Skip to main content

The impact of flight simulation in aerospace

  • D. J. Allerton (a1)

This paper explains how flight simulation has made a major contribution to flight safety over the last thirty years to become critical to the operation of civil airlines and military organisations. It not only provides effective training, but for many flight training organisations has reduced the cost of flight training significantly. The paper outlines the increasing role of flight simulation covering flight training and research and development of aircraft and systems. The contribution of the flight simulation industry to the UK economy, in terms of both employment and revenue, is highlighted.

The paper focuses on advances in the underpinning technologies of flight simulation, including mathematical modelling, real-time computation, motion actuation, visual image generation systems and projection systems.

The paper also summarises the broadening roles of flight simulation; from part-task trainers to zero flight-time training in civil aviation; in military aviation, extending to combat domes and mission rehearsal; in defence procurement, where synthetic environments are used widely in evaluation studies prior to major project commitments; in aircraft development, providing powerful design tools to enable system designers to evaluate prototype systems.

As a result of the acceptance of flight simulation in flight training, the use of simulators has been standardised throughout the world, with formal programmes of simulator qualification. These regulations, drawn up with the help of the RAeS Flight Simulation Group, ensure consistency for operators, regulators and manufacturers; the status of these regulations is outlined.

The paper concludes by reviewing the lessons learnt by the flight simulation industry over the last thirty years and summaries the potential areas of growth, which will lead to simulation becoming widespread throughout many industries, in addition to the aerospace industry.

Hide All
1. Adorian, P., Staynes, W. and Bolton, M., The Evolution of the Flight Simulator. Royal Aeronautical Society Conference, Fifty Years of Flight Simulation, London, UK, 1979.
2. Link, E.A. Jr, US Patent No. 1825462, 1930.
3. Allen, L., Evolution of flight simulation, AIAA Conference Flight Simulation and Technologies, AIAA-93-3545-CP, 1993, Monterey, US.
4. Allerton, D.J.. Avionics, systems design and simulation. Aeronaut J, 1996, 100, (1000), pp 439448.
5. Allerton, D.J.. Flight simulation – Past, present and future. Aeronaut J, 2000, 104, (1042), pp 651663.
6. Baarspul, M.. A review of flight simulation techniques, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 1990, 22, pp 120.
7. Boiffier, J.L., The Dynamics of Flight – The Equations, John Wiley & Sons, 1998, Chichester, UK.
8. McFarland, R.E., A standard kinematic model for flight simulation at NASA-Ames, 1975, NASA-CR-2497.
9. Fogarty, L.E. and Howe, R.M., Computer mechanisation of six-degree of freedom flight equations, 1969, NASA CR-1344.
10. Hanke, C.R., The simulation of a large jet transport aircraft, Vol I: mathematical model, 1971, NASA CR-1756.
11. IATA 2002 Flight Simulator Design and Performance Data Requirements, 6th ed, International Air Transport Association.
12. Heffley, R.K. and Jewell, W.F., Aircraft Handling Qualities Data, 1972, NASA CR-2144.
13. Kruger, W., Besselink, I., Cowling, D., Doan, D. B., Kortum, W. and Krabacher, W.. Aircraft landing gear dynamics: simulation and control, Vehicle System Dynamics, 1997, 28, pp 119158.
14. Beal, T.R.. Digital simulation of atmospheric turbulence for Dryden and Von Karman models, J Guidance Control and Dynamics, 1993, 16, (1), pp 132138.
15. Ahn, Y.H.. Advances in instructor operating stations, Flight Simulation – Expanding the Boundaries, Royal Aeronautical Society Conference, 1997, London, UK.
16. Barrette, R.E., Flight Simulator Visual Systems – An Overview. SAE Aerospace Technology Conference, 1986, Long Beach, USA.
17. Reid, L.D., Computer Control of Flight Simulator Motion. Proceedings of Canadian Conference on Industrial Computer Systems, 1984, 1.11.7, Ottowa, Canada.
18. Caro, P.W.. Aircraft simulators and pilot training, Human Factors, 1973, 15, pp 502509.
19. Bell, H.H. and Waag, W.L.. Evaluating the effectiveness of flight simulators for training combat skills: A review, Int J Aviation Psychology, 1998, 8, (3), pp 223242.
20. Taylor, H.L., Training effectiveness of flight simulators as determined by transfer of training. NATO DRG Panel VIII Symposium, 1985, Brussels, Belgium.
21. Caro, P., Flight training and simulation, Human Factors in Aviation, Academic Press, 1988, San Diego, CA, USA.
22. Allerton, D.J. and Ross, M., Evaluation of a Part-task Trainer for Ab Initio Pilot Training. RAeS Conference Training Transfer, 1991, London, UK.
23. Hays, R.T. and Singer, M.J., Simulation fidelity, Training System Design, Springer-Verlag, 1989, New York, USA.
24. Stewart, D., A platform with six-degrees-of-freedom. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 1965, 180, (Part 1,5), pp 371386.
25. Howard, I.P., The vestibular system, in Handbook of Perception and Human Performance: Sensory Processes and Perception (Eds Boff, K.R., Kauffman, L. and Thomas, J.P.), John Wiley & Sons, 1986, New York, USA.
26. Nahon, M.A. and Reid, L.D.. Simulator motion drive algorithms: A designer’s perspective, AIAA, J Guidance, 1990, 13, (2), pp 356362.
27. Nanua, P., Waldron, K.J. and Murthy, V., Direct kinematic solution of a Stewart platform. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 6, (4), pp 438443.
28. Ashworth, W.R., Mckissick, B.T. and Parrish, R.V., Effects of motion base and G-seat cueing on simulator pilot performance. NASA Technical Paper, 1984, No. 2247, NASA, Langley Research Centre.
29. Keirl, J.M., Cook, R.J. and White, A.D., Dynamic Seats – A Replacement for Platform Motion? DRA Report, 1995, HMSO, London, UK.
30. Blackham, G.H., A review of display systems for flight simulation. RAeS Conference Flight Simulation Technology, Capability and Benefits, 1995, London, UK.
31. Kolasinski, M., Simulator sickness in virtual environments. Tech. Report 1027, US Army Research Institute for the Behavioural and Social Sciences, 1995, Virginia, USA.
32. Allerton, D.J.. The Design of a Real-time Engineering Flight simulator for the Rapid Prototyping of Avionics Systems and Flight Control Systems, Trans Institute of Measurement and Control, 1999, 21, (2/3), pp 5162.
33. Shreiner, D. (Ed) OpenGLR Reference Manual: The Official Reference Document to OpenGL Version 1.4, Addison Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA, USA.
34. Anon, International Standards for the Qualification of Airplane Flight Simulators, 1992, The Royal Aeronautical Society, London, UK.
35. ICAO 1995 Doc. 9625-AN/938, Manual of Criteria for the Qualification of Flight Simulators, 1st Edn, International Civil Aviation Organisation. JAA 1998 JAR-STD 1A, Aeroplane Flight Simulators, Joint Aviation Authority.
36. RAeS 2005 Flight Simulator Evaluation Handbook, 1, 3rd Ed, Royal Aeronautical Society, London, UK.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Aeronautical Journal
  • ISSN: 0001-9240
  • EISSN: 2059-6464
  • URL: /core/journals/aeronautical-journal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed