Skip to main content Accessibility help

Hearing loss on the flight deck – origin and remedy

  • M. Bagshaw (a1) and M. C. Lower (a2)


Routine periodic audiometry performed as part of the statutory medical examination of flight crew employed by a major international airline indicated that up to 27–5% may suffer noise induced hearing loss, with 10-8% showing unilateral hearing loss. This was considered to result from the practice of listening to radio communications through a headset covering one ear only, leaving the other ear uncovered to allow direct conversation between crew members on the flightdeck. Ambient noise levels at the crew seats and noise levels from crew headsets were measured on a sample of aircraft and routes using a Kemar acoustic manikin. Noise levels on the flightdecks were 70-79dB(A) Leq averaged over a flight of typically seven to ten hours duration. Noise levels from headsets were 77-89dB(A) Leq being 80dB(A) or higher on 80% of flights, and 85dB(A) or higher on 40% of flights. Five prototype or production active noise reducing (ANR) headsets were evaluated in flight and in the laboratory. It was shown that the better examples, worn to cover both ears, would allow flight crew to reduce headset volumes so reducing risk to their hearing.



Hide All
1. Manual of Civil Aviation Medicine, 1985, International Civil Aviation Organisation, Montreal, Doc 894-AN/895.
2. Guidance Notes for Authorised Medical Examiners, 1993, Civil Aviation Authority, Gatwick Airport, UK.
3. Miller, J.D. Effects of noise on people, J Acoust Soc Am, 1974, 56, (3), pp 729763.
4. Ward, W.D. Auditory fatigue and masking, In: Modern developments in audiology, Jerger, J. (Ed), 1963, Academic New York, pp 240286.
5. Mills, J.H.,Gengel, R.W., Watson, C.S. and Miller, J.D. Temporary changes of the auditory system due to exposure to noise for one or two days, J Acoust Soc Am, 1970, 48, pp 524530.
6. Mosko, J.D., Fletcher, J.L. and Luz, G.A. Growth and recovery of temporary threshold shifts following extended exposure to high-level, continuous noise, US AMRL Rep 911, 1970, Fort Knox, Ky: 9 pp.
7. Fabini, G. Laryngoscope, 1931, 4, 663.
8. Fisch, U. Acta Otolaryngol, 1972, 73, 259.
9. Lawton, B.W. Typical hearing thresholds: a baseline for the assessment of noise-induced hearing loss, ISVR Technical Report No 272, 1998, Southampton, UK.
10.International Organisation for Standardisation, Acoustics: Determination of occupational noise exposure and estimation of noise induced hearing impairment, ISO 1999, Geneva, International Organisation for Standardisation, 1990.
11. Wilkins, P.A. The effects of noise on people, Chapter 30 in Noise and Vibration, 1982, White, R.G. and Walker, J.G. (Eds), Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK, ISBN 0-85312-502-3.
12. Wilkins, P.A. and Martin, A.M. The effects of hearing protectors on the masked thresholds of acoustic warning signals, 9th International congress of acoustics, Madrid, Spain, 1977.
13. Wagstaff, A.S. and Woxen, O.J. Double hearing protection and speech intelligibility - room for improvement. Proc 45th International Congress of Aviation and Space Medicine, 1997, Oslo, Norway.
14. Rood, G. Noise and communication. Chapter 24 in Aviation Medicine, 1988, 2nd edition, Ernsting, J. and King, P.F. (Eds), Butterworths, London, UK, ISBN 0-407-01470-5.
15. Lueg, P. Process of silencing sound oscillation, US Patent no 2043 416, 1936.
16. Wagstaff, A.S., Woxen, J. and Andersen, H.T. Effect of active noise reduction on noise levels at the tympanic membrane, Aviat Space Environ Med, 1998, 69, (6), pp 539544.
17. Pelausa, E.O., Abel, S.M. Simard, J. and Dempsey, I. Prevention of noise-induced hearing loss in the Canadian military, J Otolaryngology, 1995, 24, (5), pp 271280.
18.The Noise at Work Regulations, 1989, Statutory Instruments 1989 No. 1790; Health and Safety, HMSO ISBN 0-11-097790-4.
19. Council of the European Community, Council Directive of 12 May 1986 on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to noise at work (86/188/EEC), Official J European Communities, No LI 37, 24 June 1986, 2834.
20. Ricem, C.G., Breslin, M. and Roper, R.G. Sound levels from personal cassette players, British J of Audiology, 1987, 21, pp 273278.
21. Burkhard, M.D. and Sachs, R.M. Anthropometric manikin for acoustic research, J Acoustical Society of America, 1975, 58, pp 214222.
22.Bruel and Kjaer Technical Documentation, Sound level calibrator Type 4231.
23.Bruel and Kjaer Technical Review No 1, 1960.
24.Health and Safety Executive, 1989, Noise at Work, Noise Guide No. 1, Legal duties of employers to prevent damage to hearing, Noise Guide No 2, Legal duties of designers, manufacturers, importers and suppliers to prevent damage to hearing, (published together in one booklet) HMSO ISBN 0-11-885512-3.
25. Robinson, D.W., Lawton, B.W. and Rice, C.G. Occupational hearing loss from low-level noise, HSE contract Research Report no 68/1994, 1994, HSE Books, ISBN 0-7176-0885-9.
26. Council of the European Community, Proposal for a Council Directive on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (93/C77/02) COM(92) 560 final - SYN 449, Official J European Communities, No C 77, 18 March 1993, 1229.
27.Department of Employment 1972, Code of Practice for reducing the exposure of employed persons to noise, (subsequently republished unchanged by HSE), HMSO.
28. Lane, H. and Tranel, B. The Lombard sign and the role of hearing in speech, J Speech and Hearing Research, 1971, 14, pp 677709.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Hearing loss on the flight deck – origin and remedy

  • M. Bagshaw (a1) and M. C. Lower (a2)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.