Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-pvkqz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-05T08:51:30.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Aeroacoustics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

J. E. Ffowcs Williams*
Affiliation:
Department of EngineeringUniversity of CambridgeCambridge, UK

Summary

The high noise levels of early turbojet aircraft forcedattention to be given to the mechanics of the noisegeneration process and ways were urgently sought forsilencing their high speed propulsive flows. Thesubject of aeroacoustics was born with this problem,the subject being the variety of ways in which soundand flow interact, with the early emphasis being onsound generated aerodynamically. Sound was thoughtto be a by-product of the flow arid believed to havea negligible back-reaction on it.

The search for noise suppression has been extremelysuccessful, so much so, that engine noise is nolonger a problem likely to constrain future aircraftoperations. Silencing technology has made enormousstrides by avoiding as much as possible the veryhigh speed jet flows that were a feature of earlyengines. But that avenue is not available tosupersonic aircraft, which still wait for ways ofmaking their operation acceptably quiet to beidentified.

Aeroacoustics has brought into being a much deeperinsight into the interactions of sound and flow, andsome of the early presumptions about the mechanismsof noise creation have had to be rethought. Some ofthe advances have come from entirely new directions,for example, from anti-sound, a silencing idea basedon the destructive cancellation of interferingwaves, which has advanced to a state that provides auseful new technology. Some new understandingfollows the discovery that flow-acousticinteractions are not always the one-way processpreviously assumed. Sound can affect flow,especially so when the flow is unstable. It is ofcourse the very unstable flows that make most noiseso, taken together, these developments indicate thatcontrol might one day be exercised by activelymanaging the unsteady flows, making them more usefuland desirable than before. Indeed examples are nowknown where control has made possible the avoidanceof a powerful performance-limiting instability thatpreviously made that flow regime a prohibitedoperational zone, a development of aeroacousticsthat is probably far more significant than its noisesuppression role. That line of thought is expandedin this paper, which concludes with the speculationthat active control might now be offering an avenuefor approaching die high speed jet noise problemfrom a completely new direction. Of course it is fartoo early to know whether that approach can providea way for removing the take-off noise constraintcurrently threatening the viability of supersonictransports, but it might; that makes it veryimportant indeed, for it is hard to see anyalternative.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1996 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Fleming, N. The silencing of aircraft, J Roy Aeronaut Soc, 1946, 50, pp 639663.Google Scholar
2.Lord Rayleigh Theory of Sound (2 vols), 2nd edn, Macmillan, London, 1896.Google Scholar
3. Lighthill, M.J. On sound generated aerodynamically. I. General theory, Proc Roy Soc A, 1952, 211, pp 564587.also Lighthill M.J. On sound generated aerodynamically: II. Turbulence as a source of sound, Proc Roy Soc A, 1954, 222, pp 1-32.Google Scholar
4. Smith, M.J.T. Aircraft Noise, Cambridge Aerospace Series, Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
5.Noise Mechanisms, AGARD Conference Preprint No 131, Nato, 1973.Google Scholar
6. SirHooker, Stanley, Not Much of an Engineer, Airlife Publishing, 1984, pp 140159.Google Scholar
7. Whitfield, O.J. Novel Schemes for Jet Noise Control, PhD Thesis, Cambridge University, 1975.Google Scholar
8. Carpenter, P.W. The effects of swirl on the performance of supercritical convergent-divergent nozzles, May 1981, Aeronaut Q, 32, pp 126152.Google Scholar
9. Smith, M.J.T. Where to with aircraft noise control? World Aerospace Technology International 95, pp 3235.Google Scholar
10. Moore, C.J. The role of shear layer instability waves on jet exhaust noise, J Fluid Mech, 1977, 80, pp 321367.Google Scholar
11. Bechert, D. and Pfizenmaier, E. On the amplification of broad band jet noise by pure tone excitation, J Sound Vib, 1957, 43, pp 581587.Google Scholar
12. Ffowcs Williams, J.E. and Gordon, C.G. Noise of highly turbulent jets at low exhaust speeds, AlAA J, April 1965, 3, (4), pp 791793.Google Scholar
13. Pannu, S.S. and Johannesen, N.H. The structure of jets from notched nozzles, J Fluid Mech, 1976, 74, pp 515528.Google Scholar
14. Crighton, D.G., Ffowcs Williams, J.E. and Cheeseman, I.C. The outlook for simulation of forward flight effects on aircraft noise, J Aircr, 1977, 14, (11).Google Scholar
15. Michalke, A. and Michel, U. Relation between static and in-flight directivities of jet noise, J Sound Vib, 1979, 63, pp 602605.also Michalke A. and Michel U. Prediction of jet noise in flight from static tests, J Sound Vib, 1979, 67, pp 341-367.Google Scholar
16.The flight effect of Michalke and Michel vis-á-vis Lighthill's model, letters to the editor, J Sound Vib, 1979, 67, (3), pp 425431.Google Scholar
17. Hawkins, R. and Hoch, R. Studies into Concorde's engine noise, emission and reduction, Proceedings of 10th International Aeronautical Congress, Paris, 1971.Google Scholar
18. Lueg, P. Process of silencing sound oscillations, US Patent No 2,043,416, 1936.Google Scholar
19. Swinbanks, M. A. The active control of sound propagation in long ducts, J Sound Vib, 1973, 27, p 411.Google Scholar
20. Ross, C.F. Active Control of Sound, PhD Thesis, Cambridge University, 1980.Google Scholar
21. Guicking, D. Active Noise and Vibration Control, Reference Bibliography, 3rd Edn, University of Gottingen, 1988 Google Scholar
22. Dines, P.J. Active Control of Flame Noise, PhD Thesis, Cambridge University, 1984.Google Scholar
23. Stansell, J. Anti-sound heralds a silent era, Science-Technology- Industry “Link up”, 14-16, July-Sept 1985, Home & Law Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
24. Heckl, M. Active Control of the Rijke Tube, PhD Thesis, Cambridge University, 1985.Google Scholar
25. Bloxsidge, G.J., Dowling, A.P., Hooper, N. and Langhorne, P.J. Active control of reheat buzz, AlAA J, 1988, 26, pp 783790.Google Scholar
26. Huang, X.Y. Active control of aerofoil flutter, AlAA J, 1987, 25, (8), p 1126.Google Scholar
27. Ffowcs Williams, J.E. and Zhao, B.C. The active control of vortex shedding, J Fluids Structures, 1989, 3, pp 115122.Google Scholar
28. Roussopoulos, K. Feedback control of vortex shedding at low Reynolds numbers, J Fluid Mech, 1993, 248, pp 267296.Google Scholar
29. Sunyach, M. and Ffowcs Williams, J.E. The active suppression of oscillation in flow-excited cavities, CR Acad Sc Paris, 303, Serie II, 12, pp 10851088, 1986.Google Scholar
30. Emmons, H.W., Pearson, C.E. and Grant, H.P. Compressor surge and stall propagation, Transactions of the ASME, 77, pp 455469.Google Scholar
31. Epstein, A.H., Ffowcs Williams, J.E. and Greitzer, E.M. Active suppression of compressor instabilities, AlAA 10th Aeroacoustics Conference, Paper No AIAA-86-1994, 1986.Google Scholar
32. Ffowcs Williams, J.E. and Huang, E.Y. Active stabilisation of compressor surge, J Fluid Mech, 1989, 204, pp 245262.Google Scholar
33. Day, I.J. Stall inception in axial flow compressors, J Turbomachinery, 1993, 115/1, pp 19.Google Scholar
34. Ffowcs Williams, J.E. and Graham, W.R. An engine demonstration of active surge control, Presented at the Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition, Brussels, Belgium, 1990.Google Scholar