Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-mmrw7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T05:39:34.684Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A data exchange method for fluid-structure interaction problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

G. S. L. Goura ,
K. J. Badcock ,
M. A. Woodgate  and
B. E. Richards
G. S. L. Goura
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering , University of Glasgow, UK
K. J. Badcock
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering , University of Glasgow, UK
M. A. Woodgate
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering , University of Glasgow, UK
B. E. Richards
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering , University of Glasgow, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents and illustrates an interpolation method for the exchange of displacement data between fluid and structural meshes in a fluid-structure interaction simulation. The method is a local method where element volume conservation is central, and does not rely on information from the structural model. Results are evaluated for several two and three dimensional problems. Comparisons with the infinite plate spline method show that the new method gives a more realistic representation of the recovered surface than currently used methods.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 105 , Issue 1046 , April 2001 , pp. 215 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2001 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Schmitt, A.F. A least squares matrix interpolation of flexibility influence coefficients, J Aero Sciences, October 1956, 23, p 980.Google Scholar
2. Harder, R.L. and Desmarais, R.N. Interpolation using surface spline, J Aircr, February 1972, 9, (2), pp 189–191.Google Scholar
3. Hardy, R.L. Theory and applications of the multiquadric-biharmonic method, Computers Math Applic, 1990, 19, (8/9), pp 163–208.Google Scholar
4. Duchon, J. Splines minimising rotation-invariant semi-norms in sobolev spaces, Constructive Theory of Functions of Several Variables, 1976, pp 85–100, Springer Germany.Google Scholar
5. Smith, M.J., Hodges, D.H. and Cesnik, C.E.S. An evaluation of computational algorithms to interface between CFD and CSD methodologies, November 1995, Wright-Patterson Air Force report. WL-TR-96-3055.Google Scholar
6. Smith, M.J., Hodges, D.H. and Cesnik, C.E.S. Evaluation of computational algorithms suitable for fluid-structure interaction, J Aircr, March- April 2000, 37, (2), pp 282–295.Google Scholar
7. Chen, P.C. and Jadic, I. Interfacing of fluid and structural models via innovative structural boundary element method, AIAA J, 1998, 36, (2), pp 282–287.Google Scholar
8. Lohner, R., Yang, C, Cebral, J., Baum, J.D., Luo, H., Pelessone, D. and Charman, C. Fluid-structure interaction using a loose coupling algorithm and adaptive unstructured grids, 1995, AIAA paper AIAA-95-2259.Google Scholar
9. Ottosen, N. and Petersson, H. Introduction to the Finite Element Method, 1992, p 314, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
10. Goura, G.S.L., Badcock, K.J., Woodgate, M.A. and Richards, B.E. Implicit method for the time marching analysis of flutter, Aeronaut J, April 2001,105 (1046), pp 199–214 Google Scholar