Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Payment by results for mental health services: economic considerations of case-mix funding

  • Rowena Jacobs

Summary

Against the backdrop of a tight financial climate, a new method of funding mental health services is being rolled out in England's National Health Service. Called payment by results (PbR), it represents a fundamental change to the way providers of psychiatric services are paid for care of patients. The Mental Health Clustering Tool has been developed to capture activity which reflects the relative needs of patients, and cluster costs are being collected by service providers. The ultimate goal is the creation of a national tariff or fixed price for each cluster. This article describes the incentives generated by PbR and gives evidence on PbR in acute physical care services where it has been in operation for a decade, with respect to efficiency, quality, volume of activity, administrative costs, upcoding or gaming, equity of provision, and cross-subsidisation. It explores the challenges for mental health services as PbR is introduced.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

  1. Understand the difference between retrospective and prospective reimbursement systems and the incentives generated by each financing system.
  2. Understand the three key building blocks of PbR: currency, reference costs and tariffs.
  3. Consider the evidence on PbR in acute physical care and the implications for mental health services.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Payment by results for mental health services: economic considerations of case-mix funding
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Payment by results for mental health services: economic considerations of case-mix funding
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Payment by results for mental health services: economic considerations of case-mix funding
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

Dr Rowena Jacobs, Centre for Health Economics, Alcuin A Block, University of York, Heslington, York Y010 5DD. Email: rowena.jacobs@york.ac.uk

Footnotes

Hide All

In the next issue of Advances, David Yeomans offers a critical summary for the clinician of clustering in mental health payment by results and Vishwa Radhakrishnan considers whether specialist psychiatric services are losing the PbR race. Ed.

For a discussion of the use of outcome measures in clinical practice see Lewis & Killaspy, pp. 165–171, this issue. Ed.

Declaration of Interest

None.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Appleby, J, Harrison, T, Hawkins, L et al (2012) Payment by Results: How Can Payment Systems Help to Deliver Better Care? King's Fund.
Audit Commission (2005) Early Lessons from Payment by Results. Audit Commission.
Audit Commission (2008a) The Right Result? Payment by Results 2003–07. Audit Commission.
Audit Commission (2008b) PbR Data Assurance Framework 2007/08: Findings from the First Year of the National Clinical Coding Audit Programme. Audit Commission.
Capita (2013) Payment by Results Data Assurance Framework: Report on Assuring Mental Health Currencies. Capita Health and Wellbeing.
Cookson, R, Laudicella, M, Li Donni, P (2012) Measuring change in health care equity using small-area administrative data: evidence from the English NHS 2001–2008. Social Science & Medicine, 75: 1514–22.
Department of Health (2002) Delivering the NHS Plan: Next Steps on Investment, Next Steps on Reform(Cm 5503). TSO (The Stationery Office).
Department of Health (2009) Guidance on the Routine Collection of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs): For the NHS in England 2009/10. Department of Health.
Department of Health (2010) Payment by Results Guidance for 2010–11. Department of Health.
Department of Health (2011a) No Health without Mental Health: A Cross-Government Mental Health Outcomes Strategy for People of All Ages. Department of Health.
Department of Health (2011b) Payment by Results Quality and Outcomes Indicators: Report for Product Review Group Quality & Outcomes Sub Group. Department of Health.
Department of Health (2012a) A Simple Guide to Payment by Results. Department of Health.
Department of Health (2012b) Reference Costs 2011–12 Department of Health.
Department of Health (2013) Mental Health Payment by Results Guidance for 2013–14. Department of Health.
Ellis, RP (1998) Creaming, skimping and dumping: provider competition on the intensive and extensive margins. Journal of Health Economics, 17: 537–55.
Farrar, S, Sussex, J, Yi, D et al (2007) National Evaluation of Payment by Results. Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen.
Farrar, S, Yi, D, Sutton, M et al (2009) Has payment by results affected the way that English hospitals provide care? Difference-in-differences analysis. BMJ, 339: b3047.
Farrar, S, Chalkley, M, Yi, D et al (2010) Payment by Results: Consequences for Key Outcomes Measures and Variations across HRGs, Providers and Patients. Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen.
Farrar, S, Yi, D, Boyle, S (2011) Payment by results. In Understanding New Labour's Market Reforms of the English NHS (eds Mays, N, Dixon, A, Jones, L) 6677. King's Fund.
Grimwood, GG, Edmonds, T, McGuiness, F et al (2013) Delivering Public Services: The Growing Use of Payment by Results (Standard Note SN/HA/6621). House of Commons, Home Affairs Section.
Healthcare Financial Management Association (2012) Next Steps in Developing a Payment Mechanism for Mental Health (Mental Health Finance Faculty Discussion Paper). HFMA.
Kahn, KL, Rubenstein, LV, Draper, D et al (1990) The effects of the DRG-based prospective payment system on quality of care for hospitalized Medicare patients: an introduction to the series. JAMA, 264: 1953–5.
Mannion, R, Marini, G, Street, A (2006) Demand management and administrative costs under payment by results. Health Policy Matters, 12: 14.
Mannion, R, Marini, G, Street, A (2008) Implementing payment by results in the English NHS: changing incentives and the role of information. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 22: 7988.
Mason, A, Goddard, M (2009a) Payment by Results in Mental Health: A Review of the International Literature and an Economic Assessment of the Approach in the English NHS (CHE Research Paper 50). Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
Mason, A, Street, A, Miraldo, M et al (2009b) Should prospective payments be differentiated for public and private healthcare providers? Health Economics, Policy and Law, 4: 383403.
Mason, A, Goddard, M, Myers, L et al (2011a) Navigating uncharted waters? How international experience can inform the funding of mental health care in England. Journal of Mental Health, 20: 234–48.
Mason, A, Ward, P, Street, A (2011b) England: the Healthcare Resource Group system. In Diagnosis-Related Groups in Europe: Moving Towards Transparency, Efficiency and Quality in Hospitals (eds Busse, R, Geissler, A, Quentin, W et al): 197220. Open University Press.
National Audit Office (2011) Delivering Efficiency Savings in the NHS. National Audit Office.
NHS England, Monitor (2013) How Can the NHS Payment System Do More for Patients? A Discussion Paper. NHS England.
O'Reilly, J, Busse, R, Hakkinen, U et al (2012) Paying for hospital care: the experience with implementing activity-based funding in five European countries. Health Economics, Policy and Law, 7: 73101.
PriceWaterhouseCoopers (2012) An Evaluation of the Reimbursement System for NHS-Funded Care: Report for Monitor. PWC.
Propper, C, Sutton, M, Whitnall, C et al (2007) Did ‘Targets and Terror’ Reduce English Waiting Times for Elective Hospital Care? (CMPO Working Paper no. 07/179). Centre for Market and Public Organisation.
Self, R, Rigby, A, Legget, C et al (2008) Clinical Decision Support Tool: a rational needs-based approach to making clinical decision. Journal of Mental Health, 17: 3348.
Speak, B, Hay, P (2012) The Utility of the Mental Health Clustering Tool (MHCT) as a Generic Outcome Measure for the Payment by Results Quality and Outcomes Framework in Working Age and Older Adult Mental Health Services: Final Report. Care Pathways and Packages Project Consortium.
Street, A, Maynard, A (2007) Activity based financing in England: the need for continual refinement of payment by results. Health Economics, Policy and Law, 2: 419–27.
Tennant, R, Hiller, L, Fishwick, R et al (2007) The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5: 63.
Wing, JK, Curtis, RH, Beevor, AS (1996) HoNOS: Health of the Nation Outcome Scales: Report on Research and Development July 1993-December 1995. Royal College of Psychiatrists.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

BJPsych Advances
  • ISSN: 1355-5146
  • EISSN: 1472-1481
  • URL: /core/journals/bjpsych-advances
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed

Payment by results for mental health services: economic considerations of case-mix funding

  • Rowena Jacobs
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *