Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Good (or bad) vibrations: clinical intuition in violence risk assessment

  • Andrew Carroll
Summary

Assessment and management of the risk of violence in psychiatry inevitably and appropriately draws on emotionally laden ‘intuitive’ modes of thought, as well as deliberative analytic thinking. This article discusses the concept of ‘intuition’ and proposes a brief set of guidelines, derived from work by the cognitive psychologist Robin Hogarth, by which intuitive thinking may be applied by clinicians when undertaking risk assessment work. The guidelines are: consider the learning structure relevant to the risk assessment task; use your own emotions as a source of data; impose ‘circuit breakers' such as cost–benefit analyses and validated structured risk assessment tools; and use a narrative approach to develop formulations. The guidelines are intended to provide a framework for ongoing reflective practice in assessing and managing risk.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Good (or bad) vibrations: clinical intuition in violence risk assessment
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Good (or bad) vibrations: clinical intuition in violence risk assessment
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Good (or bad) vibrations: clinical intuition in violence risk assessment
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Barry-Walsh, J, Daffern, M, Duncan, S et al (2009) The prediction of imminent aggression in patients with mental illness and/or intellectual disability using the Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression instrument. Australasian Psychiatry 17: 493–6.
Baumeister, RF, DeWall, CN, Zhang, L (2007) Do emotions improve or hinder the decision making process? In Do Emotions Help or Hurt Decision Making? A Hedgefoxian Perspective (eds Vohs, KD, Baumeister, RF, Loewenstein, G) 1131. Russel Sage Foundation.
Betsch, T (2008) The nature of intuition and its neglect in research on judgment and decision making. In Intuition in Judgment and Decision Making (eds Plessner, H, Betsch, C, Betsch, T) 322. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Blackburn, R (1998) Criminality and the interpersonal circle in mentally disordered offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior 25: 155–76.
Bowers, L, Allan, T, Simpson, A et al (2009) Identifying key factors associated with aggression on acute inpatient psychiatric wards. Issues in Mental Health Nursing 30: 260–71.
Carroll, A (2009) How to make good-enough risk decisions. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 15: 192–8.
Cocozza, JJ, Steadman, HJ (1976) The failure of psychiatric predictions of dangerousness: clear and convincing evidence. Rutgers Law Review 29: 1084–101.
Daffern, M, Tonkin, M, Howells, K et al (2010a) The impact of interpersonal style and perceived coercion on aggression and self-harm in personality-disordered patients admitted to a secure psychiatric hospital. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology 21: 426–45.
Daffern, M, Thomas, S, Ferguson, M et al (2010b) The impact of psychiatric symptoms, interpersonal style and coercion on aggression and self-harm during psychiatric hospitalisation. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes 73: 365–81.
Damasio, AR (1994) Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. Putnam.
De Vogel, V, De Ruiter, C (2004) Differences between clinicians and researchers in assessing risk of violence in forensic psychiatric patients. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology 15: 145–64.
Desmarais, SL, Nicholls, T, Read, JD et al (2010) Confidence and accuracy in assessments of short-term risks presented by forensic psychiatric patients. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology 21: 122.
Deutsch, R, Strack, F (2008) Variants of judgment and decision making. The perspective of the reflective-impulsive model. In Intuition in Judgment and Decision Making (eds Plessner, H, Betsch, C, Betsch, T) 3953. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Doctor, R (2004) Psychodynamic lessons in risk assessment and management. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 10: 267–76.
Douglas, K, Webster, CD, Eaves, D et al (2001) HCR-20 Violence Risk Management Companion Guide. Mental Health Law and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
Douglas, KS, Ogloff, JRP (2003) The impact of confidence on the accuracy of structured professional and actuarial violence risk judgments in a sample of forensic psychiatric patients. Law and Human Behavior 27: 573–87.
Douglas, KS, Reeves, KA (2010a) Handbook of Violence Risk Assessment. Taylor and Francis.
Douglas, KS, Reeves, KA (2010b) Historical-Clinical-Risk Management–20 (HCR–20) Violence Risk Assessment Scheme. In Handbook of Violence Risk Assessment (eds Otto, RK, Douglas, KS) 147–86. Taylor and Francis.
Doyle, M, Dolan, M (2006) Evaluating the validity of anger regulation problems, interpersonal style, and disturbed mental state for predicting inpatient violence. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 24: 783–98.
Einhorn, HJ (1980) Learning from experience and suboptimal rules in decision making. In Cognitive Processes in Choice and Decision Behavior (ed Wallsten, T) 120. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Epstein, S (2008) Intuition from the perspective of cognitive–experiential self-theory. In Intuition in Judgment and Decision Making (eds Plessner, H, Betsch, C, Betsch, T) 2337. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Festinger, L (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press.
Finfgeld-Connett, D (2009) Model of therapeutic and non-therapeutic responses to patient aggression. Issues in Mental Health Nursing 30: 530–7.
Finucane, ML, Alhakami, A, Slovic, P et al (2000) The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 13: 117.
Finucane, ML, Peters, E, Slovic, P (2003) Judgment and decision making: The dance of affect and reason. In Emerging Perspectives on Judgment and Decision Research (eds Schneider, SL, Shanteau, J) 327–64. Cambridge University Press.
Flewett, T (2010) Clinical Risk Management. Churchill Livingstone.
Fuller, J, Cowan, J (1999) Risk assessment in a multidisciplinary setting: Clinical judgement revisited. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry 10: 276–89.
Grove, W, Meehl, P (1996) Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: the clinical-statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 12: 293323.
Hogarth, RM (2001) Educating Intuition. University of Chicago.
Hogarth, RM (2008) On the learning of intuition. In Intuition in Judgment and Decision Making (eds Plessner, H, Betsch, C, Betsch, T) 91105. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hoptman, MJ, Yates, KF, Patalinjug, MB et al (1999) Clinical prediction of assaultive behavior among male psychiatric patients at a maximum-security forensic facility. Psychiatric Services 50: 1461–6.
Hughes, P, Kerr, I (2000) Transference and countertransference in communication between doctor and patient. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 6: 5764.
Janis, IL (1982) Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes (2nd edn). Houghton Mifflin.
Johnston, J (2010) Old ways of working. Newsletter: Psychotherapy Faculty, Royal College of Psychiatrists (Spring): 69 (http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/docs/psyfacNewsletterSpring2010.doc).
Kiesler, DJ, Schmidt, JA, Wagner, CC (1997) A circumplex inventory of impact messages: An operational bridge between emotional and interpersonal behavior. In Circumplex Models of Personality and Emotions (eds Plutchik, R, Conte, HR) 221–44. American Psychological Association.
Kiesler, DJ, Schmidt, JA (2006) The Impact Message Inventory–Circumplex (IMI-C) Manual. Mind Garden Inc.
Leary, T (1957) Interpersonal Diagnosis of Personality. Ronald Press.
Lewis, B (2011) Narrative Psychiatry: How Stories Can Shape Clinical Practice. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Liu, Y, Yanjie, S, Xu, G et al (2007) Two dissociable aspects of feelings of knowing: Knowing that you know and knowing that you do not know. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 60: 672–80.
McNiel, D, Binder, R (1995) Correlates of accuracy in the assessment of psychiatric inpatients' risk of violence. American Journal of Psychiatry 152: 901–6.
McNiel, D, Sandberg, DA, Binder, R (1998) The relationship between confidence and accuracy in clinical assessment of psychiatric patients' potential for violence. Law and Human Behavior 22: 655–69.
Medawar, P (1984) Pluto's Republic: Incorporating The Art of the Soluble and Induction and Intuition in Scientific Thought. Oxford University Press.
Meehl, PE (1954) Clinical versus Statistical Prediction. University of Minnesota.
Miller, MC, Tabakin, R, Schimmel, J (2000) Managing risk when risk is greatest. Harvard Review of Psychiatry 8: 154–9.
Monahan, J (1981) The Clinical Prediction of Violent Behaviour. U.S. Government Printing Office.
Monahan, J (1984) The prediction of violent behavior: toward a second generation of theory and policy. American Journal of Psychiatry 141: 10–5.
Monahan, J, Steadman, HJ, Silver, E et al (2001) Rethinking Risk Assessment: The MacArthur Study of Mental Disorder and Violence. Oxford University Press.
Montague, RP, Berns, GS (2002) Neural economics and the biological substrates of valuation. Neuron 36: 265–84.
Mossman, D (2006) Critique of pure risk assessment or, Kant meets Tarasoff. University of Cincinnati Law Review 75: 523609.
Murphy, D (2002) Risk assessment as collective clinical judgement. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health 12: 169–78.
Nestor, PG (2002) Mental disorder and violence: personality dimensions and clinical features. American Journal of Psychiatry 159: 1973–8.
Ogloff, JRP, Daffern, M (2006) The dynamic appraisal of situational aggression: An instrument to assess risk for imminent aggression in psychiatric inpatients. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 24: 799813.
Ogloff, JRP (2011) Forensic Mental Health Spring and Autumn Institutes. Workshop 1: Assessing Risk for Violence Using the HCR 20. Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science/Monash University.
Otto, RK (2000) Assessing and managing violence risk in outpatient settings. Journal of Clinical Psychology 56: 1239–62.
Peters, E, Vastfjall, D, Garling, T et al (2006) Affect and decision making: a ‘hot’ topic. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 19: 7985.
Plessner, H, Czenna, S (2008) The benefits of intuition. In Intuition in Judgment and Decision Making (eds Plessner, H, Betsch, C, Betsch, T) 251–65. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Plous, S (1993) The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making. McGraw-Hill.
Quinsey, VL, Harris, GT, Rice, ME et al (1998) Violent Offenders: Appraising and Managing Risk. American Psychological Association.
Reilly, J, Newton, R (2011) Formulation: a proposal for a more structured, longitudinal approach. Australasian Psychiatry 19: 301–5.
Reiss, D, Kirtchuk, G (2009) Interpersonal dynamics and multidisciplinary teamwork. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 15: 462–9.
Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (2011) Formulation Guidelines for Candidates: Trainee Clinical Examination. RANZCP.
Ruscio, J (2007) The clinician as subject: Practitioners are prone to the same judgment errors as everyone else. In The Great Ideas of Clinical Science (eds Lilienfeld, SO, O'Donohue, WT) 2948. Routledge.
Ryan, C, Nielssen, O, Paton, M et al (2010) Clinical decisions in psychiatry should not be based on risk assessment. Australasian Psychiatry 18: 398403.
Sim, K, Gwee, KP, Bateman, A (2005) Case formulation in psychotherapy: Revitalizing its usefulness as a clinical tool. Academic Psychiatry 29: 289–92.
Slovic, P, Monahan, J (2000) Violence risk assessment and risk communication: The effects of using actual cases, providing instruction, and employing probability versus frequency formats. Law and Human Behavior 24: 271–96.
Slovic, P, Finucane, ML, Peters, E et al (2004) Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk and rationality. Risk Analysis 24: 311–22.
Summers, RF (2003) The psychodynamic formulation updated. American Journal of Psychotherapy 57: 3951.
Ward, T, Nathan, P, Drake, CR et al (2000) The role of formulation-based treatment for sexual offenders. Behaviour Change 17: 251–64.
Webster, CD, Douglas, KS, Eaves, D et al (1997) HCR–20: Assessing Risk for Violence (v 2). Simon Fraser University.
Webster, CD, Martin, M, Brink, J et al (2004) START: Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability. British Columbia Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission.
Webster, CD, Hucker, SJ (2007) Violence Risk Assessment and Management. John Wiley & Sons.
Weerasekera, P (1993) Formulation: A multiperspective model. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 38: 351–8.
Wittenbrink, B, Judd, CM, Park, B (1997) Evidence for racial prejudice at the implicit level and its relationship with questionnaire measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72: 262–74.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

BJPsych Advances
  • ISSN: 1355-5146
  • EISSN: 1472-1481
  • URL: /core/journals/bjpsych-advances
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed

Good (or bad) vibrations: clinical intuition in violence risk assessment

  • Andrew Carroll
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *