Skip to main content
×
×
Home

A Standard for the Scholarly Citation of Archaeological Data as an Incentive to Data Sharing

  • Ben Marwick (a1) and Suzanne E. Pilaar Birch (a2)
  • Please note an addendum has been issued for this article.
Abstract

How do archaeologists share their research data, if at all? We review what data are, according to current influential definitions, and previous work on the benefits, costs, and norms of data sharing in the sciences broadly. To understand data sharing in archaeology, we present the results of three pilot studies: requests for data by e-mail, review of data availability in published articles, and analysis of archaeological datasets deposited in repositories. We find that archaeologists are often willing to share but that discipline-wide sharing is patchy and ad hoc. Legislation and mandates are effective at increasing data sharing, but editorial policies at journals lack adequate enforcement. Although most of the data available at repositories are licensed to enable flexible reuse, only a small proportion of the data are stored in structured formats for easy reuse. We present some suggestions for improving the state of date sharing in archaeology; among these is a standard for citing datasets to ensure that researchers making their data publicly available receive appropriate credit.

¿Cómo comparten los arqueólogos sus datos de investigación, si lo hacen? Revisamos qué datos son, de acuerdo con las actuales definiciones influyentes, y el trabajo previo sobre los beneficios, costos y estándares de intercambio de datos en las ciencias en general. Para comprender el intercambio de datos en arqueología, presentamos los resultados de tres estudios piloto: solicitudes de datos por correo electrónico; revisión de la disponibilidad de datos en artículos publicados y análisis de conjuntos de datos arqueológicos depositados en repositorios. Encontramos que los arqueólogos están a menudo dispuestos a compartir, pero el intercambio de toda la disciplina es desigual y ad hoc. La legislación y los mandatos son eficaces para aumentar el intercambio de datos, pero las políticas editoriales de las revistas carecen de aplicación adecuada. Aunque la mayoría de los datos disponibles en repositorios están autorizados para permitir la reutilización flexible, sólo una pequeña proporción de los datos se almacena en formatos estructurados para su fácil reutilización. Presentamos algunas sugerencias para mejorar el estado de la fecha de intercambio en arqueología, incluyendo un estándar para citar conjuntos de datos para asegurar que los investigadores que hacen sus datos disponibles públicamente reciben crédito apropiado.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      A Standard for the Scholarly Citation of Archaeological Data as an Incentive to Data Sharing
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      A Standard for the Scholarly Citation of Archaeological Data as an Incentive to Data Sharing
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      A Standard for the Scholarly Citation of Archaeological Data as an Incentive to Data Sharing
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
(bmarwick@uw.edu, corresponding author)
References
Hide All
Alsheikh-Ali, Alawi A., Qureshi, Waqas, Al-Mallah, Mouaz H., and Ioannidis, John P. A. 2011 Public Availability of Published Research Data in High-Impact Journals. PLOS ONE 6 (9): e24357. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0024357, accessed September 7, 2017.
American Psychological Association 2001 Ethical Standards for the Reporting and Publishing of Scientific Information. In Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 5th ed., pp. 387396. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
Archaeological Resources in Cultural Heritage: A European Standard 2014 The Standard and Guide to Best Practice in Archaeological Archiving in Europe. Electronic document, http://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/arches/Wiki.jsp?page=ARCHES%20Introduction, accessed September 7, 2017.
Archaeology Data Service/Digital Antiquity 2011 Guides to Good Practice. Electronic document, http://guides.archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/, accessed September 7, 2017.
Belter, Christopher W. 2014 Measuring the Value of Research Data: A Citation Analysis of Oceanographic Data Sets. PLoS One 9 (3): e92590. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092590
Bogen, James, and Woodward, James 1998 Saving the Phenomena. Philosophical Review 97 (3):303352.
Borgman, Christine L. 2012 The Conundrum of Sharing Research Data. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63 (6):10591078.
Borgman, Christine L. 2015 Big Data, Little Data, No Data: Scholarship in the Networked World. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Chambers, Chris 2017 The Seven Deadly Sins of Psychology: A Manifesto for Reforming the Culture of Scientific Practice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Clarke, Mary E. 2015 The Digital Dilemma: Preservation and the Digital Archaeological Record. Advances in Archaeological Practice 3 (4):313330.
Cranston, Karen, Harmon, Luke J., O'Leary, Maureen A., and Lisle, Curtis 2014 Best Practices for Data Sharing in Phylogenetic Research. PLOS Currents Tree of Life (blog), June 19. DOI:10.1371/currents.tol.bf01eff4a6b60ca4825c69293dc59645, accessed September 7, 2017.
Crossref 2017 Event Data User Guide, Version 1.0.0—Beta. Electronic document, https://www.eventdata.crossref.org/guide/, accessed November 7, 2017.
Daston, Lorraine, and Galison, Peter 1992 The Image of Objectivity. Representations 40:81128.
Data Citation Synthesis Group 2014 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles. In FORCE11; 2014, edited by Martone, M.. Electronic document, https://doi.org/10.25490/a97f-egyk, accessed September 7, 2017.
Dorch, Bertil F., Drachen, Thea M., and Ellegaard, Ole 2015 The Data Sharing Advantage in Astrophysics. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union 11 (A29A):172175.
Duke, Clifford S., and Porter, John H. 2013 The Ethics of Data Sharing and Reuse in Biology. BioScience 63 (6):483489.
Ellison, Leigh A. 2012 Just 20 Days Left!! Upload Your Archaeological Information FREE to tDAR!! tDAR: The Digital Archaeological Record (blog), December 12. Electronic document, https://www.tdar.org/news/2012/12/just-20-days-left-upload-your-archaeological-information-free-to-tdar/, accessed September 7, 2017. Eglen, Stephen J., Ben Marwick, Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Michael Hanke, Shoaib Sufi, Padraig Gleeson, and Jean-Baptist Poline
Ellison, Leigh A. 2017 Toward Standard Practices for Sharing Computer Code and Programs in Neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience 20 (6):770773.
Fienberg, Stephen E., Martin, Margaret E., and Straf, Miron L. 1985 Sharing Research Data. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Floridi, Luciano 2011 The Philosophy of Information. Oxford University Press, London.
Giofrè, David, Cumming, Geoff, Fresc, Luca, Boedker, Ingrid, and Tressoldi, Patrizio 2017 The Influence of Journal Submission Guidelines on Authors’ Reporting of Statistics and Use of Open Research Practices. PLOS ONE 12 (4). DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0175583, accessed September 7, 2017.
Gleditsch, Nils P., Metelits, Claire, and Strand, Håvard 2003 Posting Your Data: Will You Be Scooped or Will You Be Famous? International Studies Perspectives 4 (1):8997.
Hacking, Ian 1992 The Self-Vindication of the Laboratory Sciences. In Science as Practice and Culture, edited by Pickering, Andrew, pp. 2964. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Hagstrom, Warren O. 1982 Gift Giving as an Organising Principle in Science. In Science in Context: Readings in the Sociology of Science, edited by Barnes, B. and Edge, D., pp. 2134. Open University Press, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom.
Harding, Anna, Harper, Barbara, Stone, Dave, O'Neill, Catherine, Berger, Patricia, Harris, Stuart, and Donatuto, Jamie 2012 Conducting Research with Tribal Communities: Sovereignty, Ethics, and Data-Sharing Issues. Environmental Health Perspectives 120 (1):610.
Hart, Edmund M., Barmby, Pauline, LeBauer, David, Michonneau, François, Mount, Sarah, Mulrooney, Patrick, and Hollister, Jeffrey W. 2016 Ten Simple Rules for Digital Data Storage. PLOS Computational Biology 12 (10): e1005097. DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005097, accessed September 7, 2017.
Henneken, Edwin A., and Accomazzi, Alberto 2011 Linking to Data—Effect on Citation Rates in Astronomy. Electronic document, https://arxiv.org/abs/1111.3618, accessed September 17, 2017.
Huggett, Jeremy 2017 Citing Data Reuse. Introspective Digital Archaeology (blog), May 23. Electronic document, https://introspectivedigitalarchaeology.wordpress.com/2017/05/23/citing-data-reuse/, accessed September 7, 2017.
Hymes, Dell 1972 Reinventing Anthropology. Pantheon, New York.
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research 2012 Guide to Social Science Data Preparation and Archiving: Best Practice throughout the Data Life Cycle, 5th ed. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Journal of Archaeological Science 2013 Guide for Authors. Journal of Archaeological Science. Electronic document, https://web.archive.org/web/20130125222940; https://www.elsevier.com/journals/journal-of-archaeological-science/0305-4403/guide-for-authors, accessed September 7, 2017.
Kansa, Eric C., and Kansa, Sarah W. 2013 Open Archaeology: We All Know That a 14 Is a Sheep: Data Publication and Professionalism in Archaeological Communication. Journal of Eastern Mediterranean Archaeology and Heritage Studies 1 (1):8897.
Kansa, Eric C., Kansa, Sarah W., and Watrall, Ethan (editors) 2011 Archaeology 2.0: New Approaches to Communication and Collaboration. Cotsen Digital Archaeology Series, University of California, Los Angeles. Electronic document, https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1r6137tb, accessed November 7, 2017.
Keers, Geurt, van derReijden, Hans, and van Rossum, Hans 2011 Planning Archaeology: A Synthesis of the Thematic Sub-reports. RIGO Research en Advies, Amsterdam.
Kidwell, Mallory C., Lazarević, Ljiljana B., Baranski, Erica, Hardwicke, Tom, Piechowski, Sarah, Falkenberg, Lina-Sophia, and Nosek, Brian 2016 Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency. PLOS Biology 14 (5): e1002456.
Kintigh, Keith 2006 The Promise and Challenge of Archaeological Data Integration. American Antiquity 71 (3):567578.
Kratz, John, and Strasser, Carly 2014 Data Publication Consensus and Controversies. F1000Research. Electronic document, https://f1000research.com/articles/3-94/v1, accessed September 7, 2017.
Kratz, John, and Strasser, Carly 2015 Researcher Perspectives on Publication and Peer Review of Data. PLOS ONE 10 (2): e0117619. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0117619, accessed September 7, 2017.
Kyzas, Panayiotis A., Loizou, Konstantinos T., and Ioannidis, John P. A. 2005 Selective Reporting Biases in Cancer Prognostic Factor Studies. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 97:10431055.
Latour, Bruno 1999 Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Leonelli, Sabina 2015 What Counts as Scientific Data? A Relational Framework. Philosophy of Science 82 (5):810821.
Leonelli, Sabina 2016 The Philosophy of Data. In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Information, edited by , L. Floridi. Routledge, New York 191202.
Macleod, Malcolm R., The NPQIP Collaborative group 2017 Findings of a retrospective, controlled cohort study of the impact of a change in Nature journals' editorial policy for life sciences research on the completeness of reporting study design and execution. bioRxiv 187245; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/187245, accessed March 12, 2018.
McCoy, Mark D., and Codlin, Maria C. 2016 The Influence of Religious Authority in Everyday Life: A Landscape-Scale Study of Domestic Architecture and Religious Law in Ancient Hawai'i. World Archaeology 48 (3):411430.
McCullough, Bruce D., McGeary, Kerry A., and Harrison, Teresa D. 2006 Lessons from the JMCB Archive. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 38 (4):10931107.
McCullough, Bruce D., and Vinod, Hrishikesh D. 2005 Comment: Econometrics and Software. Journal of Economic Perspectives 17 (1):223224.
McMurry, Julie A., Juty, Nick, Blomberg, Niklas, Burdett, Tony, Conlin, Tom, Conte, Nathalie, and Parkinson, Helen 2017 Identifiers for the 21st Century: How to Design, Provision, and Reuse Persistent Identifiers to Maximize Utility and Impact of Life Science Data. PLOS Biology 15 (6): e2001414. DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.2001414, accessed September 7, 2017.
Marwick, Ben 2017 Computational Reproducibility in Archaeological Research: Basic Principles and a Case Study of Their Implementation. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 24 (2):424450.
Marwick, Ben, Hayes, Elspeth, Clarkson, Chris, and Fullagar, Richard 2017 Movement of Lithics by Trampling: An Experiment in the Madjedbebe Sediments, Northern Australia. Journal of Archaeological Science 79:7385.
Marwick, B. and Birch, S. Pilaar 2018 Dataset and R code for “A Standard for the Scholarly Citation of Archaeological Data as an Incentive to Data Sharing,” http://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/KSRUZ, Open Science Framework, Accessed 11 March 2018.
Merton, Robert K. 1942 The Normative Structure of Science. In The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, edited by Merton, Robert K.. University of Chicago Press, Chicago 267--278.
Moore, Ray, and Richards, Julian 2015 Here Today, Gone Tomorrow: Open Access, Open Data and Digital Preservation. In Open Source Archaeology: Ethics and Practice, edited by Wilson, Andrew T. and Edwards, Ben. De Gruyter, the Netherlands 30--43.
Mounce, Ross 2014 Open Data and Palaeontology. In Issues in Open Research Data, edited by Moore, S. A., pp. 151164. Ubiquity Press, London.
National Science Foundation 2010 Data Management for NSF SBE Directorate Proposals and Awards. Electronic document, https://www.nsf.gov/sbe/SBE_DataMgmtPlanPolicy.pdf, accessed 15 March 2018.
National Science Foundation 2016 Dissemination and Sharing of Research Results. Electronic document, https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/dmp.jsp, accessed September 7, 2017.
Nature: Scientific Data Editors 2017 Recommended Data Repositories. Electronic document, https://www.nature.com/sdata/policies/repositories, accessed September 13, 2017.
Nicholas, George P. 2014 Indigenous Cultural Heritage in the Age of Technological Reproducibility: Towards a Postcolonial Ethic of the Public Domain. In Dynamic Fair Dealing: Creating Canadian Culture Online, edited by Coombe, Rosemary, Wershler, Darren, and Zeilinger, Martin, pp. 213224. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
Nicholas, George P., and Wylie, Alison 2009 Archaeological Finds: Legacies of Appropriation, Modes of Response. In The Ethics of Cultural Appropriation, edited by Young, James O. and Brunk, Conrad G., pp. 1154. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.
Nicholas, George P., and Wylie, Alison 2012 “Do Not Do unto Others . . . ”: Cultural Misrecognition and the Harms of Appropriation in an Open-Source World. In Appropriating the Past: Philosophical Perspectives on Archaeological Practice, edited by Coningham, Robin and Scarre, Geoffrey, pp. 195221. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Nosek, B. A., Alter, G., Banks, G. C., Borsboom, D., Bowman, S. D., Breckler, S. J., and Yarkoni, T. 2015 Promoting an Open Research Culture: Author Guidelines for Journals Could Help to Promote Transparency, Openness, and Reproducibility. Science 348:14221425.
Nugent, Ruth, and Williams, Howard 2012 Sighted Surfaces: Ocular Agency in Early Anglo-Saxon Cremation Burials. In Encountering Imagery: Materialities, Perceptions, Relations, edited by Danielsson, Ing-Marie Back, Fahlander, Fredrik, and Sjöstrand, Ylva, pp. 187208. Stockholm University, Stockholm.
Nuijten, Michèle B., Borghuis, Jeroen, Veldkamp, Coosje, Alvarez, Linda, van Assen, Marvel, and Wicherts, Jelte M. 2017 Journal Data Sharing Policies and Statistical Reporting Inconsistencies in Psychology. Collabra: Psychology 3 (1): 31. DOI:10.1525/collabra.102, accessed September 7, 2017.
Pampel, Heinz, Vierkant, Paul, Scholze, Frank, Bertelmann, Roland, Kindling, Maxi, Klump, Jens, and Dierolf, Uwe 2013 Making Research Data Repositories Visible: The re3data.org Registry. PLOS ONE 8 (11): e78080. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0078080, accessed September 7, 2017.
Pavlech, Laura L. 2016 Data Citation Index. Journal of the Medical Library Association 104 (1):8890.
Penev, Lyubomir, Mietchen, Daniel, Chavan, Vishwas Shravan, Hagedorn, Gregor, Smith, Vincent Stuart, Shotton, David, Tuama, Éamonn Ó, Senderov, Viktor, Georgiev, Teodor, Stoev, Pavel, Groom, Quentin John, Remsen, David, and Edmunds, Scott C. 2017 Strategies and Guidelines for Scholarly Publishing of Biodiversity Data. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e12431. DOI:10.3897/rio.3.e12431, accessed September 7, 2017.
Peng, Roger D., Dominici, Francesca, and Zege, Scott L. 2006 Reproducible Epidemiological Research. American Journal of Epidemiology 163:783789.
Pienta, Amy M., Alter, George, and Lyle, Jared A. 2010 The Enduring Value of Social Science Research: The Use and Reuse of Primary Research Data. Electronic document, http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/78307, accessed September 27, 2017.
Piwowar, Heather A., Day, Roger S., and Fridsma, Douglas B. 2007 Sharing Detailed Research Data Is Associated with Increased Citation Rate. PLOS ONE 2 (3): e308.
Piwowar, Heather A., and Vision, Todd J. 2013 Data Reuse and the Open Data Citation Advantage. PeerJ 1: e175. DOI:10.7717/peerj.175, accessed September 7, 2017.
PLOS Editorial and Publishing Policies 2017 Sharing of Materials, Methods and Data. PLOS Medicine. Electronic document, http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability, accessed March 12, 2018.
Reichman, James H., and Uhlir, Paul F. 2003 A Contractually Reconstructed Research Commons for Scientific Data in a Highly Protectionist Intellectual Property Environment. Law and Contemporary Problems 66 (1/2):315462.
Reidpath, Daniel D., and Allotey, Pascale A. 2002 Data Sharing in Medical Research: An Empirical Investigation. Bioethics 15 (2):125134.
Rheinberger, H. J. 2011 Infra-experimentality: from traces to data, from data to patterning facts. History of Science, 49 (3), 337348.
Rowhani-Farid, Anisa, Allen, Michelle, and Barnett, Adrian G. 2017 What Incentives Increase Data Sharing in Health and Medical Research? A Systematic Review. Research Integrity and Peer Review 2 (4). DOI:10.1186/s41073-017-0028-9, accessed September 7, 2017.
Savage, Caroline J., and Vickers, Andrew J. 2009 Empirical Study of Data Sharing by Authors Publishing in PLoS Journals. PLOS ONE 4 (9): e7078. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0007078, accessed September 7, 2017.
Sawyer, Steve 2008 Data Wealth, Data Poverty, Science and Cyberinfrastructure. Prometheus 26 (4):355371.
Sears, Jonathan R. L. 2011 Data Sharing Effect on Article Citation Rate in Paleoceanography. Paper presented at the fall meeting of the American Geophysical Union. Electronic document, https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.1222998.V1, accessed September 7, 2017.
Spencer, Hilary 2010 Thoughts on the Sharing of Data and Research Materials and the Role of Journal Policies. Electronic document, http://web.stanford.edu/~vcs/Conferences/RoundtableNov212009/ThoughtPieces, accessed September 7, 2017.
Stodden, Victoria 2009a Enabling Reproducible Research: Open Licensing for Scientific Innovation. International Journal of Communications Law and Policy. Electronic document, https://ssrn.com/abstract=1362040, accessed September 7, 2017.
Stodden, Victoria 2009b The Legal Framework for Reproducible Scientific Research: Licensing and Copyright. Computing in Science and Engineering 11 (1):3540.
Stodden, Victoria 2010 The Scientific Method in Practice: Reproducibility in the Computational Sciences. Columbia University Academic Commons. Electronic document, http://hdl.handle.net/10022/AC:P:11417, accessed September 7, 2017.
Strasser, Carly, Cook, Robert, Michener, William, and Budden, Amber 2012 Primer on Data Management: What You Always Wanted to Know. In DataONE Best Practices Primer. Electronic document, https://doi.org/10.5060/D2251G48, accessed September 7, 2017.
Tenopir, Carol, Allard, Suzie, Douglass, Kimberly, Aydinoglu, Arsev U., Wu, Lei, and Frame, Mike 2011 Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions. PLOS ONE 6 (6): e21101. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0021101, accessed September 7, 2017.
Tenopir, Carol, Dalton, Elizabeth, Allard, Suzie, Frame, Mike, Pjesivac, Ivanka, Birch, Ben, and Dorsett, Kristina 2015 Changes in Data Sharing and Data Reuse Practices and Perceptions among Scientists Worldwide. PLOS ONE 10 (8): e0134826. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0134826, accessed September 7, 2017.
Thessen, Anne E., and Patterson, David J. 2011 Data Issues in the Life Sciences. ZooKeys 150:1551. DOI:10.3897/zookeys.150.1766, accessed September 7, 2017.
Tsosie, Rebecca 2007 Cultural Challenges to Biotechnology: Native American Genetic Resources and the Concept of Cultural Harm. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (3):396411.
Uhlir, Paul F., and Cohen, Daniel 2011 Internal document. Board on Research Data and Information, Policy and Global Affairs Division, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, March 18.
Vanpaemel, Wolf, Vermorgen, Maarten, Deriemaecker, Leen, and Storms, Gert 2015 Are We Wasting a Good Crisis? The Availability of Psychological Research Data after the Storm. Collabra 1 (1): 3. DOI:10.1525/collabra.13, accessed September 7, 2017.
Vines, Timothy H., Albert, Arianne Y., Andrew, Rose L., Débarre, Florence, Bock, Dan G., Franklin, Michelle T., and Rennison, Diana J. 2014 The Availability of Research Data Declines Rapidly with Article Age. Current Biology 24 (1):9497.
Vitelli, Karen D., and Colwell-Chanthaphonh, John S. (editors) 2006 Archaeological Ethics. Rowman AltaMira, New York.
Wallis, Jillian C., Rolando, Elizabeth, and Borgman, Christine L. 2013 If We Share Data, Will Anyone Use Them? Data Sharing and Reuse in the Long Tail of Science and Technology. PLOS ONE 8 (7): e67332. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0067332, accessed September 7, 2017.
White, Ethan, Baldridge, Elita, Brym, Zachary T., Locey, Kenneth, McGlinn, Daniel, and Supp, Sarah 2013 Nine Simple Ways to Make It Easier to (Re)Use Your Data. Ideas in Ecology and Evolution 6 (2):110. DOI:10.4033/iee.2013.6b.6.f, accessed September 7, 2017.
Whitlock, Michael C. 2011 Data Archiving in Ecology and Evolution: Best Practices. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 26 (2):6165.
Wicherts, Jelte M., Borsboom, Denny, Kats, Judith, and Molenaar, Dylan 2006 The Poor Availability of Psychological Research Data for Reanalysis. American Psychologist 61 (7):726728.
Wilkinson, Mark D., Dumontier, Michel, Aalbersberg, Isbrand J., Appleton, Gabrielle, Axton, Myles, Baak, Arie, and Mons, Barend 2016 The FAIR Guiding Principles for Scientific Data Management and Stewardship. Scientific Data 3: 160018. DOI:10.1038/sdata.2016.18, accessed September 7, 2017.
Womack, Ryan P. 2015 Research Data in Core Journals in Biology, Chemistry, Mathematics, and Physics. PLOS ONE 10 (12): e0143460. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0143460, accessed September 7, 2017.
Wouters, Paul, and Haak, Wouter 2017 Open Data Report: The Researcher Perspective. Electronic document, https://www.elsevier.com/about/open-science/research-data/open-data-report, accessed October 11, 2017.
Zimmerman, Larry J., Vitelli, Karen, and Hollowell-Zimmer, Julie (editors) 2003 Ethical Issues in Archaeology. Rowman AltaMira, New York.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Advances in Archaeological Practice
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 2326-3768
  • URL: /core/journals/advances-in-archaeological-practice
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed

An addendum has published for this article: