Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-nf276 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-21T07:27:07.847Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamical Theory for Simultaneous X-Ray Diffraction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

P. Penning
P. Penning*
Affiliation:
Philips Research Laboratories Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

Complete dynamical solutions for three coupled plane-wave components in crystal structures with inversion symmetry have been found. After reviewing briefly the dynamical solutions for wave fields with two coupled plane-wave components, the results for the three-beam case are discussed in qualitative terms. Attention is paid to singular points and lines on the ω-surface, and to the attenuation of the mode-intensity because of absorption. The most surprising result is that in the case one of the reflections is forbidden (Umweganregung) the absorption is reduced in comparison with the adjoining two-beam cases. Experimental data are in reasonable agreement with the theory. Quantitative data are presented for a few three-beam cases of simultaneous diffraction of Cu Kα. radiation in germanium.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 10: Fifteenth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 10-12, 1966 , 1966 , pp. 67 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Penning, P., to be published in Philips Res. Repts.; see also P. P. Ewald, Z. Krist. A97: 1, 1937.Google Scholar
2. Batterman, B. W. and Cole, H., “Dynamical Diffraction of X-Rays by Perfect Crystals”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 36: 681, 1964.Google Scholar
3. James, R. W., “The Dynamical Theory of X-Ray Diffraction,” Solid State Physics 15: 55, 1963; G. Mayer, Z. Krist, 66: 555, 1928; see also E. Lamla, Ann. Physik 36: 194, 1939.Google Scholar
4. von Laue, M., Röntgenstraklinterferensen, Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Frankfurt a. M., 1960, 3rd ed.Google Scholar
5. Okkerse, B., “Anomalous transmission of X-rays in germanium. Part I; The imaginary part of the atomic scattering factor”, Philips Res. Repts. 17: 464, 1962.Google Scholar
6. Saccocio, E. J. and Zajac, A., “Simultaneous Diffraction of X-rays and the Borrmann Effect”, Phys. Rev. 139A: 255, 1965.Google Scholar
7. Borrmann, G. and Hartwig, W., “Die Absorption der Rontgenstrahlen im Dreistrahlfall der Interferenz”, Z. Krist. 121: 401, 1965.Google Scholar
8. Renninger, M., “Umweganregung, eine bisher unbeachtete Wechselwirkungserscheinung bei Raumgitterinterferenzen”, Z. Physik 106: 141, 1937.Google Scholar
9. Berghuis, J., Haanappel, G. M., Potters, M., Loopstra, B. O., MacGillavry, C. H., and Veenendaal, A. L., “New Calculations of Atomic Scattering Factors”, Acta Cryst. 8: 478, 1955.Google Scholar