Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-9nbrm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-20T15:01:27.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thrust variations in small rotors due to corner and vertex effects on the ground side

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2025

H. Otsuka Open the ORCID record for H. Otsuka [Opens in a new window] ,
S. Akaba Open the ORCID record for S. Akaba [Opens in a new window] ,
T. Hara ,
H. Nagai Open the ORCID record for H. Nagai [Opens in a new window]  and
H. Tokutake
H. Otsuka*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Frontier Engineering, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan
S. Akaba
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan
T. Hara
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan
H. Nagai
Affiliation:
Institute of Fluid Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
H. Tokutake
Affiliation:
Faculty of Frontier Engineering, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan
*
Corresponding author: H. Otsuka; Email: h-otsuka@se.kanazawa-u.ac.jp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Thrust changes near walls and the ground plane are influenced by the rotor’s position in indoor flight environments. This study evaluates variations in rotor thrust near a corner, which includes one wall and the ground plane, as well as a vertex, which involves two walls and the ground plane; these phenomena are referred to as the corner and vertex effects, respectively. Additionally, the rotor wake in the vertex effect was visualised using the laser sheet method, and wake velocity was measured with a hot-wire probe. The thrust change in the corner effect on the ground side was minimal, primarily depending on the ground effect. In the vertex effect, thrust decreased to 93% of the thrust outside the vertex effect when the rotor height above ground was 2.5 times the rotor radius, and the rotor was distanced from the two walls by 1.5 times the rotor radius. Flow visualisation and hot-wire velocimetry results suggest that the thrust decrease was caused by the flow recirculation structure between the fountain flow developed along the vertical corner and rotor inflow. The thrust decreases under conditions where the circulation structure appears, and fountain flow velocity accelerates the recirculation. These findings aid in planning the flight path of small multirotors in indoor flight conditions by providing guidance on distances that do not alter rotor thrust near corners and vertices.

Keywords

rotor thrustproximity effectscorner effectvertex effectfountain flowflow visualisation

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 129 , Issue 1334 , April 2025 , pp. 1077 - 1095
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Shen, S., Michael, N. and Kumar, V. Autonomous multi-floor indoor navigation with a computationally constrained MAV, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Shanghai, China, 2011, pp 20–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, M. and How, J.P. Analysis and control of a variable-pitch quadrotor for agile flight, J. Dyn. Sys. Meas. Control, 2015, 137, (10), p 101002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betz, A. The Ground Effect on Lifting Propellers, NACA Technical Memorandum No. 836, 1937.Google Scholar
Cheeseman, I.C. and Bennett, W.E. The Effect of the Ground on a Helicopter Rotor in Forward Flight, A. R. C. Reports and Memoranda, 3021, 1955.Google Scholar
Lee, T.E., Leishman, J.G. and Ramasamy, M. Fluid dynamics of interacting blade tip vortices with a ground plane, J. Am. Helicopter Soc., 2010, 55, (2), p 22005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mylapore, A.R. and Schmitz, F.H. An experimental investigation of ground effect on a quad tilt rotor in hover, J. Am. Helicopter Soc., 2015, 60, (1), pp 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, X., and Leang, K.K. Quasi-steady in-ground-effect model for single and multirotor aerial vehicles, AIAA J., 2020, 58, (12), pp 5318–5331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otsuka, H., Kohno, M. and Nagatani, K. Fountain flow visualization in quadrotor wake decreasing rotor thrust in-ground effect, J. Aircr., 2024, 61, (3), pp 761–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossow, V.J. Effect of Ground and/or Ceiling Planes on Thrust of Rotors in Hover, NASA Technical Memorandum 86754, 1985.Google Scholar
Powers, C., Mellinger, D., Kushleyev, A., Kothmann, B. and Kumar, V. Influence of aerodynamics and proximity effects in quadrotor flight, Experimental Robotics. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, vol. 88, Springer, 2013, Heidelberg, pp 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conyers, S.A., Rutherford, M.J. and Valavanis, K.P. An empirical evaluation of ceiling effect for small-scale rotorcraft, International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), Dallas, USA, 2018, pp 243–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez-Cuevas, P.J., Heredia, G. and Ollero, A. Multirotor UAS for bridge inspection by contact using the ceiling effect, 2017 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), Miami, USA, 2017, pp 767–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsiao, Y.H. and Chirarattananon, P. Ceiling effects for hybrid aerial–surface locomotion of small rotorcraft, IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron., 2019, 24, (5), pp 2316–2327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jimenez-Cano, A.E., Sanchez-Cuevas, P.J., Grau, P., Ollero, A. and Heredia, G. Contact-based bridge inspection multirotors: design, modeling, and control considering the ceiling effect, IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., 2019, 4, (4), pp 3561–3568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, D.C., Chung, H. and Ryan, K. Numerical investigation of a hovering micro rotor in close proximity to a ceiling plane, J. Fluids Struct., 2016, 66, pp 229–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishibe, K., Koizumi, Y. and Sekiguchi, K. Experimental study on airflow upwash and control of thrust increase induced by ceiling effect on microrotor, J. Fluids Eng., 2024, 146, (1), p 011203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanabe, Y., Sugiura, T., Aoyama, T., Sugawara, H. and Yonezawa, K. Multiple rotors hovering near an upper or a side wall, J. Robot. Mechatron., 2018, 30, (3), pp 344–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, D.J., Bouchard, L. and Quinn, D.B. Influence of the ground, ceiling, and sidewall on micro-quadrotors, AIAA J., 2021, 59, (4), pp 1398–1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ding, R., Bai, S., Dong, K. and Chirarattananon, P. Aerodynamic effect for collision-free reactive navigation of a small quadcopter, NPJ Robot., 2023, 1, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, D., Atte, A., and Rauleder, J., Near boundary multirotor interactional aerodynamics, AIAA SCITECH 2024 Forum, January 2024, Orlando, USA, AIAA 2024-1723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagaglia, D., Giuni, M., and Green, R.B., Investigation of the rotor-obstacle aerodynamic interaction in hovering flight, J. Am. Helicopter Soc., 2018, 63, (3), pp 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickles, D.J., Green, R.B. and Giuni, M. Rotor Wake Interactions with an Obstacle on the Ground, Aeronaut. J., 2018, 122, (1251), pp 798–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prothin, S., Fernandez Escudero, C., Doué, N. and Jardin, T. Aerodynamics of MAV rotors in ground and corner effect, Int. J. Micro Air Veh., 2019, 11, pp 1–13.Google Scholar
Otsuka, H., Hara, T., Tokutake, H. and Nagai, H. Simulation of fountain flow development in quadrotor wake with symmetry boundary condition, Proceeding of Twenty-third International Symposium on Advanced Fluid Information (AFI2023), Sendai, Japan, 2023.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Otsuka et al. supplementary material 1

Otsuka et al. supplementary material
Download Otsuka et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 56 KB
Supplementary material: File

Otsuka et al. supplementary material 2

Otsuka et al. supplementary material
Download Otsuka et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 1.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Otsuka et al. supplementary material 3

Otsuka et al. supplementary material
Download Otsuka et al. supplementary material 3(File)
File 6.5 MB