Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T23:27:22.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Annealing Texture in a Rolled and Artificially Nucleated Aluminum Single Crystal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

S. Kohara ,
M. N. Parthasarathi  and
Paul A. Beck
S. Kohara
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois
M. N. Parthasarathi
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois
Paul A. Beck
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois
Get access

Abstract

It has been suggested that the experimentally observed orientation dependence of the mobility of grain boundaries in f.c.c. metals may be related to the dependence of the rate of self diffusion in grain boundaries on the disorientation across the boundary. Later, this relative orientation effect on the rate of boundary diffusion and self diffusion was experimentally observed. It was shown by Hoffman and Turnbull that in bicrystals of silver misoricnted around (100) by 9° to 28°, self diffusion along the boundary (parallel to the common (100)) may be described in terms of a coefficient of self diffusion in individual grain boundary edge dislocation pipes, orders of magnitude larger than the coefficient of lattice self diffusion. It is significant that the coefficient of self diffusion in grain boundary dislocation pipes was found to be independent of the misorientation (i.e., of the density of edge dislocations in the boundary) at least up to 28°, suggesting that even a boundary of such a great misorientation may be considered as a network of dislocations, as far as self diffusion is concerned.

In recent experiments the relative mobilities of boundaries in various orientations between a deformed (99.98% pure) aluminum single crystal and recrystallized grains growing in it in fairly well defined, lattice orientation relationships were compared. The matrix crystal was rolled to 80% R.A. on a (110) plane in a [112] direction, after which the strip still retained its initial orientation and the texture was very sharp. Recrystallized grains quite accurately oriented so as to have highest overall boundary mobility, i.e., corresponding to 40° rotations around the two 111 axes of the matrix grain lying in the rolling plane, were produced in large numbers by random nucleation on one side of the strip (rubbing one side with sandpaper and annealing). The re crystallized grains, that were at first growing in very large numbers and quite randomly but only in the thin surface layer highly deformed by abrasion (nucleation side), on annealing for 600 sec at 350°C grew across the whole thickness (0,010″) of the rolled single crystal. As a result of very selective growth, the recrystallized grains reaching the other side of the strip (growth side) showed a very sharp texture consisting of four components with the orientations described.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in X-ray Analysis , Volume 2: Seventh Annual Conference on Industrial Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 13-15, 1958 , 1958 , pp. 7 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Beck, P. A., “Annealing of Cold Worked Metals,” Advances in Physics (Philosophical Magazine Supplement), Vol. 3, 1954, p. 245.Google Scholar
2 Beck, P. A., “Notes on the Theory ot Annealing Textures.” Acta Metallurgies, Vol. 1, 1953, p. 230.Google Scholar
3 Sharp, M. and Dunn, C. G., “Secondary Rccrystallization Texture in Copper.” Transactions AIME, Vol. 194, 1952, p. 42.Google Scholar
4 Dunn, C. G., “Secondary Recrystallization Textures and Their Origin in Cold-Rolled Single Crystals of Silicon. Iron.” Acta Metallurgies, Vol. 1, 1953, p. 163.Google Scholar
5 Dunn, C. G. and Koh, P. K., “Simple Orientation Relationships for Secondary Recrystallization in Si-Fe” Transactions AIME, Vol. 209, 1957, p. 81.Google Scholar
6 Dunn, C. G. and Kon, P. K., “Information on ‘Nuclei’ for Secondary Recrystallization in Si-Fe.” Transactions AIME, Vol. 212, 1958, p. 80.Google Scholar
7 Liebmann, B., Lücke, K. and Masing, G., “Uber die Oricnticrungsabbangigkeit del” Wachstumgeschwindigkeit bci der Primaren Rekristallisation von Aluminium-Einkristallen.” Zcitschrift fur Metallkunde, Vol. 47, 1956, p. 57. See also discussion in Transactions AIME, Vol. 206, 1956, p. 1413.Google Scholar
8 Graham, C. D. Jr., and Calm, R. W., “Grain Growth Rates and Orientation Relationships in the'Recrystallization of Aluminum Single Crystals.” Transactions AIME, Vol. 206, 1956, p. 517.Google Scholar
9 Beck, P. A., Sperry, P. R. and Hu, Hsun, “The Orientation Dependence of the Rate of Grain Boundary Migration.” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 22, 1950, p. 420.Google Scholar
10 Burgers, W. G. and Tiedma, T. J., “Notes on the Theory of Annealing Textures.” Acta Metallurgica, Vol. 1, 1953, p. 234.Google Scholar
11 Lutts, A. H. and Beck, P. A., “Annealing of a Cold Rolled Al Single Crystal.” Transactions AIME, Vol. 200, 1954, p. 257.Google Scholar
12 Noggle, T. S., “A Soft Mold Technique for Growing Single Crystals of Aluminum.” Review of Scientific Instruments, Vol. 24, 1953, p. 184.Google Scholar
13 Schulz, L. G., “A Direct Method of Determining Preferred Orientation of a Flat Reflection Sample Using a Geiger Counter X-ray Spectrometer.” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 20, 1949, p. 1030.Google Scholar
14 Chernock, W. P. and Beck, P. A., “Analysis of Certain Errors in the X-ray Reflection Method for the Quantitative Determination of Preferred Orientations.” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 23, 1952, p. 341.Google Scholar
15 Beck, P. A. and Hu, Hsun, “Annealing Textures in Rolled Face-Centered Cubic Metals.” Transactions AIME, Vol. 194, 1953, p. 88.Google Scholar
16 Liu, Y. C. and Hibbard, W. K. Jr., “Recrystallization of a Cold-Rolled Copper Single Crystal.” Transactions AIME, Vol. 197, 1953, p. 672.Google Scholar
17 Wei, C. T., Unpublished work.Google Scholar
18 Liu, Y. C. and Hibbard, W. R. Jr., “RecrysJallization Textures of a Cold-Rolled Aluminum Single Crystal.” Transactions AIME, Vol. 203, 1955, p. 1249.Google Scholar
19 Merlini, A., “Sur l'origine des textures de recuit.” Revue de Metallurgie, Vol. 54, 1957, p. 817.Google Scholar
20 Kohara, S., Parthasarathi, M. N. and Beck, P. A., “Anisotropy of Boundary Mobility.” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 29. 1958, p. 1125.Google Scholar
21 Dunn, C. G., “On the Theory of Secondary Recrystallization Texture Formation in Face-Centered Cubic Metals.” Acta Metallurgica. Vol. 2, 1954, p. 386.Google Scholar