Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-pn7tm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-21T12:12:03.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Technical Note

Optimisation of vibration absorbers for aircraftcannon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

P.S. Heyns  and
W.N.v.d.S. Benadé
P.S. Heyns
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical EngineeringUniversity of Pretoria, South Africa
W.N.v.d.S. Benadé
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical EngineeringUniversity of Pretoria, South Africa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is widely accepted that the effectiveness of cannonin the air-to-air combat scenarío depends on therate of fire. Present firing rates for 20-30 mmaircraft cannon range from 600 to 1500 rounds perminute. New developments are aimed towards evenhigher rates of fire. With these higher rates offire more energy is likely to be transferred to theaircraft fuselage, resulting in possible structuralfatigue damage. To absorb the recoil forces severaltypes of recoil system have been developed and arepresently in use. Conventional recoil systems arenot, however, ideal for very high rates of fire andhence alternatives must be investigated.

With this work the use of an anti-resonant device toreduce the transmission of forces to the aircraftfuselage for a high rate of fire is investigated.Antiresonant isolators operate on the principle thata condition of little or no motion may be enforcedat specific points of interest on a system atparticular frequencies, through suitable tuning ofthe system. This is essentially achieved bydesigning the isolator system in such a way thatinertial forces are used to react spring forcesunder stationary conditions.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 100 , Issue 993 , March 1996 , pp. 87 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1996 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Bartlett, F.D. and Flannelly, W.G. Application of antiresonance theory to helicopters, American Helicopter Society/NASA-Ames specialists’ meeting on rotorcraft dynamics, February 1974, pp 101–106.Google Scholar
2. Swanson, D.A., Wu, H.T. and Ashrafiuon, H. Optimization of aircraft suspension systems, J Aircr, 1993, 30, (6), pp 979–984.Google Scholar
3. Snyman, J.A., Heyns, P.S. and Vermeulen, P.J. Vibration isolation of a mounted engine through optimization, Mechanism and Machine Theory, 30, (l), pp 109–118.Google Scholar
4. Heyns, P.S., Nel, C.B. and Snyman, J.A. Optimization of engine mounting configurations. Proceedings of the 19th International Seminar on Modal Analysis. Leuven, September 1994.Google Scholar
5. D'Souza, A.F. and Garg, V.K. Advanced dynamics Modeling and analysis, Prentice-Hall: New Jersey, 1984.Google Scholar
6. Tse, F.S., Morse, I.E. and Hinkle, R.T. Mechanical Vibrations Theory and Applications, Second Edition, Prentice Hall: New Jersey 1978.Google Scholar
7. Ewins, D.J. Modal Testing: Theory and Practice, Research Studies Press, 1984.Google Scholar
8. Grace, A. Optimization toolbox for use with MatlabTM User's guide, The Mathworks, November 1990.Google Scholar