Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T15:33:01.054Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attitude maneuver planning and robust tracking control for flexible satellite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2024

L. Sun Open the ORCID record for L. Sun [Opens in a new window] ,
S. Duan Open the ORCID record for S. Duan [Opens in a new window] ,
H. Huang ,
T. Zhang Open the ORCID record for T. Zhang [Opens in a new window]  and
X. Zhao
L. Sun*
Affiliation:
School of Astronautics, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, P.R. China
S. Duan
Affiliation:
School of Astronautics, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, P.R. China
H. Huang
Affiliation:
School of Astronautics, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, P.R. China
T. Zhang
Affiliation:
School of Astronautics, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, P.R. China
X. Zhao
Affiliation:
Institute of Remote Sensing Satellite, China Academy of Space Technology, Beijing 100191, P.R. China
*
Corresponding author: L. Sun; Email: sunliang@buaa.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the attitude manoeuver planning and tracking control of the flexible satellite equipped with a coilable mast. Due to its flexible beamlike structure, the coilable mast experiences bending and torsional modal vibrations in multi-direction. The complex nonlinear coupling and other external disturbances significantly impact the achievement of high-precision attitude control. To overcome these challenges, a robust attitude tracking controller is proposed for easy implementation by the Attitude Determination and Control System (ADCS). The controller consists of a disturbance compensator, feedforward controller and output feedback controller. The compensator, based on a Nonlinear Disturbance Observer (NDO), effectively compensates for the cluster disturbances caused by vibrations, environmental factors and parameter perturbations. The feedforward controller tracks the desired path in the nominal satellite model. Furthermore, the output feedback controller enables large-angle manoeuver control of the satellite and evaluates the suppression effect of the controlled output on the observation error of cluster disturbances used the ${L_2}$-gain. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed controller successfully achieves high-precision attitude tracking control during large-angle manoeuvering.

Keywords

Flexible spacecraftAttitude maneuverNonlinear L2-gain controlSum of squares
Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , First View , pp. 1 - 19
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fan, L., Huang, H., Sun, L. and Zhou, K. Robust attitude control for a rigid-flexible-rigid microsatellite with multiple uncertainties and input saturations, Aerosp Sci Technol, 2019, 95, pp 105443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pong, C.M. On-orbit performance & operation of the attitude & pointing control subsystems on Asteria, 2018.Google Scholar
Guan, P., Liu, X.J. and Liu, J.Z. Flexible satellite attitude control via sliding mode technique, In Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. IEEE, pp 1258–1263, 2005.Google Scholar
Sun, L., Wang, Z., Zhao, G. and Huang, H. Magnetic attitude tracking control of gravity gradient microsatellite in orbital transfer, Aeronaut J, 2019, 123, (1269), pp 1881–1894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, L., Zhao, Z., Zhao, G., Huang, H., Yang, L. and Bao, X. Piecewise attitude tracking control of a gravity gradient microsatellite for coplanar orbital transfer, Asian J Control, 2022, 24, (5), pp 2165–2177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J.J. and Agrawal, B. Experiments on jerk-limited slew maneuvers of a flexible spacecraft, In AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, p 6187, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caubet, A., Biggs, J., et al. A motion planning method for spacecraft attitude maneuvers using single polynomials, In AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, vol. 8, 2015.Google Scholar
Moriello, L., Biagiotti, L. and Melchiorri, C. Multidimensional trajectories generation with vibration suppression capabilities: The role of exponential b-splines, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2017, 50, (1), pp 6054–6059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fracchia, G., Biggs, J.D. and Ceriotti, M. Analytical low-jerk reorientation maneuvers for multi-body spacecraft structures, Acta Astronaut, 2021, 178, pp 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taheri, E. and Junkins, J.L. Generic smoothing for optimal bang-off-bang spacecraft maneuvers, J Guid Control Dyn, 2018, 41, (11), pp 2470–2475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J.J. and Agrawal, B.N. Rest-to-rest slew maneuver of three-axis rotational flexible spacecraft, IFAC Proc Vol, 2008, 41, (2), pp 12054–12060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, T. and Singhose, W. Input shaping/time delay control of maneuvering flexible structures, In Proceedings of the 2002 American Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No. CH37301), vol. 3, pp 1717–1731. IEEE, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singhose, W. and Vaughan, J. Reducing vibration by digital filtering and input shaping, IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol, 2010, 19, (6), pp 1410–1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, L., Chen, X. and Sheng, T. The design of nonsingular terminal sliding-mode feedback controller based on minimum sliding-mode error, Proc Inst Mech Eng G: J Aerosp Eng, 2014, 228, (9), pp 1540–1561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rezaee, M., Jahangiri, R. and Shabani, R. Robust adaptive fuzzy sliding mode control of nonlinear uncertain MIMO fluttering FGP plate based on feedback linearization, Aerosp Sci Technol, 2019, 91, pp 391–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, B., Hu, Q. and Zhang, Y. Adaptive sliding mode fault tolerant attitude tracking control for flexible spacecraft under actuator saturation, IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol, 2011, 20, (6), pp 1605–1612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, L. and Cao, D. Dynamic modeling for a flexible spacecraft with solar arrays composed of honeycomb panels and its proportional–derivative control with input shaper, J Dyn Syst Meas Control, 2016, 138, (8), p 081008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Z., Liu, J. and Wang, L. Disturbance observer based attitude control for flexible spacecraft with input magnitude and rate constraints, Aerosp Sci Technol, 2018, 72, pp 486–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baculi, J. and Ayoubi, M.A. Fuzzy attitude control of solar sail via linear matrix inequalities, Acta Astronaut, 2017, 138, pp 233–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasemi, N. and Shaker, H.R. Spacecraft attitude control: Application of fine trajectory linearization control, Adv Space Res, 2021, 68, (9), pp 3663–3676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yousefian, P. and Salarieh, H. Nonlinear control of sway in a tethered satellite system via attitude control of the main satellite, Aerosp Sci Technol, 2017, 63, pp 317–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, C.-D. and Sun, Y.-P. Mixed h2/h∞ state-feedback design for microsatellite attitude control, Control Eng Pract, 2002, 10, (9), pp 951–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, C., Ye, D., Shi, K. and Sun, Z. Robust high-precision attitude control for flexible spacecraft with improved mixed h2/h∞ control strategy under poles assignment constraint, Acta Astronaut, 2017, 136, pp 166–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohtani, T., Hamada, Y., Nagashio, T., Kida, T., Mitani, S., Yamaguchi, I., Kasai, T. and Igawa, H. Robust attitude control using mu-synthesis for the large flexible satellite ets-viii, J Space Technol Sci, 2009, 25, (1), pp 1_27–1_40.Google Scholar
Nagashio, T., Kida, T., Hamada, Y. and Ohtani, T. Robust two-degrees-of-freedom attitude controller design and flight test result for engineering test satellite-viii spacecraft, IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol, 2013, 22, (1), pp 157–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, P., Qiao, J., Guo, L. and Li, W. Sliding mode friction observer based control for flexible spacecraft with reaction wheel, IET Control Theory Appl, 2017, 11, (8), pp 1274–1281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, L. and de Souza, C.E. Robust h∞ control for linear time-invariant systems with norm-bounded uncertainty in the input matrix, Syst Control Lett, 1990, 14, (5), pp 389–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H. and Fu, M. A linear matrix inequality approach to robust h/sub/spl infin//filtering, IEEE Trans Signal Process, 1997, 45, (9), pp 2338–2350.Google Scholar
Palhares, R.M. and Peres, P.L.L.D. Robust $\mathcal{H}\infty$ -filtering design with pole placement constraint via linear matrix inequalities, J Optim Theory Appl, 1999, 102, (2), 239–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettersson, S. and Lennartson, B. An lmi approach for stability analysis of nonlinear systems, In 1997 European Control Conference (ECC). IEEE, pp 2317–2322, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stansbery, D.T. and Cloutier, J.R. Position and attitude control of a spacecraft using the state-dependent Riccati equation technique, In Proceedings of the 2000 American Control Conference. ACC (IEEE Cat. No. 00CH36334), vol. 3. IEEE, pp 1867–1871, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hol, C.W.J. and Scherer, C.W. Sum of squares relaxations for polynomial semidefinite programming. In Proceedings of Symposium on Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems (MTNS), Leuven, Belgium. Citeseer, 2004.Google Scholar
Prajna, S., Papachristodoulou, A. and Wu, F. Nonlinear control synthesis by sum of squares optimization: A lyapunov-based approach. In 2004 5th Asian Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No. 04EX904), vol. 1. IEEE, pp 157–165, 2004.Google Scholar
Li, Y., Ke, J. and Zeng, J. Tracking control for lower limb rehabilitation robots based on polynomial nonlinear uncertain models, Int J Robust Nonlinear Control, 2021, 31, (6), pp 2186–2204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, M., Cao, D., Zhang, X., Wei, J. and Zhu, D. Nonlinear dynamic responses of beamlike truss based on the equivalent nonlinear beam model, Int J Mech Sci, 2021, 194, p 106197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, M., Cao, D. and Zhu, D. Equivalent dynamic model of the space antenna truss with initial stress, AIAA J, 2020, 58, (4), pp 1851–1863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meng, T., He, W., Yang, H., Liu, J.-K. and You, W. Vibration control for a flexible satellite system with output constraints, Nonlinear Dyn, 2016, 85, pp 2673–2686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, L., Cao, D.Q. and Wei, J. Rigid-flexible coupling dynamic modeling and vibration control for flexible spacecraft based on its global analytical modes, Sci China Technol Sci, 2019, 62, pp 608–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ren, W. Distributed cooperative attitude synchronization and tracking for multiple rigid bodies, IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol, 2009, 18, (2), pp 383–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, Q. Sliding mode attitude control with l2-gain performance and vibration reduction of flexible spacecraft with actuator dynamics, Acta Astronaut, 2010, 67, (5–6), pp 572–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bai, H., Zhou, Y., Sun, H. and Zeng, J. Observer-based non-linear h∞ attitude control for a flexible satellite, IET Control Theory Appl, 2017, 11, (15), pp 2403–2411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turki, F., Gritli, H. and Belghith, S. An LMI-based design of a robust state-feedback control for the master-slave tracking of an impact mechanical oscillator with double-side rigid constraints and subject to bounded-parametric uncertainty, Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul, 2020, 82, p 105020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, S., El Ghaoui, L., Feron, E. and Balakrishnan, V. Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory. SIAM, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar