Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-f9nfp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-18T09:24:12.555Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Monitoring Shoreline Erosion at Calusa Island: A Community-Accessible Method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2025

Rachael Kangas
Affiliation:
Florida Public Archaeology Network, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
Michelle J. LeFebvre*
Affiliation:
Randell Research Center, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
Jennifer Green
Affiliation:
Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
Sara Ayers-Rigsby
Affiliation:
Florida Public Archaeology Network, Florida Atlantic University, Davie, FL, USA
Cindy Bear
Affiliation:
Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
Natalie De La Torre Salas
Affiliation:
Florida Public Archaeology Network, Florida Atlantic University, Davie, FL, USA
Annisa Karim
Affiliation:
Randell Research Center, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
*
Corresponding author: Michelle J. LeFebvre; Email: mlefebvre@flmnh.ufl.edu

Abstract

At coastal archaeological sites, measuring erosion rates and assessing artifact loss are vital to understanding the timescale(s) and spatial magnitude of past and future site loss. We describe a straightforward low-tech methodology for documenting shoreline erosion developed by professionals and volunteers over seven years at Calusa Island Midden (8LL45), one of the few remaining sites with an Archaic component in the Pine Island Sound region of coastal Southwest Florida. We outline the evolution of the methodology since its launch in 2016 and describe issues encountered and solutions implemented. We also describe the use of the data to guide archaeological research and document the impacts of major storms at the site. The response to Hurricane Ian in 2022 is one example of how simply collected data can inform site management. This methodology can be implemented easily at other coastal sites at low cost and in collaboration with communities, volunteers, and heritage site managers.

Resumen

Resumen

Cuando nos enfrentamos a un sitio arqueológico que se deteriora, el primer paso es evaluar y documentar las condiciones. En los sitios costeros, es esencial medir las tasas de erosión y evaluar la pérdida de artefactos para comunicar la escala de tiempo y magnitud de la pérdida pasada y futura del sitio. Describimos una metodología sencilla de baja tecnología para documentar la erosión en la costa, desarrollada por profesionales y voluntarias(os) a lo largo de siete años en la isla Calusa, uno de los pocos sitios del período Arcaico que quedan en la región de Pine Island Sound, en el suroeste de Florida. Resumimos la evolución de la metodología desde su instalación en 2016 y describimos los problemas encontrados y las soluciones implementadas. También proporcionamos ejemplos de la utilidad de la metodología para orientar la investigación arqueológica y para documentar los impactos de las grandes tormentas en el sitio de la isla, incluido el huracán Ian en 2022. Esta metodología se puede implementar fácilmente en otros sitios costeros a bajo costo y en colaboración con voluntarias(os) de la comunidad local y gestoras(es) de sitios patrimoniales.

Type
How to Series
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for American Archaeology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References Cited

Calusa Land Trust. 2023. About CLT. Electronic document, https://www.calusalandtrust.org/about-clt. accessed September 2, 2023.Google Scholar
Dawson, Tom, Hambly, Joanna, Lees, William, and Miller, Sarah. 2021. Proposed Policy Guidelines for Managing Heritage at Risk Based on Public Engagement and Communicating Climate Change. In The Historic Environment: Policy and Practice, edited by Fluck, Hannah, pp. 120. Taylor & Francis, London.Google Scholar
Dawson, Tom, Nimura, Courtney, López-Romero, Elías, and Daire, Marie-Yvane (editors). 2017. Public Archaeology and Climate Change. Oxbow Books, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hambrecht, George, and Rockman, Marcy. 2017. International Approaches to Climate Change and Cultural Heritage. American Antiquity 82(4):627641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haney, Jennifer, Veres, Matthew, Walker, Karen, Marquardt, William, and Newsom, Lee. 2016. Calusa Island, Florida: Monitoring and Preliminary Archaeological Testing at a Late Archaic Shell Midden. Poster presented at the Southeastern Archaeological Conference, Athens, Georgia.Google Scholar
Hil, Greg. 2020. Better Management through Measurement: Integrating Archaeological Site Features into a GIS-Based Erosion and Sea Level Rise Impact Assessment—Blueskin Bay, New Zealand. Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology 15(1):104126. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564894.2018.1531331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtz, Debra, Markham, Adam, Cell, Kate, and Ekworzel, Brenda. 2014. National Landmarks at Risk: How Rising Seas, Floods, and Wildfires Are Threatening the United States’ Most Cherished Historic Sites. Union of Concerned Scientists, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Howland, Matthew D., Jones, Ian W. N., Najjar, Mohammad, and Levy, Thomas E.. 2018. Quantifying the Effects of Erosion on Archaeological Sites with Low Altitude Aerial Photography, Structure from Motion, and GIS: A Case Study from Southern Jordan. Journal of Archaeological Science 90:6270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquardt, William H. 1999. Useppa Island in the Archaic and Caloosahatchee Periods. In The Archaeology of Useppa Island, Monograph 3, edited by Marquardt, William H., pp. 7798. Institute of Archaeology and Paleoenvironmental Studies, Gainesville, Florida.Google Scholar
Marquardt, William H., and Walker, Karen J. (editors). 2012. The Archaeology of Pineland: A Coastal Southwest Florida Site Complex, A.D. 50–1710. Monograph 4. Institute of Archaeology and Paleoenvironmental Studies, University of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Miller, Sarah E., and Murray, Emily Jane. 2018. Heritage Monitoring Scouts: Engaging the Public to Monitor Sites at Risk across Florida. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites 20(4):234260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Rourke, Michael J. E. 2017. Archaeological Site Vulnerability Modelling: The Influence of High Impact Storm Events on Models of Shoreline Erosion in the Western Canadian Arctic. Open Archaeology 3(1):116. https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2017-0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pourkerman, Majid, Marriner, Nick, Morhange, Christophe, Djamali, Morteza, Amjadi, Sedighe, Lahijani, Hamid, Beni, Abdolmajid Naderi, Vacchi, Matteo, Tofighian, Hossein, and Shah-Hoesseini, Majid. 2018. Tracking Shoreline Erosion of “At Risk” Coastal Archaeology: The Example of Ancient Siraf (Iran, Persian Gulf). Applied Geography 101:4555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Karen. 2016. Calusa Island Protocol Background and Introdcution. Manuscript on file with Florida Public Archaeology Network, Southwest Region.Google Scholar