Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T02:50:45.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Study of Cuban Todorokite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

G. M. Faulring*
Affiliation:
Union Carbide Metals Company, Niagara Falls, New York
Get access

Abstract

Todorokite is a hydrated manganese oxide mineral containing small amounts of sodium, potassium, calcium, barium, magnesium, iron, and aluminum. From the reports of other investigators and observations in our laboratories, todorokite appears to be a more widely occurring mineral than generally recognized.

It was found by X-ray diffraction that a sample of todorokite from Charco Redondo, Cuba, had a high degree of preferred orientation and that milling for a prolonged period of time was necessary to obtain random orientation in a mounted specimen. The position of the preferred orientation direction with respect to the X-ray beam is the principal factor determining the relative intensities on an X-ray diffraction pattern. Based on fiber data, the unit cell of todorokite is considered to be pseudo-orthorhombic or triclinic with α, β, and γ angles varying slightly from 90° and cell dimensions of a0 = 9.65A, b0 = 10.29A, and c0 = 2.84A, This deviation from orthogonality may account for the diffuse and distinct reflections typical of X-ray diffraction patterns of todorokite. Optical data and a hypothesized paragenesis of Cuban todorokite are also included.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Yoshimura, T., “Todorokite, A New Manganese Mineral from the Todorold Mine, Hokkaido, Japan,” J. Fac. Soi. Hokkaido Imp. Univ., Vol. 2, Ser. IV, 1934, pp. 289-297.Google Scholar
2. Frondel, C., “New Manganese Oxides: Hydrohausmanite and Woodruffite,” Am. Mineralogist, Vol. 38, 1953, pp, 761769.Google Scholar
3. Simons, F. S. and Straczek, J. A., “Geology of the Manganese Deposits of Cuba,” U.S. Geol. Survey Bull. 1057, 1958, pp, 1-289.Google Scholar
4. Etraczek, J. A., Horen, A., Ross, M., and Warshaw, C. M., “Studies of Manganese Oxides IV: Todorokite,” Am. Mineralogist, Vol. 45, 1960, pp. 11741184.Google Scholar
5. Ljunggren, P., “Todorokite and Pyrolusite from Ver inlands Tabsrg, Sweden,” Am. Mineralogist, Vol. 45, 1960, pp. 235239.Google Scholar
6. Levitison, A. A., “Second Occurrence of Todorokite,” Am. Mineralogist, Vol. 45, 1960, pp, 802807.Google Scholar
7. Frondei, C., Marvin, U. B., and Ito, J., “New Occurrences of Todorokite,” Am. Mineralogist, Vol. 45, 1960, pp. 11671174.Google Scholar
8. McCreery, G. L., “Improved Mount for Powdered Specimens Used on the Geiger Counter X-Ray Diffractometer,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc, Vol. 32, 1949, pp. 141146.Google Scholar