No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Structures and materials
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 July 2016
Extract
Universities should be able to do two things which industry may not be able to do, and which should be valuable. We are supposed to be able to have time to think instead of continuously meeting deadlines (this is hardly true anymore) and so we can:
1. Take a risk and embark on a novel idea which may not come off. If the gamble works then we publish and promote it for the general good.
2. Recognise that industry has to meet deadlines, and often produce an answer to a problem which is only partially understood. We can then look at the problem in depth, and with better understanding point the way to future development.
Information
- Type
- Universities — Have They a Role in Aeronautical Research?
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1983
References
1.
Argyris, J. H. and Kelsey, S.
Energy Methods and Structural Analysis, Butterworths
1954.Google Scholar
2.
Turner, M. R., Clough, R., Martin, H. and Topp, L., Stiffness and deflection analysis of complex structures. J. Aero. Sci., September 1956. 23.Google Scholar
3.
Warburton, C. B. A design procedure for vibration absorbers. Inst. of Mech. Eng., (to be published).Google Scholar
4.
Giamotti, J. G., Van Mater, P. R. and Jones, N.
Critical evaluation of low energy ship collision damage theories and design methodologies. Soc Naval Arch, and Marine Eng., STAR Symposia, June 1980.Google Scholar
5.
Shadbolt, P. J., Corran, R. S. J. and Ruiz, C.
Plate perforation by projectiles in the sub-ordnance range. NASA Conf. October 1982, (to be published in Int. Jnl. Mech. Sci.)Google Scholar
6.
Rooke, D. P., Baratta, F. I. and Cartwright, D. J.
Simple methods of determining stress intensity factors. Eng. Fract. Mechs., 1981, 14.Google Scholar
8.
Singer, A. R. E. Powder metallurgy related research at University College, Swansea, Power Metallurgy, 1980, 3.Google Scholar