Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T11:23:57.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An X-ray Diffraction Method for the Determination of Temperatures in Coke Reactions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Jack L. Johnson
Affiliation:
Analytical Chemistry and Metallurgy Departments General Motors Research Laboratories GM Technical Center Warren, MI 48090
Seymour Katz
Affiliation:
Analytical Chemistry and Metallurgy Departments General Motors Research Laboratories GM Technical Center Warren, MI 48090
Get access

Extract

Information about the conditions and reactions in a foundry cupola is essential to understand the thermochemistry of a cupola and thus improve its efficiency. A potential source of such information is coke taken from inside an operating cupola. In the region of the cupola that extends from the melt zone to the taphole, coke is directly involved in important chemical processes such as combustion, gasification, slag formation, iron sulfurization, carbon pickup, and oxide reduction. Coke is also suspected of being involved in the transport of silicon to the liquid iron. Each of these processes produces characteristic physical and/or chemical changes in the coke, making it possible to extract information about the processes from an examination of coke pieces taken from within an operating cupola. A program to study such coke samples is in progress. To effectively interpret these data it is necessary to know the temperature history of the coke being examined, especially the maximum temperature attained by the coke piece in the cupola.

Type
X. XRD Applications
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Katz, S., “Fuels,” Cupola Handbook, Chapter 8, American Foundrymen's Society, Des Plains, IL (1984) pp. 101129.Google Scholar
2. Turkdogan, E. T., “Blast Furnace Reactions,” Met Trans B 163-179 (1978).Google Scholar
3. Tsuchiya, N., Tokuda, M., and Ohtani, M., “The Transfer of Silicon from the Gas Phase to Molten Iron in the Blast Furnace,” Met Trans 7B 315-320 (1976).Google Scholar
4. Fishbach, D. B., “The Kinetics and Mechanism of Graphitization,” Chemistry and Physics of Carbon, Vol. 7, P. Walker, L. Jr., ed., Marcel Dekker, N. Y., 1971, pp. 1106.Google Scholar
5. Picault, A., “The Kinetics of Graphitization, ” ibid pp. 107154.Google Scholar
6. Cullity, B. D., “Elements of X-Ray Diffraction,” 2nd ed. Addison- Wesley Reading Mass, 1978, p. 284.Google Scholar
7. Nakamura, K., Togino, Y., and Tateoka, M., “The Behavior of Cok e in Large Blast Furnaces,” Coal, Coke, and the Blast Furnace, The Metals Society, London, 1978, pp. 118.Google Scholar
8. Kajikawa, S. and Kumida, H., “Behavior of Charged Materials in the Melting Zone of the Blast Furnace,” Tetsu-to-Hagane 59 A81-A84 (1973).Google Scholar
9. Kojima, K., Nishi, T., Yamaguchi, T., Nakama, K., and Ida, S., “Changes in the Properties of Coke in the Blast Furnace,” Trans. ISIJ 17 401409 (1977).Google Scholar
10. Nishi, T., Haraguchi, H., Mirua, Y., Sakurai, S., One, K., and Kanoshima, H., “Relationship Between Shape of Race-Way and Production Rate of Blast Furnace Taking Account of properties of Coke Sampled at Tuyere Level,” Tetsu-to-Hagane 66 18201829 (1980).Google Scholar