Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T00:40:35.756Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Future system consideration for operations of aircraft in the terminal movement area

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

G. C. Howell
G. C. Howell*
Affiliation:
Royal Aircraft Establishment, Bedford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The operation of civil aircraft in the Terminal Movement Area is a very complex subject. Many disciplines are involved and, certainly in Europe, there are problems of international agreements on standards and procedures for the various airline operators, airport authorities and regulatory bodies. For this reason there has been a tendency for certain aspects of the Operational System to be studied and improved without fully evaluating the interactions and hence overall effectiveness of new technological developments.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 80 , Issue 782 , February 1976 , pp. 51 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1976 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. FAA; An overview of the FAA engineering and development programmes with the highlights of fiscal years 1974-1975. SBAC Show, Farnborough, Sept. 1974.Google Scholar
2. Brandewie, D. M. FAA: R&D status report on R Nav. RTCA 1974 Annual Assembly Meeting, Washington DC, Nov. 1974.Google Scholar
3. Aviation Week & Space Technology: Terminal- Configured 737 Progress. 6th Jan. 1975.Google Scholar
4. Sussman, M. B. Boeing Co: Terminal area considerations for an advanced CTOL transport aircraft. AGARD-CP- 160 Take-Off and Landing Conference, Edinburgh, April 1974.Google Scholar
5. CAA report by ATC/Airports Working Group of Joint Study Review Group: A study of the ATC feasibility of segregated RTOL operations in Europe in the 1980s. March 1974.Google Scholar
6. White, L. C. IATA: Safety in the accident prone flight phases of take-off approach and landing. BALPA Tech Symposium of Safety, Nov. 1972.Google Scholar
7. Flight International Staff: The 1974 fatal accidents, and the last thousand feet. Flight International 23rd Jan. 1975, 17th April 1975.Google Scholar
8. Smith, K. W. BLEU RAE Bedford: All weather operations— present achievements and future prospects. 12th Anglo-American Aeronautical Conference, Calgary, July 1971.Google Scholar
9. Gilbert, G. A. Automation in air traffic control. 12th Anglo-American Aeronautical Conference, Calgary, July 1971.Google Scholar
10. CAA ATC Evaluation Unit, NATS: London TMA Aircraft Distribution, Part A—Take-off patterns in relation to standard instrument departure routes. Report No NATS 366, Jan. 1973.Google Scholar
11. Hughes, N. H., Watling, K., Harlow, R. A. and Smith, M. E. A study of the interface between Air Traffic Control and the Microwave Landing System. Unpublished MoD(PE) Report.Google Scholar
12. Hughes, N. H., Watling, K., Harlow, R. A., Rawlings, R. C. and Macleod, J. F. Terminal area navigation— Phase II of the BLEU study of the interface between Air Traffic Control and the Microwave Landing System. Unpublished MoD(PE) Report.Google Scholar
13. Hughes, N. H. The interface of new approach techniques with existing ATC systems. Paper for Symposium on New Approach Techniques, Dusseldorf, May 1973.Google Scholar
14. Watling, K. and Rawlings, R. C. Preliminary studies of the dynamics of time-slot following. Unpublished MoD(PE) Report.Google Scholar
15. Hughes, N. H. The implications of RTOL terminal area operations on avionics and guidance requirements. Unpublished MoD(PE) Report.Google Scholar
16. CAA (Airworthiness Branch). A survey of the routine airline operation of a long-haul multi-jet aircraft. Airworthiness Tech Note No 111, August 1974.Google Scholar
17. Newbery, R. R. Manual landings in fog. RAE Tech Report 74069, August 1974. AGARD Conference, Automation in manual aerospace systems, Dayton, Ohio, October 1972.Google Scholar
18. Smith, A. J. and Johnson, D. Runway marking patterns for reduced visibility conditions. Unpublished MoD(PE) Report.Google Scholar
19. Smith, A. J. The degradation of light output from runway centreline fittings. Unpublished MoD(PE) Report.Google Scholar
20. Johnson, D. and Smith, A. J. Ground visual aids for the approach and landing of STOL aircraft. Symposium on New Approach Techniques, Dusseldorf, May 1973.Google Scholar
21. Johnson, D. and Smith, A. J. A brief note of visual sequences in fog. Unpublished MoD(PE) Report.Google Scholar
22. Smith, A. J. and Johnson, D. The improvement of visual aids for approach and landing. AGARD Symposium on Take-Oflf and Landing, Edinburgh, April 1974.Google Scholar
23. Johnson, D. and Puffett, A. W. An attempt to relate slant visibility with horizontal visibility and height based on limited data from various experimental studies of fog. Unpublished MoD(PE) Report.Google Scholar
24. Prescott, T. W. Visual sequences—their calculation and use. Unpublished MoD(PE) Report.Google Scholar
25. Howell, G. C., Woodfield, A. A., Brown, A. D. and Keating, R. F. A. Steep gradient aviation research at the Royal Aircraft Establishment. Unpublished MoD(PE) Report.Google Scholar
26. Roscoe, A. H. and Gordon-Johnson, , Sq Ldr P. Heart rate monitoring of pilots during steep gradient approaches. The development of noise abatement approach procedures and a pilot's subjective assessment of workload during the approach and landing phase of flight. Papers for 46th Annual Scientific Meeting of Aerospace Medical Association, San Francisco, April 1975.Google Scholar
27. Corbin, A. J. Turbulence time-histories causing greatest touchdown errors following an automatic flare. Unpublished MoD(PE) Report.Google Scholar
28. Lewis, R. T. Human factor contributory causes and flight deck crew complements in British civil aircraft accidents. Unpublished MoD(PE) Report.Google Scholar
29. Hillman, R. E., BAC, and Wilson, J. W., HSA. Future flight deck design. Symposium on Designing from the Inside Out, RAeS London, Feb. 1975.Google Scholar
30. Gill, F. R. and Corbin, M. J. Design and theoretical assessment of experimental glidepath and flare systems for a BAC 1-11 aircraft (including direct lift control). RAE Tech Report No 74013.Google Scholar
31. Roscoe, A. H. Monitoring of pilot's heart rate during flight evaluation. Unpublished MoD(PE) Report.Google Scholar
32. Frost & Sullivan Ltd. Civil avionic systems equipment markets in Western Europe to 1985. Frost & Sullivan Ltd, World Wide Business Centres Inc, Oct. 1974.Google Scholar
33. Erwin, R. L. Jnr. Boeing Commercial Airplane Co: Strategic control of terminal area traffic. Paper 3, AGARD Symposium, Boston, May 1975. Plans and developments for air traffic systems.Google Scholar