Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T20:23:15.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A linear guide-based actuation concept for a novel morphing aileron

Part of: Smart Aircraft

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2019

G. Amendola Open the ORCID record for G. Amendola [Opens in a new window] ,
I. Dimino ,
A. Concilio ,
R. Pecora  and
F. Amoroso
G. Amendola*
Affiliation:
CIRA, The Italian Aerospace Research Centre Smart Structures Division Via Maiorise, Capua(CE)Italy
I. Dimino
Affiliation:
CIRA, The Italian Aerospace Research Centre Smart Structures Division Capua(CE)Italy
A. Concilio
Affiliation:
CIRA, The Italian Aerospace Research Centre Smart Structures Division Capua(CE)Italy
R. Pecora
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial Engineering, Aerospace Division University of Naples “Federico II”Naples Italy
F. Amoroso
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial Engineering, Aerospace Division University of Naples “Federico II”Naples Italy
*
g.amendola@cira.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper deals with the actuation system design of a full-scale morphing aileron for regional aircraft. The aileron is allowed to smoothly change its geometrical configuration and perform the in-flight transition from a baseline shape to a set of optimal morphed ones pre-defined on the basis of aerodynamic requirements. The design of such innovative aileron is aimed not only at substituting the conventional aileron installed on a real aircraft but also to provide additional functionality. The aileron is free to rotate around its main hinge axis and it is also allowed to smoothly modify camber with two independent actuation systems. In such manner it can be used also during cruise with a symmetric deflection between the two half wings in order to reduce drag in off design condition. To accomplish variable aileron shape, a rigid-body mechanism was designed. The proposed aileron architecture is characterised by segmented adaptive ribs rigidly linked each other with spanwise reinforcements such as spars and stringers in a multi-box arrangement. Each rib is split into two movable plates connected by means of rotational hinges in a finger-like mechanism. The mechanism is driven by a load-bearing actuator by means of a kinematic chain opportunely tied based on the structural requirements in terms of shape to be matched and load to be withstood. The proposed device is an innovative arrangement of the quick-return mechanism composed of a beam leverage, commercial linear guides and a crank. The actuator shaft is directly inserted in the crank, which transmits the rotation to the linear guide that slide along a rail moving upward or downward the beam thus resulting in a camber variation. The entire aileron is moved by three leverages internally contained and distributed along the first two bays while the most external ribs are considered passive and their movement slaved. Two actuation layouts are analytically and numerically studied, the analytical theory is presented and validated by means of a multi-body simulation. Moreover, a linear static analysis was carried out under the hypothesis of glued contact between linear guides components simulating a jamming condition. This assumption has been formulated because it represents the most severe condition that envelop all the operative loads to which the actuation system is subjected. The analyses conducted are preliminarily aimed to verify that no failure occur under the imposed loads. In this first design loop, the vertical static force acting on the linear carriage exceeded allowable value and then a new configuration with double-sided linear guides was then investigated.

Keywords

Actuation systemMorphing aileronAdaptive wing
Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 123 , Issue 1265 , July 2019 , pp. 1075 - 1097
Copyright
© Royal Aeronautical Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barbarino, S., Bilgen, O., Ajaj, R.M., Friswell, M.I. and Inman, D.J. A review of morphing aircraft, J Intelligent Material System and Structure, 2011, pp 823–877, 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahrend, H., Heyland, D. and Martin, W., Das Leitkonzept ‘Adaotiver Flugel’ (ADIF), DGLR-Jahrestagung, DGLR-JT97-147, (1997) Munchen (Germany).Google Scholar
Monner, H.P., Sachau, D. and Breitbach, E., Design Aspects of the Elastic Trailing Edge for an Adaptive Wing, presented at RTO AVT Specialists’ Meeting on “Structural Aspects of Flexible Aircraft Control”, held in Ottawa, Canada, 18–20 October 1999, and published in RTO MP-36.Google Scholar
Ursache, N.M., Melin, T., Isikveren, A.T. and Friswell, M.I. Morphing winglets for aircraft multi-phase improvement. 7th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations Conference (ATIO) 18–20 September 2007, Belfast, Northern Ireland. doi: 10.2514/6.2007-7813.Google Scholar
Woods, B.K.S., Gentry, M., Kothera, C. and Werleley, N. Fatigue life testing of swaged pneumatic artificial muscles as actuators for aerospace applications, J Intelligent Material Systems and Structure, 2012, 23, (3), pp 322–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasista, S., De Gaspari, A., Ricci, S., Riemenschneider, J., Monner, H.P. and van de Kamp, B. Compliant structures-based wing and wingtip morphing devices, Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology: An International J, 2016, 88 (2), pp 311–330, doi: 10.1108/AEAT-02-2015-0067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilibig, H. and Wagner, H., Variable wing camber control for civil transport aircraft, ICAS Proceedings, ICAS-84-5.2.1, pp 107–112, (1984) Toulouse 1984.Google Scholar
Powers, G.S., Webb, L.D., Friend, E.L. and Lokos, W.A. Flight test results from a supercritical mission adaptive wing with smooth variable camber. Presented at AIAA 6th biennal flight test conference, Hilton Head, South Carolina (USA) 24-26 August 1996.Google Scholar
Ippolito, C., Nguyen, N., Totah, J., Trinh, K. and Ting, E. Initial assessment of a variable-camber continuous trailing-edge flap system on a rigid wing for drag reduction in subsonic Cruise. AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference; 19–22 August 2013, Boston, MA, US.Google Scholar
Joo, J.J. Marks, C.R., Zientarski, L. and Culler, A.J., Variable Camber Compliant Wing - Design, 23rd AIAA/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference, AIAA SciTech, (2015) (AIAA 2015-1050) doi: 10.2514/6.2015-1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Concilio, A., Dimino, I., Ciminello, M., Pecora, R., Amoroso, F. and Magnifico, M., An adaptive trailing edge, morphing wing technologies, Butterworth-Heinemann 2018, pp 517–545, ISBN 9780081009642, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100964-2.00017-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumont, A., Adjoint-Based Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Applied to Morphing Technology on a Regional Aircraft Wing, Morphing Wing Technologies, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2018, pp 145–174, ISBN 9780081009642, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100964-2.00005-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolcken, P.C., and Papadopoulos, M., Smart Intelligent Aircraft Structures (SARISTU), Proceeding of the final project conference 2016, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-22413-8.ISBN 978-3-319-22413-8.Google Scholar
Dimino, I., Flauto, D., Diodati, G., Concilio, A. and Pecora, R. Actuation system design for a morphing wing trailing edge, Recent Patents on Mechanical Engineering, 2014, pp 138–148, 7, (2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arena, M., Noviello, M., Rea, F., Amoroso, F., Pecora, R. and Amendola, G., in Modal stability assessment for a morphing aileron subjected to actuation system failures: Numerical analysis supported by test evidence, 7th International Conference on Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering ICMAE 2016, IEEE Proceeding, doi: 10.1109/ICMAE.2016.7549580, 18-22 July, 2016, London, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Website: http://www.criaq.aero/.Google Scholar
Carossa, G.M., Ricci, S., De Gaspari, A., Liauzun, C., Dumont, A. and Steinbuch, M. (2016), Adaptive Trailing Edge: Specifications, Aerodynamics, and Exploitation. In: Wölcken, P., Papadopoulos, M. (eds) Smart Intelligent Aircraft Structures (SARISTU). Springer, (2015), doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-22413-8_7.Google Scholar
Diodati, G., Concilio, A., Ricci, S., De Gaspari, A., Huvelin, F., Dumont, A. and Godard, J.-L., Estimated performances of an adaptive trailing-edge device aimed at reducing fuel consumption on a medium-size aircraft. In: Farinholt KM (eds) Industrial and commercial applications of smart structures technologies. Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 8690, pp. 1–16. SPIE, San Diego, CA, USA, 29 March 2013. doi: 10.1117/12.2013685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuethe, A.M. and Chow, C.Y., Foundations of Aerodynamics: Bases of Aerodynamic Design. 4th edition, John Wiley & Sons Inc. New York, 1996– Chapters 4, 6.Google Scholar
Pecora, R., Amoroso, F., Amendola, G. and Concilio, A., Validation of a smart structural concept for wing-flap camber morphing, Smart Structures and Systems, 2014, 14, (4), pp 659–679, doi: 10.12989/sss.2014.14.4.659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botez, R.M., Koreanschi, A., Gabor, O.S., Mebarki, Y., Mamou, M., Tondji, Y. Guezguez, M., Tchatchueng Kammegne, J., Grigorie, L., Sandu, D., Amoroso, F., Pecora, R., Lecce, L., Amendola, G., Dimino, I., and Concilio, A., Numerical and experimental transition results evaluation for a morphing wing and aileron system. The Aeronautical J, 2018, 122, pp. 747–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amendola, G., Dimino, I., Magnifico, M. and Pecora, R. Distributed actuation concepts for a morphing aileron device. The Aeronautical Journal, 2016, 120, pp 1365–1385 doi: 10.1017/aer.2016.64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callister, W.D. and Rethwisch, D.G., Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction. Wiley, Seventh edition, 2006.Google Scholar
Murray, G., Gandhi, F. and Vakis, F., (2007), Flexible matrix composites skins for one-dimensional wing morphing. AIAA/ASME/ASHE/AHS/ASC Structure, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, AIAA J.2007-1737.Google Scholar
Schorsch, O., Lühring, A., Nagel, C., Pecora, R. and Dimino, I., (2015), Polymer based morphing skin for adaptive wings. 7th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Smart Structures and Materials 3-6 June 2015 Ponta Delgada (Azores).Google Scholar
Iko Linear Guide components. Available at: http://www.ikont.eu.Google Scholar
MSC Nastran 2012 Quick Reference Guide, MSC Software, MacNeal-Schwendler Corporation.Google Scholar