Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:11:42.483Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gust effects on a flexible aircraft

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

P. Santini  and
P. Gasbarri
P. Santini
Affiliation:
Aerospace DepartmentUniversity of Rome “La Sapienza”Rome, Italy
P. Gasbarri
Affiliation:
Aerospace DepartmentUniversity of Rome “La Sapienza”Rome, Italy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Aircraft response to atmospheric turbulence is a basic problem in aeronautical design. Several uncertainties still exist about the most adequate mathematical model for it. A recent investigation conducted by AGARD revealed that different users follow very different criteria.

The reasons for this diversity in analysis methods is only partially due to the randomness of the phenomenon. Three elements are the ingredients: structure, aerodynamics and turbulence distribution. No special problems arise from the first element, since structural dynamics and programs relevant to it are well established. For the aerodynamic model, the only choice is between quasi-steady and unsteady formulation, the latter being by far heavier than the former. For turbulence distribution, as is well known(2-4), two different approaches are used, time history and power spectral density (PSD); both are used in the regulations of national certifying agencies. For the latter the turbulence power spectrum must be given, and the aircraft response is evaluated through the classical theory of random vibrations.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 95 , Issue 950 , December 1991 , pp. 379 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1991 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. The Flight of Flexible Aircraft in Turbulence — AGARD Report No 734 — Athens, Oct. 1986 — Edited by Coupry, D..Google Scholar
2. Noback, R. Review and Comparison of Discrete and Continuous Gust Methods for the Determination of Airplane Design Loads, National Luchtvaart Laboratorium — TR 82134, U, 1982.Google Scholar
3. Barnes, T. J. Current and Proposed Gust Criteria and Analysis Method: an FAA overview, from AGARD Meeting — Cesme (IZMIR, Turkey) Oct. 1987.Google Scholar
4. Etkins, B. Turbulent wind and its effects on flight, J Aircraft, May 1981.Google Scholar
5. Crandall, S., and Mark, W. D. Random Vibrations in Mechanical System, Academic Press, 1963.Google Scholar
6. Dowell, E. H., et al. A Modern Course in Aeroelasticity, Sijthoff & Noordhoff, 1978.Google Scholar
7. Houbolt, J. C, et al. Dynamic Response of Airplanes to Atmospheric Turbulence Including Flight Data on Input and Response, NASA TR R-199, June 1964.Google Scholar
8. Noll, T., Perry, B. III, and Gilbert, M. Recent activities within the aeroservoelasticity branch at the NASA Langley Research Center.' European Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Aachen, Federal Republic of Germany, April 1989.Google Scholar