Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-sd5qd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T08:29:32.881Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative Cost Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

J. V. Connolly
J. V. Connolly*
Affiliation:
Sundridge Park Management Centre
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The formation of the Steering Committee of the Management Studies Group is not an isolated manifestation of concern on the subject of management in the aircraft industry. During the past five years there have been events such as the loss of technologists to other countries, the massive cancellations of advanced projects, the Plowden Committee and many debates and ex parte statements by both the various Ministers and by industry spokesmen.

In addition to the public debate, there have been less formal meetings and approaches to the Council or the President of the Royal Aeronautical Society which indicate deep concern—almost universal—about “cost effectiveness” or, bluntly, our cost comparisons with competing aircraft industries elsewhere.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 71 , Issue 681 , September 1967 , pp. 636 - 646
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Survey of UK Aircraft Industry. Control Statistics Branch M of A. November 1966.Google Scholar
2.Paige, D. and Bomback, G.A Comparison of National Output and Productivity UK and USA. OEEC.Google Scholar
3.Kendrick, J. W.Productivity Trends in the United States. Prince- town Press.Google Scholar
4. Development of Production Acceleration Curves for Aircraft. Stanford Research Institute for Air Material Command (W33-038acl7740).Google Scholar
5. Relationships for Determining the Optimum Expansibility of the Elements of a Peacetime Aircraft Procurement Program. Stanford Re search Institute, 1949. Google Scholar
6.Davies, H. The Management of Cost Reduction—Method or Myth. J R Aero Soc, June 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Ewans, J. R. Cost Reduction and Cost Avoidance by Value Engineering. J R Aero Soc, February 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Beesley, L. R. Some Aspects of Military Aircraft Procurement. J Inst Prod Engs, August 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Takezawa, I. Management Control of Shipbuilding in Japan. Royal Institution of Naval Architects. March 1967.Google Scholar
10.Foulke, R. A.Practical Financial Statement Analysis. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
11.Asher, Harold. Cost-Quantity Relationships in the Air- frame Industry. Rand Military Project R291.Google Scholar
12. Standard Method of Estimation of Direct Operating Costs of Aircraft. SBAC.Google Scholar
13.Hurst, R.Towards a Technology of Shipbuilding. NE Coast. Inst of Engs & Shipbders, Vol. 83.Google Scholar
14. Index of Airframe Production Efficiency—Aircraft Resources Control Office. Bulletin 17A. (USA)Google Scholar