digital data grows and the options for preservation remain fundamentally misaligned with research norms and project workflows, the digital dilemma places the integrity of data at risk of loss. This article addresses this dilemma by evaluating the existing data publication, archiving, and preservation repositories and considering how, as solutions to the digital dilemma, they can be integrated into multiple workflows. I also propose new directions for archaeological associations, suggesting that they should establish a means of evaluation and approval for third-party preservation firms managing the future of academic research prior to their inevitable ubiquity.

El cuidado a largo plazo de los datos recogidos y creados es una obligación ética en el campo de la arqueología y la gestión del patrimonio cultural. Con la creciente aplicación de metodologías digitales en estos campos y la complejidad de los datos resultantes, esta tarea se ha complicado. Empresas de conservación de datos digitales han surgido desde este cambio metodológico, pero sus políticas—que defienden la democratización de la académica de datos pueden entrar en conflicto con las obligaciones legales impuestas por los países donde se originan los datos. Los estudiosos de este modo se enfrentan a la elección inevitable entre una obligación y otra, una ética y un legal. Mientras que la cantidad de datos digitales crece y las soluciones para su conservación se mantienen fundamentalmente desalineada con las normas de investigación y los flujos de trabajo del proyecto, el dilema digitales coloca la integridad de los datos en riesgo de pérdida. Este artículo aborda las soluciones a este dilema mediante la evaluación de los repositorios existentes para el archivado de datos, la publicación de datos, y la preservación de datos y la forma en que pueden integrarse en múltiples flujos de trabajo. También propongo nuevas direcciones para las asociaciones arqueológicas en que deberían establecer un medio de evaluación y aprobación de las empresas de conservación de terceros que gestionan el futuro de la investigación académica antes de su inevitable ubicuidad

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in Archaeological Practice , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , November 2015 , pp. 313 - 330
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 2015

References

References Cited

Advisory Council on Historic Preservation 2014 National Historic Preservation Act. Electronic document, http://www.achp.gov/docs/NHPA%20in%20Title%2054%20and%20Conversion%20Table.pdf, accessed July 9, 2015.Google Scholar
Alexander, Patrick H. 2013 Thoughts about Open Access Publishing in a Humanities Context. Journal of Eastern Mediterranean Archaeology and Heritage Studies 1(1):97–98.Google Scholar
Altman, Micah, Crabtree, J., Donakowski, D., Maynard, M., Pienta, H., andyoung, C. 2009 Digital Preservation through Archival Collaboration: The Data Preservation Alliance for the Social Sciences. The American Archivist 72(1):170–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Anthropological Association 2012 Resource Development Committee Launches the Anthropology Document Portal. Electronic document, http://www.aaanet.org/membership/Donation/upload/RDC-Anthropology-Document-Portal.pdf, accessed July 10, 2015.Google Scholar
American Cultural Resources Association 1996 American Cultural Resources Association Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. Electronic document, http://www.acra-crm.org/?CodeofEthics, accessed July 10, 2015.Google Scholar
Archaeological Institute of America (AIA) 1997 AIA Code of Ethics. Electronic document, http://www.archaeological.org/pdfs/AIA_Code_of_EthicsA5S.pdf, accessed April 22, 2015.Google Scholar
Archaeology Data Service (ADS) 2014a ADS Terms and Conditions. Electronic document, http://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk, accessed April 23, 2015.Google Scholar
Archaeology Data Service (ADS) 2014b ADSeasy: About. Electronic document, http://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/easy/home, http://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/easy/costing, accessed April 23, 2015.Google Scholar
Archaeological Data Services and Digital Antiquity 2011 Guides to Good Practice. Electronic document, http://guides.archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/, accessed July 9, 2015.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Ann R.E. 2006 Architectural Archives/Archiving Architecture: The Digital ERA. Art Documentation: Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North America 25(2):12–17.Google Scholar
Baker, Karen S., and Yarmey, Lynn 2009 Data Stewardship: Environmental Data Curation and a Web-of-Repositories. The International Journal of Digital Curation 2(4):12–27.Google Scholar
Barton, Justin 2009 3D Laser Scanning and the Conservation of Earthen Architecture: A Case Study at the UNESCO World Heritage Site Merv, Turkmenistan. World Archaeology 41:489–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bawaya, Michael 2010 Virtual Archaeologists Recreate Parts of Ancient Worlds. Science Magazine 327:140–141.Google Scholar
Beale, Nicole 2012 How Community Archaeology Can Make Use of Open Data to Achieve Further Its Objectives. World Archaeology 44:612–633.Google Scholar
Beaubien, Harriet, Karas, B. V., and Fitzhugh, William 2007 Documenting Mongolia’s Deer Stones: Application of Three-Dimensional Digital Imaging Technology to Preservation. In Scientific Research on the Sculptural Arts of Asia: Proceedings of the Third Forbes Symposium at the Freer Gallery of Art, edited by Douglas, Janet G., Jett, Paul, and Winter, John, pp. 133–142. Archetype Publications, London.Google Scholar
Berman, Francine 2008 Got Data? A Guide to Data Preservation in the Information Age. Communications of the ACM 51(12):50–56.Google Scholar
Bonde, Sheila, and Houston, Stephen 2013 Re-Presenting Archaeology. In Re-presenting the Past: Archaeology through Text and Image, edited byBonde, Sheila andHouston, Stephen, pp. 1–8. Oxbow Books, Oxford.Google Scholar
Borgman, Christine L. 2008 Data, Disciplines, and Scholarly Publishing. Learned Publishing 21(1):29–38. Google Scholar
Bruno, Fabio, De Sensi, G., Luchi, M. L., Mancuso, S., and Muzzupappa, M. 2010 From 3D Reconstruction to Virtual Reality: A Complete Methodology for Digital Archaeological Exhibition. Journal of Cultural Heritage 11:42–49. Google Scholar
Çatalhöyük Research Project 2015 Archive Reports. Electronic document, http://www.catalhoyuk.com/archive_reports/, accessed April 23, 2015.Google Scholar
CLOCKSS Archive 2015 Controlled LOCKSS. Electronic document, https://www.clockss.org/clockss/Home, accessed July 12, 2015.Google Scholar
Conway, Esther, Giaretta, David, Lambert, Simon, and Matthews, Brian 2011 Curating Scientific Research Data for the Long Term: A Preservation Analysis Method in Context. The International Journal of Digital Curation 2(6):38–52.Google Scholar
Conway, Paul 2010 Preserva.tion in the Age of Google: Digitization, Digital Preservation, and Dilemmas. The Library Quarterly 80(1):61–79.Google Scholar
Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems 2002 Recommendation for Space Data System Practice: Reference Model for and Open Archival Information System (OAIS), Blue Book. CCSDS Secretariat, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems 2012 Recommendation for Space Data System Practice: Reference Model for and Open Archival Information System (OAIS), Magenta Book. CCSDS Secretariat, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Creative Commons 2015 About the Licenses. Electronic document, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/, accessed July 10, 2015.Google Scholar
Cultural Heritage Partners 2012 Legal Analysis of Federal Requirements for Curation of Digital Archaeological Documents and Data. Report to the Office of General Counsel, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ. Electronic document, http://www.digitalantiquity.org/CHPFinal.pdf, accessed July 9, 2015.Google Scholar
CyArk 2003 CyArk: About. Electronic document, http://www.cyark.org/about/, accessed April 23, 2015.Google Scholar
CyArk 2015CyArk: Projects. Electronic documents, http://cyark.org/projects/, accessed April 23, 2015.Google Scholar
Dassault Systems 2013 Giza 3D. Electronic document, http://www.3DS.com/GIZA3D, accessed April 23, 2015.Google Scholar
Dassault Systems 2015 About 3DS – Dassault Systems. Electronic document, http://www.3ds.com/about-3ds/, accessed April 23, 2015.Google Scholar
Data Archiving and Networking Services 2005 The Data Seal of Approval. Electronic document, http://www.datasealofapproval.org/en/information/about/, accessed April 23, 2015.Google Scholar
Data Archiving and Networking Service 2015 License Agreement. Electronic document, http://www.dans.knaw.nl/en/about/organisation-and-policy/legal-information/DANSlicenceagreementUK.pdf, accessed July 10, 2015.Google Scholar
Dataverse Project 2015 The Dataverse Project. Electronic document, http://dataverse.org, accessed July 10, 2015.Google Scholar
De Reu, Jeroen, De Smedt, P., Herremans, D., Van Meirvenne, M., Laloo, P., and De Clercq, W. 2014 On Introducing and Image Based 3D Reconstruction Method in Archaeological Practice. Journal of Archaeological Science 41:251–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Digital Repository of Ireland 2015 The Digital Repository of Ireland. Electronic document, http://www.dri.ie/, accessed July 12, 2015.Google Scholar
Dublin Core Metadata Initiative 2015 Metadata Basics. Electronic document, http://dublincore.org/metadata-basics/, accessed July 10, 2015.Google Scholar
Dürr, Eugène, van der Meer, Kees, Luxemburg, Wim, and Dekker, Ronald 2008 Dataset Preservation for the Long Term: Results of the DareLux Project. The International Journal of Digital Curation 1(3):29–43.Google Scholar
Eve, Stuart 2012 Augmenting Phenomenology: Using Augmented Reality to Aid Archaeological Phenomenology in the Landscape. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 19:582–600.Google Scholar
Faniel, Ixchel, Kansa, Eric, Kansa, Sarah Whitcher, Barrera-Gomez, Julianna, and Yakel, Elizabeth 2013 The Challenges of Digging Data: A Study of Context in Archaeological Data Reuse. Electronic document, http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/library/2013/faniel-archae-data.pdf, accessed August 3, 2015.Google Scholar
Favro, Diane 2013 To Be or Not to Be in Past Spaces: Thoughts on Roman Immersive Reconstructions. In Re-presenting the Past: Archaeology Through Text and Image, edited by Bonde, Sheila andHouston, Stephen, pp. 151–168. Oxbow Books, Oxford.Google Scholar
FigShare 2015 FigShare. Electronic document, http://figshare.com, accessed July 12, 2015.Google Scholar
Forte, Maurizio 2014 Archaeology: New Perspectives and Challenges—The Example of Çatalhöyük. Journal of Eastern Mediterranean Archaeology & Heritage Studies 2(1):1–29.Google Scholar
Gillings, Mark 2005 The Real, the Virtually Real and the Hyperreal: The Role of VR in Archaeology. In Envisioning the Past: Archaeology and the Image, edited by Smiles, Sam andMoser, Stephanie, pp. 223–239. Blackwell Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Green, Susie, Bevan, Andrew, and Shapland, Michael. 2014 A Comparative Assessment of Structure From Motion Methods for Archaeological Research. Journal of Archaeological Science 46:173–181.Google Scholar
Guidi, Gabriele, Russo, Michele, and Angheleddu, David 2014 3D Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage 1: 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunia, Betsy, and Sandusky, Robert J. 2010 Designing Metadata for Long-Term Data Preservation: DataONE Case Study. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 47(1):1–2.Google Scholar
Hall, Martin 2013 The Emerging Open World. Journal of Eastern Mediterranean Archaeology & Heritage Studies 1(1):98–100.Google Scholar
Hanson, Brooks, Sugden, Andrew, and Alberts, Bruce 2011 Making Data Maximally Available. Science 331:649.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hockx-Yu, Helen, and Knight, Gareth 2008 What to Preserve? Significant Properties of Digital Objects. The International Journal of Digital Curation 1(3):141–153.Google Scholar
International Council of Museums 2014 CIDOC-Conceptual Reference Model. Electronic document, http://www.cidoc-crm.org/, accessed July 12, 2015.Google Scholar
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 2011 Guidelines for Quality and/or Environmental Management Systems Auditing. Electronic document, http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_ics/catalogue_detail_ics.htm?csnumber=31169, accessed April 22, 2015.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, Stuart 2012 A New Digital Dark Age? Collaborative Web Tools, Social Media and Long-Term Preservation. World Archaeology 44:553–570.Google Scholar
Johnson, Matthew 2012 Phenomenological Approaches in Landscape Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 41:269–284.Google Scholar
Kansa, Eric 2012 Openness and Archaeology’s Information Ecosystem. World Archaeology 44:1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kansa, Eric, and Kansa, Sarah Whitcher 2013 Open Archaeology: We All Know That a 14 Is a Sheep: Data Publication and Professionalism in Archaeological Communication. Journal of Eastern Mediterranean Archaeology and Heritage Studies 1(1):88–97.Google Scholar
Kansa, Sarah Whitcher, and Kansa, Eric 2014 Data Publishing and Archaeology’s Information Ecosystem. Near Eastern Archaeology: Cyber Archaeology 77:223–227.Google Scholar
King, Gary 2011 Ensuring the Data-Rich Future of the Social Sciences. Sciences 331:719–721.Google Scholar
Kintigh, Keith W., Altschul, Jeffrey H., Kinzig, Ann P., Limp, W. Frederick, Michener, William K., Sabloff, Jeremy A., Hackett, Edward J., Kohler, Timothy A., Ludäscher, Bertram, and Lynch, Clifford A. 2015 Cultural Dynamics, Deep Time, and Data: Planning Cyberinfrastructure Investments for Archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Practice 3:1–15.Google Scholar
L–P: Archaeology 2015 The ARK Reference Model. Electronic document, http://ark.lparchaeology.com/, accessed July 12, 2015.Google Scholar
Leon Levy Expedition to Ashkelon 2015 Online Database. Electronic document, http://digashkelon.com/current-projects/, accessed April 23, 2015.Google Scholar
Library of Congress 2015 Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standards. Electronic document, http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/, accessed July 10, 2015.Google Scholar
Mesick, Cassandra 2013 Of Imaging and Imagining: Landscape Reconstruction at Peidras Negras. In Re-presenting the Past: Archaeology through Text and Image, edited byBonde, Sheila andHouston, Stephen, pp. 65–84. Oxbow Books, Oxford.Google Scholar
Meyer, Élise, Grussenmeyer, Pierre, Perrin, Jean-Pierre, Durand, Anne, and Drap, Pierre 2007 A Web Information System for the Management and Dissemination of Cultural Heritage Data. Journal of Cultural Heritage 8:396–411.Google Scholar
Molloy, Jennifer C. 2011 The Open Knowledge Foundation: Open Data Means Better Science. PLOS Biology 9:1–4.Google Scholar
Museum of Fine Arts Boston 2007 Giza Archives. Electronic document, http://www.gizapyramids.org/static/html/library.jsp, accessed April 23, 2015.Google Scholar
National Archives Records Administration 1998 Trustworthy Repositories Audit and Certification: Criteria and Checklist. Electronic document, http://www.crl.edu/sites/default/files/d6/attachments/pages/trac_0.pdf, accessed April 22, 2015.Google Scholar
National Park Service 2006 [1979] Archaeological Resources Protection Act. Electronic document, http://www.nps.gov/history/local-law/fhpl_archrsrcsprot.pdf, accessed July 9, 2015.Google Scholar
National Science Foundation 2013 Application Policies. Electronic document, http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf13001/gpg_index.jsp, accessed July 12, 2014.Google Scholar
National Science Foundation 2015 Public Access Plan. Electronic document, http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2015/nsf15052/nsf15052.pdf, accessed July 10, 2015.Google Scholar
OpenContext 2015 Data Publishing Guidelines for Contributors. Electronic document, http://opencontext.org/about/publishing, accessed July 10, 2015.Google Scholar
Petrovic, Vid, Gidding, Aaron, Wypych, Tom, Kuester, Falko, DeFanti, Thomas A., and Levy, Thomas E. 2011 Dealing with Archaeology’s Data Avalanche. Computer 44(7):56–60.Google Scholar
Pleiades Project 2014 The Pleiades Project, About. Electronic document, http://pleiades.stoa.org/, accessed July 12, 2015.Google Scholar
Porter, Benjamin W. 2013 Sharing Data Is Hard!—But Worth It. Journal of Eastern Archaeology and Heritage Studies 1(1):100–101.Google Scholar
Pratt, Darrin 2013 Not an Either/Or Proposition: Combining Interpretive and Data Publication. Journal of Eastern Mediterranean Archaeology and Heritage Studies 1(1):101–102.Google Scholar
Register of Professional Archaeologists (RPA) 1998 Codes and Standards. Electronic document, http://rpanet.org/?page=CodesandStandards, accessed April 22, 2015.Google Scholar
Richards, Julian D., and Winters, Judith 2015 Digging into Data: Open Access and Open Data. Post-Classic Archaeologies 5:285–298.Google Scholar
Rieger, Oya Y. 2008 Preservation in the Age of Large-Scale Digitization. Council on Library and Information Resources, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Remondino, F., Gruen, A., Von Schwerin, J., Eisenbeiss, H., Rizzi, A., Sauerbier, M., Girardi, S., and Richards-Rissetto, H. 2009 Multi-Sensor 3D Documentation of the Maya Site of Copan. Electronic document http://cipa.icomos.org/fileadmin/template/doc/KYOTO/131-1.pdf, accessed August 3, 2015.Google Scholar
Roosevelt, Christopher H., Cobb, Peter, Moss, Emanuel, Olson, Brandon R., and Ünlüsoy, Sinan 2015 Excavation is Destruction Digitization: Advances in Archaeological Practices. Journal of Field Archaeology 40:325–346.Google Scholar
Sanders, Donald H. 2014 Virtual Heritage: Researching and Visualizing the Past in 3D. Journal of Eastern Mediterranean Archaeology & Heritage Studies 2(1):30–47.Google Scholar
Shaw, Jonathan 2012 The Humanities, Digitized. Harvard MagazineMay–June:40–44.Google Scholar
SketchFab 2015 SketchFab. Electronic Document, https://sketchfab.com/, accessed July 12, 2015.Google Scholar
Society for American Archaeology (SAA) 1996 Principles of Archaeological Ethics. Electronic document, http://www.saa.org/AbouttheSociety/PrinciplesofArchaeologicalEthics/tabid/203/Default.aspx, accessed April 22, 2015.Google Scholar
Society for American Archaeology (SAA) 2009 Archaeological Ethics Codes, Charters, and Principles, Electronic document, http://www.saa.org/AbouttheSociety/AnnualMeeting/EthicsBowl/EthicsResources/CodesChartersPrinciples/tabid/199/Default.aspx, accessed July 10, 2015.Google Scholar
Society for American Archaeology and the Digital Archaeological Record (SAA and tDAR) 2013 Joint Statement: Announcement for Collaborative Program. Electronic Document, http://www.tdar.org/wp-uploads/www.tdar.org//2013/06/jointstatementtdar.pdf, accessed July 9, 2015.Google Scholar
Society for Historical Archaeology (SHA) 2003Ethics Statement. Electronic Document, http://www.sha.org/index.php/view/page/ethics, accessed April 22, 2015.Google Scholar
The Digital Archaeological Record (tDAR) 2015 The Digital Archaeological Record. Electronic Document, https://www.tdar.org, accessed July 12, 2015.Google Scholar
Visual Past 2015 The Visual Past. Electronic document, http://visiblepast.net/see/, accessed July 12, 2015.Google Scholar
Zenodo 2015 Zenodo. Electronic document, http://zenodo.org/, accessed July 12, 2015.Google Scholar
Zuiderwijk, Anneke, Janssen, Marijn, Choenni, Sunil, Meijer, Ronald, and Alibaks, Roexsana Sheikh 2012 Socio-Technical Impediments of Open Data. Electronic Journal of e-Government 10(2):156–172.Google Scholar