Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T11:54:15.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Networks and Networked Scholars

An Open-Access Database of Paddle Designs from Pottery of the Woodland Period in the American Southeast

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2017

Thomas J. Pluckhahn  and
Neill J. Wallis
Thomas J. Pluckhahn
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA (tpluckhahn@usf.edu)
Neill J. Wallis
Affiliation:
Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We describe the development of an open-access database for Swift Creek Complicated Stamped ceramics, a type of pottery common to Georgia, eastern Alabama, and northern Florida in the Middle and Late Woodland periods between ca. cal A.D. 100 and 800. The characteristic stamped designs on Swift Creek pottery, created by impressing a carved paddle into a clay vessel before firing, provide unique signatures that enable archaeologists to identify paddle matches—multiple vessels, sometimes hundreds of kilometers apart, stamped with a single paddle. These paddle matches potentially allow archaeologists to trace social interactions across hundreds of kilometers with high spatial and temporal resolution. To date, however, this potential has been hindered by the limited accessibility and fragmented nature of the dataset of reconstructed designs. The database we describe integrates paddle designs with other pertinent data for identifying paddle matches and their context, including the results of sourcing and technofunctional analyses and absolute dating. We view this database not only as a critical component of our own research, but also as a platform for collaboration among researchers that will facilitate broad syntheses of the region.

Se describe el desarrollo de una base de datos de libre acceso para la cerámica Swift Creek Complicated Stamped, un tipo de cerámica común en Georgia, el este de Alabama y el norte de Florida en los períodos Silvícola Medio y Tardío, entre aproximadamente 100 y 800 cal d.C. Los diseños característicos estampados sobre la cerámica Swift Creek, creados mediante la impresión de una paleta de madera tallada en un recipiente de arcilla húmeda antes del secado y cocción, proporcionan firmas únicas que permiten identificar la ocurrencia de múltiples vasos, a veces cientos de kilómetros aparte, estampados con la misma paleta. Estas coincidencias entre diseños de paleta tienen el potencial de permitir el rastreo de las interacciones sociales a distancias de cientos de kilómetros con una alta resolución espacial y temporal. Sin embargo, hasta ahora este potencial se ha visto obstaculizado por la accesibilidad limitada y la fragmentación del conjunto de datos de diseños reconstruidos. La base de datos que describimos integra diseños de paleta con otros datos pertinentes para la identificación de coincidencias de paletas y su contexto, incluyendo los datos de procedencia, análisis técnico-funcional y datación absoluta. Consideramos que esta base de datos no sólo funciona como un componente crítico de nuestra propia investigación, sino también como una plataforma para la colaboración entre investigadores que facilitará amplias síntesis de la región.

Type
Articles
Information
Advances in Archaeological Practice , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , May 2017 , pp. 159 - 169
Copyright
Copyright 2017 © Society for American Archaeology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES CITED

Alvarado, Raf 2001 The Mayan Epigraphic Database Project. Electronic document, http://www2.iath.virginia.edu/med/#anchor_1, accessed August 8, 2015.Google Scholar
Arnold, Dean E. 1998 Ancient Andean Ceramic Technology: An Ethnoarchaeological Perspective. In Andean Ceramics: Technology, Organization, and Approaches, edited by Shimada, Izumi, pp. 353–367. MASCA Research Papers in Science and Archeology, Supplement to Volume 15, 1998. Museum Applied Science Center for Archaeology, University of Pennsylvania of Archaeology and Anthropology, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Arthur, John W. 2002 Pottery Use-Alteration as an Indicator of Socioeconomic Status: An Ethnoarchaeological Study of the Garno of Ethiopia. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 9 (4):331–355.Google Scholar
Ashley, Keith H. 1992 Swift Creek Manifestations along the Lower St. Johns River. Florida Anthropologist 45:127–138.Google Scholar
Ashley, Keith H. 1998 Swift Creek Traits in Northeastern Florida: Ceramics, Mounds, and Middens. In A World Engraved: Archaeology of the Swift Creek Culture, edited by Williams, Mark and Elliott, Daniel T., pp. 197–221. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Ashley, Keith H., and Wallis, Neill 2006 Northeastern Florida Swift Creek: An Overview and Future Research Directions. Florida Anthropologist 59:5–18.Google Scholar
Ashley, Keith, Stephenson, Keith, and Snow, Frankie 2007 Teardrops, Ladders, and Bull's Eyes: Swift Creek on the Georgia Coast. Early Georgia 35 (1):3–28.Google Scholar
Broyles, Bettye J. 1968 Reconstructed Designs from Swift Creek Complicated Stamped Sherds. Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 8:49–74.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Joseph R. 1978 Report of the Excavations at Fairchild's Landing and Hare's Landing, Seminole County, Georgia, edited by Smith, Betty A.. Manuscript on file, Southeastern Archaeological Center, Tallahassee.Google Scholar
Dietler, Michael, and Herbich, Ingrid 1998 Habitus, Techniques, Style: An Integrated Approach to the Social Understanding of Material Culture and Boundaries. In The Archaeology of Social Boundaries, edited by Stark, Miriam T., pp. 232–263. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Gosselain, Olivier P. 2000 Materializing Identities: An African Perspective. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 7 (3):187–217.Google Scholar
Hally, David J. 1983 Use Alteration of Pottery Surfaces: An Important Source of Evidence for the Identification of Vessel Function. North American Archaeologist 4:3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hally, David J. 1986 The Identification of Vessel Function: A Case Study from Northwest Georgia. American Antiquity 51:267–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, William Henry 1903 Aboriginal Pottery of the Eastern United States. In Twentieth Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, 1898–1899, edited by Powell, John W., pp. 1–201. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Jennings, Jesse D., and Fairbanks, Charles H. 1939 Type Description Swift Creek Complicated Stamped. Newsletter of the Southeastern Archaeological Conference 1.Google Scholar
Jones, B. Calvin, and Tesar, Louis D. 1996 Emergency Archaeological Salvage Excavation Within the Swift Creek Subarea of the Block-Sterns Site (8LE148), Leon County, Florida: A Public Archaeology Project. Report on file, Division of Historical Resources, Tallahassee.Google Scholar
Kelly, Arthur R. 1938 A Preliminary Report on Archaeological Explorations at Macon, Georgia. Bureau of Ethnology Bulletin 119. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Kelly, Arthur R., and Smith, Betty A. 1975 The Swift Creek Site, 9 Bi 3, Macon, Georgia. Department of Anthropology, University of Georgia. Report prepared for the National Park Service, Southeastern Archaeological Center, Tallahassee, Florida.Google Scholar
Kirkland, S. Dwight 2003 Human Prehistory at the Sadlers Landing Site, Camden County, Georgia. Early Georgia 31:107–192.Google Scholar
Macri, Martha J. 2008 Dated Monuments in the Maya Hieroglyphic Database. Glyph Dwellers 26. Electronic document, https://nas.ucdavis.edu/sites/nas.ucdavis.edu/files/attachments/R26.pdf, accessed August 24, 2015.Google Scholar
Mathews, Peter, and Bíró, Péter 2015 Maya Hieroglyph Dictionary. Electronic document, http://research.famsi.org/mdp/mdp_plsread.html, accessed August 24, 2015.Google Scholar
Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnography, Harvard University 2015 The Corpus of Maya Hieroglyphic Inscriptions Program. Electronic document, https://www.peabody.harvard.edu/cmhi/, accessed August 24, 2015.Google Scholar
Phelps, David S. 1969 Swift Creek and Santa Rosa in Northwest Florida. Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of South Carolina Notebook 1:14–24.Google Scholar
Pluckhahn, Thomas J. 2007 Reflections of Paddle Stamped Pottery: Symmetry Analysis of Swift Creek Paddle Designs. Southeastern Archaeology 26:1–11.Google Scholar
Reina, Rubin E., and Robert, M. Hill, II 1978 The Traditional Pottery of Guatemala. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Rice, Prudence M. 1984 Some Reflections on Change in Pottery Producing Systems. In The Many Dimensions of Pottery: Ceramics in Archaeology and Anthropology, edited by van der Leeuw, Sander Ernst and Pritchard, Alison C., pp. 231–293. CINGULA 7. Institute for Pre- and Proto-history, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Saunders, Rebecca 1986 Attribute Variability in Late Swift Creek Phase Ceramics from King's Bay, Georgia. Master's thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Saunders, Rebecca 1998 Swift Creek Phase Design Assemblages from Two Sites on the Georgia Coast. In A World Engraved: Archaeology of the Swift Creek Culture, edited by Williams, Mark and Elliott, Daniel T., pp. 154–180. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Saunders, Rebecca 2000 Stability and Change in Guale Indian Pottery, A.D. 1300–1702. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Sidorov, Grigori, Pichardo-Lagunas, Obdulia, and Chanona-Hernandez, Liliana 2010 Search Interface to a Mayan Glyph Database Based on Visual Characteristics. Natural Language Processing and Information Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Volume 5723, pp. 222–229. Horacek, Helmut, Métais, Elisabeth, Muñoz, Rafael, and Wolska, Magdalena, series editors. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Skibo, James M. 1992 Pottery Function: A Use-Alteration Perspective. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Smith, Betty A. 1975 A Re-analysis of the Mandeville Site, 9Cy1, Focusing on Its Internal History and External Relations. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Georgia, Athens.Google Scholar
Smith, Karen Y., and Knight, Vernon James Jr. 2012 Style in Swift Creek Paddle Art. Southeastern Archaeology 31:143–156.Google Scholar
Smith, Karen Y., and Knight, Vernon James Jr. 2014 Core Elements and Layout Classes in Swift Creek Paddle Art. Southeastern Archaeology 33:42–54.Google Scholar
Smith, Marion F. Jr. 1988 Function from Whole Vessel Shape: A Method and Application to Anasazi Black Mesa, Arizona. American Anthropologist 90:921–922.Google Scholar
Snow, Frankie 1975 Swift Creek Designs and Distributions: A South Georgia Study. Early Georgia 3:38–59.Google Scholar
Snow, Frankie 1977 An Archaeological Survey of the Ocmulgee Big Bend Region: A Preliminary Report. Occasional Papers from South Georgia, Number 3. South Georgia College, Douglas.Google Scholar
Snow, Frankie 1998 Swift Creek Design Investigations: The Hartford Case. In A World Engraved: Archaeology of the Swift Creek Culture, edited by Williams, Mark and Elliott, Daniel T., pp. 61–98. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Snow, Frankie 2007 Swift Creek Design Catalog. Report on file, South Georgia College, Douglas.Google Scholar
Snow, Frankie, and Stephenson, Keith 1998 Swift Creek Designs: A Tool for Monitoring Interaction. In A World Engraved: Archaeology of the Swift Creek Culture, edited by Williams, Mark and Elliott, Daniel T., pp. 99–111. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Stephenson, Keith, Bense, Judith A., and Snow, Frankie 2002 Aspects of Deptford and Swift Creek on the South Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains. In The Woodland Southeast, edited by Anderson, David G. and Mainfort, Robert C. Jr., pp. 318–351. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Stephenson, Keith, and Snow, Frankie 2004 Swift Creek to Square Ground Lamar: Situating the Ocmulgee Big Bend Region in Calibrated Time. Early Georgia 32:127–160.Google Scholar
Stoltman, James B., and Snow, Frankie 1998 Cultural Interaction within Swift Creek Society: People, Pots, and Paddles. In A World Engraved: Archaeology of the Swift Creek Culture, edited by Williams, Mark and Elliott, Daniel T., pp. 130–153. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Tesar, Louis D. 2009 A Sign of the Times: Swift Creek Ceramics at the Hartsfield Site (8LE120A). Report on file, Division of Historical Resources, Tallahassee.Google Scholar
Tesar, Louis D., and Jones, Calvin B. 2009 The Waddells Mill Pond Site (8JA65): 1973–74 Test Excavation Results. Report on file, Division of Historical Resources, Tallahassee.Google Scholar
Vail, Gabrielle 2013 The Maya Hieroglyphic Codices. Electronic document, http://www.mayacodices.org/Madcod.asp, accessed August 8, 2015.Google Scholar
van der Leeuw, Sander E., Papousek, Dick A., and Coudart, Anick 1992 Technological Traditions and Unquestioned Assumptions: The Case of Pottery in Michoacan. Techniques et Culture 16–17:145–173.Google Scholar
Veletsianos, George, and Kimmons, Royce 2012 Networked Participatory Scholarship: Emergent Techno-Cultural Pressures Toward Open and Digital Scholarship in Online Networks. Computers & Education 58:766–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, Neill J. 2011 The Swift Creek Gift: Vessel Exchange on the Atlantic Coast. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Wallis, Neill J. 2015 The Living Past: Itineraries of “Swift Creek” Images through Wood, Earthenware, and Ether. In Things in Motion: Object Itineraries in Archaeological Practice, edited by Joyce, Rosemary and Gillespie, Susan, pp. 201–219. School for Advanced Research, Sante Fe, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Wallis, Neill J., Boulanger, Mathew T., Ferguson, Jeffrey R., and Glascock, Michael D. 2010 Woodland Period Ceramic Provenance and the Exchange of Swift Creek Complicated Stamped Pottery in the Southeastern United States. Journal of Archaeological Science 37:2598–2611.Google Scholar
Wallis, Neill J., Gilmore, Zackary I., Cordell, Ann S., Pluckhahn, Thomas J., Ashley, Keith H., and Glascock, Michael D. 2015 The Ceramic Ecology of Florida: Compositional Baselines for Pottery Provenance Studies. Science and Technology of Archaeological Research 1 (2):29–48.Google Scholar
Wallis, Neill J., and O'Dell, Amanda 2011 Swift Creek Paddle Designs from the Florida Gulf Coast: Patterns and Prospects. Florida Anthropologist 64 (3-4):187–206.Google Scholar
Wallis, Neill, Pluckhahn, Thomas, and Glascock, Michael D. 2016 Interaction Networks of the Woodland Period American Southeast: Neutron Activation Analysis of Swift Creek Complicated Stamped Pottery. American Antiquity 81:717–736.Google Scholar
Willey, Gordon R. 1949 Archeology of the Florida Gulf Coast. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 113. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Williams, Mark, and Elliott, Daniel T. 1998 Swift Creek Research: History and Observations. In A World Engraved: Archaeology of the Swift Creek Culture, edited by Williams, Mark and Elliott, Daniel T., pp. 1–11. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Zhou, Jun, Yu, Haozhou, Smith, Karen, Wilder, Colin, Yu, Hongkai, and Wang, Song 2016 Identifying Designs from Incomplete, Fragmented Cultural Heritage Objects by Curve-Pattern Matching. Electronic document, https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.02023, accessed September 7, 2016.Google Scholar