Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-b5k59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-10T04:04:01.836Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Engine testing using advanced techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

P. A. E. Stewart
P. A. E. Stewart*
Affiliation:
Advanced Projects Group, Rolls-Royce (1971) Ltd, Bristol Engine Division
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For years, the development and testing of aero gas turbines has been hampered by the inability of development and test engineers to perceive and readily measure the positional changes of static and moving components within the engines due to the opaque nature of the engine casing walls. ‘Touch’ or abradable probes have been used but require special engine builds to employ them.

With the introduction of high strength materials and the thinning of engine structures and as the performance requirements have become more demanding, small component movements during engine handling have become more important. This is particularly true in areas where the airflow has the greatest work potential such as the tip and root seals of the high pressure turbine and the root seals of the final compressor stages.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 79 , Issue 776 , August 1975 , pp. 331 - 343
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1975 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Pullen, D. A. W. Radiography applied to determining dynamic conditions inside aero gas turbines. British Journal of Non-Destructive Testing Vol 13, No 2, March 1971.Google Scholar
2. Stewart, P. A. E. Radiography of gas turbines in motion. Chartered Mechanical Engineer Vol 19, No 5, pp 65–67. May 1972.Google Scholar
3. Stewart, P. A. E. The development of a real time high energy X-ray imaging system for use in dynamic fluoroscopy of aero gas turbines. Paper presented at the 20th Annual International Gas Turbine Conference and Products Show, Houston, Texas, March 1975.Google Scholar
4. Improvements in diagnostic apparatus. Patent No. 00873/73—filed 6th January 1973, P. A. E. Stewart and Rolls-Royce (1971) Ltd.Google Scholar
5. Pullen, D. A. W. High energy radiography, a new technique in the development of efficiency and integrity in aero gas turbine engines. Paper presented at ASNT Spring Conference, 15th March 1973. Materials Evaluation Vol XXXII, No 2, pp 25–30, 37, February 1974. ATOM UK AEA Monthly Bulletin No 212, pp 108-120, June 1974.Google Scholar
6. Ratcliffe, B. J. Metal intensifying screens for radiography. British Journal of Non-Destructive Testing Vol 13, No 2, pp 55–59, March 1971.Google Scholar
7. Pullen, D. A. W. Moving radiography. Unpublished paper presented to the Aerospace Industry. Session of the 9th Annual Conference of the NDT Society of Great Britain at Loughborough University, 15th September, 1972.Google Scholar
8. Hallert, B. X-ray photogrammetry. Elsevier, 1970.Google Scholar
9. Halmshaw, R. Measurement of internal components and spacing by radiographic methods. Proc. 4th Int. Conference on Non-Destructive Testing, London, pp 118–123, September 1963.Google Scholar
10. Klasens, H. A. Measurement and calculation of un-sharpness combinations in X-ray photography. Philips Research Reports, Vol 1, No 4, August 1946.Google Scholar
11. B.S.4094, Recommendation for data on shielding from ionising radiation, PT.11 Shielding from X-radiation.Google Scholar
12. Ionising Radiation (sealed sources) regulations (1969)— Statutory Instrument 8 0 8.Google Scholar
13. Martin, A. and Harbison, S. A. An introduction to radiation protection. Chapman and Hall, 1972.Google Scholar