Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-568f69f84b-jg9p7 Total loading time: 0.363 Render date: 2021-09-19T01:51:23.342Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Management of depression in later life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Both antidepressants and psychological treatments are effective in the management of late-life depression. Nevertheless, there remains a considerable challenge to improve the prognosis for depression in older people. Endlessly increasing the range of antidepressants does not seem to be the answer, so attention is turning to new combinations of treatments and new ways of delivering care and improving treatment uptake. Collaboration between specialist and primary care, case management and multifaceted interventions are currently the most exciting prospects. There is good evidence for the role of both medication and psychological treatment in keeping the patient well after recovery.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2003 

Depressive disorder is the most frequent psychiatric illness of older people (Reference Beekman, Copeland and PrinceBeekman et al, 1999). It has a negative impact on quality of life, adds significantly to disability from physical disorder (Reference Penninx, Deeg and van EijkPenninx et al, 2000) and is the leading cause of suicide in older people. It is also an independent predictor of mortality (Reference Cuijpers and SmitCuijpers & Smit, 2002). Although effective treatment exists, depression is not well recognised and often not optimally managed (Reference Baldwin, Chiu and KatonaBaldwin et al, 2002). This article updates an earlier review of the subject (Reference KatonaKatona, 1996).

Prevalence in older people

In a meta-analysis the prevalence of clinically significant depression among older people living in the community was 13.5% (Reference Beekman, Copeland and PrinceBeekman et al, 1999). Important determinants of prevalence are disability and handicap so, unsurprisingly, rates are at least doubled among patients in hospital or nursing homes. There are possible neurobiological links between depression and stroke, Parkinson’s disease and the dementias (vascular dementia having the highest rate of comorbid depression), but also a high rate of depressive symptoms in a range of chronic medical disorders, including heart disease (Reference Ariyo, Haan and TangenAriyo et al, 2000) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Reference Yohannes, Roomi and BaldwinYohannes et al, 1998).

Assessing depression in later life

Special factors to take into account when assessing depression in older people are listed in Box 1. The skills of history-taking, conducting a mental state examination, physical evaluation and organisation of relevant investigations are no less important than in other branches of psychiatry. Given the increased likelihood of finding an organic condition contributing to depression with advancing age, these skills are arguably more important. Boxes 2 and 3 list the more important causes of organic depressive episodes.

Box 1 Factors to take into account when diagnosing late-life depression

Altered symptoms in late-life depression

  1. Reduced complaint of sadness

  2. Hypochondriasis and somatic concern instead of sadness

  3. Poor subjective memory or a dementia-like picture

  4. Late-onset neurotic symptoms (marked anxiety, obsessive–compulsive or hysterical symptoms)

  5. Apathy and poor motivation

Symptoms that may be hard to interpret because of comorbid physical disorder 1

  1. Anorexia

  2. Weight loss

  3. Reduced energy

Box 2 Medications that may cause organic depression

  • Antihypertensives

  • Beta-blockers

  • Methyldopa

  • Calcium-channel blockers (e.g. nifedipine)

  • Digoxin

  • Corticosteroids

  • Prednisolone

  • Analgesics

  • Codeine

  • Opioids

  • COX-2 inhibitors (e.g. celecoxib, rofecoxib)

  • Anti-Parkinsonian drugs

  • Levo-dopa

  • Amantadine

  • Tetrabenazine

  • Psychotropics (may cause clinical picture resembling depression)

  • Antipsychotics

  • Benzodiazepines

Box 3 Physical disorders that may cause organic depression

  • Endocrine/metabolic

  • Hypo- and hyperthyroidism

  • Cushing’s syndrome

  • Hypercalcaemia (primary hyperparathyroidism or carcinoma)

  • Pernicious anaemia

  • Folic acid deficiency

  • Organic brain disease

  • Cerebrovascular disease/stroke

  • Tumours of the central nervous system

  • Parkinson’s disease

  • Alzheimer’s disease

  • Systemic lupus erythematosus

  • Occult carcinoma

  • Pancreas

  • Lung

  • Chronic infections

  • Neurosyphilis

  • Brucellosis

  • Herpes zoster

Screening

The most widely validated screening instrument is the Geriatric Depression Scale, introduced in 1983 (Reference Yesavage, Brink and RoseYesavage et al, 1983). Short and long versions and translations of the scale are available at http://www.stanford.edu/~yesavage/GDS.html. The 15-item version (with its 4- and 5-item derivatives) is shown in Box 4. The 5-item version has recently been validated in a sample comprising individuals living in the community, hospitalised patients and nursing-home residents (Reference Rinaldi, Mecocci and BenedettiRinaldi et al, 2003).

Box 4 The 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale, also showing questions for the 4- and 5-item scales

Instructions: Choose the best answer for how you have felt over the past week.

1 Are you basically satisfied with your life? Yes/No (No)
2 Have you dropped many of your activities and interests? Yes/No (Yes)
3 Do you feel your life is empty? Yes/No (Yes)
4 Do you often get bored? Yes/No (Yes)
5 Are you in good spirits most of the time? Yes/No (No)
6 Are you afraid something bad is going to happen to you? Yes/No (Yes)
7 Do you feel happy most of the time? Yes/No (No)
8 Do you often feel helpless? Yes/No (Yes)
9 Do you prefer to stay at home, rather than going out and doing new things? Yes/No (Yes)
10 Do you feel you have more problems with your memory than most? Yes/No (Yes)
11 Do you think it is wonderful to be alive now? Yes/No (No)
12 Do you feel pretty worthless the way you are? Yes/No (Yes)
13 Do you feel full of energy? Yes/No (No)
14 Do you feel that your situation is hopeless? Yes/No (Yes)
15 Do you think most people are better off (in their lives) than you are? Yes/No (Yes)

Questions 1, 2, 6 and 7 make up the 4-item version.

Questions 1, 4, 8, 9 and 12 make up the 5-item version.

The answers shown in parentheses indicate possible depression.

Possible cut-offs: ≥ 5 for the 15-item version; ≥2 for the 4-item and 5-item versions.

Types of depression in older people

Minor and major depression

Although 13.5% of older people are significantly depressed, the prevalence of depressive episode (major depression) is much lower, at around 2% (Reference Beekman, Copeland and PrinceBeekman et al, 1999). Minor depression is one term used to describe the less severe depression affecting the remaining group. Recent evidence suggests that minor and major depression in older people share similar risk factors and that in population terms the adverse consequences of minor depression lie midway between major depression and not having depression at all (Reference Cuijpers and SmitCuijpers & Smit, 2002). Minor depression is perhaps characterised by more cognitive symptoms of depression and fewer somatic ones. There is a striking lack of data about effective treatment. In one study, paroxetine was moderately effective for both persistent minor depression and dysthymia in patients with functional impairment, but problem-solving treatment was not (Reference Williams, Barrett and OxmanWilliams et al, 2000). However, there was marked site variation in the quality of the problem-solving treatment. In another study (Reference Mossey, Knott and HigginsMossey et al, 1996) a treatment similar to the problem-solving treatment was effective in patients with sub-threshold depression with medical comorbidity.

Vascular depression

The clinical features of this proposed new subtype include apathy, psychomotor retardation, poor executive function on cognitive testing, less depressive thinking (such as guilt or unworthiness) and a late age at onset. The basis is thought to be ischaemically induced white matter changes (Reference Baldwin, Chiu and KatonaBaldwin & O’Brien, 2002). This subtype is probably less responsive to antidepressant drugs (Reference Simpson, Baldwin and JacksonSimpson et al, 1998), but patients may recover with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), although with an increased risk of post-treatment delirium.

Prognosis

Reference Cole and BellavanceCole & Bellavance (1997a) reported that after an index episode about 60% of secondary care patients either remained well or had treatable relapses. About 1 in 5 developed chronic symptoms. Outcome for individuals living in the community was worse. In another meta-analysis of depressed patients in acute medical and surgical care, only about 1 in 5 recovered (Reference Cole and BellavanceCole & Bellavance, 1997b ). Low rates of detection and undertreatment may partly explain these poor results (Reference BaldwinBaldwin, 2000).

Katona’s statement in an earlier review (Reference KatonaKatona, 1996) still holds true: depression in old age is associated with chronicity and a high risk of relapse after recovery. However, this is just as true for younger adults, prompting current interest in managing depressive disorder within a chronic disease model (Reference Rost, Nutting and SmithRost et al, 2002).

Mortality is high in older patients with depression, largely because of concurrent physical disorder (Reference TumaTuma, 2000).

Principles of management

The management of depressive disorder in older people should be multimodal (involving physical and psychological modalities along with social interventions) and multidisciplinary (with help from specialists such as nurses, social workers and occupational therapists, and help as needed from dieticians, speech and language therapists and podiatrists). Some broad goals of treatment and ways of achieving them are shown in Table 1 (Reference Baldwin, Chiu and KatonaBaldwin et al, 2002). Handicap, the social disadvantage caused by illness, is closely associated with depression in old age. Thus, social factors such as the availability of transport and crime reduction may have very positive effects on reducing rates of depression.

Treatments that work are the same as for younger adults: antidepressants, psychosocial and psychological interventions, or combinations of these (Reference Anderson, Nutt and DeakinAnderson et al, 2000), and ECT.

Drug treatment

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics alter with ageing and are also affected by concomitant medication and physical illness. Older people exhibit marked inter-individual variation in how medication is metabolised. This can lead to difficulty in predicting the target dose. The adage ‘start low, go slow’ then applies. This is less of a problem with the newer antidepressants, for which the starting dose and the therapeutic dose are identical. However, therapeutic trials often exclude the very old and the very frail, so that our knowledge is incomplete. Although many newer antidepressants require no dose adjustments for older patients, impaired renal or hepatic function necessitates caution with all antidepressants. Table 2 lists the main antidepressants, starting doses and average dosages for older patients by consensus (Reference Alexopoulos, Katz and ReynoldsAlexopoulos et al, 2001; Reference Baldwin, Chiu and KatonaBaldwin et al, 2002), along with side-effect profiles.

Older patients take longer to recover. Whereas 4 weeks may be a sufficient time in which to see a response in younger adults, 6–8 weeks or longer may be more typical for older patients. Nearly 20 antidepressant drugs are currently available for use in the UK. With such a wide variety of antidepressants it is best to tailor the drug to the patient, the choice being determined by symptom profile, tolerance and the likelihood of drug interactions or side-effects.

Efficacy

A recent Cochrane systematic review (Reference Wilson, Mottram and SivanranthanWilson et al, 2001) has demonstrated that antidepressants are an effective treatment for elderly patients with major depression and it revealed no important differences between classes of antidepressants. However, only 17 trials met inclusion criteria and there were few placebo-controlled studies of newer antidepressant drugs. Most recent trials have been head-to-head comparisons of older and newer drugs. These show a trend for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and venlafaxine to be preferred because of a favourable adverse effects profile (Reference Katona and LivingstonKatona & Livingston, 2002). Lastly, there is some evidence from trials involving patients of mixed ages (Reference Anderson, Nutt and DeakinAnderson et al, 2000) that SSRIs may be less effective than tricyclics in in-patients with melancholic depression. Reference Wilson, Mottram and SivanranthanWilson et al(2001) concluded that there was insufficient evidence to recommend low-dosage antidepressant treatment in depressive episode in primary care. More research is needed.

Comorbidity

Patients with psychotic depression usually require a combined approach with the addition of antipsychotics or ECT. Physical comorbidity is common in older patients. A meta-analysis of antidepressant therapy v. placebo, although not exclusively in older patients, showed a number-needed-to-treat (NNT) of 4 for patients with depression and a range of physical disorders (Reference Gill and HatcherGill & Hatcher, 1999). A similar figure is reported in the reviews of Reference Wilson, Mottram and SivanranthanWilson et al(2001) and Reference Katona and LivingstonKatona & Livingston (2002) in older depressed patients without comorbidity. MacHale has outlined practical therapeutic strategies for patients with physical comorbidity in an earlier article in APT (Reference MacHaleMacHale, 2002).

Tolerability and side-effects

An important principle when treating older people is to remember that they have less physiological reserve and are more likely to lose homeostasis rapidly. For example, severe depression in an older person may quickly lead to dehydration, weight loss and even pressure sores. Likewise, older people are more susceptible to medication side-effects.

Anticholinergic side-effects of tricyclics, such as constipation, blurred vision and dry mouth, can be very troublesome for elderly patients, and postural hypotension, cardiac arrhythmia or overdose can be very dangerous. Delirium can occur, but is more likely in patients who are also acutely medically unwell. Lofepramine is a second generation tricyclic which is less likely to cause these adverse effects. It is more expensive than the older tricyclics, but no more expensive than SSRIs. The latter drugs are not cardiotoxic and are not usually lethal in overdose, but they have other undesirable side-effects. Gastrointestinal symptoms are well recognised, but there is growing concern about gastrointestinal haemorrhage, particularly in elderly patients (Reference van Walraven, Mamdani and Wellsvan Walraven et al, 2001). Caution should be exercised in patients treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or aspirin. Sertraline and citalopram have the least potential for drug interactions. Epilepsy is a caution for the use of antidepressants.

Discontinuation symptoms may occur with all classes of antidepressants after 8 or more weeks of treatment. They are more common and severe with antidepressants that have a short half-life. Inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (IADH) secretion is often linked to SSRIs, but may occur as a side-effect of all classes of antidepressants. There is a paucity of systematic data, but increased age, female gender and drugs that lower sodium levels are all risk factors (Reference Kirby and AmesKirby & Ames, 2001). Symptoms often (but not invariably) occur when the blood serum level falls below 130 mmol/l. Symptoms of IADH, which include lethargy, fatigue and sleep disturbance as well as muscle cramps and headaches, overlap with those of depression. A high level of suspicion is needed.

Moclobemide is well tolerated by older people. Although a special diet is not required, patients should be aware of the drug interactions with painkillers and other antidepressants. Venlafaxine is an effective drug in this age group and is generally well tolerated, particularly if the dose is increased slowly. The main side-effects of nausea and gastrointestinal disturbance tend to be transitory. Venlafaxine does have an effect on blood pressure, but studies have found that elderly people (at least, those that are fit) are no more susceptible to this problem than younger patients. There is some evidence to support the use of venlafaxine in patients who have not responded to SSRIs, although not specifically in older patients (Reference Poirier and BoyerPoirier & Boyer, 1999).

The SSRIs have minimal impact on cognitive function in older patients with depression and there is also evidence that SSRIs and lofepramine cause less impairment than the older tricyclics in cognitive skills relevant to driving.

Psychological interventions

Older patients with depression are rarely offered a psychological intervention. Changing attitudes and increased awareness are likely to alter this. In a large primary-care-based study in which a treatment choice was offered to older patients with depression, 50% expressed a preference for a psychological approach over drugs (Reference Unützer, Katon and CallahanUnützer et al, 2002). Additionally, there is emerging evidence that for older adults with mild-to-moderate depressive episodes a psychological intervention is as effective as medication (Reference McCusker, Cole and KellerMcCusker et al, 1998; Reference Pinquart and SorensenPinquart & Sorensen, 2001). Whether services are adequately configured to meet the need is more questionable. Nevertheless, in England, the National Health Service Executive’s strategic review of psychotherapy services has endorsed the need for accessibility and equity across patient groups (National Health Service Executive, 1996). General areas of importance when working psychodynamically with older people have been addressed in a previous APT article (Reference GarnerGarner, 2002).

Cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) is the best-established treatment in depression and good evidence exists for its effectiveness in older adults (Reference Thompson, Coon and Gallagher-ThompsonThompson et al, 2001). However, most studies have looked at its use in cognitively intact and medically stable patients and so its effectiveness outside this patient group is not fully established. Small studies and case reports have indicated that CBT can be adapted for use with physically frail patients and those with mild cognitive impairment, but further research is needed. Interpersonal therapy is also effective in relapse prevention (Reference Reynolds III, Miller and PasternakReynolds et al, 1999a ,Reference Reynolds III, Frank and Perel b ). There is a smaller but developing evidence base for problem-solving treatment (Reference Arean, Perri and NezuArean et al, 1993; Reference Unützer, Katon and CallahanUnützer et al, 2002). In major depression, a combination of antidepressants with psychotherapy is more effective than either of these treatments alone, especially in relapse prevention (Reference Reynolds III, Frank and PerelReynolds et al, 1999b ; Reference Thompson, Coon and Gallagher-ThompsonThompson et al, 2001). Psychoeducational techniques have also been used in this age group with good effect. For example, in one recent study a group course on coping with depression and anxiety was effective in reducing scores on the Geriatric Depression Scale (Reference Schimmel-Spreeuw, Linssen and HeerenSchimmel-Spreeuw et al, 2000).

Lastly, family therapy has been successfully adapted for use with older adults, including those with depression (Reference Benbow, Egan and MarriottBenbow et al, 1990), but no controlled data have been published regarding efficacy.

Electroconvulsive therapy

Electroconvulsive therapy remains the most effective treatment available for severe depression, with a recovery rate in the region of 80%. It is well tolerated, even by very elderly people (Reference Tew, Mulsant and HaskettTew et al, 1999). Its use is generally reserved for when there is a threat to life due to insufficient dietary intake or suicidal behaviour, or if treatment with antidepressants has been ineffective. There is evidence that it is particularly effective in psychotic depression (Reference Baldwin, Chiu and KatonaBaldwin et al, 2002). There are no absolute contraindications, but a review of medical risk by a senior anaesthetist is advisable. Wherever possible hypertension and cardiac failure should be treated optimally before ECT. It should be avoided in the first 3 months following a myocardial infarction or stroke. Elderly patients are more likely to suffer post-ECT confusion and cognitive impairment and therefore this should be carefully monitored during treatment. Memory impairment is often worse with bilateral electrode placement although the response to bilateral treatment may be more rapid.

Other treatments

Rapid transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising new treatment for depression. The early evidence suggests that it may be less effective in older adults, especially in the presence of even mild frontal atrophy (Reference Manes, Jorge and MorcuendeManes et al, 2001). St John’s Wort, a herbal remedy, is popular but lacks a satisfactory evidence base. Epidemiological data support a link between depressive symptoms and lack of exercise in older people (Reference Baldwin, Chiu and KatonaBaldwin et al, 2002), but data have not been published on the use of exercise as a treatment for late-life depression.

In an important study designed to replicate models of enhanced care (also known as ‘stepped care’) developed for use with younger patients in primary care, Reference Unützer, Katon and CallahanUnützer et al(2002) showed that a multifaceted intervention for depression was more effective than usual care for older adults. The model chosen emphasised case management, the use of antidepressants and/or problem-solving treatment, and improved links between primary and specialist care.

Treatment-resistant depression

Although definitions of treatment resistance vary, at least 30% of elderly patients with depression do not respond to first-line treatment with an antidepressant (Reference McCusker, Cole and KellerMcCusker et al, 1998). The initial steps are to ensure that a medical cause for depression has not been overlooked, that the patient tolerates and takes the medication and that the dosage is optimal.

New data suggest that if the patient has shown little or no response (in objective terms less than a quarter improvement on an appropriate rating scale) within the first 4 weeks at therapeutic dosage, recovery is unlikely (Reference Mottram, Wilson and AshworthMottram et al, 2002). The best course is to change to an antidepressant of a different class. If, however, there has been a partial response, the clinician is faced with a choice. Other things being equal, because older patients take longer to recover (Reference Anderson, Nutt and DeakinAnderson et al, 2000), waiting and supporting the patient may be a reasonable course of action. Otherwise, the advantages and disadvantages of augmentation and substitution, the two main strategies open to the clinician, are outlined in Box 5 (augmentation refers to adding another treatment to the original medication).

Box 5 Factors favouring augmentation or substitution regimens (after Reference Mulsant, Alexopoulos and Reynolds IIIMulsant et al, 2001)

Augmentation

  1. Maintains improvement already achieved in partial responders

  2. Prevents delays associated with withdrawal of existing drug

  3. May have synergistic effects on two neurotransmitter systems

  4. Allows current partially successful agent to be continued for longer

Substitution

  1. Avoids potential drug–drug interactions

  2. Simpler regimen

  3. Lower costs

  4. Easier to attribute side-effects and understand tolerance

Clinicians in the UK tend to be ‘swappers’ – from one class of antidepressant to another. The use of non-reversible monoamine oxidase inhibitors as an option has gone out of favour, although there was an early evidence base for their efficacy. Another approach, of combining a tricyclic with an SSRI, has given way to the newer dual-acting antidepressants such as venlafaxine or combinations such as SSRIs with mirtazapine. Both have some evidence to support their use in resistant depression (Reference AndersonAnderson, 2003), although not specifically in older people. The high doses of venlafaxine sometimes recommended are not always tolerated by older patients. Likewise, augmentation with lithium has a reasonable evidence base, but tolerability can be a significant problem in older patients. Serum monitoring is required.

Maintenance treatment

How long to continue with maintenance therapy is not yet clear. A recent expert consensus statement suggests that after a first episode of major depression a majority of clinicians opt to keep the patient on continuation treatment for at least 1 year. For two episodes there was less agreement, but for patients with three or more relapses or recurrences most clinicians recommended long-term treatment (Reference Alexopoulos, Katz and ReynoldsAlexopoulos et al, 2001). As with other age groups, it is important to maintain the patient on the same medication regimen that led to remission.

Surprisingly, one would be hard pressed to find any evidence to show that the new range of antidepressants developed over the past 20 years has led to an improved prognosis for late-life depression. However, there is more optimism with respect to prevention. Once a patient has recovered, there is good evidence that ongoing treatment with a tricyclic (Old Age Depression Interest Group, 1993), the SSRI citalopram (Reference Klysner, Bent-Hansen and HansenKlysner et al, 2002) or a combination of medication with a psychological treatment (Reference Reynolds III, Frank and PerelReynolds et al, 1999b) are effective. In a recent trial, sertraline at conventional therapeutic dosage was not effective in preventing relapse in older community-dwelling patients over a period of 2 years (Reference Wilson, Mottram and AshworthWilson et al, 2003). Therefore, it cannot be assumed that all antidepressants are equally effective in prophylaxis.

Multiple choice questions

  1. 1 Depressive disorder in older people:

    1. a is prevalent in 1 in 100

    2. b strongly predicts later dementia

    3. c affects almost half of patients with Parkinson’s disease

    4. d is more common in vascular than in Alzheimer’s dementia

    5. e often presents with hypochondriasis.

  2. 2 Management principles include:

    1. a symptom improvement as the main goal

    2. b dietary advice

    3. c assessment of self-neglect

    4. d a serum ferritin level

    5. e detailed neuropsychological examination.

  3. 3 Treatment:

    1. a always starts with an SSRI

    2. b should be changed if there has been a 25–50% response at 4 weeks

    3. c with cognitive–behavioural therapy is an effective alternative to antidepressants for moderate depression

    4. d of mild cases with a combination of medication and a psychological intervention is more effective than either alone

    5. e with ECT is hardly ever effective in the ‘old-old’.

  4. 4 Prevention:

    1. a of relapse requires treatment for about 6 months at most

    2. b of recurrence has been demonstrated only for tricyclic antidepressants

    3. c of recurrence after a third episode is an indication for long-term antidepressant treatment

    4. d of recurrence in moderate-to-severe depression is best achieved by combining an antidepressant with interpersonal therapy

    5. e of depression should include attending to handicap.

MCQ answers

1 2 3 4
a F a F a F a F
b F b T b F b F
c T c T c T c T
d T d F d F d T
e T e F e F e T

Table 1 Management principles

Goal Ways to achieve goals
Reduction of risk of suicide or self-neglect Carry out risk assessment and monitor risk (review regularly)
Ensure prompt referral of urgent cases (in primary care and on medical wards) to a specialist
Remission of all depressive symptoms (residual symptoms increase the risk of chronicity) Provide appropriate treatment (antidepressants, psychological treatment or electroconvulsive treatment)
Give the patient and supporters/carers timely education about depression (e.g. Depression in Older Adults leaflet, free at http:// www.rcpsych.ac.uk/info/help/doa/index.htm)
Optimise function Treat comorbid physical health problems
Attend to sensory deficits
Review medication
Enable practical support
Facilitate access to appropriate helping agencies (‘sign-posting’)
Prevention of relapse and recurrence Encourage the patient to stay on medication when recovered
Continue treatment for 12 months after recovery (see text)
Give maintenance treatment when indicated (see text)

Table 2 Average dosages and side-effect profiles of antidepressants (after Reference Baldwin, Chiu and KatonaBaldwin et al, 2002)

Anticholinergic Antihistaminic α 1 -adrenergic blocking Starting dose (mg) Average daily dose (mg)
Amitriptyline ++++ ++++ ++++ 25–50 75–100
Imipramine +++ ++ +++ 25 75–100
Nortriptyline +++ ++ ++ 10–30 75–100
Dosulepin (dothiepin) +++ ++ ++ 50–75 75–150
Lofepramine + + + 70–140 70–210
Trazodone 0 +++ + 100 300
Fluvoxamine 0/+ 0/+ 0 25–100 100–200
Sertraline 0/+ 0 0 25–50 50–100
Fluoxetine 0/+ 0 0 10 20
Paroxetine 0/+ 0 0 10–20 20–30
Citalopram 0/+ 0 0 10–20 20–30
Escitalopram 0 0 0 5–10 20
Phenelzine 0/+ 0 ++ 15 30–45 (divided doses)
Moclobemide 0/+ 0 0 300 300–400
Venlafaxine 0/+ 0 0/+ 25–75 75–150
Mirtazapine 0 ++ 0 7.5–15 15–30

Footnotes

References

Alexopoulos, G. S., Katz, I. R., Reynolds, C. F. et al (2001) Pharmacotherapy of Depressive Disorders in Older Patients. A Postgraduate Medicine Special Report. White Plains, NY: Expert Knowledge Systems.Google Scholar
Anderson, I. M. (2003) Drug treatment of depression: reflections on the evidence. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 9, 1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, I. M., Nutt, D. J. & Deakin, J. F. W. (2000) Evidence-based guidelines for treating depressive disorders with antidepressants: a revision of the British Association for Psychopharmacology guidelines. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 14, 3020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arean, P. A., Perri, M. G., Nezu, A. M. et al (1993) Comparative effectiveness of social problem-solving therapy and reminiscence therapy as treatment for depression in older adults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 10031010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ariyo, A. A., Haan, M., Tangen, C. M. et al (2000) Depressive symptoms and risks of coronary heart disease and mortality in elderly Americans. Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. Circulation, 102, 17731779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldwin, R. C. (2000) The prognosis of depression. Current Opinions in Psychiatry, 13, 8185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, R. C. & O'Brien, J. (2002) Vascular basis of late-onset depressive disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry, 180, 157160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldwin, R. C., Chiu, E., Katona, C. et al (2002) Guidelines on Depression in Older People: Practising the Evidence. London: Martin Dunitz.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beekman, A. T., Copeland, J. R. & Prince, M. J. (1999) Review of community prevalence of depression in later life. British Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 307311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benbow, S., Egan, D., Marriott, A. et al (1990) Using the family life cycle with later life families. Journal of Family Therapy, 12, 321340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, A. J., MacHale, S., Allen, K. et al (2000) Depression after stroke and lesion location: a systematic review. Lancet, 356, 122126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cole, M. G. & Bellavance, F. (1997a) The prognosis of depression in old age. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 5, 414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, M. G. & Bellavance, F. (1997b) Depression in elderly medical inpatients: a meta-analysis of outcome. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 157, 10551060.Google Scholar
Cuijpers, P. & Smit, F. (2002) Excess mortality in depression: a meta-analysis of community studies. Journal of Affective Disorders, 72, 227236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garner, J. (2002) Psychodynamic work and older adults. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 8, 128135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, D. & Hatcher, S. (1999) Antidepressant drugs in depressed patients who also have a physical illness. Cochrane Library, Issue 3. Oxford: Update Software.Google Scholar
Katona, C. (1996) Managing depression in older people. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 2, 178185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katona, C. & Livingston, G. (2002) How well do antidepressants work in older people? A systematic review of Number Needed to Treat. Journal of Affective Disorders, 69, 4752.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirby, D. & Ames, D. (2001) Hyponatraemia and selective re-uptake inhibitors in elderly patients. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 16, 484493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klysner, R., Bent-Hansen, J., Hansen, H. L. et al (2002) Efficacy of citalopram in the prevention of recurrent depression in elderly patients: placebo-controlled study of maintenance therapy. British Journal of Psychiatry, 181, 2935.Google Scholar
Koenig, H. G., George, L. K., Peterson, B. L. et al (1997) Depression in medically ill hospitalized older adults: prevalence, characteristics, and course of symptoms according to six diagnostic symptoms. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 13761383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacHale, S. (2002) Managing depression in physical illness. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 8, 297305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manes, F., Jorge, R., Morcuende, M. et al (2001) A controlled study of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as a treatment of depression in the elderly. International Psychogeriatrics, 13, 225231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCusker, J., Cole, M., Keller, E. et al (1998) Effectiveness of treatments of depression in older ambulatory patients. Archives of Internal Medicine, 158, 705712.Google Scholar
Mossey, J. M., Knott, K. A., Higgins, M. et al (1996) Effectiveness of a psychosocial intervention, interpersonal counseling, for subdysthymic depression in medically ill elderly. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 51A, M172M178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mottram, P. G., Wilson, K. C. M., Ashworth, L. et al (2002) The clinical profile of older patients' response to antidepressants – an open trial of sertraline. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 17, 574578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mulsant, B. H., Alexopoulos, G. S., Reynolds III, C. F. et al (2001) Pharmacological treatment of depression in older primary care patients: the PROSPECT algorithm. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 16, 585592.Google Scholar
National Health Service Executive (1996) Psychotherapy Services in England: Review of Strategic Policy. Leeds: NHS Executive.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Old Age Depression Interest Group (1993) How long should the elderly take antidepressants? A double-blind placebo-controlled study of continuation/prophylaxis therapy with dothiepin. British Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 175182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penninx, B. W., Deeg, D. J., van Eijk, J. T. et al (2000) Changes in depression and physical decline in older adults: a longitudinal perspective. Journal of Affective Disorders, 61, 112.Google Scholar
Pinquart, M. & Sorensen, S. (2001) How effective are psychotherapeutic and other psychosocial interventions with older adults? A meta-analysis. Journal of Mental Health and Aging, 7, 207243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poirier, M. F. & Boyer, P. (1999) Venlafaxine and paroxetine in treatment-resistant depression. Double-blind, randomised comparison. British Journal of Psychiatry, 175, 1216.Google Scholar
Reynolds III, C. F., Miller, M. D., Pasternak, R. E. et al (1999a) Treatment of bereavement-related major depressive episodes in later life: a controlled study of acute and continuation treatment with nortriptyline and interpersonal psychotherapy. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 202208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds III, C. F., Frank, E., Perel, J. M. et al (1999b) Nortriptyline and interpersonal psychotherapy as maintenance therapies for recurrent major depression: a randomized controlled trial in patients older than 59 years. JAMA, 281, 3945.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rinaldi, P., Mecocci, P., Benedetti, C. et al (2003) Validation of the five-item Geriatric Depression Scale in elderly subjects in three different settings. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 51, 694698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rost, K., Nutting, P., Smith, J. L. et al (2002) Managing depression as a chronic disease: a randomised trial of ongoing treatment in primary care. BMJ, 325, 934937.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schimmel-Spreeuw, A., Linssen, A. C. G. & Heeren, T. J. (2000) Coping with depression and anxiety: preliminary results of a standardized course for elderly depressed women. International Psychogeriatrics, 12, 7786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simpson, S., Baldwin, R. C., Jackson, A. et al (1998) Is subcortical disease associated with a poor response to antidepressant? Neurological, neuropsychological and neuroradiological findings in late life depression. Psychological Medicine, 28, 10151026.Google ScholarPubMed
Tew, J. D., Mulsant, B. H., Haskett, R. F. et al (1999) Acute efficacy of ECT in the treatment of major depression in the Old-Old. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 18651870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, L. W., Coon, D. W., Gallagher-Thompson, D. et al (2001) Comparison of desipramine and cognitive/behavioral therapy in the treatment of elderly outpatients with mild-to-moderate depression. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 9, 225240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuma, T. A. (2000) Outcome of hospital-treated depression at 4.5 years. An elderly and a younger adult cohort compared. British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 224228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Unützer, J., Katon, W., Callahan, C. et al (2002) Collaborative care management of late-life depression in the primary care setting. JAMA, 288, 28362845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Walraven, C., Mamdani, M. & Wells, P. (2001) Inhibition of serotonin reuptake by antidepressants and upper gastrointestinal bleeding in elderly patients: retrospective cohort study. BMJ, 323, 655658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, J. W., Barrett, J., Oxman, T. et al (2000) Treatment of dysthymia and minor depression in primary care: a randomised controlled trial in older adults. JAMA, 284, 15191526.Google Scholar
Wilson, K., Mottram, P., Sivanranthan, A. et al (2001) Antidepressant versus placebo for depressed elderly. Cochrane Library, issue 4. Oxford: Update Software.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, K. C. M., Mottram, P. G., Ashworth, L. et al (2003) Older community residents with depression: long-term treatment with sertraline. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 182, 492497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yesavage, J. A., Brink, T. L., Rose, T. L. et al (1983) Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: preliminary report. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 17, 3749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yohannes, A. M., Roomi, J., Baldwin, R. C. et al (1998) Depression in elderly outpatients with disabling chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Age and Ageing, 27, 155160.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1

MCQ answers

Figure 2

Table 1 Management principles

Figure 3

Table 2 Average dosages and side-effect profiles of antidepressants (after Baldwin et al, 2002)

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.
You have Access
24
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Management of depression in later life
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Management of depression in later life
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Management of depression in later life
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *