Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-k7rjm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-21T13:25:55.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Precision Lattice Parameter Determination at Liquid Helium Temperatures by Double-Scanning Diffractometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Hubert W. King  and
Carolyn M. Preece
Hubert W. King
Affiliation:
Imperial College London, England
Carolyn M. Preece
Affiliation:
Imperial College London, England
Get access

Abstract

The back-reflect ion double-scanning diffractometer method, by which lattice parameters can be measured with a reproducibility of one part in 150,000 has been applied at liquid helium temperatures. A cryostat attachment is described which enables diffraction profiles to be scanned on both sides of the primary X-ray beam up to 163°, 2θ. Alignment errors may, thus, be eliminated by measuring the included angle 4θ between respective Bragg reflections. The method is illustrated by measuring the lattice parameters of the I.U.Cr. standard specimens of silicon and tungsten at various cryogenic temperatures.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 10: Fifteenth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 10-12, 1966 , 1966 , pp. 354 - 365
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. King, Hubert W. and Russell, Carolyn M., “Double-Scanning Diffractometry in the Back Reflection Region,” Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 8, Plenum Press, New York, 1965, p. 1.Google Scholar
2. Parrish, W., “Results of the I.U.Cr. Precision Lattice Parameter Project,” Acta Cryst, 13: 838, 1960.Google Scholar
3. Delf, B. W., “The Practical Determination of Lattice Parameters Using the Centroid Method,” Brit. J. Appl. Phys. 14: 345, 1963.Google Scholar
4. Franks, A., “The Precision Measurement of Lattice Parameters Using an X-Ray Back-Reflection Focussing Camera,” N.P.L. Report (to be published).Google Scholar
5. Straumanis, M. E. and Levins, A., “The Precision Determination of Lattice Constants by the Asymmetric Method,” (translated by K. E. Beu), Goodyear Atomic Corp., Portsmouth, Ohio, 1959, GAT-T-643.Google Scholar
6. Bond, W. L., “Precision Lattice Constant Determination,” Acta Cryst. 13: 814, 1960.Google Scholar
7. King, H. W. and Vassamillet, L. F., “Precision Lattice Parameter Determination by Double- Scanning Diffractometry,” Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 5, Plenum Press, New York, 1962, p. 78.Google Scholar
8. Bearden, J. A., X-Ray Wavelengths, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Division of Technical Information Extension, Oak Ridge, Tenn., 1964.Google Scholar
9. Vassamillet, L. F. and King, H. W., “Precision X-Ray Diflfractometry Using Powder Specimens,” Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 6, Plenum Press, New York, 1963, p. 142.Google Scholar
10. Wilson, A. J. C., “Geiger-Counter X-Ray Spectrometer—Influence of Size and Absorption Coefficient of Specimen on Position and Shape of Powder Diffraction Maxima,” J. Sci. Instr. 27: 321, 1950.Google Scholar
11. Pike, E. R., “Counter Diffractometer—'Effect of Vertical Divergence on the Displacement and Breadth of Powder Diffraction Lines,” J. Sci. Instr. 34: 3S5, 1957 and 36: 52, 1959.Google Scholar
12. Lonsdale, K., International Tables for X-Rav Crystallography, Vol. III, Kynoch Press, Birmingham, England, 1962; Acta Cryst. 3: 400, 1950.Google Scholar
13. Batchelder, D. N. and Simmons, R. O., “Lattice Constants and Thermal Expansivities of Silicon and of Calcium Fluoride between 6” and 322°K,” J. Chem. Phys. 41: 2324, 1964.Google Scholar
14. Isherwood, B. J. and Wallace, C. A., Nature, in press.Google Scholar
15. King, H. W. and Russell, C. M., “Attachments for X-Ray Diffractometers,” U.K. Patent Application No. 14138/65, April 1965.Google Scholar