Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T19:01:02.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A further case for variable geometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

W. A. T. ‘Fritz’ Johl
W. A. T. ‘Fritz’ Johl*
Affiliation:
Constantia, South Africa
*
watjohl@iafrica.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Today, all sailplanes in any particular class look and perform more or less the same. This gives credence to the view that the necessary compromises in design and sailplane technology have reached a limit. Sailplane development is on a sort of plateau. Further, apart from perhaps boundary-layer control (BLC), there appears to be nothing in the foreseeable future that promises any significant improvement in performance. It is the purpose of this paper to, once again, encourage interest in Variable Geometry (VG) and address the controversies which prevailed in abundance during the 1970s and which apparently still survive today.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 116 , Issue 1175 , January 2012 , pp. 23 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lippisch, A.M. The performance of sailplanes in circling flight, Soaring, July-August 1951. pp 13–18.Google Scholar
2. Schlichting, H. Einfluss der flügelauslegung auf die flugleistungen von segelflugzeugen, Zeitschrift für Flugwissenschaften, 15, (1967), Heft 10 S, pp 386–392.Google Scholar
3. Carmichael, B.H. What Price Performance, Soaring, May-June 1954, pp 6,8–10.Google Scholar
4. Wenzinger, C.J. and Rogallo, F.M. Wind-Tunnel Investigation of Spoiler-deflector and Slot Lateral-Control Devices on Wings with Full-Span Split and Slotted Flaps, NACA Report No. 706.Google Scholar
5. Design and construction of the SB 11, OSTIV Publication XV, 1970 pp 54–59.Google Scholar
6. Induced Drag Di = and in level flight L is substantially equal to the W. Therefore: Sequence of evaluation for relating the straight glide performance (Vd/Ve) curve of a sailplane to the achievable Vct in a particular thermal. Google Scholar